Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carcinoma arising in enteric diversion or rectal neobladder for bladder exstrophy

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bladder exstrophy is a rare malformation. Ureteral diversion, such as ureterosigmoidostomy or a neorectal bladder, has been described. When the patients reach adulthood, cancer may arise in these reconstructions. Our aim was to perform a systematic review (all languages) of the published literature on neoplasia after urinary diversion and suggested management in cases of cancer. PubMed and Cochrane library were searched for relevant articles published within the last 20 years. All identified articles were reviewed for inclusion. Carcinoma occurring in the bladder and unreconstructed exstrophy were excluded. Out of 47 articles found, 12 matched our search criteria. The outcomes of 23 patients (including 2 from the authors’ institution) were reported. Twenty-two patients with adenocarcinoma and 1 with carcinoid tumour were identified. Median age at urinary diversion was 3 (range 1–13) years. There were 20 ureterosigmoidostomies and 2 neorectal bladders. Cancer was diagnosed subsequently at a median of 31 (range 5–55) years after urinary diversion still in place (n = 18) or 21 years (range 1–30) after incomplete excision of ureteric stump when re-diverted (n = 5). The long-term outcomes of 15 patients were available. Ten died due to colorectal adenocarcinoma, and 5 were disease-free at 3 years. Patients with enteric diversion for bladder exstrophy, including those with subsequent reconstruction, are at risk of adenocarcinoma during adulthood. It is important to provide adequate surveillance. If lesions suggestive of carcinoma are seen, complete excision of the receptive bowel and urinary diversion are mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall VF, Muecke EC (1962) Variation in exstrophy of the bladder. J Urol 88:766

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (1987) Epidemiology of bladder exstrophy and epispadias: a communication from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems. Teratology 36:221–227

  3. Smeulders N, Sudakaran N, Wilcox D, Ransley PG (2008) Adenocarcinoma at ureterosigmoidostomy site in 16 years old demonstrate the timing of screening in children. J Pediatr Urol 4:234–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bredenoord AJ, Onaca MG, van Ramshorst B et al (2008) Sigmoid carcinoma as a long-term complication following ureterosigmoidostomy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152:213–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gobert R, Weber D, Renzulli P, Kellenberger C (2009) Long-term followup (37 to 69 years) in patients with bladder exstrophy treated with ureterosigmoidostomy: uro-nephrological outcome. J Pediatr Urol 5:190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giordano S, Taskinen S, Sankila A (2008) Adenocarcinoma in isolated rectal bladder after treatment of bladder exstrophy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 42:392–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turedi S, Incealtin O, Hos G (2009) Complications associated with ureterosigmoidostomy-colon carcinoma and ascending infection resulting in nephrectomy: a case report. Acta Chir Belg 109:531–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pettersson L, Tranberg J, Abrahamsson K, Pettersson S, Sillen U, Jonsson O (2013) Half century of follow-up after ureterosigmoidostomy performed in early childhood. J Urol 189:1870–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abita T, Pech de Laclause B, Durand Fontanier S et al (2004) Nephro-uretero-sigmoidectomy for colonic carcinoma associated with destruction of kidney after ureterosigmoidostomy: a case report. Ann Chir 129:167–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giannini O, Friedli A, Schärli AF (1998) Sigmoid adenocarcinoma complicating ureterosigmoidostomy. Pediatr Surg Int 14:124–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smeulders N, Woodhouse CRJ (2001) Neoplasia in adult exstrophy patients. BJU Int 87:623–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan MN, Naqvi AH, Lee RE (2004) Carcinoma of sigmoid colon following urinary diversion: a case report and review of literature. World J Surg Oncol 8:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilhelm TJ, Knoll T, Weisser G, Grobholz R, Köhrmann KU, Post S (2006) Urothelial carcinoma of the ureter, giant rectal stone and sigmoid carcinoma 55 years after ureterosigmoidostomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40:172–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brauers A, Baron J, Jung P et al (1998) Expression of cytochrome P-450 2E1 messenger ribonucleic acid in adenocarcinoma at ureterosigmoidostomy site after bladder exstrophy. J Urol 159:979–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Husman DA, Spence HM (1990) Current status of tumor of the bowel following ureterosigmoidostomy. J Urol 144:607–610

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duhamel BA (1960) New operation for the treatment of Hirshprungs Disease. Arch Dis Child 35:38–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bastian PJ, Albers P, Haferkamp A, Schumacher S, Müller SC (2004) Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz Pouch II) in different age groups and with different techniques of ureteric implantation. BJU 94:345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Stasik JJ, Rosen L, Riether RD (1999) Neoplasia after ureterosigmoidostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1632–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang A, McPherson GAD (2000) Colonic carcinoma after ureterosigmoidostomy. Postgrad Med J 76:579–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan CC, Tan A, Salaman H (2008) Colon cancer 15 years after ureterosigmoidostomy. J Clin Oncol 26:1755–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leadbetter GW Jr, Zickerman P, Pierce E (1979) Ureterosigmoidostomy and carcinoma of the colon. J Urol 121:732–735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Starling JR, Uehling DT, Gilchrist KW (1984) The value of colonoscopy after ureterosigmoidostomy. Surgery 96:784–790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Austen M, Kalble T (2004) Secondary malignancies in different forms of urinary diversion using isolated gut. J Urol 172:831–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been conducted on the behalf of the Rare Diseases Center MAREP (malformations ano-rectales et pelviennes) and Neurosphinx (French Ministry of Health). The authors thank M. Vincent Wyart (MAREP Nantes coordinator) who kindly helped with the identification of patient records and the literature search.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Lehur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

According to French law, this study did not require approval from the local ethics committee, as the study was performed as an assessment of an established treatment.

Informed consent

All patients were informed of and verbally consented to participate in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ragu, R., Meurette, G., Kim, M. et al. Carcinoma arising in enteric diversion or rectal neobladder for bladder exstrophy. Tech Coloproctol 20, 745–752 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1519-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1519-2

Keywords

Navigation