Abstract
Knowledge of how mating success is related to body size may provide insight into the evolution of social systems. This study investigated the mating system and relevant social behavior of a temperate anuran (Rana chensinensis) at three localities in northern China. During chorusing, males aggregated and persisted in the communal spawning ponds with a density of 10–26 frogs per m2 water area and operational sex ratio of 15–28 males to 1 female. The males frequently grabbed any conspecifics they encountered, releasing the grip if the individual was a male, but holding the grip when it was a female. A significant positive relationship between male and female body lengths of pairs in amplexus was detected from all the sites during the five breeding seasons, but the average correlation coefficients of determination of 18% indicated that the size-assortative mating constituted a minority of the species’ mating system. Pairing probability decreased with increased size differences between sexes, which could have prevented a few adult animals in a population from forming pairs. The strong aggregation of males could limit the opportunities for large males to exhibit contest advantages in mating and for both sexes to choose a large mate. Infrequent occurrence of scramble competition (averaging 8% of the recorded amplectant pairs) and the lack of observed takeovers, probably because of reclusion of amplectant pairs at the bottom of spawning ponds, suggested a weak role of amplexus displacement in generating non-random mating. Our results suggest that although non-random mating with respect to body size may be expected in explosive breeders, the social environment characterized by male aggregation may also impose weak selective pressure for the evolution of non-random mating.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arnqvist G, Rowe L, Krupa J, Sih A (1996) Assortative mating by size: a meta-analysis of mating patterns in water striders. Evol Ecol 10:265–284
Berven KA (1981) Mate choice in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution 35:707–722
Bourne GR (1993) Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra. Anim Behav 45:1051–1059
Byrne PG, Roberts JD (1999) Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduces fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog, Crinia georgiana. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:717–721
Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2004) Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behav Ecol 15:872–882
Crespi BJ (1989) Causes of assortative mating in arthropods. Anim Behav 38:980–1000
Davies NB, Halliday TR (1979) Competitive mate searching in male common toads Bufo bufo. Anim Behav 27:1253–1267
Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York
Elmberg J (1987) Random mating in a boreal population of European common frogs. Rana temporaria. Holarct Ecol 10:193–195
Elmberg J (1991) Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog Rana temporaria. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:125–131
Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2003) Mate choice in the face of costly competition. Behav Ecol 14:771–779
Friedl TWP, Klump GM (2005) Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European tree frog: body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav 70:1141–1154
Halliday T (1998) Sperm competition in amphibians. In: Brikhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, New York, pp 465–502
Halliday T, Tejedo M (1995) Intrasexual selection and alternative mating behaviour. In: Heatwole H, Sullivan BK (eds) Amphibian biology, vol 2. Social behaviour. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, pp 419–468
Höglund J (1989) Pairing and spawning patterns in the common toad, Bufo bufo: the effects of sex ratios and the time available for male-male competition. Anim Behav 38:423–429
Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327
Klump GM, Gerhardt HC (1987) Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs. Nature 326:286–288
Krupa JJ (1995) How likely is male mate choice among anurans? Behaviour 132:643–664
Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404–408
Lee JC (1986) Is the large-male mating advantage in anurans an epiphenomenon? Oecologia 69:207–212
Lu X (1994) Feature of fecundity and its geographic variation in Rana chensinensis. Acta Ecol Sin 14:209–214
Lu X (2001) Amplexus-like behaviour of hibernating Rana chensinensis in northern China. Herpetol J 11:121–122
Lu X (2004) Annual cycle of nutritional organ mass in a temperate-zone anuran, Rana chensinensis, from northern China. Herpetol J 14:9–12
Lu X, Li B, Liang JJ (2006) Comparative demography of a temperate anuran, Rana chensinensis, along a relatively fine elevational gradient. Can J Zool 84:1789–1795
Madsen T, Shine R (1993) Temporal variability in sexual selection acting on reproductive tactics and body size in male snakes. Am Nat 141:167–171
Marco A, Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP, Blaustein AR (1998) Sex recognition and mate choice by male western toads, Bufo boreas. Anim Behav 55:1631–1635
McLain DK (1998) Non-genetic benefits of mate choice: fecundity enhancement and sexy sons. Anim Behav 55:1191–1201
Morrison C, Hero JM, Smith WP (2001) Mate selection in Litoria chloris and Litoria xanthomera: females prefer smaller males. Aus Ecol 26:223–232
Olson DH, Blaustein AR, O’Hara RK (1986) Mating pattern variability among western toad (Bufo boreas) populations. Oecologia 70:351–356
Parker GA, Partridge L (1998) Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353:261–274
Reading CJ, Clarke RT (1983) Male breeding behaviour and mate acquisition in the common toad Bufo bufo. J Zool Lond 201:237–246
Robertson JGM (1990) Female choice increases fertilization success in an Australian frog Uperoleia laevigata. Anim Behav 39:639–645
Shi J (2007) Sexual selection in relation to body size in anurans. M.S. Thesis, Wuhan University, China
Smith-Gill SJ, Berven KA (1980) In vitro fertilization and assessment of male reproductive potential using mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone to induce spermiation in Rana sylvatica. Copeia 1980:723–728
Sullivan BK, Ryan MJ, Verrell PA (1995) Female choice and mating system structure. In: Heatwole H (ed) Amphibian biology, vol 2. Social behaviour. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, pp 469–517
Tanaka-Ueno T, Matsui M, Wu GF, Fei L, Takenaka O (1999) Identity of Rana chensinensis from other brown frogs as assessed by mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 1999:187–190
Telford SR, Van Sickle J (1989) Sexual selection in an African toad (Bufo gutteralis): the roles of morphology, amplexus displacement and chorus participation. Behaviour 110:62–75
Tsuji H, Matsui M (2002) Male-male combat and head morphology in a fanged frog (Rana kuhlii) from Taiwan. J Herpetol 36:520–526
Wells KD (1977a) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693
Wells KD (1977b) Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 58:750–762
Xie F, Ye CY, Fei L, Jiang JP, Zeng XM, Matsui M (2000) Taxonomical studies on Rana chensinensis (Amphibia: Ranidae) in northwestern China. Acta Zootaxon Sin 25:228–235
Xing LX (1965) Observations on breeding activities of R. chensinensis in Zhongtiao mountains, northern China. Chin J Zool 9:27–29
Acknowledgments
We thank B. Li, J.J. Liang, and H.J. Zhang for assistance in the field work. We are also thankful to two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by National Sciences Foundation Committee of China (Grant 30425036).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, X., Ma, X., Li, Y. et al. Breeding behavior and mating system in relation to body size in Rana chensinensis, a temperate frog endemic to northern China. J Ethol 27, 391–400 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0132-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0132-x