Skip to main content
Log in

Indocyanine green endoscopic evaluation of pituitary stalk and gland blood flow in craniopharyngiomas

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence endoscopy to evaluate pituitary blood flow in craniopharyngioma resection and its possible impact on intraoperative decisions regarding pituitary stalk processing. Patients with craniopharyngiomas who had undergone transsphenoidal surgery since March 2021, when an ICG endoscope was introduced at the Kagoshima University Hospital, were included in the study. When targeted tumor removal was approaching completion, 10 mg of ICG was administered intravenously to evaluate blood flow in the pituitary stalk and gland. ICG signals and endocrinological status before and after surgery were evaluated retrospectively. Pituitary stalk and gland blood flow were evaluated as positive (++), weakly positive (+), and no signal (−).Ten patients with craniopharyngiomas underwent transsphenoidal surgery using an ICG endoscope (mean age 56.6 ± 14.2 years; 40% male). Among the eight patients in whom the pituitary stalk was preserved, pituitary function with positive signal on the stalk was intact in two. Two other patients with weakly positive stalk and positive pituitary gland signals showed intact function or minimal pituitary dysfunction. Four patients had impairments in more than three axes with poor ICG signals in the stalk or pituitary gland. Two patients underwent pituitary amputation because of high tumor invasion and lack of ICG signal in the stalk after tumor removal, resulting in panhypopituitarism. A negative ICG signal in the pituitary stalk is likely to indicate postoperative pituitary function loss. Craniopharyngioma surgery using ICG endoscopy may be useful for predicting endocrine prognosis and improving tumor outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Carmel PW, Antunes JL, Chang CH (1982) Craniopharyngiomas in children. Neurosurgery 11:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198209000-00008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM (1998) The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 89:547–551. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Müller HL (2014) Craniopharyngioma. Endocr Rev 35:513–543. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2013-1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmann BM, Höllig A, Strauss C, Buslei R, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R (2012) Results after treatment of craniopharyngiomas: further experiences with 73 patients since 1997. J Neurosurg 116:373–384. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.JNS081451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morisako H, Goto T, Goto H, Bohoun CA, Tamrakar S, Ohata K (2016) Aggressive surgery based on an anatomical subclassification of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 41:E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamada S, Fukuhara N, Oyama K, Takeshita A, Takeuchi Y, Ito J, Inoshita N (2010) Surgical outcome in 90 patients with craniopharyngioma: an evaluation of transsphenoidal surgery. World Neurosurg 74:320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bobeff EJ, Mathios D, Mistry AA et al (2023) Predictors of extent of resection and recurrence following endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.3.JNS222607

  8. Litvack ZN, Zada G, Laws ER (2012) Indocyanine green fluorescence endoscopy for visual differentiation of pituitary tumor from surrounding structures. J Neurosurg 116:935–941. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.1.JNS11601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, Melmed S, Murad MH, Salvatori R, Samuels MH (2016) Hormonal replacement in hypopituitarism in adults: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:3888–3921. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinoshita Y, Tominaga A, Usui S, Arita K, Sakoguchi T, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K (2013) The arginine and GHRP-2 tests as alternatives to the insulin tolerance test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in Japanese patients: a comparison. Endocr J 60:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM (2008) Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 108:715–728. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujio S, Hanada T, Yonenaga M, Nagano Y, Habu M, Arita K, Yoshimoto K (2021) Surgical aspects in craniopharyngioma treatment. Innov Surg Sci 6:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2019-1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duff JM, Meyer FB, Ilstrup DM, Laws ER Jr, Schleck CD, Scheithauer BW (2000) Long-term outcomes for surgically resected craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 46:291–302; discussion 302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200002000-00007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin LL, El Naqa IE, Leonard JR, Park TS, Hollander AS, Michalski JM, Mansur DB (2008) Long-term outcome in children treated for craniopharyngioma with and without radiotherapy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1:126–130. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED/2008/1/2/126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomita T, Bowman RM (2005) Craniopharyngiomas in children: surgical experience at Children’s Memorial Hospital. Childs Nerv Syst 21:729–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1202-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park YS, Chang JH, Park YG, Kim DS (2011) Recurrence rates after neuroendoscopic fenestration and gamma Knife surgery in comparison with subtotal resection and gamma Knife surgery for the treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 114:1360–1368. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.JNS09301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takano S, Akutsu H, Mizumoto M, Yamamoto T, Tsuboi K, Matsumura A (2015) Neuroendoscopy followed by radiotherapy in cystic craniopharyngiomas—a long-term follow-up. World Neurosurg 84:1305–15.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ordóñez-Rubiano EG, Forbes JA, Morgenstern PF et al (2018) Preserve or sacrifice the stalk? Endocrinological outcomes, extent of resection, and recurrence rates following endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.6.JNS18901

  19. Amano K, Aihara Y, Tsuzuki S, Okada Y, Kawamata T (2019) Application of indocyanine green fluorescence endoscopic system in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161:695–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-03778-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Inoue A, Kohno S, Ohnishi T et al (2021) Tricks and traps of ICG endoscopy for effectively applying endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery to pituitary adenoma. Neurosurg Rev 44:2133–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01382-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hide T, Yano S, Shinojima N, Kuratsu J (2015) Usefulness of the indocyanine green fluorescence endoscope in endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 122:1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.JNS14599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Muto J, Mine Y, Nishiyama Y et al (2023) Intraoperative real-time near-infrared image-guided endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumors. World Neurosurg 175:e218–e229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage for the editorial assistance.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: R.M., S.F., and R.H. Acquisition of data (e.g., patient acquisition and management): R.M, J.S., M.Y., T.H., N.H., and H.Y. Analysis and interpretation of data: R.M. Manuscript writing, and revision: R.M., S.F., and R.H. Administrative or technical support (e.g., database building and organization): R.M., S.F, and R.H. Study supervision: R.M., S.F., J.S., M.Y., T.H., N.H., and H.Y.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shingo Fujio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Kagoshima University Hospital Ethics Committee (reference no. 220186). Study-specific informed consent was obtained from all patients. An opt-out approach was used for past samples.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makino, R., Fujio, S., Sugata, J. et al. Indocyanine green endoscopic evaluation of pituitary stalk and gland blood flow in craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Rev 46, 312 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02223-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02223-w

Keywords

Navigation