Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The sampling reflex: clarifying the clinical utility of measurable parameters

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Pucciani F, Trafeli M (2021) Sampling reflex: pathogenic role in functional defecation disorders. Tech Coloproctol 25:521–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pucciani F, Rottoli MF, Bologna A, Buri M, Cianhi F, Pagliai P, Cortesini C (1996) Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zbar AP, Aslam M, Gold DM, Gatzen C, Gosling A, Kmiot WA (1998) Parameters of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:200–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS (2002) Rectoanal reflex parameters in incontinence and constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:928–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Netinho JG, MdeLS A, Coy CSR, Fagundes JJ, Goes JRN (2005) Amplitude and recovery velocity of relaxation induced by rectoanal inhibitory reflex and its importance for obstructive defecation. Arq Gastroenterol 42:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iovino P, Bellini M (2021) Sampling reflex: a relic from the past or a useful parameter? Tech Coloproctol 25:493–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan WO (1992) Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 35:874–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis WG, Williamson ME, Miller AS, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1995) Preservation of complete anal sphincteric proprioception in restorative proctocolectomy: the inhibitory reflex and fine control of continence need not be impaired. Gut 36:902–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Dietz DW (2006) Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1052–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Schoetz DJJR, Roberts PL, Murray JJ (1996) Spectrum of abnormal rectoanal reflex patterns in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gang Y (1995) What is the desirable stimulus to induce the rectoanal inhibitory reflex? Dis Colon Rectum 38:60–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M, Aslam M (2001) Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization. Int J Colorect Dis 16:307–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Habib F, Corazziari E, Primerano L, Viscardi A, Anzini T, Torsoli A (1993) The rectoanal inhibitory reflex is abnormal in constipated patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia. Gastroenterology 104:A472

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett BC, Murray JJ, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr (1995) Distal rectoanal excitatory reflex: a reliable index of pudendal neuropathy? Dis Colon Rectum 38:916–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitehead WE, Orr WC, Engel BT, Schuster MM (1981) External anal sphincter response to rectal distension: learned response or reflex? Psychophysiology 19:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goes RN, Simons AJ, Masri I, Beart RW Jr (1995) Gradient of pressure and time between the proximal anal canal and high-pressure zone during internal anal sphincter relaxation: its role in the fecal incontinence mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1043–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Zbar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zbar, A.P. The sampling reflex: clarifying the clinical utility of measurable parameters. Tech Coloproctol 26, 237–238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02507-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02507-7

Navigation