Arnesen, T., Trommald, M.: Roughly right or precisely wrong? Systematic review of quality-of-life weights elicited with the time trade-off method. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 9, 43–50 (2004)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Arnesen, T., Trommald, M.: Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable?–A systematic review of TTO methodologies. Health Econ. 14, 39–53 (2005)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Robinson, A., Spencer, A.: Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. Health Econ. 15, 393–402 (2006)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Macran, S., Kind, P.: “Death” and the valuation of health-related quality of life. Med. Care 39, 217–227 (2001)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J.A., Tsuchiya, A.: Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press (2007)
Bleichrodt, H., Pinto, J.L., Abellán-Perpinán, J.M.: A consistency test of the time trade-off. J. Health Econ. 22, 1037–1052 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: Can we fix it? Yes we can! But what? A new test of procedural invariance in TTO-measurement. Health Econ. 17, 877–885 (2008)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
NICE: Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/devnicetech/technologyappraisalprocessguides/guidetothemethodsoftechnologyappraisal.jsp (2008). Accessed 26 Apr 2013
Dolan, P.: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med. Care 35, 1095–1108 (1997)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Stalmeier, P.F.M., Goldstein, M.K., Holmes, A.M., Lenert, L., Miyamoto, J., Stiggelbout, A.M., Torrance, G.W., Tsevat, J.: What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Med. Decis. Making 21, 200–207 (2001)
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: On the (not so) constant proportional tradeoff in TTO. Qual. Life Res. 19, 489–497 (2010)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Tilling, C., Devlin, N., Tsuchiya, A., Buckingham, K.: Protocols for time trade off valuations of health states worse than dead: a literature review. Med. Decis. Making 30, 610–619 (2010)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Torrance, G.W.: Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J. Health Econ. 5, 1–30 (1986)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Devlin, N.J., Buckingham, K., Tsuchiya, A., Shah, K., Tilling, C., Wilkinson, G., van Hout, B.A.: A comparison of alternative variants of the lead and lag time TTO. Health Econ. 22, 517–532 (2013)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Devlin, N., Tsuchiya, A., Buckingham, K., Tilling, C.: A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approach. Health Econ. 20, 348–361 (2011)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Versteegh, M.M., Oppe, M., Brouwer, W.B.F., Stolk, E.A.: Lead time TTO: leading to better health state valuations? Health Econ. 22, 376–392 (2013)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: Constantly proving the opposite? A test of CPTO using a broad horizon and correcting for discounting. Qual. Life Res. 21, 25–34 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Stiggelbout, A.M., Kiebert, G.M., Kievit, J., Leer, J.W., Habbema, J.D., De Haes, J.C.: The “utility” of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional trade-off. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 48, 1207–1214 (1995)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Essink-Bot, M.L., Stuifbergen, M.C., Meerding, W.J., Looman, C.W., Bonsel, G.J.: Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 7, 62 (2007)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Heintz, E., Krol, M., Levin, L.A.: The impact of patients’ subjective life expectancy on time trade-off valuations. Med. Decis. Making 33, 261–270 (2013)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
van Nooten, F.E., Koolman, X., Brouwer, W.B.F.: The influence of subjective life expectancy on health state valuations using a 10 year TTO. Health Econ. 18, 549–558 (2009)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kattan, M.W., Fearn, P.A., Miles, B.J.: Time trade-off utility modified to accommodate degenerative and life-threatening conditions. In: Proceedings of AMIA. Annual symposium, 304–308 (2001)
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: In search of a preferred preference elicitation method: a test of the internal consistency of choice and matching tasks. Erasmus University Rotterdam. http://www.bmg.eur.nl/personal/attema/PrefRev_2013.pdf (2013). Accessed 8 April 2013
Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R.J., Luce, R.D.: The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 13, 193–212 (1990)
Article
Google Scholar
Delquié, P.: “Bi-matching”: a new preference assessment method to reduce compatibility effects. Manage. Sci. 43, 640–658 (1997)
Article
Google Scholar
Lenert, L.A., Cher, D.J., Goldstein, M.K., Bergen, M.R., Garber, A.: The effect of search procedures on utility elicitations. Med. Decis. Making 18, 76–83 (1998)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Samuelsen, C.H., Augestad, L.A., Stavem, K., Kristiansen, I.S.: Rand-Hendriksen. Anchoring bias in the lead-time time trade-off (2012)
Stalmeier, P.F.M., Chapman, G.B., de Boer, A.G.E.M., van Lanschot, J.J.B.: A fallacy of the multiplicative QALY model for low-quality weights in students and patients judging hypothetical health states. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 17, 488–496 (2001)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Stalmeier, P.F., Bezembinder, T.G., Unic, I.J.: Proportional heuristics in time tradeoff and conjoint measurement. Med. Decis. Making 16, 36–44 (1996)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Unic, I., Stalmeier, P.F., Verhoef, L.C., van Daal, W.A.: Assessment of the time-tradeoff values for prophylactic mastectomy of women with a suspected genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Med. Decis. Making 18, 268–277 (1998)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Dolan, P., Stalmeier, P.F.M.: The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic. J. Health Econ. 22, 445–458 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: The way that you do it? An elaborate test of procedural invariance of TTO, using a choice-based design. Eur J Health Econ 13, 491–500 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Spencer, A.: The TTO method and procedural invariance. Health Econ. 12, 655–668 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Krabbe, P.F., Bonsel, G.J.: Sequence effects, health profiles, and the QALY model: in search of realistic modeling. Med. Decis. Making 18, 178–186 (1998)
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Krabbe, P.F., Essink-Bot, M.L., Bonsel, G.J.: On the equivalence of collectively and individually collected responses: standard-gamble and time-tradeoff judgments of health states. Med. Decis. Making 16, 120–132 (1996)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Jansen, S.J., Stiggelbout, A.M., Wakker, P.P., Nooij, M.A., Noordijk, E.M., Kievit, J.: Unstable preferences: a shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure? Med. Decis. Making 20, 62–71 (2000)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Spencer, A.: The implications of linking questions within the SG and TTO methods. Health Econ. 13, 807–818 (2004)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Norman, R., King, M., Clarke, D., Viney, R., Cronin, P., Street, D.: Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task. Qual. Life Res. 19, 499–508 (2010)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Bowling, A.: Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J. Public Health 27, 281–291 (2005)
Article
Google Scholar
Hildum, D.C., Brown, R.W.: Verbal reinforcement and interviewer bias. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 53, 108–111 (1956)
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Versteegh, M.M., Attema, A.E., Oppe, M., Devlin, N.J., Stolk, E.A.: Time to tweak the TTO: results from a comparison of alternative specifications of the TTO. Eur. J. Health Econ. (Forthcoming)
Bansback, N., Tsuchiya, A., Brazier, J., Anis, A.: Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies. PLoS One 7, e31115 (2012)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Stolk, E.A., Busschbach, J.J.: Validity and feasibility of the use of condition-specific outcome measures in economic evaluation. Qual. Life Res. 12, 363–371 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Versteegh, M.M., Leunis, A., Uyl-de Groot, C.A., Stolk, E.A.: Condition-specific preference-based measures: benefit or burden? Value Health 15, 504–513 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P.A.: A demonstration of ‘‘less can be more’’ in risk graphics. Med. Decis. Making 30, 661–671 (2010)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., Ubel, P.A., Smith, D.M., Derry, H.A., McClure, J.B., Stark, A., Pitsch, R.K., Fagerlin, A.: Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ. Couns. 73, 209–214 (2008)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Swinburn, P.: EQ-5D orientation study report produced for the EuroQol Group (2010)
Augestad, L.A., Rand-Hendriksen, K., Kristiansen, I.S., Stavem, K.: Learning effects in time trade-off based valuation of EQ-5D health states. Value Health 15, 340–345 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., Williams, A.: The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ. 5, 141–154 (1996)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G., Barr, R., Horsman, J.: Guide to design and development of health-state utility instrumentation. (1992)
Pinto-Prades, J.L.: Imprecise preferences and order effects in the time trade-off. (2013)
Gold, M.R., Siegel, J.E., Russell, L.B., Weinstein, M.C. (eds.): Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)
Google Scholar
Riteco, J.A., de Heij, L.J.M., van Luijn, J.C.F., Wolff, I.F.: Richtlijnen voor Farmaco-Economisch Onderzoek. College voor Zorgverzekeringen, Amstelveen (1999)
Google Scholar
Dolan, P., Kahneman, D.: Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Econ. J. 118, 215–234 (2008)
Article
Google Scholar
Menzel, P., Dolan, P., Richardson, J., Olsen, J.A.: The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: a preliminary normative analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 55, 2149–2158 (2002)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Lamers, L.M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P.F.M., Krabbe, P.F.M., Busschbach, J.J.V.: The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ. 15, 1121–1132 (2006)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Viney, R., Norman, R., King, M., Cronin, P., Street, D.J., Knox, S., Ratcliffe, J.: Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value Health 14, 928–936 (2011)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Bagust, A.: Improving valuation sampling of EQ-5D health states. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 11, 14 (2013)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Brazier, J., Rowen, D.: NICE DSU technical support document 11: alternatives to EQ-5D for generating health state utility values (2011)
Gerard, K., Dobson, M., Hall, J.: Framing and labelling effects in health descriptions: quality adjusted life years for treatment of breast cancer. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 46, 77–84 (1993)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Peeters, Y., Stiggelbout, A.M.: Valuing health: does enriching a scenario lead to higher utilities? Med. Decis. Making 29, 334–342 (2009)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Peeters, Y., Vliet Vlieland, T.P.M., Stiggelbout, A.M.: Focusing illusion, adaptation and EQ-5D health state descriptions: the difference between patients and public. Health Expect. 15, 367–378 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Insinga, R.P., Fryback, D.G.: Understanding differences between self-ratings and population ratings for health in the EuroQOL. Qual. Life Res. 12, 611–619 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Pyne, J.M., Fortney, J.C., Tripathi, S., Feeny, D., Ubel, P., Brazier, J.: How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population. Health Serv. Res. 44, 1406–1423 (2009)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, D., Damschroder, L., Kim, S., Ubel, P.: What’s it worth? Public willingness to pay to avoid mental illnesses compared with general medical illnesses. Psychiatr. Serv. 63, 319–324 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Schiffman, R.M., Walt, J.G., Jacobsen, G., Doyle, J.J., Lebovics, G., Sumner, W.: Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology 110, 1412–1419 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Handler, R.M., Hynes, L.M., Nease Jr, R.F.: Effect of locus of control and consideration of future consequences on time tradeoff utilities for current health. Qual. Life Res. 6, 54–60 (1997)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Churchill, D.N., Torrance, G.W., Taylor, D.W., Barnes, C.C., Ludwin, D., Shimizu, A., Smith, E.K.: Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach. Clin. Invest. Med. 10, 14–20 (1987)
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Churchill, D.N., Morgan, J., Torrance, G.W.: Quality of life in end-stage renal disease. Perit. Dial. Bull. 4, 20–23 (1984)
Google Scholar
Arnesen, T.M., Norheim, O.F.: Quantifying quality of life for economic analysis: time out for time tradeoff. Medical Humanit. 29, 81–86 (2003)
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Iezzi, A., Richardson, J.: Measuring Quality of Life at the Centre for Health Economics. Melbourne. (2009)
Fryback, D.G., Lawrence, W.F.: Dollars may not buy as many QALYs as we think: a problem with defining quality-of-life adjustments. Med. Decis. Making 17, 276–284 (1997)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
King Jr, J.T., Styn, M.A., Tsevat, J., Roberts, M.S.: “Perfect health” versus “disease free”: the impact of anchor point choice on the measurement of preferences and the calculation of disease-specific disutilities. Med. Decis. Making 23, 212–225 (2003)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
King, J.T., Tsevat, J., Roberts, M.S.: Impact of the scale upper anchor on health state preferences. Med. Decis. Making 29, 257–266 (2009)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Lamers, L.M.: The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets. Med. Care 45, 238–244 (2007)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Patrick, D.L., Starks, H.E., Cain, K.C., Uhlmann, R.F., Pearlman, R.A.: Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med. Decis. Making 14, 9–18 (1994)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Craig, B.M., Oppe, M.: From a different angle: a novel approach to health valuation. Soc. Sci. Med. 70, 169–174 (2010)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Craig, B.M., Busschbach, J.: The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation. Popul. Health Metr. 7, 3 (2009)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: The value of correcting values: influence and importance of correcting TTO scores for time preference. Value Health 13, 879–884 (2010)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method. J. Health Econ. 28, 234–243 (2009)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Brouwer, W.B.F.: Deriving time discounting correction factors for TTO tariffs. Health Econ. doi:10.1002/hec.2921
Stiggelbout, A.M., Kiebert, G.M., Kievit, J., Leer, J.W., Stoter, G., de Haes, J.C.: Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores. Med. Decis. Making 14, 82–90 (1994)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Martin, A.J., Glasziou, P.P., Simes, R.J., Lumley, T.: A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 16, 137–147 (2000)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
van der Pol, M., Roux, L.: Time preference bias in time trade-off. Eur. J. Health Econ. 6, 107–111 (2005)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
van Osch, S.M., Wakker, P.P., van den Hout, W.B., Stiggelbout, A.M.: Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities. Med. Decis. Making 24, 511–517 (2004)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Olsen, J.A.: Persons versus years: two ways of eliciting implicit weights. Health Econ. 3, 39–46 (1994)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gyrd-Hansen, D.: Comparing the results of applying different methods of eliciting time preferences for health. Eur. J. Health Econ. 3, 10–16 (2002)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Bleichrodt, H., Johannesson, M.: Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs. J. Health Econ. 16, 155–175 (1997)
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Attema, A.E., Versteegh, M.M.: Would you rather be ill now, or later?. Health Econ. doi: 10.1002/hec.2894 (forthcoming)
Bansback, N., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., Anis, A.: Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J. Health Econ. 31, 306–318 (2012)
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar