Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a magnetic resonance (MR)-based classification system of obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) to guide physicians in patient management.
Methods
The medical records and imaging series of 105 consecutive patients (90 female, 15 male, aged 21–78 years, mean age 46.1 ± 5.1 years) referred to our center between April 2011 and January 2012 for symptoms of ODS were retrospectively examined. After history taking and a complete clinical examination, patients underwent MR imaging according to a standard protocol using a 0.35 T permanent field, horizontally oriented open-configuration magnet. Static and dynamic MR-defecography was performed using recognized parameters and well-established diagnostic criteria.
Results
Sixty-seven out of 105 (64 %) patients found the prone position more comfortable for the evacuation of rectal contrast while 10/105 (9.5 %) were unable to empty their rectum despite repeated attempts. Increased hiatus size, anterior rectocele and focal or extensive defects of the levator ani muscle were the most frequent abnormalities (67.6, 60.0 and 51.4 %, respectively). An MR-based classification was developed based on the combinations of abnormalities found: Grade 1 = functional abnormality, including paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis muscle, without anatomical defect affecting the musculo-fascial structures; Grade 2 = functional defect associated with a minor anatomical defect such as rectocele ≤2 cm in size and/or first-degree intussusception; Grade 3 = severe defects confined to the posterior anatomical compartment, including >2 cm rectocele, second- or higher-degree intussusception, full-thickness external rectal prolapse, poor mesorectal posterior fixation, rectal descent >5 cm, levator ani muscle rupture, ballooning of the levator hiatus and focal detachment of the endopelvic fascia; Grade 4 = combined defects of two or three pelvic floor compartments, including cystocele, hysterocele, enlarged urogenital hiatus, fascial tears enterocele or peritoneocele; Grade 5 = changes after failed surgical repair abscess/sinus tracts, rectal pockets, anastomotic strictures, small uncompliant rectum, kinking and/or lateral shift of supra-anastomotic portion and pudendal nerve entrapment.
Conclusions
According to our classification, Grades 1 and 2 may be amenable to conservative therapy; Grade 3 may require surgical intervention by a coloproctologist; Grade 4 would need a combined urogynecological and coloproctological approach; and Grade 5 may require an even more complex multidisciplinary approach. Validation studies are needed to assess whether this MR-based classification system leads to a better management of patients with ODS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. Eur Radiol 7:1309–1317
Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1998) Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:124–130
Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Påhlman LL (1996) Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1296–1302
Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al (2008) Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusceptions and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1611–1618
Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, Hale DS, Benson JT (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444
Healy JC, Halligan S, Resnek RH et al (1997) Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:775–779
Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, Hany TF, Steiner P, Krestin GP (1998) Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 206:641–646
Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS, Benson JT (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:81–88
Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Willmann JK, Marineck B, Hilfiker PR (2002) Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics 22:817–832
Piloni V, Fusco F, Dalla Rovere S et al (2007) MR-defecography in obstructed defecation: a simplified technique and classification system. Urodinamica 17:28–34
Longstreth GF, Thompson G, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RCL (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1480–1491
Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2007) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10:84–88
Spazzafumo L, Piloni V (1999) Rectal constipation and clinical decision-making: multiple correspondence analysis of defecographic findings. Tech Coloproctol 4:117–121
Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL, Gousse AE, Raz SL (1999) Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 54:454–457
Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218:621–641
Bartram CI (2005) Functional anorectal imaging. Abdom Imaging 30:195–203
Tunn R, DeLancey JO, Quint EE (2001) Visibility of pelvic organs support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1156–1563
Dietz HP, Shek C, Clarcke B (2005) Biometry oft he pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:580–585
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 3:681–685
Knowles CH, Eccersly AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunnis PJL (2000) Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms on patients with chronic constipation. Validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 43:1419–1426
Mahieu PH, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: 1. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9:247–251
Mahieu PH, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: 2. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 9:253–261
Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE (1988) Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 13:72–80
Grassi R, Romano S, Micera O, Fioroni C, Boller B (2005) Radiographic findings of post-operative double stapled trans anal resection (STARR) in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Eur J Radiol 53:410–416
DeLancey JO (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is discussed in the editorial available at doi:10.1007/s10151-013-0995-x.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piloni, V., Tosi, P. & Vernelli, M. MR-defecography in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS): technique, diagnostic criteria and grading. Tech Coloproctol 17, 501–510 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-0993-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-0993-z