Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of ureteric catheter placement in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to assess the morbidity related to this procedure.
Methods
Between 1994 and 2001, 313 elective laparoscopic colorectal surgeries were performed. Patients with and without ureteric catheters were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Catheter placement was attempted in 149 patients (catheter group) and was not attempted in 164 (controls). There were no significant differences between groups in the number of patients with prior colorectal resection (p=0.286) or other abdominal surgery (p=0.074). Crohn’s disease and diverticulitis were more common in the catheter group than among controls (p<0.001). Concomitant intra-abdominal fistula or abscess was present in 29 patients (19.5%) in the catheter group vs. 14 (8.5%) in the control group (p=0.005). The duration of surgery was longer in the catheter group (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in conversion, duration of bladder catheter placement, or length of hospital stay. Urinary tract infection occurred in 3 patients (2.0%) in the catheter group and 7 (4.3%) in the control group (p=0.257) and urinary retention occurred in 3 patients (2.0%) and 11 patients (6.7%), respectively (p=0.045). No intraoperative ureteric injuries occurred in either group.
Conclusion
Ureteric catheter placement was successful in most cases and was not associated with intraoperative injuries. The increased length of surgery in patients with ureteric catheter placement may attest to the increased severity of pathology in these patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agachan F, Joo JS, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1996) Intraoperative laparoscopic complications. Are we getting better? Dis Colon Rectum 39:S14–S19
Andersson A, Bergdahl L (1976) Urologic complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Arch Surg 111:969–971
Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld M (1994) An initial experience with lighted ureteral catheters during laparoscopic colectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:399–403
Bothwell WN, Bleicher RJ, Dent TL (1994) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in colon surgery. A five-year review. Dis Colon Rectum 37:330–334
Drake MJ, Noble JG (1998) Ureteric trauma in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9:108–117
Kramhoft J, Kronborg O, Backer OG, Sprechler M (1975) Urologic complications after operations for anorectal cancer, with an evaluation of preoperative intravenous pyelography. Dis Colon Rectum; 18:118–122
Kyzer S, Gordon PH (1994) The prophylactic use of ureteral catheters during colorectal operations. Am Surg 60:212–226
Leff EI, Groff W, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE, Salvati EP (1982) Use of ureteral catheters in colonic and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 25:457–460
Preston JM (2000) Iatrogenic ureteric injury: common medicolegal pitfalls. BJU Int 86:313–317
Chahin F, Dwivedi AJ, Paramesh A et al (2002) The implications of lighted ureteral stenting in laparoscopic colectomy. JSLS 6:49–52
Huscher C, Silecchia G, Croce E et al (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal resection. A multicenter Italian study. Surg Endosc 10:875–879
Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complication of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596
Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Siebra JA, Furtado DC, Regadas SM (1998) Complications in laparoscopic colorectal resection: main types and prevention. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:189–192
Champault GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline JM (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:88–95
Nam YS, Wexner SD (2002) Clinical value of prophylactic ureteral stent indwelling during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Korean Med Sci 17:633–635
Kuno K, Menzin A, Kauder HH, Sison C, Gal D (1998) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynecologic surgery. Urology 52:1004–1008
Wood EC, Maher P, Pelosi MA (1996) Routine use of ureteric catheters at laparoscopic hysterectomy may cause unnecessary complications. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:393–397
Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C et al (1999) Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc 13:639–644
Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Poulin EC (2000) Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multiple regression analysis of 416 resections. Surg Endosc 14:258–263
Yong L, Deane M, Monson JR, Darzi A(2001) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy. Surg Endosc 15:1431–1439
Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CW et al (1997) New approaches in laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Int Surg 82:266–268
Park CT, Lim KT, Chung HW et al (2002) Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:49–53
Saidi MH, Sadler RK, Vancaillie TG, Akright BD, Farhart SA, White AJ (1996) Diagnosis and management of serious urinary complications after major operative laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 87:272–276
Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB et al (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:339–345
Phipps JH, Tyrrell NJ (1992) Transilluminating ureteric stents for preventing operative ureteric damage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:81
Hamel CT, Hildebrandt U, Weiss EG, Feifelz G, Wexner SD (2001) Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Surg Endosc 15:642–645
Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475
Hong D, Lewis M, Tabet J, Anvari M (2002) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open resection for benign colorectal disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:238–242
Pokala N, Delaney CP, Kiran RP et al (2007) A randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous intra-operative vs. sequential prophylactic ureteric catheter insertion in re-operative and complicated colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:683–687
Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–766
Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214
Levine RS, Pollack HM, Banner MP (1982) Transient ureteral obstruction after ureteral stenting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:323–327
Sheikh FA, Khubchandani IT (1990) Prophylactic ureteric catheters in colon surgery—how safe are they? Report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum 33:508–510
Parker RM, Basch RI, Harrison JH (1968) Unilateral vasoconstrictive anuria. Surg Gynecol Obstet 127:66–70
Lauter DM, Froines EJ (2001) Initial experience with 150 cases of laparoscopic assisted colectomy. Am J Surg 181:398–403
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsujinaka, S., Wexner, S.D., DaSilva, G. et al. Prophylactic ureteric catheters in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 12, 45–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0397-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0397-7