Abstract
Previously, the simultaneous presence of endocarditis (IE) has been reported in 3–30% of spondylodiscitis cases. The specific implications on therapy and outcome of a simultaneous presence of both diseases are not yet fully evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a simultaneously present endocarditis on the course of therapy and outcome of spondylodiscitis. A prospective database analysis of 328 patients diagnosed with spontaneous spondylodiscitis (S) using statistical analysis with propensity score matching was conducted. Thirty-six patients (11.0%) were diagnosed with concurrent endocarditis (SIE) by means of transoesophageal echocardiography. In our cohort, the average age was 65.82 ± 4.12 years and 64.9% of patients were male. The incidence of prior cardiac or renal disease was significantly higher in the SIE group (coronary heart disease SIE n = 13/36 vs. S n = 57/292, p < 0.05 and chronic heart failure n = 11/36 vs. S n = 41/292, p < 0.05, chronic renal failure SIE n = 14/36 vs. S n = 55/292, p < 0.05). Complex interdisciplinary coordination and diagnostics lead to a significant delay in surgical intervention (S = 4.5 ± 4.5 days vs. SIE = 8.9 ± 9.5 days, p < 0.05). Mortality did not show statistically significant differences: S (13.4%) and SIE (19.1%). Time to diagnosis and treatment is a key to efficient treatment and patient safety. In order to counteract delayed therapy, we developed a novel therapy algorithm based on the analysis of treatment processes of the SIE group. We propose a clear therapy pathway to avoid frequently observed pitfalls and delays in diagnosis to improve patient care and outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The incidence of spondylodiscitis is increasing in the western world [11, 12]. Amongst other things, this is the result from an increasing life expectancy which is associated with increased multimorbidity including a wide variety of pre-existing conditions and accordingly negative impact on the immune system [21]. Spontaneous spondylodiscitis can present itself in various clinical manifestations which require different therapeutic measures from conservative to surgical treatment. Even though previous retrospective studies analyzed specific indications and corresponding outcome, there is still no gold standard regarding therapy pathways [28]. It has previously been reported that a concomitant infective endocarditis (SIE) is present in up to 30% of spondylodiscitis cases [3, 6, 7, 24]. Endocarditis (IE), like spondylodiscitis, is a life-threatening disease with a mortality rate of up to 30% [14, 23, 29] and also shows an increasing incidence due to demographic changes [9].
The simultaneous occurrence of such serious diseases has rarely been described and analyzed previously. Also, the frequency of IE in spondylodiscitis cohorts has not yet been sufficiently investigated and reported rates differ greatly from 4–10% [6, 24] to 30% [3]. Confirmation of diagnosis is greatly influenced by the screening method used [3, 24]. Behmanesh et al. were able to show that the rate of diagnosed IE was 10 times higher after implementing routine screening using transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients with known spondylodiscitis [3, 6, 20].
Patients with known IE presenting with even mild symptoms of back pain should undergo an in-depth diagnostic workup using MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) to avoid missed or delayed diagnosis of spondylodiscitis [6]. Especially in an older population, delayed diagnosis of spondylodiscitis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates of up to 27% [6, 9,10,11,12].
The utilization of TOE as imaging method has been integrated as an essential part of treatment pathways for patients with spondylodiscitis [3, 6, 20] and is routinely performed where previous transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has proven inconclusive.
From an interdisciplinary viewpoint of the treating team of physicians including spinal surgeons, cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and infectious disease specialists, the relevance of SIE regarding therapeutic strategies and outcome is unclear. Previous studies have reported increased mortality rates by up to 10 times in case of SIE [3]. So far, neither an optimal surgical strategy nor definite anti-infective guidelines have been established in this subpopulation [28]. Thus, standardized treatment algorithms or recommendations for patients presenting with SIE are lacking. It has been established that for both spondylodiscitis and IE, time to diagnosis has a significant influence on prognosis and mortality [13, 14, 16, 18].
We therefore aimed to use a prospectively managed database to analyze the influence of a simultaneously present IE in patients with already diagnosed spondylodiscitis in regard to differences in clinical care. We furthermore aimed to develop a novel treatment algorithm to be able to standardize diagnostic as well as therapeutic strategies in this cohort of patients.
Material and methods
Study population and data procurement
The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. A positive vote was received by the responsible ethics committee (medical chamber, WF-013/20). Regarding the anonymized data, there was no further consultation by the ethics committee and no informed consent was necessary.
In an 8-year period from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, all patients treated with proven spontaneous spondylodiscitis at a tertiary centre were included in a prospective database. All patients were treated, after the suspicion of spontaneous spondylodiscitis was raised, according to our internal algorithm, which is shown in Fig. 1. An analysis of this database was carried out in January 2021. All patients with complete documentation were included in the evaluation.
Demographic and disease-relevant patient data were collected in all cases. All pre-existing conditions were documented and sorted into the groups listed in Table 1. Pathogens detected via microbiological screening of intraoperative tissue samples or blood cultures were evaluated. SIE was diagnosed via echocardiography at initial presentation and follow-up screenings if necessary. In addition, the duration from admission to spinal surgery and/or surgical valve replacement/repair as well as all complications until discharge were recorded. Therapeutic procedures and diagnostic steps were analyzed according to a modular principle to build a novel, optimized treatment algorithm, which is shown in Fig. 2.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 (IBM, New York, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) whilst categorical variables are expressed as number (%). To compare patients with and without endocarditis in terms of continuous variables, the Student t-test for independent samples was used for normally distributed data. Mann–Whitney U test was used with non-normally distributed data, and chi2 or Fisher’s exact test was calculated for categorial variables. p-values below 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences between the two groups. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to check data for normal distribution. An additional propensity score matching (PSM) was then carried out in order to achieve better comparability in a retrospective evaluation between the groups. The PSM procedure was conducted with R essentials plug-in for SPSS. To minimize the selection bias, a 1:1 ratio PSM with the “nearest neighbour matching” algorithm was performed. The score is derived from a logit model considering age and gender as predictors. The estimated PSM was then used to construct the age and gender-matched comparison groups (Table 2).
Results
Three hundred twenty-eight consecutive cases of spontaneous spondylodiscitis were included in this analysis. The mean age was 65.82 ± 4.12 years and 213 (64.9%) patients were male. On average, imaging showed spondylodiscitis in 1.5 segments (1–7 segments). Most commonly, a lumbar (54.9%), followed by thoracic (24.4%) and cervical (11.6%), manifestation was diagnosed. In 9.1% of cases, dissemination in multiple sections of the spine was present. On average, the patients had 2.4 ± 1.9 pre-existing conditions. An overview of pre-existing conditions and demographics is listed in Table 1. If no pathogen could be detected in blood cultures, a transpedicular Jamshidi biopsy under general anaesthesia of the affected intervertebral disc space was carried out for further microbiological and histopathological analysis. In our experience, a percutaneous biopsy via the radiology colleagues is very painful for the patients and often brings too little material to perform an adequate microbiological and histopathological examination. Table 3 shows the percentage of pathogen detection in blood culture and biopsy. Once the pathogen was identified, the antibiotic treatment was adapted to its antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Time of intravenous treatment period and oralization thereafter was discussed at a weekly interdisciplinary conference including microbiologists, infectious disease specialists, pathologists and spinal surgeons (Fig. 1). A total of 43 (13.1%) patients received conservative therapy only. The decision whether surgical therapy was necessary was made in interdisciplinary discussion depending on the patient’s clinical condition and responsiveness to antibiotic therapy. In patients with a septic deterioration, neurological deficits, severe spinal instability, deformity caused by the infection, or a significant abscess detected on the MRI, indication for spinal surgical treatment was given. In general, conservative therapy was initially attempted in all patients after MRI imaging of the entire spine and CT of the infected area. Exceptions to this were epidural abscesses with relevant spinal compression and accompanying neurological deficits or a septic clinical condition that required intensive care therapy. If, in the case of severe instability, as shown in Fig. 3, persistent pain occurred despite antibiotic therapy in accordance with the antibiogram, surgical stabilization was recommended.
Epidural abscesses were present in 53% of patients and psoas abscesses in 27.1% cases. The indication for surgical therapy of the IE was set in interdisciplinary discussion within the endocarditis team according to current guideline recommendations [15].
In 36/328 (11.0%) patients, IE was diagnosed via echocardiography. Only six performed transthoracic echocardiographies (TTE) proved a definite IE; in the other patients, TOE was used to screen for IE. The aortic valve (50.0%), followed by the mitral valve (33.3%), was the most commonly affected heart valve (Fig. 4).
Patients in the SIE group had significantly higher rates of previous cardiac diseases (coronary heart disease SIE n = 13 vs. S n = 57, p = 0.02; chronic heart failure SIE n = 11 vs. S n = 41, p = 0.01) or chronic renal failure (SIE n = 14 vs. S n = 55, p < 0.01).
In case of diagnosed SIE, microbiological results showed coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS) and Enterococcus species to be the most common pathogens (Fig. 5). In the SIE group, 86.1% (31/36) of blood cultures were positive, whereas in the S group, only 45.6% (133/292) were positive (p < 0.001).
In the group of patients with SIE, the male sex was predominant (69.4%). There was no difference in the distribution of localizations between different patient groups (i.e. cervical, thoracic, lumbar). The rate of positive blood cultures was significantly increased in the SIE group (51.2% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001).
In the SIE group, surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis was carried out in 28/36 (77.8%) cases whilst IE was treated surgically in 16/36 (44.4%) cases.
The in-hospital mortality overall was 14.0% (n = 46). In the S group, 13.4% (n = 39) died, whilst in the SIE group, 19.4% (n = 7; p = 0.32) died. Of those patients who died in the SIE group, all patients were treated conservatively in regard to their endocarditis (p = 0.01).
PSM was used to counteract biases caused by a relatively small sample size and age as major factor for mortality. Thirty-six pairs could be formed and showed no significant difference in mortality (S: n = 4, SIE: n = 7, p = 0.33).
Time from admission to surgical treatment almost doubled in the SIE compared to the S group (S = 4.5 ± 4.5 days vs. SIE = 8.9 ± 9.5 days, p < 0.05). Furthermore, intravenous anti-infective treatment in the SIE group was delayed (S = 26.3 ± 21.3 vs. SIE = 43.9 ± 21.9 days; p > 0.05) which resulted in a prolonged in-hospital stay (S = 27 ± 23 vs. SIE = 34 ± 21 days; p > 0.05. After performing PSM, no significant changes within the complication rates were observed (Table 2). After a case by case analysis, 35 patients could be grouped and divided onto 5 different diagnosis-treatment pathways. Only one patient who received surgical therapy for IE with following conservative therapy for spondylodiscitis cannot be found in the treatment algorithm developed (Fig. 2). In the one case, which could not be included in our treatment algorithm, the initial MRI showed a mild spondylodiscitis and the patient rejected surgical therapy despite the interdisciplinary advice because he was pain free.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the influence of concomitant endocarditis on therapy and outcome in the largest group of patients with spondylodiscitis published to date. A total of 328 patients with spondylodiscitis were examined over an 8-year period using a well-established interdisciplinary approach. IE was diagnosed in 36 cases. As previously described by various authors, there is a predominance of the male sex in both the S and SIE group [6, 8, 9, 27]. Age and gender distribution in our collective was similar to those of other large spondylodiscitis [10] and endocarditis [6] collectives. Patients with IE showed typical distributions of affected valves [26]. Localization of spondylodiscitis did not differ between the S and SIE groups and coincide with literature findings [19]. In our collective, echocardiography was performed in 77.5% of patients in order to rule out the presence of IE, resulting in 36 patients diagnosed with SIE. This corresponds to a rate of 11.0% overall or 14.1% by means of conducted echocardiographic screening. This is significantly less than Pigrau et al. and Behmanesh et al., who were able to detect concomitant IE in 30% and 32% of spondylodiscitis cases [3, 24]. Nevertheless, our study shows that IE is not uncommon in patients presenting with spontaneous spondylodiscitis and therefore echocardiography should be a set step in any diagnostic algorithm used in clinical practice [20]. In our patient collective, the diagnosis was only possible in six cases by means of TTE. Despite the fact that TOE is more invasive and more expensive than TTE, we strongly recommend performing this diagnostic step as it proves a significantly higher sensitivity than a TTE [2, 25]. This recommendation coincides with the corresponding recommendations of cardiological and orthopaedic societies [4, 14, 17, 31]. We observed a significantly higher rate of positive blood cultures in the SIE group (Table 3) which is explained by the valvular localization of an infectious focus where bacteriaemia is more frequent [22]. In contrast, intraoperative samples in the SIE group showed less frequent detection of pathogens (70.6% vs. 51.6%, n < 0.05). We attribute this to the fact that, due to the early positive blood cultures in the SIE group, we had already frequently started preoperative antibiotic therapy, which made intraoperative bacterial detection more difficult [1].
Known risk factors for the development of IE [6] include pre-existing cardiac diseases such as CHD and CHF as well as chronic renal failure. Pre-existing cardiac and renal conditions proved significantly more frequent in the SIE than in the S group.
Compared to previous studies, we demonstrated a low rate of conservative therapy [5, 30], which is likely due to our spine centre being part of a tertiary hospital where many complex cases are referred to. For example, 23/36 patients with IE were referred to us from primary hospitals where conservative treatment had failed, or due to the complexity of the case. Furthermore, in cases of SIE, a surgical debridement and stabilization are mandatory after surgical valve replacement to prevent for early reinfection as it is shown in our treatment algorithm (Fig. 2).
With this study, we were able to show for the first time that concomitant spondylodiscitis and infective endocarditis diagnosed by echocardiography has a significant consequence regarding course of treatment compared to patients only diagnosed with spondylodiscitis. Anti-infective therapy was almost administered twice as long intravenously to the patients in the SIE group than to patients in the S group. Accordingly, the length of the in-hospital stay was also increased in the SIE group. Furthermore, we were able to show a significant delay of surgical therapy if IE was diagnosed. As frequently described in literature [13, 14, 16, 18], this may lead to poorer overall outcomes.
Analyzing each patient’s treatment pathway endorsed in this study, the interdisciplinary coordination and decision-making process proved to be the most likely cause of this observed time loss and treatment delay in the SIE group. In avoidance of such obstacles, the flowchart shown in Fig. 2 was developed in order to provide a ready-to-use therapy sequence which aims towards a more efficient coordination effort within the interdisciplinary team. In our department, it was put in place as a result of this study in December 2020.
Limitations
The limitations of this study result from its retrospective and monocentric design. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that all patients were treated at a university hospital and, as already mentioned, a high number of externally transferred patients with failed conservative therapy were included so it must be stated that successful conservative therapy of spondylodiscitis is certainly underrepresented in our cohort.
Conclusion
For the first time, this study was able to show that a simultaneous presence of IE in patients with an already diagnosed spondylodiscitis does not lead to increased mortality in a large collective, but significantly increases time to surgical treatment as well as time of hospitalization. The case by case analysis showed that part of this prolonged diagnosis and treatment process resulted from preoperative interdisciplinary discussions concerning therapeutic options. In order to avoid delayed treatment, this study presents an algorithm which should be implemented to safely accelerate the process of decision-making and subsequently improving patient outcome.
Data availability
All relevant data are included in the manuscript. Additional data and information will be provided from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Change history
21 February 2022
Article was modified for the funding note to be added.
Abbreviations
- S:
-
Spondylodiscitis
- SIE:
-
Spondylodiscitis and endocarditis
- IE:
-
Infective endocarditis
- TOE:
-
Transoesophageal echocardiography
- TTE:
-
Transthoracic echocardiography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MSSA:
-
Staphylococcus aureus
- CHD:
-
Coronary heart disease
- CHF:
-
Chronic heart failure
- PSM:
-
Propensity score matching
References
Al-Mayahi M, Cian A, Lipsky BA, Suvà D, Müller C, Landelle C, Miozzari HH, Uçkay I (2015) Administration of antibiotic agents before intraoperative sampling in orthopedic infections alters culture results. J Infect 71:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.08.002
Bai AD, Steinberg M, Showler A, Burry L, Bhatia RS, Tomlinson GA, Bell CM, Morris AM (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for infective endocarditis findings using transesophageal echocardiography as the reference standard: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:639-646.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.03.007
Behmanesh B, Gessler F, Schnoes K, Dubinski D, Won S-Y, Konczalla J, Seifert V, Weise L, Setzer M (2019) Infective endocarditis in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Neurosurg Focus 46:E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.10.FOCUS18445
Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ, Darouiche RO, Widmer AF, Schmitt SK, Hendershot EF, Holtom PD, Huddleston PM, Petermann GW, Osmon DR (2015) 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis 61:e26–e46. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ482
Bettini N, Girardo M, Dema E, Cervellati S (2009) Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 18:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0979-8
Carbone A, Lieu A, Mouhat B, Santelli F, Philip M, Bohbot Y, Tessonnier L, Peugnet F, D’Andrea A, Cammilleri S, Delpierre Q, Gouriet F, Camoin-Jau L, Gun M, Casalta J-P, Riberi A, Collart F, Martel H, Arregle F, Guedj E, Raoult D, Drancourt M, Tribouilloy C, Habib G (2020) Spondylodiscitis complicating infective endocarditis. Heart 106(24):1914–1918. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316492
Cone LA, Hirschberg J, Lopez C, Kanna PK, Goldstein EJC, Kazi A, Gade-Andavolu R, Younes B (2008) Infective endocarditis associated with spondylodiscitis and frequent secondary epidural abscess. Surg Neurol 69:121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2007.03.024
Cottle L, Riordan T (2008) Infectious spondylodiscitis. J Infect 56:401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2008.02.005
Dayer MJ, Jones S, Prendergast B, Baddour LM, Lockhart PB, Thornhill MH (2015) Incidence of infective endocarditis in England, 2000–13: a secular trend, interrupted time-series analysis. The Lancet 385:1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62007-9
Fantoni M, Trecarichi EM, Rossi B, Mazzotta V, Di Giacomo G, Nasto LA, Di Meco E, Pola E (2012) Epidemiological and clinical features of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16:2–7
Gouliouris T, Aliyu SH, Brown NM (2010) Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:iii11–iii24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq303
Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E, Lepage B, Surer N, Desenclos JC, Besnier JM (2008) Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002–2003. Epidemiol Infect 136:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268807008850
Gupta A, Kowalski TJ, Osmon DR, Enzler M, Steckelberg JM, Huddleston PM, Nassr A, Mandrekar JM, Berbari EF (2014) Long-term outcome of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: a cohort study of 260 patients. Open Forum Infect Dis 1:ofu107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofu107
Habib G, Erba PA, Iung B, Donal E, Cosyns B, Laroche C, Popescu BA, Prendergast B, Tornos P, Sadeghpour A, Oliver L, Vaskelyte J-J, Sow R, Axler O, Maggioni AP, Lancellotti P, EURO-ENDO Investigators (2019) Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J 40:3222–3232. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz620
Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta J-P, Del Zotti F, Dulgheru R, El Khoury G, Erba PA, Iung B, Miro JM, Mulder BJ, Plonska-Gosciniak E, Price S, Roos-Hesselink J, Snygg-Martin U, Thuny F, Tornos Mas P, Vilacosta I, Zamorano JL, Task Force per ilTrattamentodell’EndocarditeInfettivadellaSocietàEuropea di Cardiologia (ESC) (2016) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis. The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 17:277–319. https://doi.org/10.1714/2214.23904
Haider K, Pinsky MR (2013) Early surgery for native valve infective endocarditis. Crit Care 17:304. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12497
Herren C, Höh N von der, Wirbelsäulengesellschaft im N der L der D (2021) Zusammenfassung der S2K-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie der Spondylodiszitis“ (Stand 08/2020). Die Wirbelsäule 5:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1324-4424
Kang D-H, Kim Y-J, Kim S-H, Sun BJ, Kim D-H, Yun S-C, Song J-M, Choo SJ, Chung C-H, Song J-K, Lee J-W, Sohn D-W (2012) Early surgery versus conventional treatment for infective endocarditis. N Engl J Med 366:2466–2473. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112843
McHenry MC, Easley KA, Locker GA (2002) Vertebral osteomyelitis: long-term outcome for 253 patients from 7 Cleveland-area hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 34:1342–1350. https://doi.org/10.1086/340102
Morelli S, Carmenini E, Caporossi AP, Aguglia G, Bernardo ML, Gurgo and AM (2001) Spondylodiscitis and infective endocarditis: case studies and review of the literature. Spine 26:499–500
Mylona E, Samarkos M, Kakalou E, Fanourgiakis P, Skoutelis A (2009) Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: a systematic review of clinical characteristics. Semin Arthritis Rheum 39:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.03.002
Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB (2001) Infective endocarditis in adults. N Engl J Med 345:1318–1330. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra010082
Østergaard L, Valeur N, Ihlemann N, Bundgaard H, Gislason G, Torp-Pedersen C, Bruun NE, Søndergaard L, Køber L, Fosbøl EL (2018) Incidence of infective endocarditis among patients considered at high risk. Eur Heart J 39:623–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx682
Pigrau C, Almirante B, Flores X, Falco V, Rodríguez D, Gasser I, Villanueva C, Pahissa A (2005) Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and endocarditis: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Am J Med 118:1287.e17-1287.e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.02.027
Roe MT, Abramson MA, Li J, Heinle SK, Kisslo J, Corey GR, Sexton DJ (2000) Clinical information determines the impact of transesophageal echocardiography on the diagnosis of infective endocarditis by the Duke criteria. Am Heart J 139:945–951. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2000.104762
Scheggi V, Merilli I, Marcucci R, Del Pace S, Olivotto I, Zoppetti N, Ceschia N, Andrei V, Alterini B, Stefàno PL, Marchionni N (2021) Predictors of mortality and adverse events in patients with infective endocarditis: a retrospective real world study in a surgical centre. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 21:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01853-6
Skaf GS, Domloj NT, Fehlings MG, Bouclaous CH, Sabbagh AS, Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS (2010) Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: an overview. J Infect Public Health 3:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2010.01.001
Taylor DG, Buchholz AL, Sure DR, Buell TJ, Nguyen JH, Chen C-J, Diamond JM, Washburn PA, Harrop J, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS (2018) Presentation and outcomes after medical and surgical treatment versus medical treatment alone of spontaneous infectious spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Glob Spine J 8:49S-58S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218799058
Thuny F, Grisoli D, Collart F, Habib G, Raoult D (2012) Management of infective endocarditis: challenges and perspectives. Lancet 379:965–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60755-1
Zarghooni K, Röllinghoff M, Sobottke R, Eysel P (2012) Treatment of spondylodiscitis. Int Orthop 36:405–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1425-1
(2020) Diagnostik und Therapie der Spondylodiszitis – S2k-Leitlinie - https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/151-001.html
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: Viezens, Dreimann, Stangenberg. Acquisition of data: Viezens, Dreimann, Koepke, Heuer, Stangenberg. Analysis and interpretation of data: Viezens, Koepke, Bay, Waldeyer, Strahl, Stangenberg. Drafting the article: Viezens, Heuer, Stangenberg, Waldeyer. Critically revising the article: Dreimann, Bay, Heuer, Koepke, Waldeyer. Reviewed the submitted version of manuscript: Viezens, Dreimann, Strahl, Heuer, Koepke, Waldeyer, Bay, Strahl, Stangenberg. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Viezens. Statistical analysis: Strahl, Viezens, Stangenberg. Administrative/technical/material support: Bay, Heuer, Koepke, Strahl. Study supervision: Viezens, Stangenberg.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Local medical chamber, WF-013/20.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
M.D. reports being a consultant to Stryker, Medtronic, and Spineart. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Viezens, L., Dreimann, M., Strahl, A. et al. Spontaneous spondylodiscitis and endocarditis: interdisciplinary experience from a tertiary institutional case series and proposal of a treatment algorithm. Neurosurg Rev 45, 1335–1342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01640-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01640-z