Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biological stability assessment of MSW organic fractions by means of respirometric and germination tests

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Composting is the mostly applied method for recovering the organic waste by producing an organic soil conditioner. Furthermore, the organic fraction of unsorted municipal solid waste (OFMSW) should be treated in mechanical biological treatment (MBT) plants in view of reducing its environmental impacts. In both cases, it is essential the assessment of biological stability as well as the phytotoxicity of the final product. The aim of this work was to evaluate the maturity evolution during the composting process of OFMSW at full scale. Samples were collected from two Sicilian (Italy) plants and were subjected to the following analytical measures: volatile solids (VS), dynamic respirometric index (DRI), carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio and germination index (GI). Results showed that some parameters such as pH and water content values can affect the respirometric test response and the proper activity of microorganisms responsible for biodegradation at full scale. For the unsorted waste, the DRI values suggested that depending on the initial values the stabilization duration might be increased prior to landfilling. DRI revealed to be effective for the assessment of the matrix stability, even if the simultaneous measurements of different indices can provide a reliable information of biological stability and maturity of the organic matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. IPPC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: waste generation, composition and management data. www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/0_Overview/V0_1_Overview.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2009.

  2. Di Trapani D, Volpe M, Di Bella G et al (2019) Assessing methane emission and economic viability of energy exploitation in a typical Sicilian municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Biomass Valor 10:3173–3184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0321-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thorneloe SA, Pacey JG (1994) Landfill gas utilization – database of North American projects. In: Proceedings of 17th Annual Landfill Gas Symposium, Solid Waste Association of North America, Silver Spring, Maryland, pp. 197 – 208.

  4. EC/99/31 European Community Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, Official Journal L 182, 0001–0019 (16/07/ 1999)

  5. Mahapatra S, Ali MH, Samal K (2022) Assessment of compost maturity-stability indices and recent development of composting bin. Energy Nexus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jara-Samaniego J, Pérez-Murcia MD, Bustamante MA et al (2017) Composting as sustainable strategy for municipal solid waste management in the Chimborazo Region, Ecuador: suitability of the obtained composts for seedling production. J Clean Prod 141:1349–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer-Kohlstock D, Schmitz T, Kraft E (2015) Organic waste for compost and biochar in the EU: mobilizing the potential. Resources 4:457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meena MD, Joshi PK, Jat HS et al (2016) Changes in biological and chemical properties of saline soil amended with municipal solid waste compost and chemical fertilizers in a mustard – pearl millet cropping system. CATENA 140:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pérez DV, Alcantara S, Ribeiro CC et al (2007) Composted municipal waste effects on chemical properties of a Brazilian soil. Bioresour Technol 98:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Farto M et al (2015) Sewage sludge, compost and other representative organic wastes as agricultural soil amendments: benefits versus limiting factors. Waste Manag 40:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarenga P, Palma P, Gonçalves AP et al (2007) Evaluation of chemical and ecotoxicological characteristics of biodegradable organic residues for application to agricultural land. Environ Int 33:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosenza A, Di Bella G, Torregrossa M, Viviani G (2018) Biological stability of organic fraction of municipal solid wastes during composting processes. Environ Eng Sci 35:1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2017.0442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Münnich K, Mahler CF, Fricke K (2006) Pilot project of mechanical-biological treatment of waste in Brazil. Waste Manag 26:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DM 27/09/2010 - Definizione dei criteri di ammissibilita’ dei rifiuti in discarica

  15. Evangelou A, Calabro PS, Greco R et al (2016) Biodegradation activity of eight organic substrates: a correlation study of different test methods. Waste Biomass Valor 7:1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9532-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bożym M, Siemiątkowski G (2020) Assessment of composition changes, stability degree and the potential of biogas formation of sewage sludge composts during maturation process. Waste Biomass Valor 11:4081–4091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00736-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lasaridi KE, Stentiford ED (1996) Respirometric techniques in the context of compost stability assessment: principles and practice. In: de Bertoldi M (ed) The science of composting. Part 1. Blakie Academic and Professional, London, UK, pp 567–576

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lasaridi K, Stentiford E (1998) A simple respirometric technique for assessing compost stability. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00143-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iannotti DA, Pang T, Toth BL et al (1993) A quantitative respirometric method for monitoring compost stability. Compost Sci Util 1(3):52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller W, Fricke K, Vogtmann H (1998) Biodegradation of organic matter during mechanical biological treatment of MSW. Compost Sci Util 6:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.1998.10701930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonowal P, Khwairakpam M, Kalamdhad AS (2014) Stability analysis of dewatered sludge of pulp and paper mill during vermicomposting. Waste Biomass Valor 5:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9225-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wichuk KM, McCartney D (2010) Compost stability and maturity evaluation - a literature review. Can J Civ Eng 37:1505–1523. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barrena R, Font X, Gabarrell X, Sánchez A (2014) Home composting versus industrial composting: influence of composting system on compost quality with focus on compost stability. Waste Manag 34:1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brinton WF (2000) Compost quality standards and guidelines. Woods End Res Lab Inc

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adani F, Genevini P, Tambone F (1995) A new index of organic matter stability. Compost Sci Util 3:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Avnimelech Y, Bruner M, Ezrony I et al (1996) Stability indexes for municipal solid waste compost. Compost Sci Util 4:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chanyasak V, Kubota C (1981) Carbon/organic nitrogen ratio in water extract as measure of composting degradation. J Ferment Technol 59:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iannotti DA, Toth L, Hoitink HAJ (1992) Compost stability. Biocycle 33(11):62–66

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cerda A, Artola A, Font X et al (2017) Composting of food wastes: status and challenges. Bioresour Technol 248:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Colón J, Ponsá S, Álvarez C et al (2017) Analysis of MSW full-scale facilities based on anaerobic digestion and/or composting using respiration indices as performance indicators. Bioresour Technol 236:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Das KC, Smith MC, Gattie DK, Hale Boothe DD (2002) Stability and quality of municipal solid waste com_post from a landfill aerobic bio reduction process. Adv Environ Res 6:401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Villaseñor J, Pérez MA, Fernández FJ, Puchalski CM (2011) Monitoring respiration and biological stability during sludge composting with a modified dynamic respirometer. Bioresour Technol 102:6562–6568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pognani M, Barrena R, Font X et al (2010) Monitoring the organic matter properties in a combined anaerobic/aerobic full-scale municipal source-separated waste treatment plant. Bioresour Technol 101:6873–6877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adani F, Confalonieri R, Tambone F (2004) Dynamic respiration index as a descriptor of the biological stability of organic wastes. J Environ Qual 1876:1866–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cossu R, Raga R (2008) Test methods for assessing the biological stability of biodegradable waste. Waste Manag 28:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. APHA AWWA WPCF (1985) Test on sludges: oxygen-consumption rate. In: APHA, AWWA, WPCF (eds.) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, APHA, AWWA, WPCF, 16th edition pp. 127–129.

  37. ASTM (1996) Standard test method for determining the stability of compost by measuring oxygen consumption. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 5975–5996

    Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM (1992) Standard test method for determining aerobic biodegradation of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 5338–5392

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leege PB, Thompson WH (1998). Test methods for the examination of composting and compost. Environ Sci Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5068-2_22

  40. Adani F, Lozzi P, Genevini P (2001) Compost science and utilization determination of biological stability by oxygen uptake on municipal solid waste and derived products. Compost Sci Util. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2001.10702031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Scaglia B, Acutis M, Adani F (2010) Precision determination for the dynamic respirometric index (DRI ) method used for biological stability evaluation on municipal solid waste and derived products. Waste Manag 31:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. D’Imporzano G, Crivelli F, Adani F (2008) Biological compost stability influences odor molecules production measured by electronic nose during food-waste high-rate composting. Sci Total Environ 402:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Scaglia B, Adani F (2008) Sustainable landfill and biological stability, In: Lvelle JR (ed) Waste management: research, technology and developments. © 2008 Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp 1–35, ISBN 978-1-60021-256-9

  44. UNI (Italian Organization for Standardization) (2006) Potential dynamic respiration index (PDRI) determined using method UNI/TS 11184:2006 (Waste and Refuse Derived Fuels – Determination of Biological Stability by Dynamic Respirometric Index) UNI, Milan

  45. Calabrò PS, Fazzino F, Pangallo D (2021) How does separate collection efficiency influence biological stability of commingled Italian municipal solid waste ? Sustain Chem Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cesaro A, Conte A, Belgiorno V et al (2019) The evolution of compost stability and maturity during the full-scale treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J Environ Manag 232:264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. UNI 11184:2016 - Rifiuti e combustibili ricavati da rifiuti - Determinazione della stabilità biologica mediante l’Indice di Respirazione Dinamico (IRD)

  48. APAT (2003) Manuali e Linee Guida 20/2003 - Metodi microbiologici di analisi del compost

  49. ANPA (2001) Manuali e Linee guida 03/2001 - Metodi di analisi del compost

  50. D.Lgs.75/2010 Decreto Legislativo 29 aprile 2010, n. 75. Riordino e revisione della disciplina in materia di fertilizzanti a norma dell’articolo 13 della legge 7 luglio 2009, n. 88.

  51. Kazemi K, Zhang B, Lye LM et al (2016) Design of experiment (DOE) based screening of factors affecting municipal solid waste (MSW) composting. Waste Manag 58:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cesaro A, Belgiorno V, Guida M (2015) Compost from organic solid waste: quality assessment and European regulations for its sustainable use. Resour Conserv Recycl 94:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Adani F, Ubbiali C, Generini P (2006) The determination of biological stability of composts using the dynamic respiration index: the results of experience after two years. Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.025.2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. D.Lgs.121/2020 Decreto Legislativo 3 settembre 2020, n. 121. Attuazione della direttiva (UE) 2018/850

  55. Makan A, Assobhei O, Mountadar M (2013) Effect of initial moisture content on the in-vessel composting under air pressure of organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Morocco. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  56. Guo R, Li G, Jiang T et al (2012) Effect of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost. Bioresour Technol 112:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Mrs Rosa D’Addelfio for the precious help with analytical procedures. Authors warmly thank LorellaCiaccio, Giuseppe Di Salvo, Erika Craparo and Gabriella Patti for the precious support with experimental campaigns.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering (DI), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed 8, Palermo, Italy

    Daniele Di Trapani, Alida Cosenza, Federica De Marines & Gaspare Viviani

Authors
  1. Daniele Di Trapani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alida Cosenza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Federica De Marines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gaspare Viviani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica De Marines.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Trapani, D., Cosenza, A., De Marines, F. et al. Biological stability assessment of MSW organic fractions by means of respirometric and germination tests. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 25, 1142–1152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01602-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-023-01602-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation