Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recognition of monkey faces by monkey experts

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human beings automatically discriminate human faces at the individual level. Infants aged 3 months implicitly recognise monkey faces, but this capacity disappears as recognition skills mature. Expertise is known to affect recognition capacities for different categories of stimuli that are not even face-like in their configuration. We have explored the capacity of adult experts and non-experts in primatology to recognise monkey faces in both explicit and implicit recognition tasks. In the explicit task, where subjects received the instruction to recognise a face seen previously, experts proved to be more accurate than non-experts. Experts were more affected by inversion than non-experts, suggesting that the processing of those faces is based on their configuration, as is generally observed for human faces. This replicates findings from Diamond and Carey (J Exp Psychol Gen 115:107–117, 1986) in dog experts. In the implicit recognition task, assessed by a visual paired comparison task where no instruction of recognition was given, automatic discrimination was observed for human faces but not for monkey faces. These results suggest that experience acquired by the time of adulthood did not lead the experts to develop recognition skills to the point of matching those exhibited for human faces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2005) An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull/Rev 12:1043–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick HP, Bahrick PO, Wittlinger RP (1975) Fifty years of memory for names and faces: a cross-sectional approach. J Exp Psychol Gen 104:54–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Pascalis O, Coleman M, Wallace SB, Benson PJ (1997) Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:1429–1434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey S, Diamond R, Woods B (1980) The development of face recognition-a maturational component? Dev Psychol 16:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel D, Bentin S (2002) Domain specificity versus expertise: factor influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition 83:1–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Heering A, Rossion B (2008) Prolonged visual experience in adulthood modulates holistic face perception. PLoS ONE 3(5):e2317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond R, Carey S (1986) Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen 115:107–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour V, Coleman M, Campbell M, Petit O, Pascalis O (2004) On the species-specificity of face recognition in human adults. Curr Psychol Cogn 22(3):315–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Field TM, Woodson RW, Greenberg R, Cohen C (1982) Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science 218:179–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier I, Tarr MJ (1997) Becoming a greeble expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Res 37:1673–1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier I, Williams P, Tarr MJ, Tanaka J (1998) Training greeble experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Res 38:2401–2428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier I, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, Anderson AW (2000) Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci 3:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein AG, Chance JE (1985) Effect of training on Japanese face recognition: reduction of the other-race effect. Bull Psychon Soc 23:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig ND (1984) The effect of measure displacement on face recognition. Perception 13:505–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuefner D, Macchi Cassia V, Picozzi M, Bricolo E (2008) Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:811–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP (2003) Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nat Neurosci 6:1108–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP (2004) Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychol Sci 15:762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 6:255–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKone E, Kanwisher N, Duchaine BC (2007) Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends Cogn Sci 11:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meisner CA, Brigham JC (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Public Policy Law 7:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel C, Caldara R, Rossion B (2006) Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Vis Cogn 14:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Ahola S (2006) Becoming a face expert. Psychol Sci 17:930–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CA (2001) The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant Child Dev 10:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura M, Maurer D (2008) The effect of categorisation on sensitivity to second-order relations in novel objects. Perception 37:584–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis O, Bachevalier J (1998) Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study. Behav Process 43:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis O, de Haan M (2003) Recognition memory and novelty preference: what model? In: Hayne H, Fagen JW (eds) Progress in Infancy Research, vol 3. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah London, pp 95–120

  • Pascalis O, de Schonen S (1994) Recognition memory in 3- to 4-days-old human neonates. Neuroreport 5:1721–1724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis O, Demont E, de Haan M, Campbell R (2001) Recognition of faces of different species: a developmental study between 5 and 8 years of age. Infant Child Dev 10:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis O, de Haan M, Nelson CA (2002) Is facing processing species specific during the first year of life? Science 296:1321–1323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis O, Scott LS, Kelly DJ, Shannon RW, Nicholson E, Coleman M, Nelson CA (2005) Plasticity of face processing in infancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5297–5300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PC, Yarr J, Kuhn A, Slater AM, Pascalis O (2002) Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: a preference for female. Perception 31:1109–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G, Tan S, Brake S, Taylor K (1989) Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. Brit J Psychol 80:313–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins R, McKone E (2007) No face-like processing for objects-of- expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition 103:34–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossion B, Gauthier I, Goffaux V, Tarr MJ, Crommelinck M (2002) Expertise training with novel objects leads to face-like electrophysiological responses. Psychol Sci 13:250–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli S, de Schonen S (2004) Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non native effects. Dev Sci 7:74–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli S, Pallier C, Argenti AM, Ventureyra VAG, de Schonen S (2005) Reversibility of the other race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychol Sci 16:440–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka JV, Taylor M (1991) Object categories and expertise: is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cogn Psychol 23:457–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka JW, Kiefer M, Bukach CM (2004) A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition 93:B1–B9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr MJ, Gauthier I (2000) FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat Neurosci 38:764–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 81:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ethologie des Primates, Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, UMR 7178, CNRS, Université Louis Pasteur, 67037, Strasbourg, France

    Valérie Dufour & Odile Petit

  2. School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU, UK

    Valérie Dufour

Authors
  1. Valérie Dufour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Odile Petit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valérie Dufour.

About this article

Cite this article

Dufour, V., Petit, O. Recognition of monkey faces by monkey experts. J Ethol 28, 231–238 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-009-0174-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-009-0174-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation