Abstract
Inner ear organoids derived from differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells have recently gained momentum as tools to study inner ear development and developmental defects. An additional exciting aspect about this technology is represented by its translational potential, specifically, the use of organoids to validate therapeutics for hearing and balance restoration on human/patient-specific cells. This latter aspect will be briefly discussed here including opportunities and current limitations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The difficult access to human inner ear tissue significantly hinders gaining molecular insights into organ biology and pathophysiology. This information is however critical for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Animal models enable to correlate and address causality between altered physiological responses and molecular/cellular defects, yet, in many cases, the transferability of the findings to humans remains unverified. Cellular models of the inner ear derived from tissue progenitors, stem cell differentiation, or direct reprograming, represent alternative tools to derive human/patient-specific cells, bypassing, for the latter approaches, the hurdles of primary tissue collection [1]. These ex vivo culture systems could be used for disease modeling and for in vitro validation of novel therapies. A number of recent reviews has been published discussing advantages and limitations of many of these approaches, including the history of their development and potential applications [2,3,4,5,6]. We invite the readers to take a look at this literature to gain a better overview of this booming field of research. In this opinion article, we cover exclusively human pluripotent stem cell-derived inner ear organoids. We address the most recent advancements of this technology and provide a candid review of their limitations.
Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Inner Ear Organoids (IEOs)
The combination of a three-dimensional culture system and small molecules/morphogens–guided differentiation enables the differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cells—including embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)—to bona fide inner ear cell types in the so-called inner ear organoids (IEOs) [7,8,9,10]. Sensory epithelia generated in IEOs display remarkable similarities to inner ear organs, in particular vestibular epithelia, with respect to hair cell shape, intercalation of hair cells and supporting cells, hair bundle development, neuronal innervation, and transcriptome. Careful electrophysiological characterization of the murine IEOs determined that hair cells have specific vestibular features [11]. More recently, using a modified guidance protocol, it has been demonstrated that it is possible to promote the differentiation of cochlear-like hair cells, with the bundle morphology, marker expression, and transcriptional identity of human fetal cochlear hair cells [12].
IEOs have several potential applications, many of which have been previously reviewed [2,3,4, 13] (Fig. 1). Here, we only highlight some points of consideration.
A recent set of papers has provided an in-depth characterization of human iPSC-derived IEOs and a first comparison with human inner ear embryonic and fetal samples [12, 14,15,16,17,18]. By comparing single-cell profiling of IEOs, human fetal inner ear and adult vestibular epithelia, as well as by histological comparison, these studies established that in vitro differentiation follows similar timing and dynamics as in vivo. Cells differentiated in IEOs for 50–70 days match marker expression and maturity of weeks 10–12 human development [14, 17]. Further differentiation in culture until days 150–200 brings the maturity of the culture closer to weeks 18–20 of fetal inner ear development, when functionality starts [12]. These studies represent an important step forward for the field; however, more complete human inner ear embryonic/fetal/adult atlases are needed as a reference, in order for these types of studies to give a full picture of the differentiating sensory epithelia and ganglia during human development [19, 20].
The fetal nature of the in vitro–derived cell types is a common feature of all human PSC-derived models [21, 22]. While the temporal window covered is somewhat limited, equivalent to the neonatal stages of mouse development, IEOs offer the unprecedented opportunity to gain insights into molecular mechanisms of human-specific organ/cell biology. Because of their “immature” stage, these models are currently more suitable to address early developmental defects leading to congenital hearing loss than late degenerative events such as age-related hearing loss (Fig. 2). Improving maturity and functionality of these cultures should be a main objective for our field.
Modeling Developmental Defects
The corroboration that in vitro differentiation recapitulates early human organ development and that genes associated with hearing loss are expressed in IEOs [14, 16, 17] has demonstrated the possibility for the use of these models to study defects caused by gene mutations, in particular for monogenic forms of hereditary deafness. The relevant literature for this approach has recently been reviewed [3]. Notably, the differentiation potential of iPSC makes them ideal to model syndromic forms of hearing loss. By generating organoids of the different organs affected by the mutation, one could gain insight into the shared or tissue-specific molecular causes of the disease.
The absence of cell types due to developmental impairment can be difficult to demonstrate and unequivocally link to a mutation if the culture differentiation method is not optimal and suffers from variability in efficiency. The analysis of several lines and genotypes increases confidence in this respect. In addition, the use of isogenic lines as controls may reduce differences across experiments [23] (Fig. 3).
In a recent example, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was exploited to generate a series of mutant lines to study the molecular basis of CHARGE syndrome in IEOs [16]. Here, the authors demonstrated that otic progenitors derived in vitro from a CHD7 knockout line fail to differentiate to sensory epithelia, potentially explaining some of the phenotypes observed in patients.
Gene mutations which result in late degenerative events are more difficult to assess in culture due to issues with maintenance of a “healthy culture” for prolonged times (Fig. 2B). For example, this was observed in the case of mutations in the Tmprss3 gene in mESC-derived IEOs. Specifically, hair cell degeneration was detected just before the culture started to show signs of deterioration [24]. Finally, mild phenotypes such as hair bundle disorganization or cellular polarity defects may be impossible to identify in IEOs as the tissue organization does not have all the stereotypic features and patterns observed in vivo.
As our understanding and control of the system and of the culture conditions improve, addressing gross developmental defects and more subtle phenotypes will become more feasible and reliable.
In Vitro Validation of Therapeutic Strategies for Hearing Restoration
One of the potential applications of IEOs is their use as a platform to validate therapeutic interventions on human/patient-specific cells. Several gene therapy strategies (replacement/augmentation), including gene/base editing, small molecules, and antisense oligonucleotides, have been developed in the last few decades for hearing restoration and have shown promising results in different animal models [25,26,27,28]. Testing of these approaches in IEOs could provide evidence about the transferability of findings across species and a better understanding of their safety and efficacy. Finally, IEOs could also serve as models to comply with the requirement for a reduction in animal experimentation for drug development.
IEOs contain multiple inner ear cell types, including sensory and non-sensory epithelia, otic-like neuroblasts, neurons, glia, mesenchyme, and off-target tissues co-developed in vitro, such as cartilage and epidermis. The cell composition is not generated in “fixed” relative proportions, and spatial organization lacks the consistency of the in vivo counterpart, complicating data interpretation. The type of assays one could perform should therefore be carefully evaluated to account for these current limiting factors.
State-of-the-art-IEOs are suitable for in vitro testing in cases where the cellular target is known and present in the organoid. For example, to evaluate hair cells or supporting cell transduction by adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors and lentiviral vectors or to assess drug uptake. These types of experiments can produce a direct answer regarding cell targeting and provide insights into how to further optimize specificity. In contrast, when the cellular target is not well represented in IEOs, or is unknown, additional optimization of the model is obviously required to avoid false negative results. For example, targeting stria vascularis is likely to be unfeasible currently, as there’s little supporting evidence that a population of equivalent cells differentiates in vitro.
Finally, IEOs offer a model to test the efficacy of gene replacement/editing strategies to correct a genetic mutation. Genome editing of control iPSC lines or iPSC generation from patients’ cells can be used for the establishment of disease models and, in turn, exploited to assess therapeutic efficacy (Fig. 3D). This approach has been successfully utilized in other stem cell models [23, 29, 30], which should serve as guidance for the hearing research field.
IEOs as a Model to Test Drug or Infection Susceptibility
In vitro toxicity screens directly on human cells allow, in principle, for the assessment of ototoxic profiles and the selection of drug candidates that lack unwanted side effects. Functional features required for the assay should however be present and robustly characterized. As of today, cells derived in vitro are fetal-like. The susceptibility of sensory cells to ototoxic drugs at this developmental stage may differ from adults. Moreover, the penetration of drugs across the whole volume of the organoids may be variable depending on the organoid composition and depth of the sensory vesicles. Once these limitations are overcome, IEOs could be used for in vitro testing.
Besides drug ototoxicity, one could also use organoids to assess the effect of infections of pathogenic viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), bypassing the difficulty in accessing postmortem tissues [31], with the advantage of controlled experimental conditions. A recent example analyzed Sars-Cov-2 infection in IEOs [32].
Further optimization is certainly needed to upscale IEOs and in general iPSC-based organoids to medium or high-throughput screening [33, 34]. A first example of a large drug screen (2700 compounds in 20,000 organoids) in human iPSC-derived retinal organoids has been recently reported tackling cone photoreceptor survival. Retinal organoids are among the first models that have been developed [35], are now very advanced, and have been extensively characterized [36]. These studies demonstrate the feasibility of such approaches and provide a roadmap for application in other organoid models.
Assay Readouts
iPSC-derived organoids are usually complex in term of cell composition and large in size and assays based on them require critical thinking [37].
Histological analysis of organoids at selected endpoints is very laborious and low throughput. While sufficient for qualitative assessment, quantification biases can be introduced if not all sections are considered. Alternatively, one could use reporter lines to monitor the presence and quantify the number of selected cell types [12, 38]. Live-fluorescence may be difficult to evaluate with image-based methods in large organoids due to light scattering but could facilitate quantification by alternative approaches, such as flow cytometry.
Single-cell or single nuclei RNA-sequencing approaches are particularly suited to address the issue of organoid heterogeneity, as they enable a refined analysis of the relative abundance of cell types and if/how their gene expression is affected by a genetic mutation or drug treatment [23]. However, cell isolation methods to generate single-cell suspension from organoids could favor the purification of loosely adherent populations at the expenses of tight epithelia, or be too harsh for some cells, resulting in their under-representation.
Finally, when the focus of the experiments goes beyond presence/absence (death/survival) of a selected cell type and the treatment may impact cellular activity/function, ad hoc readouts to measure such effects would need to be implemented. Classical methods for hair cell electrophysiology have been used successfully in IEOs [11, 12], but are difficult to translate to high- or medium-throughput assays. Functional readouts for neuronal activity on two- and three-dimensional multielectrode arrays have been used for brain organoids [39]. These methods may not translate well to IEO cultures where neurons are only a fraction of all cells. Alternatively, genetically encoded calcium indicators such as GCaMP [40] or other biosensors could be used to monitor cellular activity. A careful evaluation of the different quantification methods and their robustness should be performed in order to set up meaningful assays.
Conclusion
IEOs represent complementary tools to animal models to tackle human-specific features of inner ear development and disease (Fig. 4). While at present, IEOs can be used to validate the effect of known mutations and therapeutics on human cells, in the future, they may enable discoveries. This will require more robust protocols, reference atlases for the developing inner ear, optimization of the readouts, and the integration of cutting-edge techniques like co-cultures on organ-on-chip. The establishment of international consortia, the sharing of patient-derived, engineered, reporter lines, and protocols should be reinforced, also by funding agencies, to facilitate the uptake of this technology by different laboratories and to enable this promising field to progress at a rapid pace.
References
Roccio M (2021) Directed differentiation and direct reprogramming: applying stem cell technologies to hearing research. Stem Cells 39:375–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3315
Roccio M, Edge ASB (2019) Inner ear organoids: new tools to understand neurosensory cell development, degeneration and regeneration. Development 146:dev177188. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.177188
Romano DR, Hashino E, Nelson RF (2022) Deafness-in-a-dish: modeling hereditary deafness with inner ear organoids. Hum Genet 141:347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-021-02325-9
Nist-Lund C, Kim J, Koehler KR (2022) Advancements in inner ear development, regeneration, and repair through otic organoids. Curr Opin Genet Dev 76:101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2022.101954
Lou Y, Liu Y, Wu M et al (2023) Inner ear organoids: recent progress and potential applications. Fundamental Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.07.013
Lee MP, Waldhaus J (2022) In vitro and in vivo models: what have we learnt about inner ear regeneration and treatment for hearing loss? Mol Cell Neurosci 120:103736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2022.103736
Koehler KR, Hashino E (2014) 3D mouse embryonic stem cell culture for generating inner ear organoids. Nat Protoc 9:1229–1244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.100
Koehler KR, Mikosz AM, Molosh AI et al (2013) Generation of inner ear sensory epithelia from pluripotent stem cells in 3D culture. Nature 500:217–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12298
Koehler KR, Nie J, Longworth-Mills E et al (2017) Generation of inner ear organoids containing functional hair cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 35:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3840
Nie J, Hashino E (2020) Generation of inner ear organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods Cell Biol 159:303–321
Liu XP, Koehler KR, Mikosz AM et al (2016) Functional development of mechanosensitive hair cells in stem cell-derived organoids parallels native vestibular hair cells. Nat Commun 7:11508. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11508
Moore ST, Nakamura T, Nie J et al (2023) Generating high-fidelity cochlear organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 30:950–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2023.06.006
van der Valk WH, Steinhart MR, Zhang J, Koehler KR (2021) Building inner ears: recent advances and future challenges for in vitro organoid systems. Cell Death Differ 28:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-00678-8
Doda D, Jimenez SA, Rehrauer H et al (2023) Human pluripotent stem cell-derived inner ear organoids recapitulate otic development in vitro. Development 150:dev201865. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201865
Ueda Y, Nakamura T, Nie J et al (2023) Defining developmental trajectories of prosensory cells in human inner ear organoids at single-cell resolution. Development (Cambridge) 150:dev201071. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201071
Nie J, Ueda Y, Solivais AJ, Hashino E (2022) CHD7 regulates otic lineage specification and hair cell differentiation in human inner ear organoids. Nat Commun 13:7053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34759-8
van der Valk WH, van Beelen ESA, Steinhart MR et al (2023) A single-cell level comparison of human inner ear organoids with the human cochlea and vestibular organs. Cell Rep 42:112623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112623
Steinhart MR, van der Valk WH, Osorio D et al (2023) Mapping oto-pharyngeal development in a human inner ear organoid model. Development 150:dev201871. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.201871
Haniffa M, Taylor D, Linnarsson S et al (2021) A roadmap for the Human Developmental Cell Atlas. Nature 597:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03620-1
Bock C, Boutros M, Camp JG et al (2021) The organoid cell atlas. Nat Biotechnol 39:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-00762-x
Kim J, Koo B-K, Knoblich JA (2020) Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21:571–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3
Corsini NS, Knoblich JA (2022) Human organoids: new strategies and methods for analyzing human development and disease. Cell 185:2756–2769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.051
Brancati G, Treutlein B, Camp JG (2020) Resolving neurodevelopmental and vision disorders using organoid single-cell multi-omics. Neuron 107:1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.001
Tang PC, Alex AL, Nie J et al (2019) Defective Tmprss3-associated hair cell degeneration in inner ear organoids. Stem Cell Reports 13:147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.05.014
Géléoc GSG (1979) Holt JR (2014) Sound strategies for hearing restoration. Science 344:1241062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241062
Müller U, Barr-Gillespie PG (2015) New treatment options for hearing loss. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14:346–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4533
Petit C, Bonnet C, Safieddine S (2023) Deafness: from genetic architecture to gene therapy. Nat Rev Genet 24:665–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00597-7
Jiang L, Wang D, He Y, Shu Y (2023) Advances in gene therapy hold promise for treating hereditary hearing loss. Mol Ther 31:934–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.02.001
Geurts MH, Clevers H (2023) CRISPR engineering in organoids for gene repair and disease modelling. Nature Reviews Bioengineering 1:32–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-022-00013-5
Lancaster MA, Huch M (2019) Disease modelling in human organoids. Dis Model Mech 12:dmm039347. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.039347
Gabrielli L, Bonasoni MP, Santini D et al (2014) Human fetal inner ear involvement in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-5960-1-63
Jeong M, Ocwieja KE, Han D et al (2021) Direct SARS-CoV-2 infection of the human inner ear may underlie COVID-19-associated audiovestibular dysfunction. Communications Medicine 1:44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-021-00044-w
Vandana JJ, Manrique C, Lacko LA, Chen S (2023) Human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived organoids for drug discovery and evaluation. Cell Stem Cell 30:571–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.011
Lukonin I, Zinner M, Liberali P (2021) Organoids in image-based phenotypic chemical screens. Exp Mol Med 53:1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00641-8
Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H et al (2011) Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09941
Cowan CS, Renner M, De Gennaro M et al (2020) Cell types of the human retina and its organoids at single-cell resolution. Cell 182:1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.013
Struzyna LA, Watt ML (2021) The emerging role of neuronal organoid models in drug discovery: potential applications and hurdles to implementation. Mol Pharmacol 99:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1124/molpharm.120.000142
Hartman BH, Bӧscke R, Ellwanger DC et al (2018) Fbxo2VHC mouse and embryonic stem cell reporter lines delineate in vitro-generated inner ear sensory epithelia cells and enable otic lineage selection and Cre-recombination. Dev Biol 443:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.08.013
Passaro AP, Stice SL (2021) Electrophysiological analysis of brain organoids: current approaches and advancements. Front Neurosci 14:622137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.622137
Zhang Y, Rózsa M, Liang Y et al (2023) Fast and sensitive GCaMP calcium indicators for imaging neural populations. Nature 615:884–891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05828-9
Meenderink SWF, Shera CA, Valero MD et al (2019) Morphological immaturity of the neonatal organ of corti and associated structures in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 20:461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-019-00734-2
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Prof G. Girotto and Prof P. Gasparini (Burlo Garofolo Trieste, IT) and Prof A. Huber (USZ, Zurich, CH) for enabling the scientific visit of Dr Pianigiani to the inner ear stem cell lab.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Zurich. The research was sponsored by the Zürcher Stiftung für das Hören, the Novartis Foundation for Medical Biological Research (grant#22B133), and the Hearing Restoration Programme (USA Department of Defense; grant# W81xWH211810).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pianigiani, G., Roccio, M. Inner Ear Organoids: Strengths and Limitations. JARO 25, 5–11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00929-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00929-2