Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As a substantial waiting time is usually required for radical surgery, safe and effective preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is desired for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the significance of NAC in advanced HNSCC is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of NAC using the paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCE) regimen.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the background characteristics, incidence of adverse events, overall response rate (ORR), pathological response, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in 26 patients. Patients receiving the PCE regimen were further divided into two groups based on the number of chemotherapy cycles (one cycle or more) and eligibility for cisplatin. Patients aged ≥ 75 years and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min were classified as ineligible for cisplatin.

Results

The median age was 70 (27–81) years. The median eGFR at treatment initiation was 63.2 (41.1–89.7) mL/min. Fourteen (53.8%) patients were ineligible for cisplatin. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia was observed in 11 of 25 (42.3%) patients. No delay in or withdrawal from surgery was observed. The ORR was 65.4%. The 2-year RFS and OS were 61.5% and 76.7%, respectively. No significant differences in safety and efficacy between the number of chemotherapy cycles and cisplatin eligibility were observed.

Conclusion

NAC using the PCE regimen for patients with locally advanced HNSCC, including cisplatin-ineligible patients, has acceptable toxicity and favorable efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Head and neck cancers, version 2.2023. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf Accessed 23 Aug 2023

  2. Xiao R, Ward MC, Yang K et al (2018) Increased pathologic upstaging with rising time to treatment initiation for head and neck cancer: a mechanism for increased mortality. Cancer 124:1400–1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31213. (PMID: 29315499)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liao DZ, Schlecht NF, Rosenblatt G et al (2019) Association of delayed time to treatment initiation with overall survival and recurrence among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in an underserved urban population. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2414. (PMID: 31513264)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoonbeek RC, Zwertbroek J, Plaat BEC et al (2021) Determinants of delay and association with outcome in head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:1816–1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.029. (PMID: 33715909)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rygalski CJ, Zhao S, Eskander A et al (2021) Time to surgery and survival in head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 28:877–885. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09326-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brody RM, Albergotti WG, Shimunov D et al (2020) Changes in head and neck oncologic practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Head Neck 42:1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H et al (2011) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J et al (2009) Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5062–5067. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD et al (2008) Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 26:778–785. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2018) Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 19:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitamura H, Tsukamoto T, Shibata T et al (2014) Randomised phase III study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, doxorubicin, vinblastine and cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy compared with radical cystectomy alone for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0209. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. International Collaboration of Trialists (2011) International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2171–2177. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.3139

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vermorken JB, Remenar E, van Herpen C et al (2007) Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa071028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Posner MR, Hershock DM, Blajman CR et al (2007) Cisplatin and fluorouracil alone or with docetaxel in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1705–1715. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Licitra L, Grandi C, Guzzo M et al (2013) Primary chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity squamous cell cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 21:327–333. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.06.146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhong LP, Zhang CP, Ren GX et al (2013) Randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by surgery versus up-front surgery in locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 31:744–751. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.8820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takenaka M, Arai A, Yoshizaka K et al (2019) Feasibility of combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab as induction chemotherapy for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Oncol 4:1657. https://doi.org/10.25107/2474-1663.1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Enokida T, Ogawa T, Homma A et al (2020) A multicenter phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab followed by chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Med 9:1671–1682. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kies MS, Holsinger FC, Lee JJ et al (2010) Induction chemotherapy and cetuximab for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from a phase II prospective trial. J Clin Oncol 28:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tahara M, Kiyota N, Yokota T et al (2018) Phase II trial of combination treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSPOR-HN02). Ann Oncol 29:1004–1009. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised recist guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Japan Society for Head and Neck Cancer (2018) General rules for clinical studies on head and neck cancer, 6th edn. Kanehara & Co., Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun L, Candelieri-Surette D, Anglin-Foote T et al (2022) Cetuximab-based vs carboplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Haddad RI, Massarelli E, Lee JJ et al (2019) Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, cetuximab, and cetuximab, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by local therapy in previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 30:471–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Shirasu H, Yokota T, Kawakami T et al (2020) Efficacy and feasibility of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab for locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer patients ineligible for combination treatment with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. Int J Clin Oncol 25:1914–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01742-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bang J, Shin HI, Kim GJ et al (2023) Oncologic and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in human papillomavirus-positive tonsillar cancer. Head Neck 45:2580–2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chaukar D, Prabash K, Rane P et al (2022) Prospective phase II open-label randomized controlled trial to compare mandibular preservation in upfront surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in operable oral cavity cancer. J Clin Oncol 40:272–281. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing services.

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: R. Tanaka, Y. Ueki, T. Takahashi, and A. Horii. Data analysis and interpretation: R. Tanaka, Y. Ueki, S. Ohshima, Y. Yokoyama, T. Takahashi, R. Shodo, K. Yamazaki, K. Ohtaki, T. Togashi, and Y. Sato. Drafting of the manuscript: R. Tanaka, Y. Ueki, and A. Horii. Final approval of the version to be published: All authors. Y. Ueki has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yushi Ueki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethical approval

This trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided written informed consent before enrolling in the study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Niigata University Hospital (No. 2022-0157).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, R., Ueki, Y., Ohshima, S. et al. Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02545-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02545-9

Keywords

Navigation