Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of dust sugar filter waste on soil dynamic parameters and liquefaction

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During sugar production, at the end of the sugar purification process with limestone, a large amount of sugar press filter waste (SFW) (up to 20% of the as a result of weight of sugar produced) is generated collecting the substances removed from the syrup with the help of CO2 with the help of filters. In this study, as a suggestion for the management of this waste, its usability as a construction material for soil improvement is discussed. In this direction, the effect of the powder form of SFW material on soil dynamic parameters and liquefaction after its addition as a soil additive at different ratios was investigated. For this purpose, a clayey sand soil sample with high liquefaction risk was selected and resonant column test was performed by adding different amounts (1–3–5–8–10%) of powdered SFW waste at different confining pressures (50 kPa, 100 kPa, 150 kPa), and the effect of the admixture on shear modulus and damping ratio parameters was investigated according to the results of the experiment. According to the findings, it was observed that the highest soil strength was obtained when the additive ratio was selected as 3% at all confining pressures. In the liquefaction analysis, it was determined that the liquefaction risk of the soil with 3% SFW material additive was reduced at all depths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rozhkovskaya A, Rajapakse J, Millar GJ (2021) Synthesis of LTA zeolite beads using alum sludge and silica rich wastes. Adv Powder Technol 32:3248–3258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu X, Leng Z, Lan J, Wang W, Yu J, Bai Y, Sreeram A, Hu J (2021) Sustainable practice in pavement engineering through value-added collective recycling of waste plastic and waste tyre rubber. Engineering 7:857–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gan L, Xiao Z, Pan H, Xu W, Wang Y, X, (2021) Wang Efficiently production of micron-sized polyethylene terephthalate (PET) powder from waste polyester fibre by physicochemical method. Adv Powder Technol 32:630–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hahladakisa JN, Iacovidoub E (2019) An overview of the challenges and trade-offs in closing the loop of postconsumer plastic waste (PCPW): Focus on recycling. J Hazard Mater 380:120887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasanipour H, Aslani F, J. (2019) Taherinezhad Effect of silica fume on durability of self-compacting concrete made with waste recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 227:116598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zacco A, Borgese L, Gianoncelli A, Struis RPWJ, Depero LE, Bontemp E (2014) Review of fly ash inertisation treatments and recycling. Environ Chem Lett 12:153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xinyuan Z, Ke Y, Xiang H, Zhen W, Jiqiang Z (2022) Study on proportioning experiment and performance of solid waste for underground backfilling. Materials Today Communications. (32) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103863

  8. Zheng L, Wu H, Zhang H, Duan H, Wang J, Jiang W et al (2017) Characterizing the generation and flows of construction and demolition waste in China. Constr Build Mater 136:405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Ruonan, M. Ruining, C. Yali, Z. Wanyong, C. Hui (2022) Facile fabrication of N-self-doped porous carbons from green solid waste for supercapacitors with high cycling stability and flexibility. (33) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104911

  10. Akhtar A, Sarmah AK (2018) Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: a global perspective. J Clean Prod 186:262–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muise I, Adams M, Côté R, Price GW (2016) Attitudes to the recovery and recycling of agricultural plastics waste: a case study of Nova Scotia, Canada. Resour Conserv Recycl 109:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Z, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S (2020) Recent applications of waste solid materials in pavement engineering. Waste Manage 108:78–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao S, Dong H, Geng Y, Brander M (2018) An overview of China’s recyclable waste recycling and recommendations for integrated solutions. Resour Conserv Recycl 134:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahirwar R, Tripathi AK (2021) E-waste management: a review of recycling process, environmental and occupational health hazards, and potential solutions. Environ Nanotechnol Monitoring Manag 15:100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain S, Singhal S, Pandey S (2020) Environmental life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling: a case of urban India. Resour Conserv Recycl 155:104642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Athira G, Bahurudeen A, Sahu PK et al (2020) Effective utilization of sugar industry waste in Indian construction sector: a geospatial approach. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:724–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00963-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Özmıhçı S, Hacıoğlu İ, Altındağ EE (2022) Impacts of mycotoxin on biohydrogen production from waste dry fruits. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24:1736–1746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01418-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Ngo A, Nguyen HT, Van Le C et al (2016) A dynamic simulation of methane fermentation process receiving heterogeneous food wastes and modelling acidic failure. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0462-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ribeiro B, Yamashiki Y, Yamamoto T (2020) A study on mechanical properties of mortar with sugarcane bagasse fiber and bagasse ash. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:1844–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01071-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aydin K, Sivrikaya O, Uysal F (2020) Effects of curing time and freeze–thaw cycle on strength of soils with high plasticity stabilized by waste marble powder. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22:1459–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01035-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Domingues LGF, Santos Ferreira GC, Pires MSG (2022) Waste foundry sand used to cover organic waste in landfills. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24:378–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01327-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu G, Xie M, Zhang S (2017) Effect of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW)-based biochar on organic carbon mineralization in a dry land soil. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0447-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. EUWasteFrameworkDirective https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02008L0098-20180705

  24. Topçu IB, Sofuoglu T (2021) Properties of geopolymers produced with sugar press filter waste and fly ash under certain curing conditions. J Build Eng 44:102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Li, W. Xu, X. Yang, J. Wu, Preparation of Portland cement with sugar filter mud as lime-based raw material, J. Clean. Prod. 66 (Mar. 2014) 107–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.003.

  26. T. Uzel, K. Eren, E. Gülal, A.A. Dindar, İ. Tiryakioğlu, H. Yılmaz (2011) Tusaga Aktif (CorsTr) Verileri ile Tektonik Plaka Hareketlerinin İzlenmesi. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası. 13. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı. Ankara.

  27. Habibi A, Jami E (2017) Correlation between Soil Motion parameters and target displacement of steel structures. Int J Civ Eng 15:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0084-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vahdani R, Gerami M, Vaseghi-Nia MA (2019) The spectra of relative input energy per unit mass of structure for iranian earthquakes. Int J Civ Eng 17:1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0377-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Güler, K. B. Afacan (2021) Dynamic behavior of clayey sand over a wide range usin dynamic triaxial and resonant column tests. (24):105–113 https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.24.2.105

  30. M. Erdik, K. Sesetyan, MB. Demircioglu, C. Tuzun, D. Giardini, L. Gülen et al (2012) Assessment of seismic hazard in the Middle East and Caucasus: EMME (Earthquake Model of Middle East) project. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering.

  31. Danciu L, Şeşetyan K, Demircioglu M, Gülen L et al (2018) The 2014 Earthquake Model of the Middle East: seismogenic sources. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3465–3496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0096-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Güler, K. B. Afacan (2021) Assestment of Shear Wave Velocity Concept on the Site Specific Analysis and Its Effects over Performances of Building Codes. Revista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction. (20): 527-543. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.20.3.527

  33. Kaptan K, Tezcan S (2012) Deprem dalgalarinin zemı̇n büyütmesı̇ üzerı̇ne örnekler Turkısh Science-Research Foundation (4):17–32.

  34. Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng 12:1425–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Afacan K (2019) Estimation of excess pore pressure generation and nonlinear site response of liquefied areas. geotechnical engineering—advances in soil mechanics and foundation engineering 1–21 https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88682

  36. Pandya S, Sachan A (2019) Experimental studies on effect of load repetition on dynamic characteristics of saturated ahmedabad cohesive soil. Int J Civ Eng 17:781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00392-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alnuaim A, Alsanabani N, Alshenawy A (2020) Monotonic and cyclic behavior of salt-encrusted flat (Sabkha) soil. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00561-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chakrabortty P, Nilay N, Das A (2020) Effect of silt content on liquefaction susceptibility of fine saturated river bed sands. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00574-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. KL. Lee, A. Albaisa (1974) Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 100 (GT4)

  40. Seed HB, Idriss IM, Makdisi F, Banerjee N (1975) Representation of irregular stress time histories by equivalent uniform stress series in liquefaction analyses, EERC 75–29. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  41. Booker JR, Rahman MS, Seed HB (1976) A computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation during cyclic or earthquake loading. Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  42. Polito CP, Green RA, Lee J (2008) Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviromental Eng 134:1490–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koçyiğit A, Özacar A (2003) Extensional neotectonic regime through the NE edge of outer Isparta Angle, SW Turkey: new field and seismic data. Turkish J Earth Sci 12:67–90

    Google Scholar 

  44. Afad. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Turkey (2019). https://deprem.afad.gov.tr

  45. ASTM D2487–17. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).

  46. http://www.utest.com.tr/tr/20365/Tam-Otomatik-Resonant-Kolon-ve-Burgusal-Kesme-Sistemi (20.03.2023).

  47. Morsy AM, Salem MA, Elmamlouk HH (2019) Evaluation of dynamic properties of calcareous sands in egypt at small and medium shear strain ranges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 116:692–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Banerjee S, Balaji P (2018) Effect of anisotropy on cyclic properties of chennai marine clay. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bedr S, Mezouar N, Verrucci L, Lanzo G (2019) Investigation on shear modulus and damping ratio of algiers marls under cyclic and dynamic loading conditions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:2473–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stewart JP, Afshari K, Hashash YMA (2014) Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional soil response analysis for soil motion prediction. Report PEER 16:152

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kramer SL (1996)Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Simon & Schuster/A Viacom Company Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A..

  52. Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski D, Phillips CA, Park D (2016).DEEPSOIL V6.1, User Manual. Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  53. PEER (2023) Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Strong Motion Database, https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, 26480, Turkey

    Ersin Güler

Authors
  1. Ersin Güler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ersin Güler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güler, E. The effect of dust sugar filter waste on soil dynamic parameters and liquefaction. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01934-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01934-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation