Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) modeling in bioreactor landfill design and permitting

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • APLAS Seoul 2010
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The practice of operating municipal solid waste landfills as bioreactor landfills has become more common over the past decade. Because simulating moisture balance and flow is more critical in such landfills than in dry landfills, researchers have developed methods to address this problem using the hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model. This paper discusses three methods of applying the HELP model to simulate the percolation of liquids added to landfill waste: the leachate recirculation feature (LRF), the subsurface inflow (SSI) feature, and additional rainfall to mimic liquids addition. The LRF is simple to use but may not be able to bring the landfill to bioreactor conditions. The SSI feature provides a convenient user interface for modeling liquids addition to each layer. The additional rainfall feature provides flexibility to the model, allowing users to estimate the leachate generation rate and the leachate head on bottom liner associated with daily variation in the liquids addition rate. Additionally, this paper discusses several issues that may affect the HELP model, such as the time of model simulation, layers of liquids addition, and the limitations of the HELP model itself. Based on the simulation results, it is suggested that the HELP model should be run over an extended period of time after the cessation of liquids addition in order to capture the peak leachate generation rate and the head on the liner (HOL). From the perspectives of leachate generation and the HOL, there are few differences between single-layer injection and multiple-layer injection. This paper also discusses the limitations of using the HELP model for designing and permitting bioreactor landfills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schroeder PR, Dozier TS, Zappi PA, McEnroe BM, Sjostrom JW, Peyton RL (1994) The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model: engineering documentation for version 3. EPA/600/R-94/168b. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger K, Melchior S, Miehlich G (1996) Suitability of hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model of the US Environmental Protection Agency for the simulation of the water balance of landfill cover systems. Environ Geol 28:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barlaz MA, Ham RK, Schaefer DM (1990) Methane production from municipal refuse: a review of enhancement techniques and microbial dynamics. Crit Rev Environ Control 19:557–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartz KE, Ham RK (1983) Moisture level and movement effects on methane production rates in landfill samples. Waste Manag Res 1:139–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil SA (1993) Integrated solid waste management: engineering principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain P, Townsend TG, Tolaymat TM (2010) Steady-state design of vertical wells for liquids addition at bioreactor landfills. Waste Manag 30:2022–2029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Townsend TG (1995) Leachate recycle at solid waste landfills using horizontal injection. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

  8. Jain P, Powell J, Townsend TG, Reinhart DR (2006) Estimating the hydraulic conductivity of landfilled municipal solid waste using the borehole permeameter test. J Environ Eng ASCE 132:645–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Townsend TG, Miller WL, Earle JFK (1995) Leachate-recycle infiltration ponds. J Environ Eng ASCE 121:465–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Fadel M (1999) Leachate recirculation effects on settlement and biodegradation rates in MSW landfills. Environ Technol 20:121–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jonnalagadda S (2004) Resistivity and time domain reflectrometry sensors for assessing in-situ moisture content in a bioreactor landfill. Master’s thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

  12. Mehta R, Barlaz MA, Yazdani R, Augenstein D, Bryars M, Sinderson L (2002) Refuse decomposition in the presence and absence of leachate recirculation. J Environ Eng ASCE 128:228–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Townsend TG, Miller WL, Lee HJ, Earle JFK (1996) Acceleration of landfill stabilization using leachate recycle. J Environ Eng ASCE 122:263–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zornberg JG, Jernigan BL, Sanglerat TR, Cooley BH (1999) Retention of free liquids in landfills undergoing vertical expansion. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thankfully recognize the assistance of Dr. Peggy Macdonald for her technical editorial contributions. The historical research support of the Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) are recognized.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiyong Xu or Timothy G. Townsend.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Kim, H., Jain, P. et al. Hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) modeling in bioreactor landfill design and permitting. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 14, 38–46 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-011-0035-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-011-0035-8

Keywords

Navigation