The impact of evacuation on the incidence of chronic kidney disease after the Great East Japan Earthquake: The Fukushima Health Management Survey

  • Yoshimitsu Hayashi
  • Masato Nagai
  • Tetsuya Ohira
  • Hiroaki Satoh
  • Akira Sakai
  • Akira Ohtsuru
  • Mitsuaki Hosoya
  • Yukihiko Kawasaki
  • Hitoshi Suzuki
  • Atsushi Takahashi
  • Yoshihiro Sugiura
  • Hiroaki Shishido
  • Hideto Takahashi
  • Seiji Yasumura
  • Junichiro James Kazama
  • Shigeatsu Hashimoto
  • Gen Kobashi
  • Kotaro Ozasa
  • Masafumi Abe
Open Access
Original article

Abstract

Background

About 146,000 people were forced into long-term evacuation due to the nuclear power plant accident caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. Disaster is known to induce hypertension in survivors for a certain period, but it is unclear whether prolonged disaster stress influences chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted an observational cohort study to elucidate the effects of evacuation stress on CKD incidence.

Methods

Participants were individuals living in communities near the Fukushima nuclear power plant, aged 40–74 years without CKD as of their 2011 general health checkup (non-evacuees: n = 9780, evacuees: n = 4712). We followed new-onset CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or proteinuria] using general annual health checkup data from 2012 to 2014. Association between evacuation and CKD incidence was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Mean age of the participants at baseline was 65 years, 46.7% were men, and baseline eGFR was 75.7 ml/min/1.73 m2. During the mean follow-up period of 2.46 years, CKD incidence rate was 80.8/1000 and 100.2/1000 person-years in non-evacuees and evacuees, respectively. Evacuation was a significant risk factor of CKD incidence after adjusting for age, gender, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, and baseline eGFR [hazard ratio (HR): 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35–1.56]. Evacuation was significantly associated with the incidence of eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.37–1.60), but not with the incidence of proteinuria (HR: 1.21; 95% CI 0.93–1.56).

Conclusion

Evacuation was a risk factor associated with CKD incidence after the disaster.

Keywords

Earthquake Disaster Nuclear powerplant Evacuation Hypertension Chronic kidney disease 

Introduction

The Great East Japan Earthquake (9.0 on the Richter scale) and subsequent tsunami took the lives and destroyed the homes of many people on March 11, 2011. The Fukushima nuclear power plant was also damaged, and radiation was leaked into areas along the east coast of Fukushima Prefecture. Survivors living in the area were faced with overwhelming stress from having experienced a large earthquake, massive tsunami, and radioactive leakage all in the short span of a few weeks. Moreover, radioactive contamination is a long-lasting public health concern. The Japanese government-designated areas within a 30-km radius of the plant, as well as areas with high radioactive contamination, as an evacuation zone. People living in the evacuation zone (approximately 146,000 evacuee) were forced to move to another area until further notice.

Disaster has been reported to cause stress-related diseases, particularly hypertension. The elderly and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, and metabolic syndrome are more susceptible to disaster stress [1, 2, 3]. Disaster hypertension is characterized as temporal increased blood pressure which returns to pre-disaster levels within 6 months when the disrupted behavioral and biological circadian rhythm is restored. Disaster hypertension is regarded as important because of its association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death in the first few weeks or months after the disaster [4, 5, 6]. However, it is unknown whether disaster stress can induce chronic diseases such as CKD.

The Fukushima Prefectural Government launched the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) to investigate the effects of long-term, low-dose radiation exposure among survivors of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Comprehensive health checks are included in the survey with the aim of preventing the development of lifestyle-related diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and CVD, after the disaster. The FHMS previously reported that prolonged stress changed the lifestyles of the evacuees, resulting in significant increases in the incidence of obesity, hypertension, and diabetes [7, 8, 9]. Hypertension and metabolic disorders are well-known predictors of the onset and exacerbation of CKD. Furthermore, the combination of CKD and metabolic syndrome is a strong predictor of the incidence of CVD [10]. Thus, we hypothesized that a natural disaster and subsequent prolonged evacuation stress increases the incidence of CKD and CVD. Here, we investigated the incidence of CKD, and verified the association between evacuation and the incidence of CKD in a longitudinal analysis using annual health checkup data from survivors of the Great East Japan Earthquake.

Method

Study population

Participants were Japanese people living one of the following 13 municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture at the time of the disaster: Tamura City, Minami-soma City, Kawamata-machi, Hirono-machi, Naraha-machi, Tomioka-machi, Kawauchi-mura, Okuma-machi, Futaba-machi, Namie-machi, Katsurao-mura, Iitate-mura, and Date City. The government-designated evacuation zone included the entirety of nine of these municipalities (Hirono-machi, Naraha-machi, Tomioka-machi, Kawauchi-mura, Okuma-machi, Futaba-machi, Namie-machi, Katsurao-mura, and Iitate-mura) and some parts of the remaining four. All residents of the evacuation zone were forced to leave their homes after the disaster. Areas not included in the government-designated evacuation zone were defined as the non-evacuation zone in the present study (Fig. 1). The participants were divided into evacuee or non-evacuee based only on the residential area, evacuation zone or not. Evacuation style of evacuee (temporary house or relative house, etc.) and voluntary evacuation from non-evacuation zone were not taken into account.

Fig. 1

Geographic details of evacuation zone, non-evacuation zone, and the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant

Since 2008, the Japanese government has conducted an annual health check program, “The Specific Health Check and Guidance System (Tokutei-Kensin)”, which targets those with national health care insurance aged 40–74 years, with the aim of detecting metabolic syndrome. We used data from these annual health checkups from 2011 obtained as part of the comprehensive health checks in the FHMS. A previous report details the methods of the comprehensive health checks and the FHMS [11].

Based on national census data, the total population of the 13 municipalities aged between 40 and 74 years was estimated at 125,987 in 2010, the year before the disaster. For the present longitudinal analysis, we targeted residents who received a checkup in 2011 (baseline) and at least one checkup in between 2012 and 2014 (follow-up). Then, we obtained data for the 18,353 residents, representing about 15% of the population from the census data. We also excluded participants with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or positive proteinuria by dipstick at baseline. After these exclusions, 14,492 participants were included in the final analyses (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Flow diagram of participants. CKD: chronic kidney disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate

Baseline measurements and definitions

Height in stocking feet (m) and weight (kg) in light clothing were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated (kg/m2). Underweight, normal weight, and obesity were defined as BMI <18.5, ≥18.5 to <25, and ≥25, respectively. Blood and urine sampling were performed at each local medical institution. Blood pressure (BP) was measured with a standard sphygmomanometer or an automated device by medical staff at each local medical institution. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg, diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or the self-reported use of antihypertensive agents. Diabetes was defined as fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), casual glucose ≥200 mg/dl, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5%, or the self-reported use of antihyperglycemic agents. We defined dyslipidemia as triglycerides (TG) ≥150 mg/dl and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <40 mg/dl, which are widely used values in metabolic syndrome criteria.

Urinalysis by the dipstick method was performed on a single spot urine specimen. Results of proteinuria were recorded as (−), (±), (1+), (2+), and (3+) based on guidelines approved by the Japanese Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (http://jccls.org/). In Japan, all urine dipstick tests should be manufactured, so that a urine dipstick result of (1+) corresponds to a urinary protein level of 30 mg/dl. We defined proteinuria as dipstick result of ≥(1+). Serum creatinine was assayed using the enzymatic method. eGFR was estimated using the following equation recommended by the Japanese Society of Nephrology [12]:

eGFR = 194 × serum creatinine−1.094 × age− 0.287 (×0.739 if female).

In the present study, CKD was defined as eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or a dipstick proteinuria result of ≥(1+), and new-onset CKD was defined as an endpoint for follow-up.

Statistical analysis

The participants were divided into two groups based on whether they lived in the evacuation or non-evacuation zone at the time of the disaster: evacuees (n = 4712) and non-evacuees (n = 9780), respectively. Baseline characteristics of interest (sex, eGFR >75 ml/min/1.73 m2, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit) were compared between groups using the χ2 test. Age, eGFR, BP, and levels of HbA1c, TG, and HDL-C were compared using a non-paired t test. Fasting and causal glucose levels were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. To evaluate the impact of evacuation on the incidence of CKD, the hazard ratio (HR) of new-onset CKD and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for evacuation were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for other potential confounding factors (age, sex, baseline eGFR, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking). We also assessed the HRs of the incidence of eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria separately. SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA) was used for analyses. All probability values for statistical tests were two-tailed, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among all 18,149 participants at baseline, including those with CKD (n = 3657), the prevalence of CKD at baseline was estimated to be 20.2% from Fig. 2. Table 1 shows the baseline clinical characteristics of all participants by group (evacuees or non-evacuees). The mean age of all participants was 65.0 years, women accounted for 53%, and mean eGFR was 75.7 ml/min/1.73 m2. Hypertension was present in 54%, diabetes in 10%, and obesity in 30%. First, we compared risk factors of CKD between the two groups at baseline. In the evacuee group, a significantly younger age, higher prevalence of women, and higher levels of baseline eGFR were observed than in the non-evacuee group. However, the evacuee group had a significantly higher prevalence of obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking than the non-evacuee group. No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of hypertension between the two groups.

Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics

 

Total

Evacuee

Non-evacuee

p value

Number

14,492

4712

9780

 

Age (years)

65.0 (9.4)

63.8 (10.6)

65.6 (8.8)

<0.001

Women (%)

53.31

56.07

51.97

<0.001

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

75.7 (10.7)

76.3 (11.1)

75.4 (10.5)

<0.001

  ≥75(%)

46.0

47.6

45.2

0.005

  ≥60 to <75(%)

54.0

52.4

54.8

 

Obesitya(%)

30.22

36.44

27.23

<0.001

BMI(kg/m2)

23.5 (3.3)

24.0 (3.5)

23.3 (3.2)

<0.001

Waist circumference(cm)

70.2 (32.1)

71.0 (32.5)

69.8 (31.9)

0.0357

Hypertensionb(%)

54.02

53.27

54.38

0.21

Blood Pressure (mmHg)

  Systolic

131.7 (16.1)

131.3 (15.9)

131.9 (16.2)

0.0424

  Diastolic

77.9 (10.0)

77.7 (9.9)

77.9 (10.1)

0.2932

Diabetesc(%)

10.07

11.35

9.46

<0.001

Fasting glucose(mg/dl)

96 (90–104)

97 (91–106)

96 (90–104)

<0.001

Casual glucose (mg/dl)

98 (91–112)

99 (91–111)

98 (91–112)

0.1421

Hemoglobin A1c(%)

5.5 (0.7)

5.5 (0.7)

5.4 (0.6)

<0.001

TG ≥150 or HDL-C <40(%)

22.15

24.89

20.83

<0.001

Triglycerides(mg/dl)

113.8 (73.1)

118.0 (73.2)

111.7 (73.0)

<0.001

HDL-C(mg/dl)

59.8 (14.6)

59.0 (14.5)

60.1 (14.7)

<0.001

Smoking habit(%)

13.32

14.75

12.63

<0.001

Data are expressed means with (SD) or median with (IQR). p values were obtained by Chi-square test, Student’s t test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test between evacuees and non-evacuees

SD standard deviation; IQR interquartile range; BMI body mass index; TG triglycerides; HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

aBMI ≧ 25

bSystolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or self-reported use of antihypertensive agents

cFasting glucose 126 mg/dl, casual blood glucose ≥200 mg/dl, HbA1c ≥6.5%, self-reported use of antihyperglycemic agents

Incidence of CKD

Next, we investigated the incidence of CKD and the results are shown in Table 2. The cumulative incidence of CKD was 3,093 (21%) over a mean follow-up period of 2.46 years. The incidence rate of CKD of evacuees was higher (100/1000-person-years) than that of non-evacuees by a ratio of 1.24. Since significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups, we performed multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. HRs of the risk factors of incidence of CKD are shown in Table 3. Evacuation was a significant risk factor of CKD with a crude HR of 1.38 (95% CI 1.28–1.48) compared with non-evacuation. The multivariate adjusted HR for evacuation was 1.45 (95% CI 1.35–1.56), and it was the highest HR among the other common risk factors of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia at baseline. Sex and smoking were not associated with the incidence of CKD.

Table 2

Incidence rate of CKD, eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, and proteinuria

 

CKDa

eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2

Proteinuriab

 

Incidence

1000 person-years

Incidence

1000 person-years

Incidence

1000 person-years

Total

3093

86.74

2915

81.36

269

6.98

Evacuee

1090

100.18

1036

94.73

92

7.76

Non-evacuee

2003

80.84

1879

75.49

177

6.63

CKD chronic kidney desease, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

aCKD was defined as eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or urinary protein of ≥(1+)

bProteinuria was defined as urinary protein of ≥(1+)

Table 3

HRs (95% CIs) for risk of CKD

 

Crude HR

Age- and sex-adjusted HR

Multivariable-adjusted HR

Evacuee (ref : non-evacuaee)

1.38 (1.28–1.48)

1.44 (1.33–1.55)

1.45 (1.35–1.56)

Age (continuous)

1.05 (1.05–1.06)

1.05 (1.05–1.06)

1.03 (1.03–1.04)

Women (ref : men)

1.09 (1.01–1.17)

1.20 (1.11–1.28)

1.05 (0.98–1.14)

eGFR

  ≥75

Ref

Ref

Ref

  ≥60 to <75

12.26 (10.74–13.99)

11.08 (9.70-12.65)

11.09 (9.71–12.67)

BMIa

  Underweight

0.89 (0.74–1.07)

0.86 (0.72–1.04)

1.08 (0.89–1.30)

  Normal weight

Ref

Ref

Ref

  Obese

1.33 (1.23–1.43)

1.36 (1.26–1.46)

1.17 (1.09–1.27)

Hypertension (ref : without HT)

1.60 (1.49–1.73)

1.31 (1.22–1.42)

1.26 (1.16–1.36)

Diabetes (ref : without DM)

1.25 (1.12–1.39)

1.21 (1.08–1.34)

1.17 (1.04–1.30)

Dyslipidemia (ref : without DL)

1.20 (1.10–1.30)

1.28 (1.18–1.39)

1.12 (1.03–1.22)

Smoking (ref : no smoking)

0.70 (0.62–0.79)

0.92 (0.81–1.04)

0.99 (0.88–1.13)

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, BMI body mass index, ref reference, HT hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, DL dyslipidemia

aUnderweight, normal weight, and obese were defined as BMI <18.5, ≥18.5 to <25, and ≥25, respectively

Incidence of eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria

We assessed the endpoints of eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria separately, and the results are shown in Table 2. Most of CKD incidence was eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 2,915, mean follow-up period of 2.5 years). It was marked higher than that of positive proteinuria (n = 269, mean follow-up period of 2.7 years). As shown in Table 4, evacuation was a significant risk for developing eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with a multivariate adjusted HR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.37–1.60). Obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia at baseline were also significant risk factors. On the other hand, evacuation was not associated with the incidence of proteinuria with a multivariate adjusted HR of 1.21 (95% CI 0.93–1.56). Women had a significantly lower risk of developing positive proteinuria with an HR of 0.58 (95% CI 0.44–0.75). Obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking at baseline were also significant risk factors.

Table 4

HRs (95% CIs) for risk of eGFR <60 ml/min/ 1.73 m2 and proteinuria

 

eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2

Proteinuria

 

Age- and sex-adjusted HR

Multivariable-adjusted HR

Age- and sex-adjusted HR

Multivariable-adjusted HR

Evacuee (ref : non-evacuee)

1.45 (1.35–1.57)

1.48 (1.37–1.60)

1.35 (1.05–1.74)

1.21 (0.93–1.56)

Age (continuous)

1.06 (1.05–1.06)

1.04 (1.03–1.04)

1.03 (1.02–1.05)

1.03 (1.02–1.05)

Women (ref: men)

1.28 (1.19–1.38)

1.09 (1.01–1.18)

0.45 (0.35–0.58)

0.58 (0.44–0.75)

eGFR

≥75

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

≥60 to <75

19.78 (16.58–23.59)

19.81 (16.60–23.63)

1.02 (0.80–1.31)

1.00 (0.78–1.29)

BMIa

Underweight

0.84 (0.69–1.014)

1.06 (0.87–1.28)

1.10 (0.58–2.09)

1.28 (0.67–2.45)

 Normal weight

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Obese

1.31 (1.21–1.42)

1.14 (1.06–1.24)

1.92 (1.51–2.45)

1.55 (1.20–2.00)

Hypertension (ref : without HT)

1.27 (1.17–1.37)

1.22 (1.13–1.33)

2.13 (1.61–2.82)

1.86 (1.40–2.48)

Diabetes (ref : without DM)

1.13 (1.00–1.26)

1.11 (0.99–1.25)

2.49 (1.88–3.31)

2.09 (1.57–2.78)

Dyslipidemia (ref : without DL)

1.25 (1.14–1.36)

1.09 (1.00–1.19)

1.66 (1.28–2.14)

1.38 (1.06–1.79)

Smoking (ref: no smoking)

0.84 (0.73–0.96)

0.91 (0.79–1.04)

1.93 (1.42–2.62)

1.95 (1.43–2.65)

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, BMI body mass index, ref reference, HT hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, DL dyslipidemia

aUnderweight, normal weight and obese were defined as BMI <18.5, ≥18.5 to <25, ≥25, respectively

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study of the incidence of CKD among survivors of the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, and we revealed the impact of evacuation stress on the incidence of CKD after the nuclear power plant accident from 2011 to 2014. This study had two major findings. First, the incidence of CKD after the disaster was high. Second, evacuation was an independent risk factor of the incidence of CKD and other common risk factors.

A Japanese nationwide cohort study was previously conducted to survey the incidence of CKD using data from Tokutei-Kensin. Yano et al. reported that 6.3% of 48,587 participants aged 40–74 years (mean age: 61.7 years; men: 39%) without diabetes developed CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2: 4.1%; proteinuria: 2.5%) over the 3 years from 2008 to 2011 [13]. New onset of eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the present study, not of proteinuria, is much higher than above-mentioned study. We did not exclude participants with hypertension, diabetes, and pre-existing CVD, and our participants were older and had a higher proportion of men and obesity compared to the previous study. CKD prevalence at the start of our survey was higher than the previous Japanese nationwide cohort with Tokutei-Kensin data of 2008 (20.2 vs 14.5%: p < 0.001) [14]. It is possible that the high-risk target population in this study caused the high incidence. Another cause to consider is the influence of disaster. Not a few peoples with hypertension or diabetes have to interrupt their medication or clinic visits to adjust their medication for a certain period after a disaster, and this could induce temporary change in eGFR. Temporary decreases in eGFR may be counted as new-onset CKD. Furthermore, past natural disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes have been shown to deteriorate glycemic and blood pressure control even if not accompanied by nuclear power plant accident [1, 15, 16, 17]. The FHMS have reported significant increase in prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity after disaster in both evacuee and non-evacuee [7, 8, 9]. Hypertension, diabetes and obesity are well-known risk factors of CKD [18], thus, the high-risk population at baseline and disaster-induced disorders may have synergistically increased the incidence of CKD in both evacuee and non-evacuee.

Evacuation stress cannot be an ignored factor when discussing the influence of a disaster. The FHMS has reported that the prevalence of CKD was not significantly different between evacuees and non-evacuees in 2011 just after the disaster in a cross-sectional study (22.0 vs 21.4%: p = 0.37) [19], and in this longitudinal study, we demonstrated that evacuation stress was significantly associated with the incidence rate of CKD with a 1.45-fold higher HR independent of other baseline characteristics. However, it is unclear that how evacuation is associated with CKD based on our study alone. The FHMS for mental health care revealed evacuees who believed that radiation exposure causes negative health effects which were significantly more likely to be psychologically distressed [20]. Moreover, psychological distress was significantly more prevalent among residents of the evacuation zone, even after adjusting for other significant risk factors such as age, gender, living arrangement (own home or other type), experiencing the nuclear power plant accident, loss of a family member, becoming unemployed, and history of mental illness. Interestingly, psychological distress in each evacuation zone was positively associated with the radiation levels in the evacuees’ environment [21]. These studies suggest that fear of radiation risk contributes to psychological distress among evacuees. Although not under natural disaster conditions, a prospective population-based study in Finland (n = 466) showed that high psychological distress at baseline predicts the development of metabolic syndrome independent of age, gender, marital status, educational attainment, and baseline health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use and leisure time physical activity) with an odds ratio of 1.83 (95% CI 1.05–3.21) [22]. Evacuation has been demonstrated to be significantly associated with increased incidence of metabolic syndrome by the FHMS [23]. Moreover, FHMS have revealed that evacuation was a significant risk for overweight and diabetes with an HR of 1.61 (95% CI 1.47–1.77) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.20–1.63), respectively [7, 8]. FHMS has speculated that these increasing metabolic disorders were induced by a less physical activity due to loss of jobs and social connectedness by evacuation.

Evacuation also has been reported to be significant risk of hypertension especially among men with HR 1.24 (95% CI 1.1–1.39) by FHMS [9]. Therefore, we could regard evacuation as a composite risk factor mainly composed of metabolic disorders and hypertension. Kario stated that people with psychological distress or metabolic syndrome are more susceptible to disaster hypertension. Disaster hypertension was accompanied with increased salt sensitivity, blood viscosity, platelet activation, and endothelial dysfunction caused by sympathetic nerve activation [2]. These conditions might be involved in the CKD incidence that was based on eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, not proteinuria. Taking the results of the previous studies together with our results, evacuation could induce prolonged psychological distress and less physical activity which increase new-onset or exacerbation of metabolic disorders and hypertension, and it may cause the high incidence of CKD. Japanese government has begun to release gradually the evacuation zone with decontamination. However, there are unanswered questions as to how long it takes for the influence of the disaster to weaken and further observation on this topic is needed.

The strengths of the present population-based study are its relatively large sample size and the incorporation of complete eGFR and proteinuria information at baseline and at each annual checkup. However, there are also several limitations. First, we did not follow residents who received no annual checkup or only one annual checkup. This selection bias may have affected our results. Second, our study did not include data collected before the disaster as a control. Serum creatinine had not been examined at annual checkups in most areas before 2011. Cohorts in areas not affected or less affected by the disaster who underwent checkups should be investigated to evaluate the influence of the disaster. Third, we could not exclude one participant who was temporarily positive for CKD, and this may have led to overestimation of the incidence of CKD as long as using annual checkup data. Several checkups in a year are necessary to determine a more accurate incidence of CKD; however, it is difficult for general population to receive frequent checkups in a year. Finally, we used baseline clinical characteristics and evacuation as confounders in our multivariate analysis. We cannot completely rule out the possibility of residual confounding, for example, socioeconomic factors such as changes in living conditions and job status after the disaster. The target population consisted of people with national health insurance (mainly intended for farmers, fisherpersons, the self-employed, and retirees), and we did not include people covered by social insurance (mainly intended for employees) in our analyses. These socioeconomic factors may have influenced the association between evacuation and risk of CKD.

Conclusion

In conclusion, evacuation was a risk factor strongly associated with the incidence of eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 among residents around the damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant over 3 years. In addition to environmental recovery, care for psychological distress, physical activity, and following clinical disorders might be necessary to prevent CK among evacuees.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This survey was supported by the National Health Fund for Children and Adults Affected by the Nuclear Incident. We thank the staff of the Fukushima Health Management Survey for their important contributions. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the Fukushima Prefecture government.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have declared no competing interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee at which the studies were conducted (approval number 1916) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from community representatives to conduct an epidemiological study based on the guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.

References

  1. 1.
    Kario K, Matsuo T, Ishida T, Shimada K. “White coat” hypertension and the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Lancet (London. England). 1995;345:1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kario K. Disaster hypertension: its characteristics, mechanism, and management. Circ J Off J Japanese Circ Soc. 2012;76:553–62.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saito K, Kim JI, Maekawa K, Ikeda Y, Yokoyama M. The great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake aggravates blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients. Am J Hyperten. 1997;10:217–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kario K, McEwen BS, Pickering TG. Disasters and the heart: a review of the effects of earthquake-induced stress on cardiovascular disease. Hyperten Res Off J Japanese Soc Hyperten. 2003;26:355–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hata S. Cardiovascular disease caused by earthquake-induced stress: psychological stress and cardiovascular disease. Circ J Off J Japanese Circ Soc. 2009;73:1195–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakagawa I, Nakamura K, Oyama M, Yamazaki O, Ishigami K, Tsuchiya Y, Yamamoto M. Long-term effects of the Niigata-Chuetsu earthquake in Japan on acute myocardial infarction mortality: an analysis of death certificate data. Heart Br Cardiac Soc. 2009;95:2009–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohira T, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Satoh H, Suzuki H, Sakai A, Ohtsuru A, Kawasaki Y, Takahashi A, Ozasa K, Kobashi G, Kamiya K, Yamashita S, Abe M. Effect of evacuation on body weight after the great East Japan earthquake. Am J Prevent Med 2015.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Satoh H, Ohira T, Hosoya M, Sakai A, Watanabe T, Ohtsuru A, Kawasaki Y, Suzuki H, Takahashi A, Kobashi G, Ozasa K, Yasumura S, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M. Evacuation after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident Is a cause of diabetes: results from the Fukushima Health Management Survey. J Diabet Res. 2015;2015:627390.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ohira T, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Satoh H, Suzuki H, Sakai A, Ohtsuru A, Kawasaki Y, Takahashi A, Ozasa K, Kobashi G, Hashimoto S, Kamiya K, Yamashita S, Abe M. Evacuation and risk of hypertension after the great East Japan earthquake: the Fukushima Health Management Survey. Hypertension. 2016;68:558–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agarwal S, Shlipak MG, Kramer H, Jain A, Herrington DM. The association of chronic kidney disease and metabolic syndrome with incident cardiovascular events: multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:806102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yasumura S, Hosoya M, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M, Akashi M, Kodama K, Ozasa K. Study protocol for the Fukushima Health Management Survey. J Epidemiol Japan Epidemiol Assoc. 2012;22:375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Nat Kidney Foundat. 2009;53:982–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yano Y, Fujimoto S, Kramer H, Sato Y, Konta T, Iseki K, Iseki C, Moriyama T, Yamagata K, Tsuruya K, Narita I, Kondo M, Kimura K, Asahi K, Kurahashi I, Ohashi Y, Watanabe T. Long-Term blood pressure variability, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and new-onset chronic kidney disease in the Japanese general population. Hypertension. 2015;66:30–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iseki K, Asahi K, Moriyama T, Yamagata K, Tsuruya K, Yoshida H, Fujimoto S, Konta T, Kurahashi I, Ohashi Y, Watanabe T. Risk factor profiles based on estimated glomerular filtration rate and dipstick proteinuria among participants of the Specific Health Check and Guidance System in Japan 2008. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2012;16:244–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minami J, Kawano Y, Ishimitsu T, Yoshimi H, Takishita S. Effect of the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake on home blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hyperten. 1997;10:222–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fonseca VA, Smith H, Kuhadiya N, Leger SM, Yau CL, Reynolds K, Shi L, McDuffie RH, Thethi T, John-Kalarickal J. Impact of a natural disaster on diabetes: exacerbation of disparities and long-term consequences. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1632–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirizuka K, Nishizaki H, Kohriyama K, Nukata O, Arioka Y, Motobuchi M, Yoshiki K, Tatezumi K, Kondo T, Tsuboi S. Influences of The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake on glycemic control in diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;36:193–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanaka H, Shiohira Y, Uezu Y, Higa A, Iseki K. Metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in Okinawa, Japan. Kidney Int. 2006;69:369–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Satoh H, Ohira T, Nagai M, Hosoya M, Sakai A, Watanabe T, Ohtsuru A, Kawasaki Y, Suzuki H, Takahashi A, Kobashi G, Ozasa K, Yasumura S, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M. Prevalence of renal dysfunction among evacuees and non-evacuees after the great east earthquake: results from the Fukushima Health Management Survey. Intern Med (Tokyo. Japan). 2016;55:2563–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suzuki Y, Yabe H, Yasumura S, Ohira T, Niwa S, Ohtsuru A, Mashiko H, Maeda M, Abe M. Psychological distress and the perception of radiation risks: the Fukushima health management survey. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:598–605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kunii Y, Suzuki Y, Shiga T, Yabe H, Yasumura S, Maeda M, Niwa S, Otsuru A, Mashiko H, Abe M. Severe psychological distress of evacuees in evacuation zone caused by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: The Fukushima Health Management Survey. PloS One. 2016;11:e0158821.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Puustinen PJ, Koponen H, Kautiainen H, Mantyselka P, Vanhala M. Psychological distress predicts the development of the metabolic syndrome: a prospective population-based study. Psychosom Med. 2011;73:158–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hashimoto S, Nagai M, Fukuma S, Ohira T, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Satoh H, Suzuki H, Sakai A, Ohtsuru A, Kawasaki Y, Takahashi A, Ozasa K, Kobashi G, Kamiya K, Yamashita S, Fukuhara SI, Ohto H, Abe M. Influence of Post-disaster Evacuation on Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshimitsu Hayashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Masato Nagai
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tetsuya Ohira
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hiroaki Satoh
    • 1
    • 4
  • Akira Sakai
    • 1
    • 5
  • Akira Ohtsuru
    • 1
    • 6
  • Mitsuaki Hosoya
    • 1
    • 7
  • Yukihiko Kawasaki
    • 1
    • 7
  • Hitoshi Suzuki
    • 1
    • 8
  • Atsushi Takahashi
    • 1
    • 9
  • Yoshihiro Sugiura
    • 1
    • 10
  • Hiroaki Shishido
    • 1
    • 11
  • Hideto Takahashi
    • 1
  • Seiji Yasumura
    • 1
    • 12
  • Junichiro James Kazama
    • 2
  • Shigeatsu Hashimoto
    • 1
  • Gen Kobashi
    • 1
    • 13
  • Kotaro Ozasa
    • 1
    • 14
  • Masafumi Abe
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management SurveyFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Nephrology and HypertensionFukushima Medical UniversityFukushima CityJapan
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, and MetabolismFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Radiation Life SciencesFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  6. 6.Department of Radiation Health ManagementFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  7. 7.Department of PediatricsFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  8. 8.Department of CardiologyFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  9. 9.Department of GastroenterologyFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  10. 10.Department of NeurologyFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  11. 11.Department of OrthopedicsFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  12. 12.Department of Public HealthFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
  13. 13.Department of Public HealthDokkyo Medical UniversityMibuJapan
  14. 14.Department of EpidemiologyRadiation Effects Research FoundationFukushimaJapan

Personalised recommendations