Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging findings of acute intravascular thrombus on non-enhanced computed tomography

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intravascular thrombosis and thromboembolism are critical diagnoses which are frequently made on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) or Doppler ultrasound. For a variety of reasons, some patients with acute intravascular pathology are imaged using CT without intravenous contrast. In the acute setting, the increased Hounsfield unit (HU) density of the thrombus compared to the blood pool allows the diagnosis to be made, or at least suggested, on non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT). The increased density of the clot is commonly referred to as the “hyperdense vessel sign.” This is a well-known finding in the setting of stroke, but hyperdense vessels can also signal arterial or venous thrombosis in the chest, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. Once a hyperdense vessel sign is noted on NECT, further exploration with CECT, angiography, or ultrasound may then be performed. Here, we present a pictorial review of the appearance of acute intravascular thrombosis as seen on non-enhanced computed tomography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Previtali E, Bucciarelli P, Passamonti SM, Martinelli I (2011) Risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis. Blood Transfus 9:120–138

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Norman D, Price D, Boyd D, Fishman R, Newton TH (1977) Quantitative aspects of computed tomography of the blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Radiology 123:335–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. New PFJ, Aronow S (1976) Attenuation measurements of whole blood and blood fractions in computed tomography. Radiology 121:635–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morita S, Ueno E, Masukawa A, Suzuki K, Machida H, Fujimura M (2010) Hyperattenuating signs at unenhanced CT indicating acute vascular disease. RadioGraphics 30:111–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swenson SJ, McLeod RA, Stephens DH (1984) CT of extracranial hemorrhage and hematomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petitti N (1998) The hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign. Radiology 208(3):687–688

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen UR, Weiss M, Zimmerman P, Jansen O, Riedel C (2010) The hyperdense anterior cerebral artery sign (HACAS) as a computed tomography marker for acute ischemia in the anterior cerebral artery territory. Cerebrovasc Dis 29:62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Connell L, Koerte IK, Laubender RP et al (2012) Hyperdense basilar artery sign—a reliable sign of basilar artery occlusion. Neuroradiology 54:321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozdemir O, Leung A, Bussiere M, Hachinski V, Pelz D (2008) Hyperdense internal carotid artery sign: a CT sign of acute ischemia. Stroke 39:2011–2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krings T, Noelchen D, Mull M et al (2006) The hyperdense posterior cerebral artery sign: a computed tomography marker of acute ischemia in the posterior cerebral artery territory. Stroke 37:399–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gotway MB, Webb WR (2000) Acute pulmonary embolism: visualization of high attenuation clot in the pulmonary artery on non-contrast helical chest CT. Emerg Radiol 7:117–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanne JP, Gotway MB, Thuoongsuwan S, Stern EJ (2003) Six cases of acute central pulmonary embolism revealed on unenhanced multi-detector CT of the chest. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1661–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cobelli R, Zompatori M, De Luca G, Chiari G, Bresciani P, Marcato C (2005) Clinical usefulness of computed tomography study without contrast injection in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:6–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Castaner E, Andreu M, Gallardo X, Mata JM, Cabezuelo MA, Pallardo Y (2003) CT in nontraumatic acute thoracic aortic disease: typical and atypical features and complications. RadioGraphics 23:S93–S110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonsalves CF (1999) The hyperattenuating crescent sign. Radiology 211:37–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Augustinos P, Ouriel K (2004) Invasive treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 110:I-27–I-34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McRae SJ, Ginsberg JS (2004) Initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 110:I-3–I-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ouriel K, Veith FJ, Sasahara AA (1998) A comparison of recombinant urokinase with vascular surgery as initial treatment for acute arterial occlusion of the legs. N Engl J Med 338:1105–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leach JL, Fortuna RB, Jones BV, Gaskill-Shipley MF (2006) Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. RadioGraphics 26:S19–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortez O, Schaeffer CJ, Hatem SF, Glauser J, Ahmed M (2009) Cases from the Cleveland clinic: cerebral venous sinus thrombosis presenting to the emergency department with worst headache of life. Emerg Radiol 16:79–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Puig J, Pedraza S, Demchuk A et al (2012) Quantification of thrombus Hounsfield units on noncontrast CT predicts stroke subtype and early recanalization after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:90–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee TC, Bartlett ES, Fox AJ, Symons SP (2005) The hypodense artery sign. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2027–2029

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lovy AJ, Rosenblum JK, Levsky JM et al (2013) Acute aortic syndromes: a second look at dual-phase CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(4):805–811

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. White RH (2003) The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 107:I-4–I-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luciani A, Clement O, Halimi P et al (2001) Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on doppler ultrasound. Radiology 220:655–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellis MH, Manor Y, Witz M (2000) Risk factors and management of patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. Chest 117:43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prandoni P, Polistena P, Bernardi E et al (1997) Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and complications. Arch Intern Med 157(1):57–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rucker CM, Menias CO, Bhalla S (2004) Mimics of renal colic: alternative diagnoses at unenhanced helical CT. RadioGraphics 24:S11–S33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Okino Y, Kiyosue H, Mori H et al (2001) Root of the small bowel mesentery: correlative CT anatomy and CT features of pathologic conditions. RadioGraphics 21:1475–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Warshauer DM, Lee JKT, Mauro MA, White GC (2001) Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis with radiologically occult cause: a retrospective study of 43 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:837–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Girard P, Hauuy MP, Musset D, Simonneau G, Petitpretz P (1989) Acute inferior vena cava thrombosis: early results of heparin therapy. Chest 95:284–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferris EJ, McCowan TC, Carver DK, McFarland DR (1993) Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology 188(3):851–856

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Akpinar E, Turkbey B, Eldem G, Karcaaltincaba M, Akhan O (2009) When do we need contrast-enhanced CT in patients with vague urinary system findings on unenhanced CT? Emerg Radiol 16(2):97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallego C, Velasco M, Marcuello P, Tejedor D, De Campo L, Friera A (2002) Congenital and acquired anomalies of the portal venous system. RadioGraphics 22:141–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zuckerman J, Levine D, McNicholas MMJ et al (1997) Imaging of pelvic postpartum complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:663–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Batra P, Bigoni B, Manning J et al (2000) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection on CT angiography. RadioGraphics 20:309–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Godwin JD, Breiman RS, Speckman JM (1982) Problems and pitfalls in the evaluation of thoracic aortic dissection by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:750–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jeffrey A. Breall, Professor of Clinical Medicine and director of Interventional Cardiology at the Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, for providing the cardiac catheter images seen in Fig. 4c, d.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott D. Steenburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitesell, R.T., Steenburg, S.D. Imaging findings of acute intravascular thrombus on non-enhanced computed tomography. Emerg Radiol 21, 271–277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1210-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1210-8

Keywords

Navigation