Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regional ecosystem services relationships and their potential driving factors in the Yellow River Basin, China

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Yellow River Basin (YRB) occupies an important position in China’s socioeconomic development and ecological conservation efforts. Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of the relationships among multiple ecosystem services (ESs) and their drivers is crucial for regional sustainable development and human-earth system coordination. This study simulated food production (FP), water yield (WY), net primary production (NPP), soil conservation (SC), and habitat quality (HQ) in the YRB from 2000 to 2020, and evaluated the spatial evolution and the relationship of ESs at the raster scale. Redundancy analysis was used to identify the impact of natural, socioeconomic, and landscape patterns on the relationship between ESs. The results demonstrated that the average HQ per unit area decreased by 18.10%, while SC, NPP, WY, and FP increased by 42.68%, 47.63%, 30.82%, and 67.10%, respectively, from 2000 to 2020. The relationship between ESs in the YRB was dominated by weak trade-offs and weak synergies at a temporal scale, with the trade-offs strengthened in the Upper Yellow River Basin (UYRB) and the Middle Yellow River Basin (MYRB), and synergies strengthened in the Lower Yellow River Basin (LYRB). At the spatial scale, the relationships between HQ and WY, HQ and SC, HQ and NPP, FP and SC, and FP and HQ were all dominated by trade-offs, while other ES pairs were mostly based on synergistic relationships. In the YRB, the relationships among ESs were mainly influenced by human disturbance, precipitation, and land-use and exploitation intensity. Specifically, the trade-offs among ESs in the UYRB were primarily affected by precipitation, and those in the MYRB and LYRB by human disturbance. The heterogeneity of the landscape could also effectively promote synergies among ESs. This study could provide insights into trade-offs and synergies among ESs and their driving forces and lay a foundation for ecological restoration and sustainable development of ESs in the YRB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai Y, Chen Y, Alatalo J M et al., 2020. Scale effects on the relationships between land characteristics and eco-system services: A case study in Taihu Lake Basin, China. The Science of the Total Environment, 716: 137083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2010. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing L F, Shao Q, Liu J Y, et al., 2011. Runoff characteristics in flood and dry seasons in source regions of Changjiang River and Huanghe River based on wavelet analysis. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(2): 2323–2328. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford J B, D’Amato A W, 2012. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 10(4): 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budyko M I, 1974. Climate and Life. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai C F, Ding S W, Shi Z H, et al., 2000. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 14(2): 19–24. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao S X, Zhang J Z, Chen L et al., 2016. Ecosystem water imbalances created during ecological restoration by afforestation in China, and lessons for other developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 183: 843–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Z, Li Y R, Liu Y S et al., 2018. When and where did the Loess Plateau turn “green”? Analysis of the tendency and breakpoints of the normalized difference vegetation index. Land Degradation & Development, 29(1): 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawanji S, Masocha M, Dube T, 2018. Spatial assessment of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in Zimbabwe. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 73(2): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T T, Peng L, Wang Q, 2022. Response and multiscenario simulation of trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services to the Grain to Green Program: A case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(22): 33572–33586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm R A, 2010. Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecological Economics, 69(10): 1973–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cord A F, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M et al., 2017. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosystem Services, 28: 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R D et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(15): 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Groot R D, Braat L et al., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosystem Services, 28: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai X, Wang L C, Huang C B et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal variations of ecosystem services in the urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Ecological Indicators, 115: 106394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue R J, Roderick M L, McVicar T R, 2012. Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology, 436: 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou H S, Li X B, Li S K et al., 2020. Mapping ecosystem services bundles for analyzing spatial trade-offs in inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson J, 2015. The rising pressure of global water shortages. Nature, 517(7523): 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei S, Su F L, Mi C X et al., 2021. Analysis of driving forces on wetland ecosystem services value change: A case in northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 751: 141778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensholt R, Langanke T, Rasmussen K et al., 2012. Greenness in semi-arid areas across the globe 1981–2007: An Earth Observing Satellite based analysis of trends and drivers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121: 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Zhang L W, Xu Z H et al., 2015. Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediment, 15(4): 833–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y J, Shi X Y, He J et al., 2020. Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern: A case study in the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 112: 106030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J B, Zuo L Y, 2021. Revealing ecosystem services relationships and their driving factors for five basins of Beijing. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(1): 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng W L, Li Y Y, Zhang P Y, et al., 2022. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 138: 108825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, Liu D Q, Zhang J X, et al., 2019. Trade-offs/synergies of multiple ecosystem services based on land use simulation in a mountain-basin area, western China. Ecological Indicators, 99: 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y Z, Liu Y S, 2022. Sustainable poverty alleviation and green development in China’s underdeveloped areas. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(1): 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M et al., 2012. Synergies, trade-offs and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrating framework with an application for the Leipzig-Halle-Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17(3): 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han R, Feng C C, Xu N Y et al., 2020. Spatial heterogeneous relationship between ecosystem services and human disturbances: A case study in Chuandong, China. Science of the Total Environment, 721: 137818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Shi X Y, Fu Y J et al., 2020. Spatiotemporal pattern of the trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services after Grain for Green Program: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24): 30020–30033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y Z, Zhao W W, Liu Y X et al., 2020. Relationships of multiple landscape services and their influencing factors on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Landscape Ecology, 36(7): 1987–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu B A, Zhang Z J, Han H R et al., 2021. The Grain for Green Program intensifies trade-offs between ecosystem services in midwestern Shanxi, China. Remote Sensing, 13(19): 3966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L S, Wang B, Niu X et al., 2019. Changes in ecosystem services and an analysis of driving factors for China’s natural forest conservation program. Ecology and Evolution, 9(7): 3700–3716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaligot R, Chenal J, Bosch M et al., 2019. Historical dynamics of ecosystem services and land management policies in Switzerland. Ecological Indicators, 101: 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Wang F, Zhang H Y et al., 2016. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 2000–2012 on the Loess Plateau, China, as a result of climate variability and ecological restoration. Ecological Engineering, 97: 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, 2008. Studying beta diversity: Ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis. Journal of Plant Ecology, 1(1): 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B Y, Chen N C, Wang Y C et al., 2018. Spatio-temporal quantification of the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services based on grid-cells: A case study of Guanzhong basin, NW China. Ecological Indicators, 94: 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y J, Zhang L W, Qiu J X et al., 2017. Spatially explicit quantification of the interactions among ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 32(6): 1181–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J G, Yang H, Gosling S N et al., 2017. Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future. Earth’s Future, 5(6): 545–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X Q, Liu Y S, Wang Y S et al., 2022. Evaluating potential impacts of land use changes on water supply-demand under multiple development scenarios in the dryland region. Journal of Hydrology, 610: 127811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Fang F, Li Y H, 2014. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy-making. Land Use Policy, 40: 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Li Y H, 2017. Revitalize the world’s countryside. Nature, 548(7667): 275–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Wang D W, Gao J et al., 2005. Land use/cover changes, the environment, and water resources in Northeast China. Environmental Management, 36(5): 691–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Zang Y Z, Yang Y Y, 2020. China’s rural revitalization and development: Theory, technology and management. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(12): 1923–1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y X, Lu Y H, Fu B J et al., 2019. Quantifying the spatio-temporal drivers of planned vegetation restoration on ecosystem services at a regional scale. Science of the Total Environment, 650: 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y X, Wang Y L, Peng J et al., 2015. Correlations between urbanization and vegetation degradation across the world’s metropolises using DMSP/OLS nighttime light data. Remote Sensing, 7(2): 2067–2088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z J, Liu Y S, Li Y R, 2019. Extended warm temperate zone and opportunities for cropping system change in the Loess Plateau of China. International Journal of Climatology, 39(2): 658–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z J, Zhong H M, Li Y R et al., 2021. Change in grain production in China and its impacts on spatial supply and demand distributions in recent two decades. Journal of Natural Resources, 36(6): 1413–1425. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H L, Ge D Z, Zhang Y N et al., 2018. Changing man-land interrelations in China’s farming area under urbanization and its implications for food security. Journal of Environmental Management, 209: 440–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D D, Sun D Q, 2019. Development and management tasks of the Yellow River Basin: A preliminary understanding and suggestion. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(12): 2431–2436. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lufafa A, Tenywa M M, Isabiryeb M et al., 2003. Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based Universal Soil Loss model. Agricultural Systems, 76(3): 883–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morán-Ordóez A, Ameztegui A, Cáceres D M et al., 2020. Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios. Ecosystem Services, 45: 101174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen T H, Maxwell C, Field J L, et al., 2018. High-resolution trade-off analysis and optimization of ecosystem services and disservices in agricultural landscapes. Environmental Modelling & Software, 107: 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Hu X X, Zhao M Y et al., 2017. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(6): 960–973. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira L S, 2017. Water, agriculture, and food: Challenges and issues. Water Resources Management, 31: 2985–2999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potdar M B, Ravindranath S, Ravi N et al., 1995. Spectro-meteorological modeling of sorghum yield using single date IRS LISS-I and rainfall distribution data. Remote Sensing, 16: 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao X N, Gu Y Y, Zou C X et al., 2019. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China. Science of the Total Environment, 651: 218–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J, Turner M G, 2016. Importance of landscape heterogeneity in sustaining hydrologic ecosystem services in an agricultural watershed. Ecosphere, 6(11): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran C, Wang S J, Bai X Y et al., 2020. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in southwestern China. Environmental Engineering Science, 37(10): 669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A et al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). In: Agricultural Handbook 703 (p. 404). US Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M et al. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M, 2022. Global water shortage and potable water safety: Today’s concern and tomorrow’s crisis. Environment International, 158: 106936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley A N, Williams J R, 1990. EPIC-Erosion productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1768. USA Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shui Y P, Lu H T, Wang H F et al., 2018. Assessment of habitat quality on the basis of land cover and NDVI changes in Lhasa River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(24): 8946–8954. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C H, Fu B J, 2013. Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Global and Planetary Change, 101: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y Y, Zhou D Y, Jiang G H, 2020. Conflict or coordination? Multiscale assessment of the spatio-temporal coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: The case of the Jingjinji Region, China. Ecological Indicators, 117: 106543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomscha S A, Gergel S E, 2016. Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history. Ecology and Society, 21(1): 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G Q, Wang S Y, Chen Z X, 2004. Land-use/land-cover changes in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Tsinghua University, 44(9): 1218–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu G H, Li Z S et al., 2020. Processes and driving forces for changing vegetation ecosystem services: Insights from the Shaanxi province of China. Ecological Indicators, 112: 106105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Fu B J, Piao S L et al., 2016. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes. Nature Geoscience, 9(1): 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S J, Liu J, Wang R Q et al., 2012. Impact of socio-economic development on ecosystem services and its conservation strategies: A case study of Shandong province, China. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 184(5): 3212–3229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei H J, Fan W G, Ding Z Y et al., 2017. Ecosystem services and ecological restoration in the northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau, China, in relation to climate fluctuation and investments in natural capital. Sustainability, 9(2): 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W H, Smith D D, 1958. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 39(2): 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Yan Z, Yu C Q et al., 2017. Land management influences trade-offs and the total supply of ecosystem services in alpine grassland in Tibet, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 193: 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W H, Peng J, Liu Y X et al., 2017. Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City. Process in Geography, 36(12): 1571–1581. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J Y, Chen J X, Liu Y X, 2020. Partitioned responses of ecosystem services and their trade-offs to human activities in the Belt and Road region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276(4): 123205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Xu C Y, Shao Q et al. 2010. Temporal and spatial patterns of low-flow changes in the Yellow River in the last half-century. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(2): 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X N, Li J, Qin K Y et al., 2015. Trade-offs between ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(11): 1762–1773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J J, Zhu W B, Zhu L Q et al., 2022. Multi-scale analysis of trade-off/synergistic effects of forest ecosystem services in the Funiu Mountain Region, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(5): 981–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X X, Zheng J Y, Ge Q S et al., 2004. Relationships between climate change and vegetation in Beijing using remote sensed data and phenological data. Journal of Plant Ecology, 28(4): 499–506. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Huang C C, Tan Z, et al., 2019. Prehistoric and historic overbank floods in the Luoyang Basin along the Luohe River, middle Yellow River basin, China. Quaternary International, 521: 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z Y, Liu Y F, Wang Y H et al., 2020. What factors affect the synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257: 120454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X Y, Du Y X, Li H et al., 2021. Spatio-temporal changes of the coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services in the Middle Yellow River. Journal of Natural Resources, 36(1): 131–147. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Wang L J, Wu T, 2019. Coordinating ecosystem service trade-offs to achieve win-win outcomes: A review of the approaches. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 82: 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y H, Luo P P, Zhang S et al., 2020. Spatiotemporal analysis of hydrological variations and their impacts on vegetation in semiarid areas from multiple satellite data. Remote Sensing, 12(24): 4177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41931293; The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA23070302; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.42171208

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yellow River Institute of Shaanxi Province, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710127, China

    Yajing Shao & Yansui Liu

  2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yansui Liu & Yuheng Li

  3. School of Land Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710064, China

    Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan

Authors
  1. Yajing Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yansui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xuefeng Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yansui Liu.

Additional information

Author

Shao Yajing (1990—), PhD, specialized in land engineering, urban-rural development, and ecosystem services. E-mail: ynllsyj@163.com

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y. et al. Regional ecosystem services relationships and their potential driving factors in the Yellow River Basin, China. J. Geogr. Sci. 33, 863–884 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2110-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2110-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation