Abstract
The inability of traditional state organisations to respond to new economic, technological and social challenges and the associated emerging problems has made it necessary to adopt new methods of health management. As a result, new directions have emerged in the reform of Public Administration together with the introduction of innovative models. The aim is to achieve a type of management that focusses on results as well as on effort and efficiency. We intend to analyse to what extent the adoption of business management models by hospital healthcare units can improve their performance, mainly in terms of standards of efficiency. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to investigate the efficiency of a set of public Portuguese hospitals. The aim was to evaluate the impact of business management in Portuguese public hospitals with regards to efficiency, specifically taking into account the fact that lack of resources and increased health care needs are a present and future reality. From a total of 83 public hospitals, a sample of 59 hospitals was chosen, of which 21 are state-owned hospital enterprises (SA) and 38 are traditional public administration sector hospitals (SPA). This study evaluates hospital performance by calculating two efficiency measures associated with two categories of inputs. The first efficiency measures the costs associated with hospital production lines and the number of beds (representing fixed capacity) as inputs. The annual costs generated by the hospitals in the consumption of capital and work (direct and indirect costs) are used. A second measure of efficiency is calculated separately. This measure includes in the inputs the number of beds as well as the human resources available (number of doctors, number of nurses and other personnel) in each hospital. With regard to output, the variables that best reflect the hospital services rendered were considered: number of inpatient days, patients discharged, outpatient visits, emergencies services, sessions in hospital day care services and the number of surgeries. The results seem to suggest that the introduction of market processes and changes in organisational structure—such as managerial autonomy and corporatisation of public hospitals—have had a positive impact on Portuguese public hospitals. This positive evolution was particularly evident in SA hospitals, but further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
SFA is an econometric approach that requires the specification of a functional form for the efficient frontier as well as the distributional assumptions for the inefficiency and error terms. In this approach, deviations from the efficient frontier are considered as being either because of inefficiency or because of random effects.
Scale efficiency score = CRS TE Score/VRS TE Score.
While the CCR model maintains the assumption of CRS, the Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (BCC) model allows the VRS to prevail.
This window analysis methodology has previously been used where the use of cross-sectional and panel designs has proved unsatisfactory to measure efficiency. Windows analysis is a tabular method that allows for an analysis of efficiency changes and enables the researcher to determine periodic variations of the relative performance of DMUs.
That is, results based on the mean estimated efficiency scores obtained for each group of hospitals and for each year.
In this case, we treated the omission cases as suggested by Kuosmanen [36], giving a sufficiently high value to the input “Costs with Hospital Day Care Services” and a null value to the output “No. of Sessions in Hospital Day Care Services”.
The average score of efficiency for each type of hospital in each year is the arithmetical mean of the estimated efficiency scores.
References
Hughes, O.: Public Management and Administration, 2nd edn. Palgrave, Hampshire (1998)
Proeller, I.: Trends in local government in Europe. Public Manage. Rev. 8(1), 7–29 (2006). doi:10.1080/14719030500518642
Boyne, G., Farrell, C., Law, J., et al.: Evaluating Public Management Reforms. Principles and Practice. Managing the Public Services Series. Open University Press, Philadelphia (2003)
Conrad, R., Strauss, R.: A multiple-output multiple-input model of the hospital industry in North Carolina. Appl. Econ. 15, 341–352 (1983). doi:10.1080/00036848300000005
Cowing, T., Holtman, A.: Multiproduct short-run hospital cost functions: empirical evidence and policy implications from cross-section data. South. Econ. J. 49, 637–653 (1983). doi:10.2307/1058706
Grannemann, T., Brown, R., Pauly, M.: Estimating hospital costs. A multiple-output analysis. J. Health Econ. 5, 107–127 (1986). doi:10.1016/0167-6296(86)90001-9
Vita, M.: Exploring hospital production relationships with flexible functional forms. J. Health Econ. 9, 1–21 (1990). doi:10.1016/0167-6296(90)90038-5
Scuffham, P.A., Devlin, N.J., Jaforullah, M.: The structure of costs and production in New Zealand public hospitals: an application of the transcendental logarithmic variable cost function. Appl. Econ. 28, 75–85 (1996). doi:10.1080/00036849600000010
Fournier, G.M., Mitchell, J.M.: Hospital costs and competition services: a multiproduct analysis. Rev. Econ. Stat. 74(4), 627–634 (1992). doi:10.2307/2109376
Rosko, M., Broyles, R.: Short-term responses of hospitals to the DRG prospective pricing mechanism in New Jersey. Med. Care 25(2), 307–318 (1987). doi:10.1097/00005650-198702000-00002
Hadley, J., Zuckerman, S., Feder, J.: Profits and fiscal pressure in the prospective payment system: their impacts on hospitals. Inquiry 26(3), 354–365 (1989)
Chesney, J.: Utilization trends before and after PPS. Inquiry 27(4), 376–381 (1990)
Menke, T.: Impacts of PPS on Medicare–Part B expenditures and utilization for hospital episodes of care. Inquiry 27(2), 114–126 (1990)
Lave, J., Frank, R.: Effect of the structure of hospital payment on length of stay. Health Serv. Res. 25(2), 327–347 (1990)
Hodgkin, D., McGuire, T.: Payments levels and hospital response to prospective payment. J. Health Econ. 13, 1–29 (1994). doi:10.1016/0167-6296(94)90002-7
Ellis, R., McGuire, T.: Hospital response to prospective payment: moral hazard, selection and practice-style effects. J. Health Econ. 15, 257–277 (1996). doi:10.1016/0167-6296(96)00002-1
Antioch, K.M., Walsh, M.K.: Risk adjusted capitation funding models for chronic diseases in Australia: alternatives to casemix funding. Eur. J. Health Econ. 3, 83–93 (2002). doi:10.1007/s10198-002-0096-7
Antioch, K.M., Walsh, M.K.: Risk adjusted vision beyond casemix (DRG) funding in Australia: international lessons in high complexity and capitation. Eur. J. Health Econ. 5, 95–109 (2004). doi:10.1007/s10198-003-0208-z
Antioch, K.M., Ellis, R.P., Gillett, S., et al.: Risk adjustment policy options for casemix funding: international lessons in financing reforms. Eur. J. Health Econ. 8, 195–212 (2007)
Zuckerman, S., Hadley, J., Lezzoni, L.: Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. J. Health Econ. 13(3), 255–281 (1994)
Farrell, M.J.: The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. [Ser A] 120(Part 3), 253–290 (1957). http://www.rss.org.uk/main.asp?page=1711 doi:10.2307/2343100
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505543/description#description doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, A.: Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Charnes, A., et al.: Data Envelopment Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer, Boston (1996)
Cooper, W., Seiford, L., Tone, K.: Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models. Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer, Boston (2004)
Zhu, J.: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver. Kluwer, Boston (2004)
Ramanathan, R.: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis. A Tool for Performance Measurement. Sage, London (2003)
Chirikos, T., Sear, A.: Measuring hospital efficiency: a comparison of two approaches. Health Ser. Res. 34(6), 1389–1408 (2000)
Ganley, J.A., Cubbin, J.S.: Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1992)
Bauer, P.W.: Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontier. J Econ. 46, 39–56 (1990). doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90046-V
Grosskopf, S., Valdmanis, V.: Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric approach. J. Health Econ., June, vol. 6 (2), pp. 89–108 (1987). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505560/description
Valdmanis, V.: Sensitivity analysis for DEA models: An empirical example using public versus NFP hospitals. Journal of Public Economics, Amsterdam, July, vol. 48 (2), pp. 185–206 (1992). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505578/description#description
Register, C., Brunning, E.: Profit incentives and technical efficiency in the production of hospital care. South. Econ. J. 53, 899–914 (1987). http://www.utc.edu/Outreach/SouthernEconomicAssociation/southern-economic-journal.html doi:10.2307/1059684
Ozcan, Y., Luke, R.: A national study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets. Health Serv. Res. (Feb):719–739 (1993). http://www.hsr.org/hsr/abouthsr/journal.jsp
Chirikos, T., Sear, A.: Measuring hospital efficiency: A comparison of two approaches. Health Serv. Res. (Feb), vol. 34 (6), pp. 1389–1408 (2000). http://www.hsr.org/hsr/abouthsr/journal.jsp
Magnussen, J.: Efficiency measurement and the operationalization of hospital production. Health Serv. Res. 31(1), 21–37 (1996). http://www.hsr.org/hsr/abouthsr/journal.jsp
Dalmau, E., Puig-Junoy, J.: Market structure and hospital efficiency: Evaluating potential effects of deregulation in a National Health Service. Rev. Ind. Organ. 13, 447–466 (1998). http://www.springer.com/economics/industrial+organization/journal/11151 doi:10.1023/A:1007775616593
Al-Shammari, M.: A multi-criteria data envelopment analysis model for measuring the productive efficiency of hospitals. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. Bradf. 19(9), 879–890 (1999). http://info.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?PHPSESSID=2pnd0pqs7n2v2ds9n2p4mgu914&id=ijopm doi:10.1108/01443579910280205
Kirigia, J., Emrouznejad, A., Sambo, L.: Measurement of technical efficiency of public hospitals in Kenya: using data envelopment analysis. J. Med. Syst. 26(1), 39–45 (2002). http://www.springer.com/statistics/stats+life+sci/journal/10916 doi:10.1023/A:1013090804067
Osei, D., D’Almeida, S., George, M., Kirigia, J., et al.: Technical efficiency of public district hospitals and health centres in Ghana: a pilot study. Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 3(9), (2005). http://www.resource-allocation.com/
Ouellette, P., Vierstraete, V.: Technological change and efficiency in the presence of quasi-fixed inputs: A DEA application to the hospital sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154, 755–764 (2004). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505543/description#description doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00712-9
Chang, H., Chang, W., Das, S., Li, S.: Healthcare regulation and the operating efficiency of hospitals: Evidence from Taiwan. J. Account. Public Policy 23, 483–510 (2004). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505721/description#description doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.10.004
Banker, R., Charnes, W., Cooper, W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30(9), 1078–1092 (1984). http://www.informs.org/site/ManSci/ doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Harrison, J., Coppola, M., Wakefield, M.: Efficiency of federal hospitals in the United States. J. Med. Syst., Oct., vol. 28 (5), pp. 411–422 (2004). http://www.springer.com/statistics/stats+life+sci/journal/10916
Chen, A., Yuhchang, H., Shao, B.: Measurement and sources of overall and input inefficiencies: evidences and implications in hospital services. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 161, 447–468 (2005). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505543/description#description doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.09.017
Bates, L., Mukherjee, K., Santerre, R.: Market structure and technical efficiency in the hospital services industry: A DEA approach. Med. Care Res. Rev. 63(4), 499–524 (2006). http://mcr.sagepub.com/current.dtl doi:10.1177/1077558706288842
Kontodimopoulos, N., Niakas, D.: Efficiency measurement of hemodialysis units in Greece with data envelopment analysis. Health Policy 71, 195–204 (2005). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505962/description#description doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.004
Mobley, L., Magnussen, J.: An international comparison of hospital efficiency. Does institutional environment matter? Appl. Econ. 30(8), 1089–1100 (1998). http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00036846.asp doi:10.1080/000368498325255
Steinman, L., Dittrich, G., Karmann, A., Zweifel, P.: Measuring and comparing the (in)efficiency of German and Swiss hospitals. Eur. J. Health Econ. 5, 216–226 (2004). http://www.springerlink.com/content/110376/ doi:10.1007/s10198-004-0227-4
Linna, M., Häkkinen, U., Magnussen, J.: Comparing hospital cost efficiency between Norway and Finland. Health Policy 77(3), 268–278 (2006). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505962/description#description doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.019
Golany, B., Roll, Y.: An application procedure for DEA. Omega. Int. J. Manage. Sci 17, 237–250 (1989)
IGIF–Instituto de Gestão Informática e Financeira da Saúde: Contabilidade Analítica 2004, Hospitais do SNS. Ministério da Saúde. Janeiro, Lisboa (2006)
Scheel, H.: EMS: Efficiency Measurement System User’s Manual. http://www.wiso.uni-dortmund.de/lsfg/or/scheel/sem; http://www.netlib.org. (2000)
Kuosmanen, T.: Modelling blank data entries in data envelopment analysis”. Nonparametric Methods in Economics of Production, Natural Resources and the Environment, http://www.sls.wageningen-ur.nl/enr/staff/kuosmanen/program1/Kuosmanen (2003)
Direcção-Geral da Saúde: O Hospital Português. Ministério da Saúde, Lisboa (1998)
Torgersen, A., Forsund, F., Kittlesen, S.: Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J. Prod. Anal. 7, 379–398 (1996). doi:10.1007/BF00162048
Andersen, P., Petersen, N.: A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39(10), 1261–1264 (1993). doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
Adler, N., Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z.: Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140, 249–265 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rego, G., Nunes, R. & Costa, J. The challenge of corporatisation: the experience of Portuguese public hospitals. Eur J Health Econ 11, 367–381 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-009-0198-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-009-0198-6