Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 111–115 | Cite as

Unique numerical competence of Asian elephants on the relative numerosity judgment task

  • Naoko IrieEmail author
  • Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa
  • Nobuyuki Kutsukake
Short Communication

Abstract

Many animals demonstrate numerical competence even without language. However, their representation is mainly based on inaccurate quantity instead of absolute numbers. Thus, their performance on numerical tasks is affected by the distance, magnitude, and the ratio of comparisons (i.e., as distance decreases, magnitudes increase, or as ratios increase the accuracy of discrimination decreases). We report that Asian elephants’ numerical representation is quite different from that of other animals. We trained three Asian elephants to use a touch-panel apparatus and one female successfully learned to use the apparatus. Next, a relative numerosity judgment task was presented on the screen and the elephant was asked to touch, with the tip of her trunk, the figures with the larger numbers of items. The numbers of items in each figure ranged from 0 to 10. We found that her performance was unaffected by distance, magnitude, or the ratios of the presented numerosities but, consistent with observations of human counting, she required a longer time to respond to comparisons with smaller distances. This study provides the first experimental evidence that nonhuman animals have cognitive characteristics partially identical to human counting.

Keywords

Numerical competence Relative numerosity judgment Asian elephants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Director and the elephant keepers at Ueno Zoo for their cooperation in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (22-6613) and ESB Cooperation Program in SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

Our study was approved by the Director of Ueno Zoo, after it was evaluated by the research and education committee at the zoo. Ueno Zoo is a member of the Japanese Association of Zoos and Aquariums (http://www.jaza.jp/index.html), which also has an animal welfare committee to confirm that Ueno Zoo meets their animal welfare standards as well. Since it was approved by the zoo, the current study meets the animal welfare standards of Japan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10164_2018_563_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Data of the overall proportion of correct responses (XLSX 9 kb)

References

  1. Agrillo C, Bisazza A (2018) Understanding the origin of number sense: a review of fish studies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 373:20160511CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A, Butterworth B (2012) Evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies. PLoS One 7:e31923CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson US, Stoinski TS, Bloomsmith MA, Maple TL (2007) Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young, middle-aged, and older adult orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii and Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 121:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beran M (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran MJ (2007) Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33:42–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Biro D, Matsuzawa T (2001) Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Anim Cognit 4:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butterworth B, Gallistel CR, Vallortigara G (2018) Introduction: the origins of numerical abilities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 373:20160507CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis H, Perusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehaene S (1997) The number sense. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 8(7):307–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallistel CR, Gelman R (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4:59–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hicks LH (1956) An analysis of number-concept formation in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Physiol Psychol 49:212–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Irie N (2012) Numerical cognition of elephants: relative quantity judgment by an African forest elephant Loxodonta cyclotis and an African savannah elephant Loxodonta africana. In: Aranovich M, Dufresne O (eds) Elephants: ecology, behavior, and conservation. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, pp 145–151Google Scholar
  15. Irie N, Hasegawa T (2012) Summation by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Behav Sci 2:50–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Irie-Sugimoto N, Kobayashi T, Sato T, Hasegawa T (2009) Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Anim Cognit 12:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meck WH, Church RM (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 9:320–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Murofushi T (1997) Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee. Jpn Psychol Res 39:140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Perdue BM, Talbot CF, Stone AM, Beran M (2012) Putting the elephant back in the herd: elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species. Anim Cognit 15:955–961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0521-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perusse R, Rumbaugh DM (1990) Summation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): effects of amounts, number of wells, and finer ratios. Int J Primatol 11:425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rohland N, Malaspinas AS, Pollack JL, Slatkin M, Matheus P, Hofreiter M (2007) Proboscidean mitogenomics: chronology and mode of elephant evolution using mastodon as outgroup. PLoS Biol 5:e207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Hegel MT (1987) Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 13:107–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Tomonaga M (2008) Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations. Anim Cognit 11:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vonk J, Beran M (2012) Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears, Ursus americanus. Anim Behav 84:231–238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naoko Irie
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa
    • 1
  • Nobuyuki Kutsukake
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary Studies of BiosystemsSokendai (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)MiuraJapan
  2. 2.Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations