Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An initial experience with a novel technique of single-port robotic resection for rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The da Vinci single-port (SP) system is designed to facilitate single-incision robotic surgery in a narrow space. We developed a new procedure of rectal resection using this system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of SP robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer patients based on our initial experience.

Methods

A study was conducted on consecutive patients with mid or low rectal cancer who had SP robotic resection at our institution between July and September 2020. The demographic characteristics, perioperative data, and pathology results of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

There were 5 patients (3 males, 2 females, median age 57 years (range 36–73 years). The median tumor height from the anal verge was 4 cm (range 3−5 cm). Two patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer. A single docking was conducted, and the median docking time was 4 min 20 s (range 3 min 30 s to 5 min). The median total operation time was 195 min (range 155−240 min), and the median time of pelvic dissection was 45 min (range 36−62 min). All patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient experienced an anastomosis-related complication. The median duration of hospital stay was 7 days (range 7−8 days).

Conclusions

Our initial experience suggests that SP robotic rectal resection is safe and feasible. Further clinical trials comparing SP and multiport robotic rectal resection should be conducted to verify the superior aspects of this new system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park JS, Kim NK, Kim SH, Lee KY, Lee KY, Shin JY, Kim CN, Choi GS, Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (2015) Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 102:1567–1573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, Roh YE, Lee JW, Kwak HD, Kwak JM, Kim SH (2017) Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones R, Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Vigneswaran HT, Madueke I, Wilson J, Abern MR, Crivellaro S (2020) Single port robotic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP platform: a step by step approach. Can J Urol 27:10263–10269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Abel KM, Yin LX, Price DL, Janus JR, Kasperbauer JL, Moore EJ (2020) One-year outcomes for da Vinci single port robot for transoral robotic surgery. Head Neck 42:2077–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park HS, Lee J, Lee H, Lee K, Song SY, Toesca A (2019) Development of robotic mastectomy using a single-port surgical robot system. J Breast Cancer 23:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee YS, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lee SC, Kang BM, Kim CW, Lim SW, Lee SH, Kim JG (2020) Short-term outcomes of single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: the SIMPLE multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003882 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32209897)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Luján JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Pérez D, Parrilla P (2015) Single-port colectomy vs multi-port laparoscopic colectomy. Systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 2800 procedures. Cir Esp 93:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marks JH, Salem JF, Anderson BK, Josse JM, Schoonyoung HP (2020) Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (rSILS). Tech Coloproctol 24:57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marks JH, Kunkel E, Salem J, Martin C, Schoonyoung HP, Agarwal S (2020) rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 24:817–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kneist W, Stein H, Rheinwald M (2020) Da Vinci single-port robot-assisted transanal mesorectal excision: a promising preclinical experience. Surg Endosc 34:3232–3235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1066–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brockhaus AC, Sauerland S, Saad S (2016) Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence. BMC Surg 16:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koh DC, Tsang CB, Kim SH (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25:1945–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17:3195–3202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JL, Alsaleem HA, Kim JC (2020) Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives. Ann Surg Treat Res 98:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morelli L, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Rossi L, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Mosca F, Moglia A, Cuschieri A (2018) Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si. Surg Endosc 32:589–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaouk J, Valero R, Sawczyn G, Garisto J (2020) Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique. BJU Int 125:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim K, Kang SW, Kim JK, Lee CR, Lee J, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY (2020) Robotic transaxillary hemithyroidectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system: initial experience with 10 consecutive cases. Surg Innov 27:256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning. (2016R1C1B2016002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Analysis and writing of manuscript are attributed to HJK. Responsibility to correspondence and study proposal is attributed to GSC. Enrollment of patients, data collection and study proposal are attributed to SHS, JSP, SYP, SML, and JAC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G.-S. Choi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The study did not receive any commercial sponsorship or grant support.

Ethical approval

The internal review board approved the study.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.J., Choi, GS., Song, S.H. et al. An initial experience with a novel technique of single-port robotic resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 25, 857–864 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02457-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02457-0

Keywords

Navigation