Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Craniocervical trauma above the age of 90: are current prognostic scores sufficient?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical data following head or spine trauma in patients over 90 years is rare. The aim of this study was to analyze this patient cohort, assessing clinical characteristics, outcomes, and survival rates and to identify variables that may predict early mortality. A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 90 that were treated between January 2006 and December 2016 at our department was performed. Patient characteristics, type of injury, and comorbidities were analyzed with regard to the 30-day mortality rate as the primary outcome. One hundred seventy-nine patients were identified. Mean age was 93 (range 90–102); 105 (59%) patients were female. One hundred thirty-two (74%) and 34 (19%) of patients presented with head and spinal trauma, respectively. Fourteen patients (8%) had a combined head and spine injury. One hundred (56%) patients were treated operatively. Mean Charlson comorbidity index was 4.1 (range 0–18), mean diagnosis count was 6.2 (range 0–12), mean geriatric index of comorbidity (GIC) was 3.3 (range 1–4), and mean Barthel index was 28 (range 0–100). The 30-day mortality rate was 31%. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that head trauma had a 1.66 hazard ratio (p = 0.036) of dying within 30 days of admission, whereas a higher Glasgow coma score and surgical treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.88 (p = 0.0001) and 0.72 (p = 0.05) to reach the primary outcome. None of the standard geriatric scores reached any significant correlation with the primary outcome. Standard geriatric prognostic scores seem less reliable to predict mortality for patients above the age of 90. Higher Glasgow coma score and surgical treatment were associated with a higher survival probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken LM, Burmeister E, Lang J, Chaboyer W, Richmond TS (2010) Characteristics and outcomes of injured older adults after hospital admission. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:442–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02728.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Champion HR, Copes WS, Buyer D, Flanagan ME, Bain L, Sacco WJ (1989) Major trauma in geriatric patients. Am J Public Health 79:1278–1282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook C, Coronado RA, Bettger JP, Graham JE (2018) The association of discharge destination with 30-day rehospitalization rates among older adults receiving lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 34:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.01.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Delcourt T, Begue T, Saintyves G, Mebtouche N, Cottin P (2015) Management of upper cervical spine fractures in elderly patients: current trends and outcomes. Injury 46(Suppl 1):S24–S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(15)70007-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Levin R, Schneeweiss S (2011) A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores. J Clin Epidemiol 64:749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Court-Brown C, Pape HC (2009) Severe and multiple trauma in older patients; incidence and mortality. Injury 40:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaesmacher J, Schweizer C, Valentinitsch A, Baum T, Rienmuller A, Meyer B, Kirschke JS, Ryang YM (2017) Osteoporosis is the most important risk factor for odontoid fractures in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 32:1582–1588. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kehoe A, Rennie S, Smith JE (2015) Glasgow coma scale is unreliable for the prediction of severe head injury in elderly trauma patients. Emerg Med J 32:613–615. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim B-G, Lee Y-K, Park H-P, Sohn H-M, Oh A-Y, Jeon Y-T, Koo K-H (2016) C-reactive protein is an independent predictor for 1-year mortality in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a retrospective analysis. Medicine 95:e5152–e5152. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Velilla N, Cambra-Contin K, Ibanez-Beroiz B (2014) Comorbidity and prognostic indices do not improve the 5-year mortality prediction of components of comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. BMC Geriatr 14:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-64

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez Velilla NI, Gaminde Inda I (2011) Comorbidity and multimorbidity indexes in the elderly patients. Med Clin 136:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Melfi C, Holleman E, Arthur D, Katz B (1995) Selecting a patient characteristics index for the prediction of medical outcomes using administrative claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 48:917–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Min L, Wenger N, Walling AM, Blaum C, Cigolle C, Ganz DA, Reuben D, Shekelle P, Roth C, Kerr EA (2013) When comorbidity, aging, and complexity of primary care meet: development and validation of the Geriatric CompleXity of Care Index. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:542–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nossaman VE, Larsen BE, DiGiacomo JC, Manuelyan Z, Afram R, Shukry S, Kang AL, Munnangi S, Angus LDG (2017) Mortality is predicted by comorbidity polypharmacy score but not Charlson comorbidity index in geriatric trauma patients. Am J Surg 216:42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rau C-S, Wu S-C, Chen Y-C, Chien P-C, Hsieh H-Y, Kuo P-J, Hsieh C-H (2017) Effect of age on Glasgow coma scale in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: an approach with propensity score-matched population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111378

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rozzini R, Frisoni GB, Ferrucci L, Barbisoni P, Sabatini T, Ranieri P, Guralnik JM, Trabucchi M (2002) Geriatric index of comorbidity: validation and comparison with other measures of comorbidity. Age Ageing 31:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryang YM, Torok E, Janssen I, Reinke A, Buchmann N, Gempt J, Ringel F, Meyer B (2016) Early morbidity and mortality in 50 very elderly patients after posterior atlantoaxial fusion for traumatic odontoid fractures. World Neurosurg 87:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sammy I, Lecky F, Sutton A, Leaviss J, O'Cathain A (2016) Factors affecting mortality in older trauma patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 47:1170–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. SB D (2017) Animierte Bevölkerungspyramide

  22. Stawicki SP, Kalra S, Jones C, Justiniano CF, Papadimos TJ, Galwankar SC, Pappada SM, Feeney JJ, Evans DC (2015) Comorbidity polypharmacy score and its clinical utility: a pragmatic practitioner’s perspective. J Emerg Trauma Shock 8:224–231. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.161658

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Strosberg DS, Housley BC, Vazquez D, Rushing A, Steinberg S, Jones C (2017) Discharge destination and readmission rates in older trauma patients. J Surg Res 207:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G (2014) The Glasgow coma scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol 13:844–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70120-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wan X, Liu S, Wang S, Zhang S, Yang H, Ou Y, Zhao M, James L, Shu K, Chen J, Lei T (2016) Elderly patients with severe traumatic brain injury could benefit from surgical treatment. World Neurosurg 89:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitehouse KJ, Jeyaretna DS, Enki DG, Whitfield PC (2016) Head injury in the elderly: what are the outcomes of neurosurgical care? World Neurosurg 94:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World-Medical-Association (2013) Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310:2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yilmaz U, Hellen P (2016) Cervical spine trauma. Radiologe 56:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-016-0135-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zekry D, Loures Valle BH, Lardi C, Graf C, Michel JP, Gold G, Krause KH, Herrmann FR (2010) Geriatrics index of comorbidity was the most accurate predictor of death in geriatric hospital among six comorbidity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 63:1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was completely financed by the Department of Neurosurgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany

    Nicole Lange, Paulina Rothlauf, Ann-Kathrin Jörger, Arthur Wagner, Bernhard Meyer & Ehab Shiban

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Ehab Shiban

Authors
  1. Nicole Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paulina Rothlauf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ann-Kathrin Jörger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arthur Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bernhard Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ehab Shiban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Lange.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lange, N., Rothlauf, P., Jörger, AK. et al. Craniocervical trauma above the age of 90: are current prognostic scores sufficient?. Neurosurg Rev 43, 1101–1107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01130-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01130-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation