Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectocele or stool quality: what matters more for symptoms of obstructed defecation?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rectocele is a common condition seen in patients presenting with symptoms of obstructed defecation. We designed a prospective observational study to investigate the relative roles of rectocele and stool quality for such symptoms.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-two women were assessed in a tertiary urogynaecological unit in a prospective observational study. History taking included questions regarding chronic constipation, incomplete bowel emptying, straining at stool and vaginal digitation, as well as symptoms of prolapse. Stool quality was assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound and defined as a diverticulum of the anterior vaginal wall measuring 10 mm or more in depth.

Results

The mean age was 53 (17–85) years. Patients reported frequent straining at stool (30%), chronic constipation (20%), vaginal digitation (15%) and incomplete bowel emptying (35%). Median stool quality was 4 (1–7). Ninety-seven women (40%) were found to have a true rectocele on imaging. Vaginal digitation was the only symptom significantly associated with true rectocele. Other symptoms of obstructed defecation were associated with stool quality rather than rectocele. Stool quality was not a confounder of the relationship between true rectocele and symptoms when tested by regression analysis.

Conclusions

Stool quality seems to be of greater relevance in the aetiology of symptoms of obstructed defecation than the presence of a rectocele. This was true even when using imaging criteria for a true rectocele rather than just surface anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swift S, Theofrastous JP (2001) Aetiology and classification of pelvic organ prolapse. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D (eds) Female urology and urogynecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 576–585

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2005) Posterior compartment prolapse on two- dimensional and three- dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior vaginal wall prolapse and its management. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynecol 9:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:96–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halban J, Tandler J (1907) Anatomie und Aetiologie der Genitalprolapse beim Weibe. Braumueller, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shull BL, Bachofen C (1999) Enterocele and rectocele. In: Walters MD, Karram MM (eds) Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery, 2nd edn. Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeLancey J (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Creighton SM, Pearce JM, Stanton SL (1992) Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: early observations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99:310–313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J (2001) Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:511–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N et al (2002) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP (2004) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:60–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perniola G, Shek K, Chong C, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz H (2008) Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:567–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Konstantinovic ML, Steensma AB, Domali E et al (2007) Correlation between 3D/4D translabial ultrasound and colpocystodefecography in diagnosis of posterior compartment prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steensma AB, Oom DMJ, Burger CW, Schouten WR (2007) Comparison of defecography and 3D/4D translabial ultrasound in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and/or evacuation disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz H (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: part 1: 2D aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:80–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz HP, Korda A (2005) Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:505–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis S, Heaton K (1997) Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:920–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riegler G, Esposito I (2001) Bristol scale stool form. A still valid help in medical practice and clinical research. Tech Coloproctol 5:163–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz HP, Clarke B (2005) Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:391–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hausammann R, Steffen T, Weishaupt D, Beutner U, Hetzer F (2009) Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders? Tech Coloproctol 13:17–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. P. Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, H.P. Rectocele or stool quality: what matters more for symptoms of obstructed defecation?. Tech Coloproctol 13, 265–268 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0527-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0527-x

Keywords

Navigation