Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to devise a symptom scoring system to assist in diagnosing constipation and in discriminating among pathophysiologic subgroups. METHOD: A structured symptom scoring questionnaire (11 questions) was completed by 71 chronically constipated patients and by 20 asymptomatic controls. The symptom score was correlated with a previously validated constipation score (Cleveland Clinic Score). All patients underwent colonic transit studies, standard anorectal physiology testing, and evacuation proctography. On the basis of these investigations alone, an observer blinded to the questionnaire results allocated patients to one of three pathophysiologic subgroups: slow-transit constipation, rectal evacuatory disorder, or mixed (slow-transit constipation and rectal evacuatory disorder). Linear discriminant analysis was used to assess the ability of different questionnaire symptoms to discriminate among these subgroups. RESULTS: Total symptom score was strongly correlated with the Cleveland Clinic Score (r=0.9). The median total score in constipated patients was 20 (range, 11–35) compared with a median of 2 in controls (range, 0–6). Discriminant analysis using cross validation estimated that pathophysiology could be predicted correctly for 55 percent (95 percent confidence interval =43–67 percent) of patients using just five symptoms. The discriminant function rarely misclassified patients with rectal evacuatory disorder as slow-transit constipation andvice versa, but could not effectively discriminate between patients with single and mixed pathologies. CONCLUSION: This new scoring system is a valid technique to assist in the diagnosis of constipation and is the first study using appropriate statistical methodology to demonstrate a discriminatory ability of multiple symptoms in constipation. At present, symptom analysis does not adequately differentiate major pathophysiologic subgroups for use in clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Halverson AL, Orkin BA. Which physiologic tests are useful in patients with constipation? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:735–9.
Pfeifer J, Agachan F, Wexner SD. Surgery for constipation: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:444–60.
Ho YH, Tan M, Goh HS. Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:520–4.
Ko C, Tong J, Lehman R, Shelton A, Schrock T, Welton M. Biofeedback is effective therapy for fecal incontinence and constipation. Arch Surg 1997;132:829–34.
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:681–5.
Grotz RL, Pemberton JH, Talley NJ, Rath DM, Zinsmeister AR. Discriminant value of psychological distress, symptom profiles, and segmental colonic dysfunction in outpatients with severe idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 1994;35:798–802.
Karlbom U, Påhlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W. Relationship between defecographic findings, rectal emptying and colonic transit time in constipated patients. Gut 1995;36:907–12.
Koch A, Voderholzer WA, Klauser AG, Muller-Lissner S. Symptoms in chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:902–6.
Mertz H, Naliboff B, Mayer EA. Symptoms and physiology in severe chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:131–8.
Whitehead WE, Chaussade S, Corazziari E, Kumar D. Report of an international workshop on management of constipation. Gastroenterology Int 1991;4:99–113.
Roberts JP, Newell MS, Deeks JJ, Waldron DW, Garvie NW, Williams NS. Oral [111In] DTPA scintigraphic assessment of colonic transit in constipated subjects. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1032–9.
Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:190–7.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
Moore DH. Evaluation of five discrimination procedures for binary variables. J Am Stat Assoc 1973;68:399–404.
Krzanowski WJ. Discrimination and classification using both binary and continuous variables. J Am Stat Assoc 1975;70:782–90.
Titterington DM, Murray GD, Murray LS,et al. Comparison of discrimination techniques applied to a complex data set of head injured patients. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1981;144:145–75.
Reeves BC, Quigley M. A review of data-derived methods for assigning causes of death from verbal autopsy data. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:1080–9.
Krzanowski WJ. Selection of variables, and assessment of their performance, in mixed-variable discriminant-analysis. Comp Stat Data Analysis 1995;19:419–31.
Wexner SD, Daniel N, Jagelman DG. Colectomy for constipation: physiologic investigation is the key to success. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:851–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by The Lillian May Coleman Fellowship in Surgery, The Royal College of Surgeons of England.
About this article
Cite this article
Knowles, C.H., Eccersley, A.J., Scott, S.M. et al. Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 1419–1426 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236639
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236639