Skip to main content
Log in

Gangrenous cholecystitis: prediction with CT imaging

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the usefulness of different patterns of gallbladder mucosal enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for differentiating between gangrenous and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. This retrospective evaluation involved 56 patients with histopathologically proved acute cholecystitis (32 with gangrenous and 24 with uncomplicated acute cholecystitis) who had preoperative contrast-enhanced CT imaging. CT in 38 patients showed a gallbladder mucosal enhancement pattern that could be categorized into continuous, discontinuous, and/or irregular categories. In the other 18 patients, the mucosal enhancement pattern could not be classified due to lack of mucosal enhancement or inadequate mucosal enhancement. On contrast-enhanced CT evaluation, continuous and discontinuous and/or irregular mucosal enhancement patterns were seen in 20 and 18 patients, respectively. Among the 20 patients with continuous mucosal enhancement, 17 had uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. Seventeen of the 18 patients with discontinuous and/or irregular mucosal enhancement had gangrenous cholecystitis. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of discontinuous and/or irregular mucosal enhancement in the diagnosis of gangrenous cholecystitis were 30.3% and 94.4% (17 of 18), respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of continuous mucosal enhancement in the diagnosis of uncomplicated acute cholecystitis were 30.3% and 85.5% (17 of 20), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0005) between the PPV of discontinuous and/or irregular (94.4%) and that of continuous (15%) mucosal enhancement for predicting gangrenous cholecystitis. The pattern of gallbladder mucosal enhancement on CT can be used as a reliable criterion for distinguishing acute, uncomplicated cholecystitis from gangrenous cholecystitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Pinto S Romano W Vecchio ParticleDel et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePersonal experience in 71 consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis Radiol Med (Torino) 99 62–67

    Google Scholar 

  2. GL Bennet H Rusinek V Lisi et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCT findings in acute gangrenous cholecystitis AJR 178 275–281

    Google Scholar 

  3. N Aoun T Smayra S Haddad-Zebouni et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAcute cholecystitis using computed tomography: usefulness of the trabeculation of the peri-cholecystic adipose tissue J Radiol 80 575–578

    Google Scholar 

  4. J Fidler EK Paulson L Layfield (1996) ArticleTitleCT evaluation of acute cholecystitis: findings and usefulness in diagnosis AJR 166 1085–1088

    Google Scholar 

  5. K Yamashita MJ Jin Y Hirose et al. (1995) ArticleTitleCT finding of transient focal attenuation of the liver adjacent to the gallbladder in acute cholecystitis AJR 164 343–346

    Google Scholar 

  6. SE Mirvis JR Vainright AW Nelson et al. (1986) ArticleTitleThe diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis: a comparison of sonography, scintigraphy, and CT AJR 147 1171–1175

    Google Scholar 

  7. F Blakenberg R Wirth RB Jeffrey SuffixJr et al. (1991) ArticleTitleComputed tomography as an adjunct to ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis Gastrointest Radiol 16 149–153

    Google Scholar 

  8. NF Williams TF Scobie (1976) ArticleTitlePerforation of the gallbladder: analysis of 19 cases Can Med Assoc J 115 1223–1225

    Google Scholar 

  9. PN Kim KS Lee IY Kim et al. (1994) ArticleTitleGallbladder perforation: comparison of US findings with CT Abdom Imaging 19 239–242

    Google Scholar 

  10. CS Pedrosa R Casanova R Rodriguez (1981) ArticleTitleCT findings in subacute perforation of the gallbladder: report of 5 cases Eur J Radiol 1 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  11. R Zissin A Osadchy M Shapiro-Feinberg G Gayer (2003) ArticleTitleCT of a thickened-wall gall bladder Br J Radiol 76 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  12. F Terrier CD Becker C Stoller JK Triller (1984) ArticleTitleComputed tomography in complicated cholecystitis J Comput Assist Tomogr 8 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  13. N Lamki B Raval E St Ville (1986) ArticleTitleComputed tomography of complicated cholecystitis J Comput Assist Tomogr 10 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  14. RA Kane P Costello E Duszlak (1983) ArticleTitleComputed tomography in acute cholecystitis: new observations AJR 141 697–701

    Google Scholar 

  15. DR Hunt FC Chu (2000) ArticleTitleGangrenous cholecystitis in laparoscopic era Aust N Z J Surg 70 428–430

    Google Scholar 

  16. FA Habib RB Kolachalam R Khilnani et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRole of laparascopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous cholecystitis Am J Surg 181 71–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, A.K., Sagar, P. Gangrenous cholecystitis: prediction with CT imaging. Abdom Imaging 30, 218–221 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0217-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0217-0

Keywords

Navigation