Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 139–150 | Cite as

Kin selection and reproductive value in social mammals

  • Masaru Hasegawa
  • Nobuyuki KutsukakeEmail author
Review

Abstract

Empirical studies have tested and confirmed a positive relationship between relatedness and the degree of altruistic behavior, as predicted by kin selection theory. In contrast, researchers have studied the relationship between reproductive value—the extent to which an individual of a given “state” contributes to future generations—and the degree of altruistic behavior far less frequently, although reproductive value should be considered when testing kin selection. Here, we reviewed empirical studies examining such relationships in social mammals. Overall, > 50% of these studies demonstrated that the degree of altruistic behavior (1) decreases with the reproductive value of the actor, and (2) increases with the reproductive value of the recipient, supporting the importance of reproductive value in altruistic behavior. However, these studies cannot rule out all other explanations than kin selection. Few empirical studies have adopted a stronger test that uses the product of relatedness and reproductive value (i.e., their two-way interaction in a linear model). Such tests should be particularly useful when studying long-lived vertebrates, for which the direct estimation of fitness benefits and costs is impractical. To achieve a better understanding of the evolution of kin-directed behaviors, future studies should use the product of relatedness and reproductive value.

Keywords

Altruism Kin selection Kinship Social behavior Reproductive value 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by MEXT (#25711025 to NK). We are grateful to the members of the laboratory of Sokendai (the Graduate University for Advanced Studies). We also thank Michael Griesser, Fumiaki Nomano, Joe Yuichiro Wakano, and anonymous reviewers for critical comments. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

10164_2019_586_MOESM1_ESM.docx (217 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 217 kb)

References

  1. Albert S, Altmann J (2003) Matrix models for primate life history analysis. In: Kappeler PM, Periera ME (eds) Primate life histories and socioecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 66–102Google Scholar
  2. Alizon S, Taylor P (2008) Empty sites can promote altruistic behavior. Evolution 62:1335–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann SA (1979) Altruistic behaviour: the fallacy of kin deployment. Anim Behav 27:958–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman TJ, Beehner JC (2015) Measuring social complexity. Animal Behaviour 103:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergmüller R, Johnstone RA, Russell AF, Bshary R (2007) Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation. Behav Process 76:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borries C, Sommer V, Srivastava A (1994) Weaving a tight social net: allogrooming in free-ranging female langurs (Presbytis entellus). Int J Primatol 15:421–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourke AFG (2014) Hamilton’s rule and the causes of social evolution. Phil Trans R Soc B 369:20130362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Minot EO (2000) Aging and improving reproductive success in horses: declining residual reproductive value or just older and wiser? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caswell H (1989) Matrix population models. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapais B (2001) Primate nepotism: what is the explanatory value of kin selection? Int J Primatol 22:203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. Combes SL, Altmann J (2001) Status change during adulthood: life-history by-product or kin selection based on reproductive value? Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1367–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croft DP, Brent LJN, Franks DW, Cant MA (2015) The evolution of prolonged life after reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol 30:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies NB, Krebs JR, West SA (2012) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 4th edn. Wiley–Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. de Waal FBM, Tyack PL (2003) Animal social complexity. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Descamps S, Boutin S, Berteaux D, Gaillard JM (2007) Female red squirrels fit Williams’ hypothesis of increasing reproductive effort with increasing age. J Anim Ecol 76:1192–1201Google Scholar
  18. Emlen JM (1973) Ecology: an evolutionary approach. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  19. Fairbanks LA (1988) Vervet monkey grandmothers: interactions with infant grandoffspring. Int J Primatol 9:425–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox GA (2008) Discrete analysis (matrix models). eLS.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003308
  22. Frank SA (1998) Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Grafen A (2006) A theory of Fisher's reproductive value. J Mathemat Biol 53(1):15–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hernández-Pacheco R, Rawlins RG, Kessler MJ, Williams LE, Ruiz-Maldonado TM, González-Martínez J, Ruiz-Lambides AV, Sabat AM (2013) Demographic variability and density-dependent dynamics of a free-ranging rhesus macaque population. Am J Primatol 75:1152–1164Google Scholar
  26. Holekamp KE, Smale L (1993) Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyenas: juvenile rank relations with other immature individuals. Anim Behav 46:451–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houston AI, McNamara JM (1999) Models of adaptive behaviour: an approach based on state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Hrdy SB, Hrdy DB (1976) Hierarchical relations among female Hanuman langurs (Primates: Colobinae, Presbytis entellus). Science 193:913–915Google Scholar
  29. Johnstone RA, Cant MA, Field J (2012) Sex-biased dispersal, haplodiploidy and the evolution of helping in social insects. Proc R Soc B 279:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kappeler PM, Watts DP (2012) Long-term field studies of primates. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Komdeur J (2012) Sex allocation. In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M (eds) The evolution of parental care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–188Google Scholar
  32. Koskela E, Juutistenaho P, Mappes T, Oksanen TA (2000) Offspring defense in relation to litter size and age: experiment in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Evol Ecol 14:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koskela E, Mappes T, Niskanen T, Rutkowska J (2009) Maternal investment in relation to sex ratio and offspring number in a small mammal: a case for Trivers and Willard theory? J Anim Ecol 78:1007–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurland JA (1977) Kin selection in the Japanese monkey. Contributions to primatology, vol 12. Karger, Basel, pp 1–145Google Scholar
  35. Kutsukake N (2009) Complexity, dynamics and diversity of sociality in group-living mammals. Ecol Res 24:521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leimar O (1996) Life history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex ratio problem. Behav Ecol 7:316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milinski M (1978) Kin selection and reproductive value. Z Tierpsychol 47:328–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morris DW (1986) Proximate and ultimate controls on life-history variation: the evolution of litter size in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Evolution 40:169–181Google Scholar
  41. Nehring V, Boomsma JJ, d’Ettorre P (2012) Wingless virgin queens assume helper roles in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Curr Biol 22:R671–R673Google Scholar
  42. Oli MK (2003) Hamilton goes empirical: estimation of inclusive fitness from life history. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:307–311Google Scholar
  43. Pen I, Weissing FJ (2000) Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding. The role of ecology and life history re-examined. Proc R Soc B 267:2411–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pianka ER, Parker WS (1975) Age-specific reproductive tactics. Am Nat 109:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rees M, Childs DZ, Ellner SP (2014) Building integral projection models: a user’s guide. J Anim Ecol 83:528–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salguero-Gómez R, Jones OR, Archer CR, Bein C, de Buhr H, Farack C, Gottschalk F, Hartmann A, Henning A, Hoppe G, Römer G, Ruoff T, Sommer V, Wille J, Voigt J, Zeh S, Vieregg D, Buckley YM, Che-Castaldo J, Hodgson D, Scheuerlein A, Caswell H, Vaupel JW (2016) COMADRE: a global data base of animal demography. J Anim Ecol 85:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schindler S, Gaillard J, Gruning A, Neuhaus P, Traill LW, Tuljapurkar S, Coulson T (2015) Sex-specific demography and generalization of the Trivers–Willard theory. Nature 526:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schulman SR, Chapais B (1980) Reproductive value and rank relations among macaque sisters. Am Natl 115:580–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwanz LE (2008a) Chronic parasitic infection alters reproductive output in deer mice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1351–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwanz LE (2008b) Persistent effects of maternal parasitic infection on offspring fitness: implications for adaptive reproductive strategies when parasitized. Funct Ecol 22:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwartz OA, Armitage KB, Van Vuren D (1998) A 32-year demography of yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). J Zool 264:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Silk JB (2009) Nepotistic cooperation in non-human primate groups. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:3243–3254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith JE (2014) Hamilton’s legacy: kinship, cooperation and social tolerance in mammalian groups. Anim Behav 92:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor PD (1990) Allele-frequency change in a class-structured population. Am Natl 135:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor PD, Frank S (1996) How to make a kin selection model. J Theor Biol 180:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Horn RC, Buchan JC, Altmann J, Alberts SC (2007) Divided destinies: group choice by female savannah baboons during social group fission. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1823–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. West SA, Grrifin AS, Gardner A (2007) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr Biol 17:R661–R672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wild G (2011) Direct fitness for dynamic kin selection. J Evol Biol 24:1598–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary Studies of BiosystemsSokendai (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)HayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations