Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation techniques for early facial nerve reanimation after surgical intra-cranial injuries: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the functional outcomes

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surgical injury of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve (FN) is a severe complication of many skull base procedures, and it represents a relevant issue in terms of patients’ discomfort, social interactions, risk for depression, and social costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and functional outcomes of the most common facial nerve rehabilitation techniques. The present study is a systematic review of the pertinent literature, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two different online medical databases (PubMed, Scopus) were screened for studies reporting the functional outcome, measured by the House-Brackman (HB) scale, and complications, in FN early reanimation, following surgical injuries on its intracranial portion. Data on the VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation, the surgical technique, the use of a nerve graft, the duration of the deficit, and complications were collected and pooled. The XII-to-VII end-to-side coaptation seems to provide higher chances for functional restoration (HB 1–3) than the VII-to-VII (68.8% vs 60.6%), regardless of the duration of the palsy deficit, the use or not of a nerve graft, and the use of stitches or glues. However, its complication rate was as high as 28.6%, and a second procedure is then often needed. The XII-to-VII side-to-end coaptation is the most effective in providing a functional outcome (HB 1–3), even though it is associated to a higher complication rate. Further trials are needed to better investigate this relevant topic, in terms of health-related social costs and patients’ quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ak H, Sanus GZ, Ulu MO, Tanriover N, Cihan LER, Tanriverd T, Kafadar AM Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis for facial nerve palsy following surgery for vestibular schwannoma: retrospective analysis of 13 patients. Turk Neurosurg 16

  2. Albathi M, Oyer S, Ishii LE, Byrne P, Ishii M, Boahene KO (2016) Early nerve grafting for facial paralysis after cerebellopontine angle tumor resection with preserved facial nerve continuity. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Angeli RD, Piccirillo E, Di Trapani G, Sequino G, Taibah A, Sanna M (2011) Enlarged translabyrinthine approach with transapical extension in the management of giant vestibular schwannomas: personal experience and review of literature. Otol Neurotol 32:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ff7562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bacciu A, Ait Mimoune H, D’Orazio F, Vitullo F, Russo A, Sanna M (2014) Management of facial nerve in surgical treatment of previously untreated Fisch class C tympanojugular paragangliomas: long-term results. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacciu A, Falcioni M, Pasanisi E, Di Lella F, Lauda L, Flanagan S, Sanna M (2009) Intracranial facial nerve grafting after removal of vestibular schwannoma. Am J Otolaryngol 30:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baro V, Landi A, Brigadoi S, Castellaro M, Moretto M, Anglani M, Ermani M, Causin F, Denaro L, Bertoldo A, d’Avella D (2019) Preoperative prediction of facial nerve in patients with vestibular schwannomas: the role of diffusion tensor imaging. A systematic review. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.099

  7. Biglioli F (2015) Facial reanimations: part I--recent paralyses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:901–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.06.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biglioli F, Bolognesi F, Allevi F, Rabbiosi D, Cupello S, Previtera A, Lozza A, Battista VMA, Marchetti C (2018) Mixed facial reanimation technique to treat paralysis in medium-term cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46:868–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Birkenbeuel J, Vu K, Lehrich BM, Abouzari M, Cheung D, Khosravi P, Sahyouni R, Ziai K, Moshtaghi O, Sahyouni S, Djalilian HR (2019) Medical malpractice of vestibular schwannoma: a 40-year review of the United States legal databases. Otol Neurotol 40:391–397. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Catapano J, Demsey DRB, Ho ES, Zuker RM, Borschel GH (2016) Cross-face nerve grafting with Infraorbital nerve pathway protection: anatomic and histomorphometric feasibility study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Catli T, Bayazit YA, Gokdogan O, Goksu N (2010) Facial reanimation with end-to-end hypoglossofacial anastomosis: 20 years’ experience. J Laryngol Otol 124:23–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215109991344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coulson SE, Croxson GR, Adams RD, O’Dwyer NJ (2005) Reliability of the “Sydney,” “Sunnybrook,” and “House Brackmann” facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Darrouzet V, Guerin J, Bébéar JP (1999) New technique of side-to-end hypoglossal-facial nerve attachment with translocation of the infratemporal facial nerve. J Neurosurg 90:27–34. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dey JK, Ishii LE, Byrne PJ, Boahene KDO, Ishii M (2014) Seeing is believing: objectively evaluating the impact of facial reanimation surgery on social perception. Laryngoscope 124:2489–2497. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dziedzic TA, Kunert P, Marchel A (2018) Hemihypoglossal−facial nerve anastomosis for facial nerve reanimation: case series and technical note. World Neurosurg 118:e460–e467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eser Ocak P, Dogan I, Ocak U, Dinc C, Başkaya MK (2018) Facial nerve outcome and extent of resection in cystic versus solid vestibular schwannomas in radiosurgery era. Neurosurg Focus 44:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.FOCUS17667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez E, Marchese E, Palma P, Lauretti L, Procaccini E, Pallini R (1999) Pathology of the peripheral nervous system. Crit Rev Neurosurg 9:12–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia RM, Gosain AK, Zenn MR, Marcus JR (2015) Early postoperative complications following Gracilis free muscle transfer for facial reanimation: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 31:558–564. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Godefroy WP, Malessy MJA, Tromp AAM, van der Mey AGL (2007) Intratemporal facial nerve transfer with direct coaptation to the hypoglossal nerve. Otol Neurotol 28:546–550. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0b013e31804301b8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Györi E, Przestrzelski C, Pona I, Hagmann M, Rath T, Radtke C, Tzou C-HJ (2018) Quality of life and functional assessment of facial palsy patients: a questionnaire study. Int J Surg 55:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Han JH, Suh MJ, Kim JW, Cho HS, Moon IS (2017) Facial reanimation using hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis after schwannoma removal. Acta Otolaryngol 137:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2016.1212398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayashi A, Nishida M, Seno H, Inoue M, Iwata H, Shirasawa T, Arai H, Kayamori R, Komuro Y, Yanai A (2013) Hemihypoglossal nerve transfer for acute facial paralysis. J Neurosurg 118:160–166. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.JNS1270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman WY (1992) Reanimation of the paralyzed face. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 25:649–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Humphrey CD, Kriet JD (2008) Nerve repair and cable grafting for facial paralysis. Facial Plast Surg 24:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1075832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jandali D, Revenaugh PC (2019) Facial reanimation: an update on nerve transfers in facial paralysis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 27:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knox CJ, Hohman MH, Kleiss IJ, Weinberg JS, Heaton JT, Hadlock TA (2013) Facial nerve repair: fibrin adhesive coaptation versus epineurial suture repair in a rodent model. Laryngoscope 123:1618–1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kunert P, Podgórska A, Bartoszewicz R, Marchel A (2011) Hemihypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis for facial nerve palsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol 45:452–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lassaletta L, Alfonso C, Del Rio L, Roda JM, Gavilan J (2006) Impact of facial dysfunction on quality of life after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:694–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940611500908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Clerc N, Herman P, Kania R, Tran H, Altabaa K, Tran Ba Huy P, Sauvaget E (2013) Comparison of 3 procedures for hypoglossal-facial anastomosis. Otol Neurotol 34:1483–1488. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828dac62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leonetti JP, Anderson DE, Marzo SJ, Origitano TC, Vandevender D, Quinonez R (2007) Facial paralysis associated with glomus jugulare tumors. Otol Neurotol 28:104–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000244357.72626.f5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leong SC, Lesser TH (2015) A national survey of facial paralysis on the quality of life of patients with acoustic neuroma. Otol Neurotol 36:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li MKK, Niles N, Gore S, Ebrahimi A, McGuinness J, Clark JR (2016) Social perception of morbidity in facial nerve paralysis. Head Neck 38:1158–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin V, Jacobson M, Dorion J, Chen J, Nedzelski J (2009) Global assessment of outcomes after varying reinnervation techniques for patients with facial paralysis subsequent to acoustic neuroma excision. Otol Neurotol 30:408–413. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a8e26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Linder T, Mulazimoglu S, El Hadi T, Darrouzet V, Ayache D, Somers T, Schmerber S, Vincent C, Mondain M, Lescanne E, Bonnard D (2017) Iatrogenic facial nerve injuries during chronic otitis media surgery: a multicentre retrospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 42:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lipschitz N, Kohlberg GD, Zuccarello M, Samy RN (2018) Comprehensive review of the extended middle cranial fossa approach. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 26:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu L, Yang S, Han D, Huang D, Yang W (2007) Primary tumours of the facial nerve: diagnostic and surgical treatment experience in Chinese PLA General Hospital. Acta Otolaryngol 127:993–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480601110246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Magliulo G, D’Amico R, Forino M (2001) Results and complications of facial reanimation following cerebellopontine angle surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:45–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Manni JJ, Beurskens CH, van de Velde C, Stokroos RJ (2001) Reanimation of the paralyzed face by indirect hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis. Am J Surg 182:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00715-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Martins RS, Socolovsky M, Siqueira MG, Campero A (2008) Hemihypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy after mastoid dissection of the facial nerve: results in 24 patients and comparison with the classic technique. Neurosurgery 63:310–316; discussion 317. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000312387.52508.2C

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mohamed A, Omi E, Honda K, Suzuki S, Ishikawa K (2016) Outcome of different facial nerve reconstruction techniques. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 82:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mooney MA, Hendricks B, Sarris CE, Spetzler RF, Almefty KK, Porter RW (2018) Long-term facial nerve outcomes after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas in patients with preoperative facial nerve palsy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79:309–313. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Murphey AW, Clinkscales WB, Oyer SL (2018) Masseteric nerve transfer for facial nerve paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 20:104–110. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Okochi M, Okochi H, Asai E, Sakaba T, Ueda K (2018) Eyelid reanimation using crossface nerve graft: relationship between surgical outcome and preoperative paralysis duration. Microsurgery 38:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pardo-Maza A, Lassaletta L, González-Otero T, Roda JM, Moraleda S, Arbizu Á, Gavilán J (2016) Evolution of patients with immediate complete facial paralysis secondary to acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125:495–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489415624700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pareschi R, Righini S, Destito D, Raucci AF, Colombo S (2003) Surgery of glomus jugulare tumors. Skull Base 13:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-43325

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Parhizkar N, Hiltzik DH, Selesnick SH (2005) Facial nerve rerouting in skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 38(685–710):ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2005.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Prasad SC, Balasubramanian K, Piccirillo E, Taibah A, Russo A, He J, Sanna M (2018) Surgical technique and results of cable graft interpositioning of the facial nerve in lateral skull base surgeries: experience with 213 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 128:631–638. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ramachandran S, Midha R (2018) Editorial. Outcomes of facial nerve repair using nerve grafts applied immediately following nerve discontinuity in skull base surgery. J Neurosurg 128:627–630. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.10.JNS162354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramakrishnan Y, Alam S, Kotecha A, Gillett D, D’Souza A (2010) Reanimation following facial palsy: present and future directions. J Laryngol Otol 124:1146–1152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110001507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ramos DS, Bonnard D, Franco-Vidal V, Liguoro D, Darrouzet V (2015) Stitchless fibrin glue-aided facial nerve grafting after cerebellopontine angle schwannoma removal: technique and results in 15 cases. Otol Neurotol 36:498–502. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Razfar A, Lee MK, Massry GG, Azizzadeh B (2016) Facial paralysis reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 49:459–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Roy M, Corkum JP, Shah PS, Borschel GH, Ho ES, Zuker RM, Davidge KM (2019) Effectiveness and safety of the use of gracilis muscle for dynamic smile restoration in facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.027

  54. Rutherford SA, King AT (2005) Vestibular schwannoma management: what is the “best” option? Br J Neurosurg 19:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690500305399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sahovaler A, Yeh D, Yoo J (2017) Primary facial reanimation in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 74:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.08.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Samii M, Gerganov VM, Samii A (2010) Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 112:860–867. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.7.JNS0989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Samii M, Koerbel A, Safavi-Abbasi S, Di Rocco F, Samii A, Gharabaghi A (2006) Using an end-to-side interposed sural nerve graft for facial nerve reinforcement after vestibular schwannoma resection. Technical note J Neurosurg 105:920–923. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.105.6.920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sanna M, Jain Y, De Donato G, Rohit LL, Taibah A (2004) Management of jugular paragangliomas: the Gruppo Otologico experience. Otol Neurotol 25:797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sanna M, Jain Y, Falcioni M, Mancini F, Romano G (2004) Facial nerve grafting in the cerebellopontine angle. Laryngoscope 114:782–785. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200404000-00038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Schwartz MS, Lekovic GP, Miller ME, Slattery WH, Wilkinson EP (2018) Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 129:128–136. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.JNS162287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sharma SC, Panda S, Thakar A, Devaraja K (2019) Petrous bone cholesteatoma: radical excision with an endeavour for hearing preservation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71:1572–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01662-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Shirazi MA, Leonetti JP, Marzo SJ, Anderson DE (2007) Surgical management of facial neuromas: lessons learned. Otol Neurotol 28:958–963. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181461c8d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Slattery WH, Cassis AM, Wilkinson EP, Santos F, Berliner K (2014) Side-to-end hypoglossal to facial anastomosis with transposition of the intratemporal facial nerve. Otol Neurotol 35:509–513. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182936bcf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Song J-J, An Y-H, Ahn S-H, Yoo JC, Lee JH, Oh SH, Kim CS, Chang SO (2011) Surgical management options and postoperative functional outcomes of petrous apex cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 131:1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2011.593550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Starnoni D, Daniel RT, Tuleasca C, George M, Levivier M, Messerer M (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the technique of subtotal resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas: a “nerve-centered” approach. Neurosurg Focus 44:E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.FOCUS17669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sue GR, Ho OH (2019) Microsurgical reconstruction of the smile: a critical analysis of outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 82:S310–S312. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tanbouzi Husseini S, Kumar DV, De Donato G, Almutair T, Sanna M (2013) Facial reanimation after facial nerve injury using hypoglossal to facial nerve anastomosis: the gruppo otologico experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65:305–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0468-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Terzis JK, Wang W, Zhao Y (2009) Effect of axonal load on the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the cross-facial nerve graft procedure for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1499–1512. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181babb93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Thapa PB, Shahi S, Jha RK, Shrestha D (2019) Vestibular schwanomma: an experience in a developing world. World J Oncol 10:118–122. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Ueda K, Akiyoshi K, Suzuki Y, Ohkouchi M, Hirose T, Asai E, Tateshita T (2007) Combination of hypoglossal-facial nerve jump graft by end-to-side neurorrhaphy and cross-face nerve graft for the treatment of facial paralysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 23:181–187. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-974654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Uziel A, Benezech J, Frerebeau P (1993) Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in posterior fossa acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989310800204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Wang Z, Zhang Z, Huang Q, Yang J, Wu H (2013) Long-term facial nerve function following facial reanimation after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery: a comparison between sural grafting and VII-XII anastomosis. Exp Ther Med 6:101–104. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Xiang D, Liu L, Li Y, Qiao J (2015) Near-total removal of facial nerve schwannomas: long-term outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol 36:390–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Alessandro Rapisarda for providing us his original drawing of the surgical techniques (Fig. 2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Ricciardi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not mandatorily required in our institution for literature reviews.

Informed consent

All patients treated in our Department of Neurosurgery provide their informed consent for the use of their clinical and radiological data for scientific purposes together with the informed consent for surgical treatment.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricciardi, L., Stifano, V., Pucci, R. et al. Comparison between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation techniques for early facial nerve reanimation after surgical intra-cranial injuries: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the functional outcomes. Neurosurg Rev 44, 153–161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01231-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01231-z

Keywords

Navigation