Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Which is more important in the management of splenic flexure colon cancer: strict central lymph node dissection or adequate bowel resection margin?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

What qualifies as optimal lymph node (LN) dissection in the surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer (SFCC) still remains controversial because few studies have evaluated the distribution of LN metastasis of SFCC. The aim of this study was to clarify detailed distribution of LN metastasis and long-term outcomes of SFCC.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients who had curative colectomy for primary transverse or descending colon cancer of pathological stage I, II, or III at a single high-volume cancer center between April 2002 and December 2018. The 538 eligible patients were divided into three groups: patients with SFCC (SFCC group, n = 168), patients with proximal transverse colon cancer (PTCC group, n = 290), and patients with distal descending colon cancer (DDCC group, n = 80). LNs were classified into horizontal (pericolic) and vertical (intermediate and main) nodes. Intermediate and main LN station numbers were defined according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum classification. Distributions of LN metastasis and long-term outcomes were compared.

Results

In the SFCC group, the mean age was 67.3 ± 10.5 years and 110 patients (65.5%) were male. The proportion of patients with LN metastasis in the intermediate or main region was significantly lower in the SFCC group (8%) than in the PTCC (37%) (p < 0.01) or DDCC group (29%) (p < 0.01) in pathological stage III patients. In the SFCC group, the incidence of pericolic LN metastasis on the oral side of tumor (43%) was significantly higher than in the PTCC group (21%) (p < 0.01) and was similar to that in the DDCC group (42%) (p = 0.51), while in the SFCC group, the incidence of pericolic LN metastasis on the anal side of tumor (17%) was lower than in the PTCC group (31%) and was also similar to that in the DDCC group (21%). There were no significant differences in disease-specific survival rates among all groups.

Conclusions

LN metastasis occurred mainly in the pericolic region, especially on the oral side of the tumor in SFCC. It may, therefore, be important to have an adequate bowel resection margin, especially on the oral side, for SFCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jamieson JK, Dobson JF (1909) The Lymphatics of the Colon. Proc R Soc Med 2 (Surg Sect):149–174

  2. Griffiths JD (1956) Surgical anatomy of the blood supply of the distal colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 19(4):241–256

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Levien DH, Gibbons S, Begos D, Byrne DW (1991) Survival after resection of carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Dis Colon Rectum 34(5):401–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Perrakis A, Weber K, Merkel S, Matzel K, Agaimy A, Gebbert C, Hohenberger W (2014) Lymph node metastasis of carcinomas of transverse colon including flexures. Consideration of the extramesocolic lymph node stations. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(10):1223–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rusu MC, Vlad M, Voinea LM, Curcă GC, Sişu AM (2008) Detailed anatomy of a left accessory aberrant colic artery. Surg Radiol Anat 30(7):595–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim CW, Shin US, Yu CS, Kim JC (2010) Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatment and outcomes for splenic flexure colon cancer. Cancer Res Treat 42(2):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Odermatt M, Siddiqi N, Johns R, Miskovic D, Khan O, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2014) Short- and long-term outcomes for patients with splenic flexure tumours treated by left versus extended right colectomy are comparable: a retrospective analysis. Surg Today 44(11):2045–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de'Angelis N, Hain E, Disabato M, Cordun C, Carra MC, Azoulay D, Brunetti F (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(3):623-630

  9. Martín Arévalo J, Moro-Valdezate D, García-Botello SA, Pla-Martí V, Garcés-Albir M, Pérez Santiago L, Vargas-Durán A, Espí-Macías A (2018) Propensity score analysis of postoperative and oncological outcomes after surgical treatment for splenic flexure colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(9):1201–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beisani M, Vallribera F, García A, Mora L, Biondo S, Lopez-Borao J, Farrés R, Gil J, Espin E (2018) Subtotal colectomy versus left hemicolectomy for the elective treatment of splenic flexure colonic neoplasia. Am J Surg 216(2):251–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rega D, Pace U, Scala D, Chiodini P, Granata V, Fares Bucci A, Pecori B5, Delrio P (2019) Treatment of splenic flexure colon cancer: a comparison of three different surgical procedures: Experience of a high volume cancer center. Sci Rep 9(1):10953

  12. Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Jibiki M, Ohbatake M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T, Kurosaki N, Ayabe H, Ishikawa H (2001) Surgical treatment and subsequent outcome of patients with carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Surg Today 31(3):204–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manceau G, Mori A, Bardier A, Augustin J, Breton S, Vaillant JC, Karoui M (2018) Lymph node metastases in splenic flexure colon cancer: Is subtotal colectomy warranted? J Surg Oncol 118(6):1027–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steffen C, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH (1987) Carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Dis Colon Rectum 30(11):872–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2019) Japanese classification of colorectal, appendiceal, and anal carcinoma, third, English edn. Kanehara & CO Ltd, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, Hasegawa K, Hotta K, Ishida H, Ishiguro M, Ishihara S, Kanemitsu Y, Kinugasa Y, Murofushi K, Nakajima TE, Oka S, Tanaka T, Taniguchi H, Tsuji A, Uehara K, Ueno H, Yamanaka T, Yamazaki K, Yoshida M, Yoshino T, Itabashi M, Sakamaki K, Sano K, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Uetake H, Yamaguchi S, Yamaguchi N, Kobayashi H, Matsuda K, Kotake K, Sugihara K; Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2019) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol In press

  17. Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Shinto E, Yamamoto J (2011) Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg 98(8):1171–1178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamaoka Y, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Yamaguchi T, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, Furutani A, Manabe S (2017) The distribution of lymph node metastases and their size in colon cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(8):1213–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasey CE, Rajaratnam S, O'Grady G, Hulme-Moir M (2018) Lymphatic drainage of the splenic flexure defined by intraoperative scintigraphic mapping. Dis Colon Rectum 61(4):441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe J, Ota M, Suwa Y, Ishibe A, Masui H, Nagahori K (2017) Evaluation of lymph flow patterns in splenic flexural colon cancers using laparoscopic real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(2):201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakagoe T, Sawa T, Tsuji T, Jibiki M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T, Ayabe H, Ishikawa H (2000) Carcinoma of the splenic flexure: multivariate analysis of predictive factors for clinicopathological characteristics and outcome after surgery. J Gastroenterol 35(7):528–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yusuke Yamaoka drafted the paper and designed this study. Yusuke Yamaoka, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Hitoshi Hino, Shoichi Manabe, Shunichiro Kato, and Marie Hanaoka obtained and analyzed data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Yamaoka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital (Institutional code: J2019-7-2019-1-3).

Informed consent

Written informed consents for examination and treatment were obtained from all patients prior to the procedures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaoka, Y., Shiomi, A., Kagawa, H. et al. Which is more important in the management of splenic flexure colon cancer: strict central lymph node dissection or adequate bowel resection margin?. Tech Coloproctol 24, 873–882 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02260-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02260-3

Keywords

Navigation