Abstract
The importance of ecosystem services (ESs) has been widely recognized and studied since 2000. However, research on the interactions (synergies and trade-offs) among ESs and hotspots of ESs is limited. This study focused on the Asian Water Tower (AWT) region (17 countries) and assessed the importance of five critical ESs by four quantitative models, analyzed the interactions among ESs, and identified hotspots of ESs using hotspot analysis. The results showed that the areas with “high importance” of the composite ESs accounted for 6.3% of the AWT region, and they were distributed mainly in mountain and coastal areas. Additionally, high synergies among the five ESs were observed in areas with “high importance” of the composite ESs, whereas poor synergies among ESs were found in areas with “relatively high importance” of the composite ESs. Furthermore, a total of 132 hotspot basins (28.4% of the AWT region) of the composite ESs were identified, and 23.2% of the hotspot basins were areas with “highly and relatively highly synergistic” ESs. The results provide evidence-based support for setting ecosystem protection goals, achieving win-win ESs, and improving ecosystem management efficiency. Overall, this study can deepen the understanding of the interactions and hotspots of ESs in the AWT region.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbaspour KC, Vaghefi SAS, Yang H, Srinivasan R (2019) Global soil, landuse, evapotranspiration, historical and future weather databases for SWAT Applications. Sci Data 6:e263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0282-4
Alewell C, Borrelli P, Meusburger K, Panagos P (2019) Using the USLE: chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling. Int Soil Water Conse 7(3):203–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004
Bai Y, Wong CP, Jiang B, Hughes AC, Wang M et al (2018) Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nat Commun 9:e3034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1
Bai Y, Fang Z, Hughes AC (2021) Ecological redlines provide a mechanism to maximize conservation gains in Mainland Southeast Asia. One Earth 4(10):1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.010
Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12(12):1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
Cai W, Gibbs D, Zhang L, Ferrier G, Cai Y (2017) Identifying hotspots and management of critical ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta Region, China. J Environ Manage 191:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.003
Convention on Biological Diversity (2022) The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. https://www.cbd.int/article/cop15-cbd-press-release-final-19dec2022. Accessed 10 July 2023
Fan Y, Fang C (2022) Measuring Qinghai-Tibet plateaus sustainability. Sustain Cities Soc 85:e104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104058
Feng Q, Zhao W, Fu B, Ding J, Wang S (2017) Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: a case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Sci Total Environ 607–608:1250–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.079
Gao M, Hu Y, Bai Y (2022) Construction of ecological security pattern in national land space from the perspective of the community of life in mountain, water, forest, field, lake and grass: a case study in Guangxi Hechi, China. Ecol Indic 139:e108867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108867
Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, Artmann M, Borgstrom S et al (2014) A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43(4):413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
He J, Shi X (2022) Detection of social-ecological drivers and impact thresholds of ecological degradation and ecological restoration in the last three decades. J Environ Manage 318:e115513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115513
Hochkirch A, Samways MJ, Gerlach J, Böhm M, Williams P et al (2021) A strategy for the next decade to address data deficiency in neglected biodiversity. Conserv Biol 35(2):502–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13589
Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, Mace GM (2014) Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Glob Environ Chang 28:263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005
Hughes AC (2017) Mapping priorities for conservation in Southeast Asia. Biol Conserv 209:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.007
Immerzeel WW, Lutz AF, Andrade M, Bahl A, Biemans H et al (2020) Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature 577(7790):364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y
Lee H, Lautenbach S (2016) A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 66:340–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004
Li M, Fan J, Zhang Y, Guo F, Liu L et al (2018) A systematic approach for watershed ecological restoration strategy making: an application in the Taizi River Basin in northern China. Sci Total Environ 637:1321–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.411
Li R, Zheng H, O’Connor P, Xu H, Li Y et al (2021) Time and space catch up with restoration programs that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs. Sci Adv 7(14):eabf8650. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf8650
Li Y, Liu W, Feng Q, Zhu M, Yang L et al (2022) Quantitative assessment for the spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services, tradeoff–synergy relationships and drivers in the semi-arid regions of China. Remote Sens-Basel 14:e239. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010239
Lin S, Wu R, Yang F, Wang J, Wu W (2018) Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Indic 84:371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.007
Lin Z, Xiao Y, Ou-Yang Z (2021) Assessment of ecological importance of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on ecosystem service flows. J Mt Sci-Engl 18:1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6448-x
Manning P, vanderPlas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT et al (2018) Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
MEPC (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China) (2017) https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201707/W020170728397753220005.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2023
Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1–2):17–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332142
Perrings C, Naeem S, Ahrestani F, Bunker DE, Burkill P et al (2010) Ecosystem services for 2020. Science 330:323–324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196431
Power M (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems—Daily, GC. Nature 388(6642):529–530. https://doi.org/10.1038/41464
Qiu J, Turner MG (2013) Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Pnas 110:12149–12154. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310539110
Reyers B, Selig ER (2020) Global targets that reveal the social–ecological interdependencies of sustainable development. Nat Ecol Evol 4:1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1230-6
Rosa IMD, Smith MJ, Wearn OR, Purves D, Ewers RM (2016) The environmental legacy of modern tropical deforestation. Curr Biol 26:2161–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.013
Ross SRP-J, Arnoldi J, Loreau M, White CD, Stout JC et al (2021) Universal scaling of robustness of ecosystem services to species loss. Nat Commun 12:5167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25507-5
Serna-Chavez HM, Schulp CJE, van Bodegom PM, Bouten W, Verburg PH et al (2014) A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 39:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
Wang Y, Wang X, Yin L, Feng X, Zhou C et al (2021) Determination of conservation priority areas in Qinghai Tibet Plateau based on ecosystem services. Environ Sci Policy 124:553–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.019
Wu YD, Meng JJ (2022) Quantifying the spatial pattern for the importance of natural resource ecosystem services in China. J Nat Resour 37(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20220102
Yan R, Zhang X, Yan S, Chen H (2018) Estimating soil erosion response to land use/cover change in a catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Int Soil Water Conse 6(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.12.002
Yu D, Lu N, Fu B (2017) Establishment of a comprehensive indicator system for the assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 32:1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0549-0
Zhou G, Huan Y, Wang L, Zhang R, Liang T et al (2023) Identifying ecological priority areas for synergistic conservation across scales in the Asian Water Tower region. Ecosyst Health Sust 9(1):0036. https://doi.org/10.34133/ehs.0036
Zhu G, Qiu D, Zhang Z, Sang L, Liu Y et al (2021) Land-use changes lead to a decrease in carbon storage in arid region, China. Ecol Indic 127:e107770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107770
Zhu L, Hughes AC, Zhao X, Zhou L, Ma K et al (2021) Regional scalable priorities for national biodiversity and carbon conservation planning in Asia. Sci Adv 7:e4261. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4261
Funding
This research was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA20010301) and the project (prioritization network analysis and multi-perspective action strategies research on global sustainable development goals) of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72204140).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Communicated by Woonsup Choi
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, G., Huan, Y., Wang, L. et al. Identifying synergies and hotspots of ecosystem services for the conservation priorities in the Asian Water Tower region. Reg Environ Change 23, 132 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02129-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02129-9