Abstract
The lateral superior olive (LSO) is a brainstem nucleus that is classically understood to encode binaural information in high-frequency sounds. Previous studies have shown that LSO cells are sensitive to envelope interaural time difference in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones (Joris and Yin, J Neurophysiol 73:1043–1062, 1995; Joris, J Neurophysiol 76:2137–2156, 1996) and that a subpopulation of LSO neurons exhibit low-threshold potassium currents mediated by Kv1 channels (Barnes-Davies et al., Eur J Neurosci 19:325–333, 2004). It has also been shown that in many LSO cells the average response rate to ipsilateral SAM tones decreases with modulation frequency above a few hundred Hertz (Joris and Yin, J Neurophysiol 79:253–269, 1998). This low-pass feature is not directly inherited from the inputs to the LSO since the response rate of these input neurons changes little with increasing modulation frequency. In the current study, an LSO cell model is developed to investigate mechanisms consistent with the responses described above, notably the emergent rate decrease with increasing frequency. The mechanisms explored included the effects of after-hyperpolarization (AHP) channels, the dynamics of low-threshold potassium channels (KLT), and the effects of background inhibition. In the model, AHP channels alone were not sufficient to induce the observed rate decrease at high modulation frequencies. The model also suggests that the background inhibition alone, possibly from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, can account for the small rate decrease seen in some LSO neurons, but could not explain the large rate decrease seen in other LSO neurons at high modulation frequencies. In contrast, both the small and large rate decreases were replicated when KLT channels were included in the LSO neuron model. These results support the conclusion that KLT channels may play a major role in the large rate decreases seen in some units and that background inhibition may be a contributing factor, a factor that could be adequate for small decreases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam TJ, Finlayson PG, Schwarz DW (2001) Membrane properties of principal neurons of the lateral superior olive. J Neurophysiol 86:922–934
Barnes-Davies M, Barker MC, Osmani F, Forsythe ID (2004) Kv1 currents mediate a gradient of principal neuron excitability across the tonotopic axis in the rat lateral superior olive. Eur J Neurosci 19:325–333
Batra R, Kuwada S, Fitzpatrick DC (1997) Sensitivity to interaural temporal disparities of low- and high-frequency neurons in the superior olivary complex. I. Heterogeneity of responses. J Neurophysiol 78:1222–1236
Beraneck M, Pfanzelt S, Vassias I, Rohregger M, Vibert N, Vidal PP, Moore LE, Straka H (2007) Differential intrinsic response dynamics determine synaptic signal processing in frog vestibular neurons. J Neurosci 27:4283–4296
Blum JJ, Reed MC (1991) Further studies of a model for azimuthal encoding: lateral superior olive neuron response curves and developmental processes. J Acoust Soc Am 90:1968–1978
Boudreau JC, Tsuchitani C (1968) Binaural interaction in the cat superior olive S segment. J Neurophysiol 31:442–454
Boudreau JC, Tsuchitani C (1970) Cat superior olive S-segment cell discharge to tonal stimulation. Contrib Sens Physiol 4:143–213
Bourk TR (1976) Electrical response of neural units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge
Cant NB, Casseday JH (1986) Projections from the anteroventral cochlear nucleus to the lateral and medial superior olivary nuclei. J Comp Neurol 247:457–476
Carney LH (1993) A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat. J Acoust Soc Am 93:401–417
Colburn HS, Moss PJ (1981) Projections to the lateral and medial superior olivary nuclei from the spherical and globular bushy cells of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. In: Syka J, Aitkin L (eds) Neuronal mechanisms of hearing. Plenum, New York, pp 283–288
Day ML, Doiron B, Rinzel J (2008) Subthreshold K + channel dynamics interact with stimulus spectrum to influence temporal coding in an auditory brain stem model. J Neurophysiol 99:534–544
Dreyer A, Delgutte B (2006) Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization. J Neurophysiol 96:2327–2341
Finlayson PG, Caspary DM (1991) Low-frequency neurons in the lateral superior olive exhibit phase-sensitive binaural inhibition. J Neurophysiol 65:598–605
Frisina RD, Smith RL, Chamberlain SC (1990a) Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear Res 44:99–122
Frisina RD, Smith RL, Chamberlain SC (1990b) Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: II. Possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 44:123–141
Gai Y, Doiron B, Rinzel J (2010) Slope-based stochastic resonance: how noise enables phasic neurons to encode slow signals. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000825
Goldberg JM, Brown PB (1969) Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32:613–636
Hewitt MJ, Meddis R (1994) A computer model of amplitude-modulation sensitivity of single units in the inferior colliculus. J Acoust Soc Am 95:2145–2159
Hines ML, Carnevale NT (1997) The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput 9:1179–1209
Johnson DH, Dabak A, Tsuchitani C (1990) Function-based modeling of binaural processing: interaural level. Hear Res 49:301–319
Joris PX (1996) Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive. J Neurophysiol 76:2137–2156
Joris PX, Yin TC (1992) Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 91:215–232
Joris PX, Yin TC (1995) Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. J Neurophysiol 73:1043–1062
Joris PX, Yin TC (1998) Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. III. Comparison with afferent pathways. J Neurophysiol 79:253–269
Leao KE, Leao RN, Sun H, Fyffe RE, Walmsley B (2006) Hyperpolarization-activated currents are differentially expressed in mice brainstem auditory nuclei. J Physiol 576:849–864
Lopez-Poveda EA, Meddis R (2001) A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J Acoust Soc Am 110:3107–3118
Manis PB, Marx SO (1991) Outward currents in isolated ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurosci 11:2865–2880
Melcher JR (1993) The cellular generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge
Mountain DC, Cody AR (1999) Multiple modes of inner hair cell stimulation. Hear Res 132:1–14
Nelson PC, Carney LH (2004) A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am 116:2173–2186
Reed MC, Blum JJ (1990) A model for the computation and encoding of azimuthal information by the lateral superior olive. J Acoust Soc Am 88:1442–1453
Rhode WS, Greenberg S (1994) Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 71:1797–1825
Rothman JS, Manis PB (2003a) Differential expression of three distinct potassium currents in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 89:3070–3082
Rothman JS, Manis PB (2003b) Kinetic analyses of three distinct potassium conductances in ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol 89:3083–3096
Rothman JS, Manis PB (2003c) The roles potassium currents play in regulating the electrical activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol 89:3097–3113
Ryugo DK, Sento S (1991) Synaptic connections of the auditory nerve in cats: relationship between endbulbs of held and spherical bushy cells. J Comp Neurol 305:35–48
Sanes DH (1990) An in vitro analysis of sound localization mechanisms in the gerbil lateral superior olive. J Neurosci 10:3494–3506
Smith PH, Joris PX, Yin TC (1993) Projections of physiologically characterized spherical bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat: evidence for delay lines to the medial superior olive. J Comp Neurol 331:245–260
Smith PH, Joris PX, Yin TC (1998) Anatomy and physiology of principal cells of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) of the cat. J Neurophysiol 79:3127–3142
Smith PH, Joris PX, Carney LH, Yin TC (1991) Projections of physiologically characterized globular bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol 304:387–407
Tollin DJ, Yin TC (2005) Interaural phase and level difference sensitivity in low-frequency neurons in the lateral superior olive. J Neurosci 25:10648–10657
Tsuchitani C (1988a) The inhibition of cat lateral superior olive unit excitatory responses to binaural tone bursts. II. The sustained discharges. J Neurophysiol 59:184–211
Tsuchitani C (1988b) The inhibition of cat lateral superior olive unit excitatory responses to binaural tone bursts. I. The transient chopper response. J Neurophysiol 59:164–183
Tsuchitani C, Boudreau JC (1966) Single unit analysis of cat superior olive S segment with tonal stimuli. J Neurophysiol 29:684–697
Zacksenhouse M, Johnson DH, Williams J, Tsuchitani C (1998) Single-neuron modeling of LSO unit responses. J Neurophysiol 79:3098–3110
Zhou Y, Colburn HS (2010) A modeling study of the effects of membrane afterhyperpolarization on spike interval statistics and on ILD encoding in the lateral superior olive. J Neurophysiol 103:2355–2371
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH-NIDCD DC00100. We thank three anonymous reviewers for many useful suggestions.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0635-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Colburn, H.S. A Modeling Study of the Responses of the Lateral Superior Olive to Ipsilateral Sinusoidally Amplitude-Modulated Tones. JARO 13, 249–267 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0300-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0300-5