Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of extensive necrotic change in acute gangrenous cholecystitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a severe type of acute cholecystitis that implies higher mortality and morbidity rates than uncomplicated cholecystitis. The characteristics of GC are various for each case. However, preoperative predictors of GC with extensive necrotic change have not been investigated well.

Methods

A total of 239 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with GC underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2021. Of these, 135 patients were included in this study and were subdivided into the extensive necrosis group (patients with necrotic change extending to the neck of the gallbladder, n = 18) and the control group (patients with necrotic change limited to the fundus or body, not extending to the neck, n = 117) according to each operation video. Patient characteristics and perioperative factors predicting extensive necrotic change were investigated.

Results

Pericholecystic fat stranding (83.3 vs. 53.8%, p = 0.018) and absence of wall enhancement on preoperative CT images (50.0 vs. 24.7%, p = 0.026) were significantly associated with extensive necrosis. Seven of 18 patients in the extensive necrosis group showed necrotic changes beyond the infundibulum. The absence of wall enhancement on preoperative CT images (71.4 vs. 28.8%, p = 0.018) was significantly associated with necrotic changes beyond the infundibulum.

Conclusions

Pericholecystic fat stranding and absence of wall enhancement on preoperative enhanced CT are predictors of extensive necrotic change in patients with GC. In addition, the absence of wall enhancement also predicts the presence of necrotic changes beyond the infundibulum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Önder A, Kapan M, Ülger BV, Oğuz A, Türkoğlu A, Uslukaya Ö (2015) Gangrenous cholecystitis: mortality and risk factors. Int Surg 100:254–260. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00222.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganapathi AM, Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Perez A, Tyler DS, Zani S (2015) Gangrenous cholecystitis: a contemporary review. J Surg Res. 197:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkwood R, Damon L, Wang J, Hong E, Kirkwood K (2017) Gangrenous cholecystitis: innovative laparoscopic techniques to facilitate subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy when a critical view of safety cannot be achieved. Surg Endosc. 31:5258–5266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5599-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett GL, Rusinek H, Lisi V, Israel GM, Krinsky GA, Slywotzky CM, Megibow A (2002) CT findings in acute gangrenous cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 178:275–281. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh AK, Sagar P (2005) Gangrenous cholecystitis: prediction with CT imaging. Abdom Imaging. 30:218–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0217-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CH, Chen CC, Wang CJ, Wong YC, Wang LJ, Huang CC, Lo WC, Chen HW (2011) Discrimination of gangrenous from uncomplicated acute cholecystitis: accuracy of CT findings. Abdom Imaging. 36:174–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9612-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang WC, Sun Y, Wu EH, Kim SY, Wang ZJ, Huang GS, Yeh BM (2016) CT findings for detecting the presence of gangrenous ischemia in cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 207:302–309. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maehira H, Itoh A, Kawasaki M, Ogawa M, Imagawa A, Mizumura N, Okumura S, Kameyama M (2016) Use of dynamic CT attenuation value for diagnosis of acute gangrenous cholecystitis. Am J Emerg Med. 34:2306–2309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.08.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uemura S, Higuchi R, Yazawa T, Izumo W, Sugishita T, Morita S, Yamamoto M (2019) Impact of transient hepatic attenuation differences on computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of acute gangrenous cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 26:348–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erlichman DB, Lipman JN, In H, Ye K, Lin J, Goldman I (2021) Diagnostic significance of the CT rim sign in cases of gangrenous cholecystitis. Clin Imaging. 73:53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu B, Buddensick TJ, Ferdosi H, Narducci DM, Sautter A, Setiawan L, Shaukat H, Siddique M, Sulkowski GN, Kamangar F, Kowdley GC, Cunningham SC (2014) Predicting gangrenous cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 16:801–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mok KW, Reddy R, Wood F, Turner P, Ward JB, Pursnani KG, Date RS (2014) Is C-reactive protein a useful adjunct in selecting patients for emergency cholecystectomy by predicting severe/gangrenous cholecystitis? Int J Surg. 12:649–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouassida M, Madhioub M, Kallel Y, Zribi S, Slama H, Mighri MM, Touinsi H (2021) Acute gangrenous cholecystitis: proposal of a score and comparison with previous published scores. J Gastrointest Surg. 25:1479–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04707-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan SM, Emile SH, Barsom SH, Naqvi SAA, Khan MS (2021) Accuracy of pre-operative parameters in predicting severe cholecystitis-a systematic review. Surgeon. 19:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H (2015) Subtotal cholecystectomy for “difficult gallbladders”: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 150:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koo JGA, Chan YH, Shelat VG (2021) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques. Surg Endosc. 35(3):1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirata K, Sekimoto M, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Wada K, Miura F, Yasuda H, Yamashita Y, Nagino M, Hirota M, Tanaka A, Tsuyuguchi T, Strasberg SM, Gadacz TR (2007) Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 14:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1152-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Adachi T, Eguchi S, Muto Y (2022) Pathophysiology and pathology of acute cholecystitis: a secondary publication of the Japanese version from 1992. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 29:212–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fagan SP, Awad SS, Rahwan K, Hira K, Aoki N, Itani KM, Berger DH (2003) Prognostic factors for the development of gangrenous cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 186:481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nikfarjam M, Niumsawatt V, Sethu A, Fink MA, Muralidharan V, Starkey G, Jones RM, Christophi C (2011) Outcomes of contemporary management of gangrenous and non-gangrenous acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 13:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00327.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Altun E, Semelka RC, Elias J Jr, Braga L, Voultsinos V, Patel J, Balci NC, Woosley JT (2007) Acute cholecystitis: MR findings and differentiation from chronic cholecystitis. Radiology. 244:174–183. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2441060920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang H, Marsh I, Doyle J (2014) Does ultrasonography accurately diagnose acute cholecystitis? Improving diagnostic accuracy based on a review at a regional hospital. Can J Surg. 57(3):162–168. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.027312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.K. wrote the manuscript and performed data analysis. All authors contributed to acquire data and revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Kohga.

Ethics declarations

This work was supported by departmental resources only, and the corresponding author is not a recipient of a research scholarship.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kohga, A., Suzuki, K., Okumura, T. et al. Prediction of extensive necrotic change in acute gangrenous cholecystitis. Emerg Radiol 29, 723–728 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02055-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02055-z

Keywords

Navigation