Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery Annual Report 2010: an educational review

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Trompetto M, Clerico G, Realis Luc A, Marino F, Giani I, Ganio E (2006) Transanal Delorme procedure for treatment of rectocele associated with rectal intussusception. Tech Coloproctol 10:389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al (2008) Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1611–1618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holzer B, Rosen HR, Novi G, Ausch C, Hölbling N, Hofmann M, Schiessel R (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with severe constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:524–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maeda Y, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: suboptimal outcome and adverse events. Dis Colon Rectum 53:995–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pescatori M, Zbar AP (2009) Reinterventions after complicated or failed STARR procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:87–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Hoore A, Vanbeckevoort D, Penninckx F (2008) Clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of rectovaginal septum reinforcement with mesh for complex rectocele. Br J Surg 95:1264–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodner IJ (2009) Innovations in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 13:167–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zmora O, Khaikin M, Lebeydev A, Rosin D, Hoffman A, Gutman M, Ayalon A (2011) Multimedia manuscript. Laparoscopic rectopexy with posterior mesh fixation. Surg Endosc 25:313–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A et al (2011) Laparoscopic anterior rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorect Dis 13:561–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1825–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ et al (2006) Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapsed. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1052–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Devesa JM, López-Hervás P, Vicente R, Rey A, Die J, Moreno I, Teruel D (2011) Anal encirclement with a simple rectal sling for faecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 15:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholls RJ (2004) Sphincter repair: its present place. Acta Chir Iugosl 51:27–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van der Hulst VP et al (2006) MRI in evaluating atrophy of the external anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:991–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brouwer R, Duthie G (2010) Sacral nerve neuromodulation is effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the presence of a sphincter defect, pudendal neuropathy, or previous sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 53:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Editor-in-chief is deeply indebted to G.L. Occelli, who collected and processed the data from the Coloproctology Units, tp V. Podzemny and T. Bruni who helped to collect and review the data, to the chairmen of the SICCR-UCP club UCP who provided the figures of their series, and to the four experts who accepted to comment the data. The Uniderm kindly provided financial support for this project, helping Dr. G.L. Occelli.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Casula.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zorcolo, L., Giordano, P., Zbar, A.P. et al. The Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery Annual Report 2010: an educational review. Tech Coloproctol 16, 9–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0804-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0804-y

Keywords

Navigation