Skip to main content
Log in

Service life of sewage culvert with bacteria coating from waste sludge and negative pressure method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a bacteria coating resistant to sulfate attack using materials with bacteria immobilization has been developed. For core coating material, Rhodobacter capsulatus, slime-forming bacteria collected from sediment sludge in sewage was used. For cement substitute materials, FA and GGBFS, by-products from coal combustion and steel manufacturing were used. Based on the sulfate ion diffusion coefficient of the bacteria coating, deterioration analysis with two methods was performed, and the service life changes were analyzed with the design parameters such as coating thickness and bacterial replacement ratio. The predicted service life of the bacteria coating by the deterioration depth evaluation shows an increase to 301–559% considering normal repair materials when the bacterial replacement ratio was 35% and the coating thickness changed from 5 to 20 mm. With the multi-layer method, it increases to 485% with the coating thickness change from 5 to 20 mm in the same replacement ratio. Through the quantification of predicted service life, the results showed that the effect of replacement ratio on service life was greater than that of the coating thickness, and the coating with more than 20% replacement ratio of immobilization was very effective for service life extension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwon SJ, Na UJ (2011) Prediction of durability for RC columns with crack and joint under carbonation based on probabilistic approach. Int J Concr Struct M 5(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Broomfield JP (2006) Corrosion of steel in concrete: understanding, investigation and repair. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas (1996) Chloride thresholds in marine concrete. Cem Concr Res 26:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maekawa K, Ishida T, Kishi T (2003) Multi-scale modeling of concrete performance. J Adv Concr Technol 1:91–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. European Committee for Standardization (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structure (EN-1992-1-1). Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), Brussels

  6. American Concrete Institute (2016) Guide to durable concrete (ACI 201.2R-16). American Concrete Institute, Detroit

  7. Japan Society of Civil Engineering (2007) Standard specification for concrete structures. Japan Society of Civil Engineering, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clifton JR, Knab LI (1989) Service life of concrete. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan HA, Castel A, Khan MSH (2020) Corrosion investigation of fly ash based geopolymer mortar in natural sewer environment and sulphuric acid solution. Corros Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadj-meliani H, Elhoud A, Sadou M, Bouledroua O, Azari Z, Pluvinage G (2015) Degradation of sewage pipe caused sinkhole: A real case study in a main road. In: Proceedings of the AFM, Association Francaise de Mecanique, Lyon, 24–28 August

  11. Zhang M, Yang LM, Guo JJ, Liu WL, Chen HL (2018) Mechanical properties and service life prediction of modified concrete attacked by sulfate corrosion. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8907363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atkinson A, Hearne JA (1989) Mechanistic model for the durability of concrete barriers exposed to sulphate-bearing groundwaters. MRS Online Proc Libr Arch 176:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HJ, Cho MS, Lee JS, Kim DG (2013) Prediction model of life span degradation under sulfate attack regarding diffusion rate by amount of sulfate ions in seawater. Int J Mater Mech Manuf 1:251–255

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang KH, Lim HS, Kwon SJ (2020) Effective bio-slime coating technique for concrete surfaces under sulfate attack. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin S, Zou D, Liu T, Jivkov A (2020) A chemo-transport-damage model for concrete under external sulfate attack. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sotiriadis K, Mácová P, Mazur Anton S, Viani A, Peter MT, Tsivilis S (2020) Long-term thaumasite sulfate attack on Portland-limestone cement concrete: a multi-technique analytical approach for assessing phase assemblage. Cem Concr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.105995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang KH, Yoon HS, Lee SS (2018) Feasibility tests toward the development of protective biological coating mortars. Constr Build Mater 181:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon HS, Yang KH, Lee SS (2021) Evaluation of sulfate resistance of protective biological coating mortars. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Niel CB (1944) The culture, general physiology, morphology, and classification of the non-sulfur purple and brown bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 8(1):1–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Suresh D, Nagaraju K (2015) Ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) in concrete—a review. IOSR J Mech Civ 12(4):76–82

    Google Scholar 

  21. America Concrete Institute (1996) Use of Fly ash in concrete (ACI 232.2R-96). American Concrete Institute, Detroit

  22. Monteny J, Vincke E, Beeldens A, De Belie N, Taerwe L, Van Gemert D, Verstraete W (2000) Chemical, microbiological, and in situ test methods for biogenic sulfuric acid corrosion of concrete. Cem Concr Res 30:623–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aviam O, Bar-Nes G, Zeiri Y, Sivan A (2004) Accelerated biodegradation of cement by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria as a bioassay for evaluating immobilization of low-level radioactive waste. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6031–6036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Figg J (1979) Corrosion of metals in the construction industry. Anti-Corros Method M 26(5):11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Amoudi OSB, Maslehuddin M, Saadi MM (1995) Effect of magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate on the durability performance of plain and blended cements. ACI Mater J 92(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hilsdof HK, Kroff J (1995) Performance criteria for concrete durability (Rilem Report 12). Taylor & Francis, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Tritthart J (1989) Chloride binding in cement, II. The influence of hydroxide concentration in the pore solution of hardened cement paste on chloride binding. Cem Concr Res 19:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Buenfeld NR, Zhang JZ (1998) Chloride diffusion through surface treated mortar specimens. Cem Concr Res 28(5):665–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon HS, Yang KH, Lee KM, Kwon SJ (2021) Service life evaluation for RC sewer structure repaired with bacteria mixed coating: Through probabilistic and deterministic method. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang KH, Kwon SJ, Yoon HS (2021) Enhancement of strength and resistance to sulfate attack in bio-coating material through negative pressure method for bacteria immobilization. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Andrade C, Diez JM, Alonso C (1997) Mathematical modeling of a concrete surface “skin effect” on diffusion in chloride contaminated media. Adv Cem Based Mater 6:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas MDA, Bamforth PB (1999) Modeling chloride diffusion in concrete: Effect of fly ash and slag. Cem Concr Res 29:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas MDA, Bentz EC (2002) Computer program for predicting the service life and life-cycle costs of reinforced concrete exposed to chlorides: Life365 Manual, Silica Fume Association, Virginia

  34. Yoon HS (2021) Characteristics of biomimetic protective coating materials using bacteria slime immobilized by negative pressure for concrete exposed to sulfate attack. Ph.D. Dissertation, Kyonggi University

  35. American Concrete Institute (2019) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–19). American Concrete Institute, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  36. KS F 2438 (2017) Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and poisson's ratio in compression of cylindrical concrete specimens (in Korean). Korean Standards Information Center (KS), South Korea

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant (21SCIP-C158976-02) from Construction Technology Research Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Jun Kwon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, HS., Yang, KH. & Kwon, SJ. Service life of sewage culvert with bacteria coating from waste sludge and negative pressure method. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24, 582–594 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01342-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01342-0

Keywords

Navigation