Abstract
Background
Rectocele is a common condition seen in patients presenting with symptoms of obstructed defecation. We designed a prospective observational study to investigate the relative roles of rectocele and stool quality for such symptoms.
Methods
Two hundred and forty-two women were assessed in a tertiary urogynaecological unit in a prospective observational study. History taking included questions regarding chronic constipation, incomplete bowel emptying, straining at stool and vaginal digitation, as well as symptoms of prolapse. Stool quality was assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound and defined as a diverticulum of the anterior vaginal wall measuring 10 mm or more in depth.
Results
The mean age was 53 (17–85) years. Patients reported frequent straining at stool (30%), chronic constipation (20%), vaginal digitation (15%) and incomplete bowel emptying (35%). Median stool quality was 4 (1–7). Ninety-seven women (40%) were found to have a true rectocele on imaging. Vaginal digitation was the only symptom significantly associated with true rectocele. Other symptoms of obstructed defecation were associated with stool quality rather than rectocele. Stool quality was not a confounder of the relationship between true rectocele and symptoms when tested by regression analysis.
Conclusions
Stool quality seems to be of greater relevance in the aetiology of symptoms of obstructed defecation than the presence of a rectocele. This was true even when using imaging criteria for a true rectocele rather than just surface anatomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swift S, Theofrastous JP (2001) Aetiology and classification of pelvic organ prolapse. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D (eds) Female urology and urogynecology. Isis Medical Media, London, pp 576–585
Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2005) Posterior compartment prolapse on two- dimensional and three- dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:73–77
Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior vaginal wall prolapse and its management. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynecol 9:303–310
Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:96–99
Halban J, Tandler J (1907) Anatomie und Aetiologie der Genitalprolapse beim Weibe. Braumueller, Vienna
Shull BL, Bachofen C (1999) Enterocele and rectocele. In: Walters MD, Karram MM (eds) Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery, 2nd edn. Mosby, St Louis
DeLancey J (1999) Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:815–823
Creighton SM, Pearce JM, Stanton SL (1992) Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: early observations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99:310–313
Dietz HP, Haylen BT, Broome J (2001) Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:511–514
Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N et al (2002) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:239–245
Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP (2004) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:60–67
Perniola G, Shek K, Chong C, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz H (2008) Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:567–571
Konstantinovic ML, Steensma AB, Domali E et al (2007) Correlation between 3D/4D translabial ultrasound and colpocystodefecography in diagnosis of posterior compartment prolapse. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:448
Steensma AB, Oom DMJ, Burger CW, Schouten WR (2007) Comparison of defecography and 3D/4D translabial ultrasound in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and/or evacuation disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:447
Dietz H (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: part 1: 2D aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:80–92
Dietz HP, Korda A (2005) Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:505–508
Lewis S, Heaton K (1997) Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:920–924
Riegler G, Esposito I (2001) Bristol scale stool form. A still valid help in medical practice and clinical research. Tech Coloproctol 5:163–164
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749
Dietz HP, Clarke B (2005) Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:391–394
Hausammann R, Steffen T, Weishaupt D, Beutner U, Hetzer F (2009) Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders? Tech Coloproctol 13:17–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dietz, H.P. Rectocele or stool quality: what matters more for symptoms of obstructed defecation?. Tech Coloproctol 13, 265–268 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0527-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0527-x