Skip to main content
Log in

Recent trends in mechanochemical processing of fly ash aluminosilicate materials (geopolymers): advancement, challenges, and opportunities

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For achieving sustainable development in terms of waste to wealth, low CO2 production, and recycling, geopolymers can be recognized as a practicable alternative. The current review presented a brief study of the potential usage of class F fly ash as a raw material for geopolymer, the chemistry of geopolymerization, and recent development in the field. A brief status of fly ash-based geopolymers (cement, concrete, coating material) is also presented and the research findings are critically analyzed. The new era of one-part geopolymer and mechanochemical grinding-based advanced geopolymers is also discussed to indicate the advancement of fly ash geopolymers globally. Up to a certain extent microstructure, particle size/fineness and effective leaching of amorphous Si/Al from fly ash in the alkaline solution can enhance the mechanical and physical properties of geopolymer material; on the other hand, chemical properties are controlled by milling or mechanochemical grinding. This review also recapitulates the remarkable findings and conclusions of reviewed literature. Understanding 111 indexed research articles from different data sources may provide a productive and precise document for future research. In the last section, challenges and opportunities for fly ash geopolymers are discussed with a special preference for their chemical composition and synthesis mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

[27]

Fig. 3

[59]

Fig. 4

[87]

Fig. 5

[106]

Fig. 6
Fig. 7

[111]

Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Davidovits J (1976) Solid phase synthesis of a mineral block polymer by low temperature polycondensation of aluminosilicate polymers, IUPAC International Symposium on Macromolecules Stockholm, Topic III, New Polymers of high stability.

  2. Glukhovsky VD (1959) Soil Silicates (Russia) GosstroyizdatUkrainy Publishing, Kiev

  3. Krivenko PD (1994) Alkaline cements. Paper presented at the The first international conference on alkaline cements and concrete, Kiev, Ukraine.

  4. Davidovits J (1994) Properties of Geopolymer Cements, The First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev State Technical University, Kiev, Ukraine.

  5. Davidovits J (1999) Geopolymer 2nd International Conference, Saint-Quentin: France 99: 9–39.

  6. Lukey GC (2002) The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash-and kaolinite-based geopolymers. J Chem Eng 89:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidovits J (1994) High-Alkali Cements for 21st Century Concretes, Special. Publication 144:383–398

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raza MH, Zhong RY (2022) A sustainable roadmap for additive manufacturing using geopolymers in construction industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 186:106592

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JSJ (2007) The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 37:1590–1597

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nuaklong P, Jongvivatsakul P, Pothisiri T, Sata V (2020) Influence of rice husk ash on mechanical properties and fire resistance of recycled aggregate high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Değirmenci FN (2018) Utilization of natural and waste pozzolans as an alternative resource of geopolymer mortar. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0115-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JSJ (2007) The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete. Cem Concr Res 37:1590–1597

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ, Lorenzen L (1997) The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: Part 1, Theory and applications. Miner. Eng. 10(7):659–669

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu G, Shi X (2018) Characteristics and applications of fly ash as a sustainable construction material: A state-of-the-art review. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  15. Amran M, Debbarma S, Ozbakkaloglu T (2021) Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties. Constr Build Mater 270:121857

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Central Electricity Authority of India, Report on fly ash generation at coal / lignite based thermal power stations and its utilization in the country for the year 2019 – 20.

  17. Yusuf G (2021) Adewuyi, Recent Advances in Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymers: Potential on the Utilization for Sustainable Environmental Remediation, ACS. Omega 6(24):15532–15542

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zerfu K, Ekaputri JJ (2016) Review on alkali-activated fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Mater Sci Forum 841:162–169

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meesala CR, Verma NK, Kumar S (2019) Critical review on fly-ash based geopolymer concrete, Struct. Concr. 1–16.

  20. Purdon AO (1940) The action of alkalis on blast furnace slag. J Soc Chem Ind 59:191–202

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glukhovsky VD (1994) Ancient, Modern and Future Concretes, In Proceedings of the First Int. Conf. on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, 1–9, VIPOL Stock Company, Kiev, Ukraine.

  22. Davidovits J (1988) Soft mineralurgy and geopolymers. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Geopolymers 1:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  23. Standard C618 - 03: Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw of Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA (2003).

  24. Jiang W, Roy DM (1992) Hydrothermal processing of new Fly Ash Cement. Am Ceram Soc Bull 71(4):642–647

    Google Scholar 

  25. Silverstrim T, Rostami H et al. Fly Ash Cementitious Material and Method of Making a Product, US Patent 5601643 (1997).

  26. Palomoa A, Grutzeckb MW, Blanco MT (1999) Alkali-activated fly ashes A cement for the future. Cem Concr Res 29:1323–1329

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davidovits J (2002) 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications.Market trends and potential breakthroughs”. Keynote Conference on Geopolymer Conference (2002).

  28. Lee WKW, Van Deventer JSJ (2002) Structural reorganisation of class F fly ash in alkaline silicate solutions. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 211:49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00237-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA (2002) Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material. Appl. Geochem. 17:1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00005-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdullah MMAB, Jamaludin L et al (2012) Fly ash porous material using geopolymerization process for high temperature exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13:4388–4395

    Google Scholar 

  31. MuZek MN, Zelic J, Jozic D (2012) Microstructural characteristics of geopolymers based on alkali-activated fly ash. Chem. Biochem. Eng. 26(2):89–95

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chindaprasirt P, Rattanasak U, Taebuanhuad S (2013) Role of microwave radiation in curing the fly ash geopolymer. Adv Powder Technol 24:703–707

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Z, Provis ZL, Reid A, Wang H (2014) Fly ash-based geopolymers: The relationship between composition, pore structure and efflorescence. Cem Concr Res 64:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  34. Palankar N, Shankar AUR, Mithun BM (2015) Studies on eco-friendly concrete incorporating industrial waste, as aggregates. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 4:378–390

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo AA (2005) Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator. Cem Concr Res. 35:1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Steveson M, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2005) Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers. Part 2 Fly Ash-Derived Inorganic Polymers. J Mater Sci 40:4247–4259

    Google Scholar 

  37. Panias D, Giannopoulou IP (2006) Development of inorganic polymeric materials based on fired coalfly ash. Acta Metall Slovaca 12(2006):321–327

    Google Scholar 

  38. Criado M, Palomo A, A. Ferna´ndez-Jime´nez, (2005) Alkali activation of fly ashes Part 1: Effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of the reaction products. Fuel. 84:2048–2054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL, Duxson P, Lukey GC (2007) Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products. J Hazard Mater A 139:506–513

    Google Scholar 

  40. Provis JL, Yong CZ, Duxson P, Van Deventer JSJ (2009) Correlating mechanical and thermal properties of sodium silicate-fly ash geopolymers. Colloid Surf. A- Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 336:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  41. Joshi SV, Kadu MS (2012) Role of Alkaline Activator in Development of Eco-friendly Fly Ash Based Geo Polymer Concrete. Int. J. of Environ. Sci. Dev. 3:5

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nyale SM, Babajide OO (2013) Synthesis and characterization of coal fly ash-based foamed Geopolymer. Procedia Environ Sci. 18:722–730

    Google Scholar 

  43. Atis CD, Görüret EB et al (2015) Very high strength (120 MPa) class F fly ash geopolymer mortar activated at different NaOH amount, heat curing temperature and heat curing duration. Constr. Build. Mater. 96:673–678

    Google Scholar 

  44. Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2003) The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geopolymers. Mater. Lett. 57:1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00971-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A (2003) Characterisation of fly ashes Potential reactivity as alkaline cements. Fuel. 82:2259–2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00194-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thakur RN, Ghosh S (2009) Effect of mix composition on compressive strengthand microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer composites. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 4:4

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hardjito SSF (2010) Fly ash-based geopolymer mortar incorporating bottom ash. Mod. Appl. Sci. 4:1

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ma X, Zhang Z, Wang A (2016) The transition of fly ash-based geopolymer gels into ordered structures and the effect on the compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 104:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lee H, Vimonsatit V, Chindaprasirt P (2016) Mechanical and micromechanical properties of alkali activated fly-ash cement based on nano-indentation. Constr. Build. Mater. 107:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development andProperties of Low Calcium Fly Ash-Based GeopolymerConcrete, Research Report GC 1. Curtin University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  51. Škvára F, Jílek T, Kopecký L (2005) Geopolymer materials based on fly ash. Ceram− Silik 49(3): 195–204

  52. Davidovits J, Sawyer JL (1985) Early High-strength Mineral Polymer, US Patent4509985

  53. Lippmaa E, Megi M, Samoson A, Engelhardt G, Grimmer AR (1980) Structural studies of silicates by solid-state high-resolution silicon-29 NMR. J Am Chem Soc 102:4889

    Google Scholar 

  54. Klinowski J (1984) Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of zeolites. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectros. 16:237–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(84)80007-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu H (2002) Geopolymerisation of Aluminosilicate Minerals. The University ofMelbourne, Melbourne http://hdl.handle.net/11343/38811

  56. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, Criado M (2005) Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: a descriptive model. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Provis JL. Modelling the formation of geopolymers. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne (2006) http://cat.lib.unimelb.edu.au/record=b3029741

  58. Davidovits J (2005) Geopolymer chemistry and sustainable development. the poly(sialate) trminology : a very useful and simple model for the promotion and understanding of green-chemistry, geopolymer, green chemistry and sustainable development solutions, saint-quentin. France: InstitutGéopolymère p. 9–15.

  59. Loewenstein W (1954) The distribution of aluminium in the tetrahedra of silicates and aluminates. Am Mineral 39(1–2):92–96

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fernández-Jiménez AM, Palomo A, Hombrados LC (2006) Engineering Properties of Alkali activated Fly Ash Concrete,ACI Mater J, 103(2): 106–112 http://worldcat.org/oclc/13846872

  61. Chancey RT, Stutzman P et al (2010) Comprehensive phase characterization of crystalline and amorphous phases of a Class F fly ash. Cem Concr Res 40:146–156

    Google Scholar 

  62. Konstantinos A (2011) Komnitsas, Potential of geopolymer technology towards green buildings and sustainable cities. Procedia Eng 21:1023–1032

    Google Scholar 

  63. Buchwald A, Zellmann HD, Kaps C (2011) Condensation of aluminosilicate gels—model system for geopolymer binders. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:1376–1382

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang Z, H. Wang H, J.L Provis, (2012) Quantitative study of the reactivity offly ash in geopolymerization by FTIR. J. Sustain. Cem. -Based Mater. 1(4):154–166

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bhardwaj P, Gupta R, Mishra D, Amritphale SS (2018) Quadrifunctionality variation of Aluminosilicate silicon nucleus on solid state Geopolymerisation observed by 29si magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Silicon. 11(4):2127–2133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-0032-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gupta R, Bhardwaj P, Mishra D, Prasad M, Amritphale SS (2017) Formulation of mechanochemically evolved fly ash based hybrid inorganic–organic geopolymers with multilevel characterization. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 27(2):385–398

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shall HE, Somasundaran P (1984) Physico-chemical aspects of grinding: a review of use of additives. Powder Technol. 38:275–293

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gupta R, Bhardwaj P, Mishra D, Mudgal M, Chouhan RK, Prasad M, Amritphale SS (2016) Evolution of Advanced Geopolymeric Cementitious Material via novel process. Adv. Cem. Res. 29(3):125–134. https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.16.00113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bhardwaj P, Gupta R, Mishra D, Mudgal M, Amritphale SS (2017) Synthesis of advanced phosphatic geopolymers utilizing fly ash via greener route. Emerg Mater Res 6(1):168–177

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bouzoubaa N, Zhang MH, Bilodeau A, Malhotra VM (1997) Effect of grinding on the physical properties of fly ashes and a Portland cement clinker. Cem Concr Res 27(12):1861–1874

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ruan Y, Pan G, Gao Q (1997) Study of super high strength concrete by adding ground ultrafine fly ash. Dalian LigongDaxueXuebao/J Dalian Univ Technol 37:1

    Google Scholar 

  72. Paya J, Monzo J et al (1995) Mechanical treatment of fly ashes: Part I Physico-chemical characterization of ground fly ashes. CemConcr Res 25:1469–1479

    Google Scholar 

  73. Paya J, Monzo J et al (1997) Mechanical treatments of fly ashes. Part 3: Studies on strength development of ground fly ashes (GFA)—Cement mortars. Cem Concr Res 27(9):1365–1377

    Google Scholar 

  74. Murai H, Kobayashi T, Nagaoka S (1997) The application of classified fly ash to self-compacting concrete. SementoKonkuritoRonbunshu 51:316–321

    Google Scholar 

  75. Erdoğan TY (1997) Admixtures for concrete. Middle East Technical University Press, Ankara, p 188

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kiattikomol K, Jaturapitakkul C, Songpiriyakij S, Chutubtim S (2001) A study of ground coarse fly ashes with different fineness from various sources as puzzolanic materials. Cem Concr Compos 23:335–343

    Google Scholar 

  77. Suryanarayana C (2001) Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog Mater Sci 46:1–184

    Google Scholar 

  78. Chindaprasit P, Homwuttiwong S, Sirivivatnanon V (2003) Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 34:1087–1092

    Google Scholar 

  79. Chindaprasirt P, Chai J, Sinsiri T (2005) Effect of fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended cement paste. Cem Concr Res 27:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  80. Baomin W, Li-Jiu W. Development of studies and applications of activation techniques of fly ash. In: Proceedings of the international conference ‘World of Coal Ash’ (2005) 159–69.

  81. Kumar S, Kumar R, Alex TC, Bandopadhyay A, Mehrotra SP (2007) Influence of reactivity of fly ash on geopolymerisation. Adv Appl Ceram 106(3):120–127

    Google Scholar 

  82. Komnitsas K, Zaharaki D (2007) Geopolymerisation: a reviewand prospects for the minerals industry. Miner Eng 20(2007):1261–1277

    Google Scholar 

  83. Paul KT, Satpathyet SK et al (2007) Preparation and Characterization of Nano structured Materials from Fly ash: A Waste from Thermal Power Stations, by High Energy Ball Milling. Nanoscale Res Lett 2:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  84. Xiaoru F, Qin L, Jianping Z, Guanghong S, Feihu L (2008) The physical–chemical characterization of mechanically-treated CFBC fly ash. Cem ConcrCompos 30:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  85. Temuujin J, Williams RP, Riessen AV (2009) Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. J Mater Process Technol 209:5276–5280

    Google Scholar 

  86. Chatterjee AK. Indian fly ashes, their characteristics, and potential for mechano-chemical activation for enhanced usability, proceedings second international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies. UniversitaPolitecnicadelleMaeche, Ancona, Italy(2010).

  87. Kiatsuda S, Chai J, Puangrat K, Chindaprasirt P (2011) NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Fuel 90(6):2118–2124

    Google Scholar 

  88. Sharma A, Srivastava K, Devra V, Rani A (2012) Modification in properties of fly ash through mechanical and chemical activation. Am Chem Sci J 2(4):177–187

    Google Scholar 

  89. Hela R, Orsakova D (2013) The mechanical activation of fly ash, Concrete and concrete structures. Procedia Eng 65:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  90. Bhardwaj P, Gupta R, Mishra D, Mudgal M, Amritphale SS. 27Al NMR MAS spectral studies inferring the initiation of geopolymerization reaction on together mechanochemical grinding of raw materials. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. (2017).

  91. Zdujić M (2001) Mechanochemical treatment ofinorganicmaterials. Hem Ind 55(5):191–206

    Google Scholar 

  92. Bhardwaj P, Gupta R, Mishra D, Sanghi SK, Verma S, Amritphale SS (2019) Corrosion and fire protective behavior of advanced phosphatic geopolymeric coating on mild steel substrate. Silicon 12:487–500

    Google Scholar 

  93. Nath SK, Kumar S (2019) Role of alkali concentration on reaction kinetics of fly ashgeopolymerization. J Non-Cryst Solids 505:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  94. Bong SH, Nematollahi B, Nazari A, Xia M, Sanjayan JG (2019) Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D Printable Geopolymer Cured in Ambient Temperature. RILEM Bookseries 19:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  95. Puligilla S, Chen X, Mondal P (2018) Understanding the role of silicate concentration on the early-age reaction kinetics of a calcium containing geopolymeric binder. Constr Build Mater 191:206–215

    Google Scholar 

  96. Alrefaei Y, Wang Y-S, Dai JG (2019) The effectiveness of different superplasticizers in ambient cured one-part alkali activated pastes. Cem Concr Compos 97:166–174

    Google Scholar 

  97. Zhao M, Zhang G, Htet KW, Kwon M, Liu C, Xu Y, Tao M (2019) Freeze-thaw durability of red mud slurry-class F fly ash-based geopolymer: Effect of curing conditions. Constr Build Mater 215:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  98. Hwang CL, Yehualaw MD, Vo DH, Huynh TP (2019) Development of high-strength alkali-activated pastes containing high volumes of waste brick and ceramic powder. Constr Build Mater 218:519–529

    Google Scholar 

  99. Zhang J, Feng Q (2020) The making of Class C fly ash as high-strength precast construction material through geopolymerization. Mining Metall Explor 37:1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00283-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Hajimohammadi A, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2011) The effect of silica availability on the mechanism of geopolymerisation. Cem Concr Res 41:210–216

    Google Scholar 

  101. Gupta R, Bhardwaj P, Deshmukh K, Mishra D, Prasad M, Amritphale SS (2019) Development and characterization of inorganic-organic (Si-O-Al) hybrid geopolymeric precursors via solid state method. SILICON 11(1):221–232

    Google Scholar 

  102. Gupta R, Tomar AS, Mishra D, Sanghi SK (2020) Multinuclear MAS NMR characterization of fly-ash-based advanced sodium aluminosilicate geopolymer: Exploring solid-state reactions. ChemistrySelect 5(16):4920–4927

    Google Scholar 

  103. Bhardwaj P, Gupta R, Deshmukh K, Mishra D (2021) Optimization studies and characterization of advanced geopolymer coatings for the fabrication of mild steel substrate by spin coating technique, Indian. J Chem Technol 28:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  104. Gupta R, Tomar AS, Mishra D, Sanghi SK (2021) Multifaceted geopolymer coating: Material development, characterization and study of long term anti-corrosive properties. Micropor Mesopor Mat 317:110995

    Google Scholar 

  105. Gupta R, Bhardwaj P, Mishra D, Sanghi SK, Amritphale SS (2021) Novel non-hydroxyl synthesis and fabrication of advanced hybrid inorganic-organic geopolymeric coating material for corrosion protection. Int JAdhes Adhes 110:102951

    Google Scholar 

  106. Gupta R, Tomar AS, Mishra D, Sanghi SK (2020) Multinuclear MAS NMR characterization of fly-ash-based advanced sodium aluminosilicate geopolymer: Exploring solid-state reactions. ChemistrySelect 5:4920–4927

    Google Scholar 

  107. Hager I, Sitarz M, Mroz K (2021) Fly-ash based geopolymer mortar for high-temperature application – Effect of slag addition. J Clean Prod 316:128168

    Google Scholar 

  108. Nuaklong P, Janprasit K, Jongvivatsakul P (2021) Enhancement of strengths of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer containing borax with rice husk ash. J Build Eng 40:102762

    Google Scholar 

  109. Rashad AM, Gharieb M (2021) Valorization of sugar beet waste as an additive for fly ash geopolymer cement cured at room temperature. J Build Eng 44:102989

    Google Scholar 

  110. Chiranjeevi K, Vijayalakshmi MM, Praveenkumar TR. Investigation of fly ash and rice husk ash‑based geopolymer concrete using nano particles, Appl. Nanosci.(2021)

  111. Hosseini S, Brake NA, Nikookar M, Gunaydın-Sen O, Snyder HA (2021) Mechanochemically activated bottom ash-fly ash geopolymer. Cem Concr Compos 118:103976

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, CSIR Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute, Bhopal, for his kind support and motivation.

Funding

This work was supported by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR, India under grant number- MLP-206.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Pooja Bhardwaj made substantial contributions to conception and design with acquisition of data analysis and interpretation, Rainy Gupta have been involved in drafting the manuscript with revising it critically for important intellectual content, TS Shabi and Chetna Dhand are involved in the editing related to the manuscript, Deepti Mishra provide acquisition of funding and given final approval of the version to be published with the supervision of the research group.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainy Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Authors of this paper declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors provide their consent to participate in this review work.

Consent for publication

Applicable as per the norms and standards of journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhardwaj, P., Gupta, R., Salammal, S.T. et al. Recent trends in mechanochemical processing of fly ash aluminosilicate materials (geopolymers): advancement, challenges, and opportunities. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 26, 1–19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01817-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01817-2

Keywords

Navigation