Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single surgeon experience of 102 consecutive cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Due to the recent heightened interest in even less invasive surgery, single port laparoscopic colorectal surgery is quickly gaining acceptance. While this access technique was first described in 2007 for colorectal resective procedures, large series are lacking.

Methods

Between January 2009 and October 2010, all patients undergoing single port colorectal surgery performed by a single surgeon were prospectively entered into an IRB-approved database and studied with regard to perioperative events, morbidity, and mortality.

Results

One hundred and two consecutive patients underwent a single port colorectal procedure. Mean age was 47 years (9–93 years), and average body mass index was 26 kg/m2 (15–39 kg/m2). Primary diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (51), neoplasia (23), Crohn’s disease (14), diverticulitis (11), familial adenomatous polyposis (1), and other (2). Procedures included 23 total colectomies, 40 segmental colectomies, and 19 other procedures. There was 1 conversion to an open operation, and 18 (18%) patients required placement of additional ports (1 port: N = 13; 2 ports: N = 2; 3 ports: N = 3). Average operating room time was 99 min (13–245), mean length of incision was 3.7 cm (1.2–7.8 cm), and average estimated blood loss was 140 ml (0–750 ml). There was one postoperative death, and 39 (38%) patients experienced minor postoperative complications. Mean lymph node harvest for oncologic resections was 44 (14–142). The average length of hospital stay was 5.9 days (2–24 days).

Conclusions

With proper patient selection and laparoscopic experience, single port colorectal surgery can be performed for even the most complex colorectal procedures. Further studies are needed to assess the benefits that single port colorectal surgery has over a conventional laparoscopic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open surgery for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW et al (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozturk E, Kiran RP, Geisler DP, Hull TL, Vogel JD (2009) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: benefits of laparoscopic colectomy at no extra cost. J Am Coll Surg 209:242–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Polle SW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2008) Total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: are there advantages compared with open and hand-assisted approaches? Dis Colon Rectum 51:541–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH (2008) Laparoscopic versus hand-assisted ultralow anterior resection: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curcillo PG 2nd, Wu AS, Podolosky ER et al (2010) Single-port access (spa TM) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403–1412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erbella J Jr, Bunch GM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 24:1958–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HJ, Lee JI, Lee YS et al (2010) Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24:2765–2769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG 2nd (2010) Single port access (SPA) surgery—a 24-month experience. J Gastrointest Surg 14:759–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1549–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Yaakovian MD, Haas EM (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a novel approach through a Pfannensteil incision. Tech Coloproctol 15:61–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fichera A, Zoccali M, Gullo R (2011) Single incision (“scarless”) laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg (in press)

  17. Geisler DP, Condon ET (2010) Single incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileopouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 12:941–943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Geisler DP (2010) Laparoscopic single-port colectomy for sigmoid cancer. Tech Coloproctol 14:253–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Ouchi M, Hirasaki Y (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: early experience with 31 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 54:705–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diana M, Dhumane P, Cahill RA, Mortensen N, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2011) Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: current state of the art. J Minim Access Surg 7:52–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Gazzaz GS, Kiran RP, Hull TL, Geisler DP (2009) Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 96:522–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu J, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Kiran RP (2011) Staged restorative proctocolectomy: laparoscopic or open completion proctectomy after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy. Surg Endosc (in press)

  24. Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M, Marcello P et al (2011) Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 54:187–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg (in press)

  26. Hompes R, Lindsey I, Jones OM et al (2011) Stepwise integration of single-port laparoscopic surgery into routine colorectal surgical practice by use of a surgical glove port. Tech Coloproctol 15:165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ishida H, Okada N (2011) Single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer via a periumbilical approach using a surgical glove: initial experience with 9 cases. Int J Surg 9:150–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Victor and Mrs. Carolyn Fazio for their support, guidance, and enthusiasm in pursuing innovative ways for the individualized treatment of patients with colorectal disorders during Dr. Fazio’s outstanding time of leadership at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Geisler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geisler, D., Garrett, T. Single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single surgeon experience of 102 consecutive cases. Tech Coloproctol 15, 397–401 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0756-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0756-7

Keywords

Navigation