Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gracilis muscle interposition for recurrent rectovaginal fistula

  • Video Forum
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Lavryk OA, Bandi B, Shawki SF et al (2022) Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through operation: the Cleveland Clinic experience in the 21st century. Colorectal Dis 24(10):1184–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsang CB, Madoff RD, Wong WD et al (1998) Anal sphincter integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fistula repair. Dis Colon Rectum 41(9):1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM et al (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 59(12):1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maspero M, Otero Piñeiro A, Steele SR, Hull TL (2023) Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistula: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 66(5):631–645. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hull TL, Sapci I, Lightner AL (2023) Gracilis flap repair for reoperative rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 66(1):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization/Design: SY, MM, RI, JW, NF, AS, TH; Data acquisition: SY, MM, JW, NF; Data interpretation: SY, MM, RI, JW, NF, AS, TH; Methodology: SY, MM, RI, JW, NF, AS, TH; Resources: SY, MM, RI, JW, NF, AS, TH; Supervision: AS, RI, TH; Writing—original draft preparation: SY; Writing—critical revision for important intellectual content: SY, MM, RI, JW, NF, AS, TH; Approval for publication: SY, MM, RI, JW, NF, AS, TH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. L. Hull.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was approved by local Institutional Review Board. The patient was informed about the possible risks and benefits of this procedure, and a written consent agreeing to undergo the described procedure was signed. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Patient confidentiality

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the video.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 603279 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yilmaz, S., Maspero, M., Isakov, R. et al. Gracilis muscle interposition for recurrent rectovaginal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 27, 945–946 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02835-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02835-w

Navigation