Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility study on combination chemotherapy using nogitecan hydrochloride (topotecan) and cisplatin for patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervical cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The standard chemotherapeutic regimen for stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervical cancer is platinum-based combination chemotherapy such as cisplatin (CDDP)/paclitaxel and CDDP/nogitecan hydrochloride (NGT, topotecan). Because it is unclear whether the CDDP/NGT combination chemotherapy is tolerable for Japanese patients, we conducted the present study to assess the feasibility of CDDP/NGT combination chemotherapy.

Methods

Between June 2012 and April 2014, 15 patients with stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients underwent six cycles of NGT at a dose of 0.75 mg/m2, followed immediately by CDDP at a dose of 50 mg/m2 on day 1 by intravenous infusion, and then NGT at a dose of 0.75 mg/m2 on days 2 and 3.

Results

Of 15 patients, 9 patients underwent at least 6 cycles of NGT/CDDP combination chemotherapy. Of a total of 83 cycles, 70 cycles (84.3 %) of NGT/CDDP combination chemotherapy could be continued at the starting dose of NGT (0.75 mg/m2). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included leukopenia in 10 patients (66.7 %), neutropenia in 15 (100 %), anemia in 6 (40.0 %), thrombocytopenia in 4 (26.7 %), and febrile neutropenia in 4 (26.7 %). The response rate according to RECIST was 27 % (3/11), with partial response in 3 patients.

Conclusions

NGT/CDDP combination chemotherapy may be a tolerable and effective regimen for Japanese patients with stage IVB, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervical cancer. Based on the results of this study, NGT/CDDP combination chemotherapy was approved in Japan in November 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thigpen T, Shingleton H, Homesley H et al (1981) Cis-platinum in treatment of advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer (Phila) 48:899–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS et al (2009) Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 27:4649–4655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bookman MA, Blessing JA, Hanjani P et al (2000) Topotecan in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 77:446–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muderspach LI, Blessing JA, Levenback C et al (2001) A phase II study of topotecan in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 81:213–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr et al (2005) Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 23:4626–4633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Cella D et al (2005) Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 23:4617–4625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitagawa R, Katsumata N, Shibata T et al (2015) Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer: the open-label randomized phase III trial JCOG0505. J Clin Oncol 33:2129–2135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ et al (2014) Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 370:734–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto K, Kokawa K, Umesaki N et al (2009) Phase I study of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride and nedaplatin for cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Oncol Rep 21:1005–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng L, Li M, Hu J et al (2014) UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms are correlated with irinotecan-induced toxicity: a system review and meta-analysis in Asians. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:551–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muneaki Shimada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Yoshihiro Nambu serves as an employee of Pharmaceuticals Group, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd. Yasuhiro Nambu has stock ownership in Nippon Kayaku. The other authors have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimada, M., Sato, S., Oishi, T. et al. Feasibility study on combination chemotherapy using nogitecan hydrochloride (topotecan) and cisplatin for patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervical cancer . Int J Clin Oncol 21, 969–974 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-0984-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-0984-y

Keywords

Navigation