Abstract
Inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of various kidney diseases. Kidney perivascular cells (pericytes/fibroblasts) are responsible for producing proinflammatory molecules, promoting immune cell infiltration, and enhancing inflammation. Vascular adhesion protein-1, expressed in kidney perivascular cells, is an ectoenzyme that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of primary amines with the production of hydrogen peroxide in the extracellular space. Our study demonstrated that blocking this enzyme suppressed hydrogen peroxide production and neutrophil infiltration, thereby reducing renal ischemia–reperfusion injury. Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signaling was also observed to play an essential role in the regulation of perivascular inflammation. S1P, which is produced in kidney perivascular cells, is transported into the extracellular space via spinster homolog 2, and then binds to S1P receptor-1 expressed in perivascular cells. Upon injury, inflammatory signaling in perivascular cells is enhanced by this pathway, thereby promoting immune cell infiltration and subsequent fibrosis. Furthermore, inhibition of S1P transport by spinster homolog 2 reduces kidney fibrosis. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors can restore the capacity for erythropoietin production in kidney perivascular cells. Animal data suggested that these drugs could also alleviate kidney and lipid inflammation although the precise mechanism is still unknown. Neuroimmune interactions have been attracting significant attention due to their potential to benefit patients with inflammatory diseases. Vagus nerve stimulation is one of the most promising strategies for harnessing neuroimmune interactions and attenuating inflammation associated with various diseases, including kidney disease. Using cutting-edge tools, the vagal afferents–C1 neurons–sympathetic nervous system–splenic nerve–spleen–kidney axis responsible for kidney protection induced by vagus nerve stimulation was identified in our study. Further research is required to decipher other crucial systems that control kidney inflammation and to determine whether these novel strategies can be applied to patients with kidney disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Acute kidney injury (AKI), which is characterized by a rapid loss of kidney function, affects approximately 10–15% of patients admitted in hospitals, and in intensive care units, its incidence can be as high as 50% [1]. Inflammation plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of AKI [2]. AKI is associated with high morbidity and mortality [3]. Moreover, recent epidemiological and experimental observations have also indicated that AKI can progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD) [4, 5]. Approximately 10% of the population worldwide suffers from CKD, which is associated with sustained inflammation and progressive fibrosis in the kidney [6, 7]. CKD can progress to end-stage kidney disease and is a potential risk factor for cardiovascular disease [8, 9]. Currently, the treatment options available to alleviate AKI are quite limited [1], and even with widespread use of renin–angiotensin system blockers and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, a substantial residual risk of CKD progression remains [10, 11]. Hence, it is important to understand the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of AKI/CKD as it can lead to novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the role of inflammation in kidney disease with potential therapeutic strategies.
Perivascular cells play a crucial role in kidney inflammation
Innate immunity is critical to various types of AKI (e.g., ischemia) [12]. The first step in the infiltration of immune cells into injured kidneys is the interaction between immune cells and adhesion molecules, such as selections, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, expressed in endothelial cells. Blocking this step successfully ameliorated AKI in animal studies [13, 14]; however, translation of this therapeutic concept into clinical settings has not been very successful [15]. Thus, an alternative strategy to block immune cell infiltration is required for the treatment of AKI.
An ectoenzyme, vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1), is a 170–180 kDa homodimeric transmembrane glycoprotein that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of primary amines in the extracellular space (R-CH2-NH2 + O2 + H2O → R-CHO + NH3 + H2O2) [16, 17]. This molecule is known to be important for immune cell infiltration [18, 19], but its mechanism remains unknown. Several researchers along with ourselves, have observed the predominant expression of VAP-1 in perivascular cells (pericytes/fibroblasts) in the kidney and the liver [20, 21]. Pharmacological inhibition of VAP-1 has been observed to reduce rat kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) through the suppression of neutrophil infiltration [20]. Hydrogen peroxide is a critical chemoattractant for neutrophils [22, 23], and our study demonstrated that hydrogen peroxide, a product generated by the VAP-1 enzyme reaction, aggravated AKI by attracting neutrophils into injured kidneys (Fig. 1).
Perivascular cells are also known to contribute to the progression of fibrosis by attracting and navigating immune cells to inflammatory sites [20, 24]. Kidney perivascular cells function as major innate immune sentinels and express adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines upon injury, thereby enhancing immune cell infiltration [24, 25], which results in persistent inflammation and subsequent fibrosis [26]. A recent study conducted by us has demonstrated that sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signaling enhances perivascular inflammation [27]. S1P, which is a product of sphingolipid catabolism, mediates several fundamental cellular functions, such as adhesion, proliferation, and inflammation. S1P is produced by sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2) in kidney perivascular cells, and exported through spinster homolog 2 (Spns2) into the extracellular space. Extracellular S1P then binds to the S1P receptor-1 (S1P1) that is expressed in perivascular cells [27]. The SphK2/S1P/Spns2/S1P1 axis enhances perivascular inflammatory signaling, promoting immune cell infiltration and subsequent fibrosis in the event of kidney injury. A small-molecule Spns2 inhibitor [28], which had been previously developed by us, successfully suppressed inflammatory signaling in kidney perivascular cells and ameliorated kidney fibrosis (Fig. 2). The significance of perivascular inflammatory signaling has been demonstrated in other organs as well. Following injury, pericytes in the lung produce proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines [29], and an inflammatory response in liver pericytes also contributes to inflammation and fibrosis [30, 31]. Hence, perivascular inflammation could serve as a good drug target for the treatment of AKI and CKD.
Kidney perivascular cells perform the additional function of producing erythropoietin (EPO) in response to hypoxia, which binds to erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow and enhances erythropoiesis [32, 33]. In the event of kidney injury, EPO-producing perivascular cells lose their capacity to produce EPO by transdifferentiating into myofibroblasts [32,33,34,35]. This describes the pathophysiology of anemia in CKD. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) can restore the capacity for EPO production [32,33,34]. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and HIF-prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) play major roles in regulating EPO production in kidney perivascular cells [36, 37]. HIF, which consists of an oxygen-sensitive α subunit (HIF-α) and a constitutively expressed β subunit (HIF-β), is a heterodimeric transcription factor. HIF-α is consistently synthesized in cells; however, under normoxic conditions, hydroxylation by HIF-PH at specific proline residues enables recognition of HIF-α by the von Hippel–Lindau–E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, resulting in its degradation. Conversely, hypoxic conditions lead to HIF-α accumulation since the hydroxylation of HIF-α does not occur due to scarcity of oxygen. Then, HIF-α and HIF-β bind to the hypoxia-response element, thereby inducing EPO transcription. In addition to the regulation of EPO transcription, this system induces a broad spectrum of genes important for adaptation to hypoxia in virtually all mammalian cells. Three isoforms of HIF-α (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and HIF-3α) and HIF-PH enzymes (HIF-PH1, HIF-PH2, and HIF-PH3) have been identified, among which the HIF-PH2/HIF-2α axis plays a predominant role in the regulation of EPO production in the kidney [38, 39]. Since HIF-PH enzymes are known to regulate a broad spectrum of genes, and given that HIF-PHIs can affect cells other than EPO-producing kidney perivascular cells, in addition to the effect on EPO induction, HIF-PHIs can have off-target effects, both favorable and unfavorable. Previous exploration of the long-term effect of HIF-PH inhibition in diabetic mice by us [40] demonstrated that the administration of HIF-PHI caused suppressed macrophage infiltration in glomeruli and white adipose tissue, which was accompanied by improved glucose and lipid metabolism, reduced albuminuria, and suppressed epithelial/endothelial damage in the glomeruli. The mechanism by which HIF-PHI suppressed inflammation in glomeruli and white adipose tissue remains unknown; however, in vitro studies have indicated that HIF-1 activation resulted in the suppression of MCP-1 production in mesangial cells. To date, there are no clinical data to directly show that HIF-PHIs suppress inflammation or kidney injury. This discrepancy might be due to, at least in part, the difference between CKD patients with anemia and animal models (e.g., kidney function). Further preclinical and clinical studies investigating the effects of HIF-PHIs on the kidney and whole body are necessary [41, 42].
Perivascular cells play several harmful and beneficial roles (e.g., promoting tubular regeneration) in the kidney. Please refer to a recent review [43] that describes the multiple functions of kidney perivascular cells in physiological and pathophysiological states.
Utilization of neuroimmune interactions to alleviate kidney inflammation
Pharmacological approaches to alleviate kidney inflammation have not met with much success in clinical trials, partly because drug targets are often embedded within pathways that exhibit high redundancy. Excessive immunosuppression by drugs must be avoided in patients with kidney disease because they already have a greater possibility of developing infectious diseases. Thus, nonpharmacological approaches to alleviate kidney inflammation are more eagerly awaited. Among these approaches, the use of neuroimmune interactions is gathering more attention because studies have revealed neural pathways that regulate inflammation [44, 45].
In 1995, Watkins et al. found that subdiaphragmatic vagal transection abolished IL-1β-induced hyperthermia, indicating the activation of vagal afferents caused by peripheral inflammation, to initiate fever response [46]. At the beginning of the 2000s, Kevin Tracey and colleagues demonstrated that a small amount of CNI-1493 (potent antiinflammatory agent) administered via the intracerebroventricular route decreased tumor necrosis factor (TNF), not only in the brain but also in the plasma, originating predominantly from the spleen, in rats treated with LPS [47]. They also found that cutting the vagus nerve annulled the decrease in plasma TNF caused by the treatment with CNI-1493 and that electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve was sufficient to reduce plasma TNF, indicating that some signals alleviate inflammation by descending from the brain through the vagus nerve to the spleen. “The inflammatory reflex” was advocated based on these findings; after the afferent vagus nerve senses inflammation occurring in the periphery, the signal is transmitted to the efferent vagus nerve to abrogate the peripheral inflammation.
Extensive efforts have been made to understand the mechanism of the inflammatory reflex. The current concept of the inflammatory reflex is as follows (Fig. 3): (1) In case of peripheral inflammation, afferent vagus nerve terminals are stimulated by inflammatory products, that include proinflammatory cytokines, damage-associated molecular patterns, and pathogen-associated molecular patterns, through cytokine receptors and pattern recognition receptors expressed on vagal afferents [48]. (2) Transmission of nerve activity in the brain causes activation of the efferent vagus nerve. (3) The signal is relayed to the splenic nerve (primarily sympathetic) [49]. (4) The splenic nerve terminals release norepinephrine, which binds to β2-adrenergic receptors expressed on choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive T cells in the spleen. This causes release of acetylcholine (ACh) from this specific T cell subpopulation [50]. (5) The interaction of ACh with α7 nicotinic ACh receptors (α7nAChRs) expressed on macrophages residing close to ChAT-positive T cells, suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production and inflammation [51]. The efferent arm of the inflammatory reflex is referred to as the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway (CAP) [52].
Considering the dominant role played by the vagus nerve in the inflammatory reflex, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can be considered as a reasonable therapeutic strategy for inflammatory diseases. Inoue et al. demonstrated that VNS performed 24 h before kidney IRI protected the kidney [53]. VNS performed in brain dead donor rats also improved long-term kidney function and survival of recipients by suppressing immune cell infiltration into tubules and arteries [54]. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve causes transmission of action potential in both types of fibers (efferent motor and afferent sensory fibers). Optogenetics was recently utilized to elucidate the precise neural circuits involved in kidney protection induced by VNS [55]. Optogenetics is a technique that optically controls cells in living tissues, typically neurons, that have been genetically modified to express light-sensitive opsins. Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), a representative light-sensitive excitatory opsin, is a nonselective cation channel, and its gate rapidly opens following application of blue light. Thus, ChR2-expressing neurons can be selectively depolarized by blue light, mainly via Na+ entry, thereby evoking an action potential. Chat-ChR2 and Vglut2-ChR2 mice, in which ChR2 is expressed in the efferent and afferent vagus nerve respectively, were used in our experiments. Through the experiments with optogenetic selective VNS, either efferent or afferent fiber stimulation was demonstrated to be sufficient to protect the kidneys against IRI. We further identified a new pathway, the C1 neurons (in the medulla oblongata)–sympathetic nervous system–splenic nerve–spleen–kidney axis that protects the kidney through vagal afferent stimulation (Fig. 4) [55]. This significant role of C1 neurons in kidney protection is in agreement to a study conducted by Abe et al., in which they demonstrated that restraint stress was protective against kidney IRI through the activation of C1 neurons and that optogenetic stimulation of C1 neurons was also sufficient for kidney protection [56]. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes, but not lymph node/bone marrow cells, isolated from VNS-treated mice protected naïve recipient mice from kidney IRI, further supporting a critical role of splenocytes in this context [55]. These results indicate that the signal from the splenic nerve protects the kidney by altering the phenotype of the splenocytes; however, its mechanism needs to be elucidated.
VNS is an effective therapy that has already received FDA approval for the treatment of various disorders, such as epilepsy, depression, migraines, cluster headaches, and obesity [57]. Several clinical trials have been performed and are ongoing to convert the protective effect of VNS into treatment for inflammatory diseases. The first clinical trial that tested an implanted electronic device in patients suffering from refractory rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated inhibition of TNF by VNS, which resulted in improved disease severity for up to 84 days [58]. The effectiveness of VNS has also been tested in Crohn’s disease [59]. VNS enabled achievement of significant clinical remission (decreased disease activity index and improved endoscopic findings) for 6 months in five out of seven patients with active disease. These results demonstrate that VNS can also alleviate inflammation in humans, offering a promising treatment option of using VNS for treating other inflammatory diseases, including kidney disease. Larger clinical trials and continued investigations elucidating the mechanism by which VNS exerts an antiinflammatory effect are warranted for the safe and effective clinical application of VNS in patients with kidney disease.
Conclusion
Inflammation is evidently a critical factor in the pathophysiology of several kidney diseases. Accumulating data indicates that kidney perivascular cells use inflammatory signaling to attract immune cells to the injury site, thereby enhancing inflammation. Thus, perivascular cells could serve as a reasonable drug target for treating kidney disease. Another strategy is utilization of neuroimmune interaction, which can be a nonpharmacological approach. VNS is one of the most promising approaches for harnessing neuroimmune interactions and attenuating inflammation. Further studies are required to precisely determine the mechanisms by which these strategies exert antiinflammatory effects and to further apply them in clinical settings.
References
Ronco C, Bellomo R, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury. Lancet (London, England). 2019;394(10212):1949–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32563-2.
Singbartl K, Ley K. Leukocyte recruitment and acute renal failure. J Mol Med (Berl). 2004;82(2):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-003-0498-8.
Levey AS, James MT. Acute kidney injury. Ann Int Med. 2017;167(9):ITC66-ITC80. https://doi.org/10.7326/AITC201711070.
Chawla LS, Eggers PW, Star RA, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1214243.
Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2012;81(5):442–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.379.
Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet (London, England). 2017;389(10075):1238–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5.
Eckardt KU, Coresh J, Devuyst O, Johnson RJ, Kottgen A, Levey AS, et al. Evolving importance of kidney disease: from subspecialty to global health burden. Lancet (London, England). 2013;382(9887):158–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60439-0.
Keith DS, Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Brown JB, Smith DH. Longitudinal follow-up and outcomes among a population with chronic kidney disease in a large managed care organization. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(6):659–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.6.659.
Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041031.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.
Tanaka S, Sugiura Y, Saito H, Sugahara M, Higashijima Y, Yamaguchi J, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition normalizes glucose metabolism and suppresses oxidative stress in the kidneys of diabetic mice. Kidney Int. 2018;94(5):912–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.025.
Li L, Okusa MD. Macrophages, dendritic cells, and kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Semin Nephrol. 2010;30(3):268–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.03.005.
Nemoto T, Burne MJ, Daniels F, O’Donnell MP, Crosson J, Berens K, et al. Small molecule selectin ligand inhibition improves outcome in ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2001;60(6):2205–14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00054.x.
Rabb H, Mendiola CC, Saba SR, Dietz JR, Smith CW, Bonventre JV, et al. Antibodies to ICAM-1 protect kidneys in severe ischemic reperfusion injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;211(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1995.1779.
Salmela K, Wramner L, Ekberg H, Hauser I, Bentdal O, Lins LE, et al. A randomized multicenter trial of the anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibody (enlimomab) for the prevention of acute rejection and delayed onset of graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation: a report of the European Anti-ICAM-1 Renal Transplant Study Group. Transplantation. 1999;67(5):729–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199903150-00015.
Kaitaniemi S, Grön K, Elovaara H, Salmi M, Jalkanen S, Elima K. Functional modulation of vascular adhesion protein-1 by a novel splice variant. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1): e54151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054151.
Noonan T, Lukas S, Peet GW, Pelletier J, Panzenbeck M, Hanidu A, et al. The oxidase activity of vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) is essential for function. Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2013;2(2):172–85.
Salmi M, Jalkanen S. A 90-kilodalton endothelial cell molecule mediating lymphocyte binding in humans. Science. 1992;257(5075):1407–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1529341.
Salmi M, Kalimo K, Jalkanen S. Induction and function of vascular adhesion protein-1 at sites of inflammation. J Exp Med. 1993;178(6):2255–60. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.178.6.2255.
Tanaka S, Tanaka T, Kawakami T, Takano H, Sugahara M, Saito H, et al. Vascular adhesion protein-1 enhances neutrophil infiltration by generation of hydrogen peroxide in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2017;92(1):154–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2017.01.014.
Weston CJ, Shepherd EL, Claridge LC, Rantakari P, Curbishley SM, Tomlinson JW, et al. Vascular adhesion protein-1 promotes liver inflammation and drives hepatic fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(2):501–20. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI73722.
Niethammer P, Grabher C, Look AT, Mitchison TJ. A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature. 2009;459(7249):996–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08119.
Yoo SK, Starnes TW, Deng Q, Huttenlocher A. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature. 2011;480(7375):109–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10632.
Stark K, Eckart A, Haidari S, Tirniceriu A, Lorenz M, von Bruhl ML, et al. Capillary and arteriolar pericytes attract innate leukocytes exiting through venules and ‘instruct’ them with pattern-recognition and motility programs. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(1):41–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2477.
Leaf IA, Nakagawa S, Johnson BG, Cha JJ, Mittelsteadt K, Guckian KM, et al. Pericyte MyD88 and IRAK4 control inflammatory and fibrotic responses to tissue injury. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):321–34. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI87532.
Tang PM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(3):144–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0110-2.
Tanaka S, Zheng S, Kharel Y, Fritzemeier RG, Huang T, Foster D et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling in perivascular cells enhances inflammation and fibrosis in the kidney. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(658):eabj2681. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abj2681
Fritzemeier R, Foster D, Peralta A, Payette M, Kharel Y, Huang T, et al. Discovery of in vivo active Sphingosine-1-phosphate Transporter (Spns2) inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2022;65(11):7656–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02171.
Wu Y, Li P, Goodwin AJ, Cook JA, Halushka PV, Zingarelli B, et al. miR-145a regulates pericyte dysfunction in a murine model of sepsis. J Infect Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa184.
Seki E, De Minicis S, Osterreicher CH, Kluwe J, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007;13(11):1324–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1663.
Paik YH, Schwabe RF, Bataller R, Russo MP, Jobin C, Brenner DA. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates inflammatory signaling by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2003;37(5):1043–55. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50182.
Kaneko K, Sato Y, Uchino E, Toriu N, Shigeta M, Kiyonari H, et al. Lineage tracing analysis defines erythropoietin-producing cells as a distinct subpopulation of resident fibroblasts with unique behaviors. Kidney Int. 2022;102(2):280–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.04.026.
Souma T, Yamazaki S, Moriguchi T, Suzuki N, Hirano I, Pan X, et al. Plasticity of renal erythropoietin-producing cells governs fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(10):1599–616. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013010030.
Asada N, Takase M, Nakamura J, Oguchi A, Asada M, Suzuki N, et al. Dysfunction of fibroblasts of extrarenal origin underlies renal fibrosis and renal anemia in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(10):3981–90. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI57301.
Chang YT, Yang CC, Pan SY, Chou YH, Chang FC, Lai CF, et al. DNA methyltransferase inhibition restores erythropoietin production in fibrotic murine kidneys. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(2):721–31. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI82819.
Tanaka S, Tanaka T, Nangaku M. Hypoxia as a key player in the AKI-to-CKD transition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;307(11):F1187–95. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00425.2014.
Nangaku M. Chronic hypoxia and tubulointerstitial injury: a final common pathway to end-stage renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2005070757.
Souma T, Nezu M, Nakano D, Yamazaki S, Hirano I, Sekine H, et al. Erythropoietin synthesis in renal myofibroblasts is restored by activation of hypoxia signaling. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(2):428–38. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2014121184.
Minamishima YA, Moslehi J, Bardeesy N, Cullen D, Bronson RT, Kaelin WG Jr. Somatic inactivation of the PHD2 prolyl hydroxylase causes polycythemia and congestive heart failure. Blood. 2008;111(6):3236–44. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-10-117812.
Sugahara M, Tanaka S, Tanaka T, Saito H, Ishimoto Y, Wakashima T, et al. Prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitor protects against metabolic disorders and associated kidney disease in obese type 2 diabetic mice. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(3):560–77. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2019060582.
Locatelli F, Del Vecchio L. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxyl domain inhibitors: from theoretical superiority to clinical noninferiority compared with current ESAs? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(11):1966–79. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2022040413.
Sugahara M, Tanaka T, Nangaku M. Future perspectives of anemia management in chronic kidney disease using hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;239: 108272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108272.
Tanaka S, Portilla D, Okusa MD. Role of perivascular cells in kidney homeostasis, inflammation, repair and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19(11):721–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-023-00752-7.
Tanaka S, Okusa MD. AKI and the neuroimmune axis. Semin Nephrol. 2019;39(1):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.10.008.
Tanaka S, Okusa MD. Crosstalk between the nervous system and the kidney. Kidney Int. 2020;97(3):466–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2019.10.032.
Watkins LR, Goehler LE, Relton JK, Tartaglia N, Silbert L, Martin D, et al. Blockade of interleukin-1 induced hyperthermia by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy: evidence for vagal mediation of immune-brain communication. Neurosci Lett. 1995;183(1–2):27–31.
Bernik TR, Friedman SG, Ochani M, DiRaimo R, Ulloa L, Yang H, et al. Pharmacological stimulation of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Exp Med. 2002;195(6):781–8.
Hosoi T, Okuma Y, Matsuda T, Nomura Y. Novel pathway for LPS-induced afferent vagus nerve activation: possible role of nodose ganglion. Auton Neurosci. 2005;120(1–2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2004.11.012.
Rosas-Ballina M, Ochani M, Parrish WR, Ochani K, Harris YT, Huston JM, et al. Splenic nerve is required for cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway control of TNF in endotoxemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(31):11008–13. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803237105.
Rosas-Ballina M, Olofsson PS, Ochani M, Valdes-Ferrer SI, Levine YA, Reardon C, et al. Acetylcholine-synthesizing T cells relay neural signals in a vagus nerve circuit. Science. 2011;334(6052):98–101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209985.
Wang H, Yu M, Ochani M, Amella CA, Tanovic M, Susarla S, et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation. Nature. 2003;421(6921):384–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01339.
Tracey KJ. Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(2):289–96. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI30555.
Inoue T, Abe C, Sung SS, Moscalu S, Jankowski J, Huang L, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation mediates protection from kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury through α7nAChR+ splenocytes. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(5):1939–52. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI83658.
Hoeger S, Fontana J, Jarczyk J, Selhorst J, Waldherr R, Kramer BK, et al. Vagal stimulation in brain dead donor rats decreases chronic allograft nephropathy in recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(3):544–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft451.
Tanaka S, Abe C, Abbott SBG, Zheng S, Yamaoka Y, Lipsey JE et al. Vagus nerve stimulation activates two distinct neuroimmune circuits converging in the spleen to protect mice from kidney injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(12). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021758118.
Abe C, Inoue T, Inglis MA, Viar KE, Huang L, Ye H, et al. C1 neurons mediate a stress-induced anti-inflammatory reflex in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(5):700–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4526.
Goggins E, Mitani S, Tanaka S. Clinical perspectives on vagus nerve stimulation: present and future. Clin Sci (Lond). 2022;136(9):695–709. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20210507.
Koopman FA, Chavan SS, Miljko S, Grazio S, Sokolovic S, Schuurman PR, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(29):8284–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605635113.
Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Hoffmann D, Clarencon D, Mathieu N, Dantzer C, et al. Chronic vagus nerve stimulation in Crohn’s disease: a 6-month follow-up pilot study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(6):948–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12792.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the Japanese Society of Nephrology for the 2023 Oshima Award. The author is grateful to Drs. Tokuichiro Sugimoto, Naobumi Mise (Mitsui Memorial Hospital), Drs. Masaomi Nangaku, Reiko Inagi, Tetsuhiro Tanaka (The University of Tokyo), Dr. Mark D. Okusa (University of Virginia) for their patient mentorship. The author would also like to thank his colleagues and collaborators, especially his team members, Drs. Shuhei Mitani, Nobuaki Nishima, Jumpei Yamashita, Yosei Clovis Manuel Tetsu, and Mr. Yoshitaka Suzuki.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo. The author’s work was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (JP21K20894, JP22K16232), AMED (JP22gm6510016), the Ichiro Kanehara Foundation, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, Life Science Foundation of Japan, the Salt Science Research Foundation (2225/2327/2435), Research Fund of Mitsukoshi Health and Welfare Foundation 2022, Kobayashi Foundation, the Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation, Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders, Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science, the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, Daiwa Securities Health Foundation, Japan Diabetes Foundation, Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation, SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation, and the Pharmacological Research Foundation, Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Tanaka, S. Targeting inflammation in perivascular cells and neuroimmune interactions for treating kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol 28, 505–512 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02494-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02494-7