Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental policy and legal framework for controlling mercury emissions from stationary sources: a case study in Taiwan

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: REGIONAL CASE STUDY
  • Mercury cycles and their management
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the Taiwan government partnered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Global Mercury Partnership program to follow the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Due to the most important mercury (Hg) emissions from the stationary vent streams, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) has promulgated the strict standards and limits for industrial facilities. In this work, the legal framework for Hg control will focus on the main generators, including coal-fired power plants, cement-manufacturing plants, metal-smelting plants, and waste incineration plants, under the Air Pollution Control Act and the Waste Management Act. Based on the official survey data, the updated analysis of inventory Hg emissions in Taiwan was performed to echo the sustainable material management of Hg-containing waste by the recovery methods, showing a downward trend in the Hg emissions during the period of 2016–2020. To reduce the discharge into the atmospheric environment, the multiple air pollution control devices for Hg emissions from the main stationary sources in Taiwan were also reviewed in this work. Some recommendations for controlling Hg emissions from the stationary sources were also addressed to provide for the policy makers, environmental engineers, and process manager.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in the article. Besides, the datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Raj D, Maiti SK (2019) Sources, toxicity, and remediation of mercury: an essence review. Environ Monit Assess 191:566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beckers F, Rinklebe J (2017) Cycling of mercury in the environment: sources, fate, and human health implications: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:693–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sundseth K, Jozef M, Pacyna JM, Pacyna EG, Pirrone N, Thorne RJ (2017) Global sources and pathways of mercury in the context of human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saturday A (2018) Mercury and its associated impacts on environment and human health: a review. J Environ Health Sci 4(2):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mercury and Health (World Health Organization) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mercury-and-health Accessed 27 Oct 2022

  6. Sakamoto M, Tatsuta N, Izumo K, Phan PT, Vu LD, Yamamoto M, Nakamura M, Nakai K, Murata K (2018) Health impacts and biomarkers of prenatal exposure to methylmercury: lessons from Minamata. Japan Toxics 6:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perrez FX (2020) The role of the United Nations Environment Assembly in emerging issues of international environmental law. Sustainability 12:5680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang SW, Chen CY, Chen MH (2008) Total and organic Hg in fish from the reservoir of a chlor-alkali plant in Tainan. Taiwan J Food Drug Anal 16(2):75–80

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crook J, Mousavi A (2016) The chlor-alkali process: a review of history and pollution. Environ Forensics 17:211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lakshmanan S, Murugesan T (2014) The chlor-alkali process: work in progress. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai WT (2016) Analysis of municipal solid waste incineration plants for promoting power generation efficiency in Taiwan. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai WT (2022) Multimedia pollution prevention of mercury-containing waste and articles: case study in Taiwan. Sustainability 14:1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) (2016) Implementation plan for the Minamata convention on mercury in Taiwan (in Chinese) EPA Taipei Taiwan. https://topic.epa.gov.tw/hg/cp-94-147-c87d5-3.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2022

  14. Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) (2021) Implementation plan for the Minamata convention on mercury in Taiwan—2020 implementation results (in Chinese) EPA Taipei Taiwan. https://topic.epa.gov.tw/hg/cp-94-147-c87d5-3.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2022

  15. Nansai K, Oguchi M, Suzuki N, Kida A, Nataami T, Tanaka C, Haga M (2012) High-resolution inventory of Japanese anthropogenic mercury emissions. Environ Sci Technol 46:4933–4940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takiguchi H, TamuraT, (2018) Mercury emission control in Japan. Asian J Atmos Environ 12:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sung JL, Seo YC, Jurng J, Hong JH, Park JW, Hyun JE, Lee TG (2004) Mercury emissions from selected stationary combustion sources in Korea. Sci Total Environ 325:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JH, Park JM, Lee SB, Pudasainee D, Seo YC (2010) Anthropogenic mercury emission inventory with emission factors and total emission in Korea. Atmos Environ 44:2714–2721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pudasainee D, Seo YC, Kim JH, Hong JH, Park JM (2014) National inventory of mercury release into different phase media estimated by UNEP toolkit in South Korea. Atmos Pollut Res 5:630–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sung JH, Oh JS, Mojammal AHM, Back SK, Lee ES, Kim SH, Seo YC (2018) Estimation and future prediction of mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources in South Korea. J Chem Eng Japan 51:800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Takaoka M, Takeda N, Fujiwara T, Kurata M, Kimura T (2002) Control of mercury emissions from a municipal solid waste incinerator in Japan. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52:931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu W, Shao M, Yang Y, Liu R, Wu Y, Zhu T (2017) Mercury emission from sintering process in the iron and steel industry of China. Fuel Process Technol 159:340–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Charvát P, Klimeš L, Pospíšil J, Klemeš JJ, Varbanov PS (2020) An overview of mercury emissions in the energy industry—a step to mercury footprint assessment. J Clean Prod 267:122087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shih YH, Tseng CH (2015) Co-benefits of mercury reduction in Taiwan: a case study of clean energy development. Sustain Sci 10:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Laws and Regulation Retrieving System (Ministry of Justice, Taiwan) https://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/index.aspx Accessed 13 October 2022

  26. Yokoyama T, Asakura K, Matsuda H, Ito S, Noda N (2000) Mercury emissions from a coal–fired power plant in Japan. Sci Total Environ 259:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Industrial Waste Reporting and Management Information System (Environmental Protection Administration, Taiwan) https://waste.epa.gov.tw/RWD/ Accessed 23 October 2022

  28. Tsai WT (2020) Recycling of waste electrical & electronic equipment (WEEE) and its toxics-containing management in Taiwan—a case study. Toxics 8:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu W, Vidic RD, Brown TD (2000) Impact of flue gas conditions on mercury uptake by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol 34:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chou CP, Chang TC, Chiu CH, His HC (2018) Mercury speciation and mass distribution of cement production process in Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res 18:2801–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo J, Chen YL, Chen BQ (2020) Investigations on mercury emissions and waste recycling in the cement industry (in Chinese). Sinotech Eng 149:50–64

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chou CP, Chiu CH, Chang TC, His HC (2021) Mercury speciation and mass distribution of coal-fired power plants in Taiwan using different air pollution control processes. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 71:553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee SX, Huang CF, His HC, Wang HC, Chen W (2009) Investigations on mercury distribution of electric arc processes in the iron-making industry (in Chinese). Ind Pollut Control 109:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  34. Solid Waste Incinerator Management System (Environmental Protection Administration, Taiwan) https://swims.epa.gov.tw/ Accessed 27 October 2022

  35. Takaoka M, Oshita K, Takeda N, Morisawa S (2010) Mercury emission from crematories in Japan. Atmos Chem Phys 10:3665–3671

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WTT initiated the work and drafted the manuscript. CHT analyzed the data. YHS reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Tien Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, WT., Tsai, CH. & Shen, YH. Environmental policy and legal framework for controlling mercury emissions from stationary sources: a case study in Taiwan. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 2716–2725 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01665-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01665-0

Keywords

Navigation