Global population projections foresee the biggest increase to occur in Africa with most of the available uncultivated land to ensure food security remaining on the continent. Simultaneously, greenhouse gas emissions are expected to rise due to ongoing land use change, industrialisation, and transport amongst other reasons with Africa becoming a major emitter of greenhouse gases globally. However, distinct knowledge on greenhouse gas emissions sources and sinks as well as their variability remains largely unknown caused by its vast size and diversity and an according lack of observations across the continent. Thus, an environmental research infrastructure—as being setup in other regions—is more needed than ever. Here, we present the results of a design study that developed a blueprint for establishing such an environmental research infrastructure in Africa. The blueprint comprises an inventory of already existing observations, the spatial disaggregation of locations that will enable to reduce the uncertainty in climate forcing’s in Africa and globally as well as an overall estimated cost for such an endeavour of about 550 M€ over the next 30 years. We further highlight the importance of the development of an e-infrastructure, the necessity for capacity development and the inclusion of all stakeholders to ensure African ownership.
The greatest increase in global population growth in the twenty-first century is projected to occur in Africa (FAO 2017), where much of the available uncultivated land required to meet global twenty-first century food demand is located (Ramankutty et al. 2018). Land use change in Africa is proceeding at an unprecedented rate, through agricultural expansion and urbanisation, leading to increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and it is expected that emissions from industrialisation, transport and power generation will follow suit (Liousse et al. 2014). For all these reasons, Africa can be expected to go from a footnote (~ 4%) to the global anthropogenic GHG emission inventories, to a major emitter (20%) over the next three decades. At the same time, the continent is already strongly affected by climate change and its vulnerability to extreme weather and climate conditions may increase during its further development.
At present, the infrastructure for quantifying the GHG sources and sinks in Africa is inadequate, due to the diversity of land cover, climate, management intensity and investment in capacity development, making the continent one of the weakest links in the global observation system (Ballantyne et al. 2015). More broadly, an integrated environmental research infrastructure (RI) in Africa is essential to achieve sustainable development and to guide the necessary investments. The need for such an infrastructure has been apparent for many years (see the commentary by Mbow (2014) on Valentini et al. (2014): “Other future directions of research should include the creation of an inventory of databases of information from in situ studies, as part of a collaborative framework to improve the availability of low-cost greenhouse gas data.”).
Such coordinated RIs are emerging worldwide (Franz et al. 2018; Steinhoff et al. 2019) and are helping to harmonise measurement and data-acquisition methods which then improves the consistency of the collected data (Chabbi and Loescher 2017). New generations of satellites, new automated measurement technologies and sophisticated modelling capabilities provide the opportunity to substantially improve greenhouse gas budgeting for Africa at both continental and national scale (Janardanan et al. 2020). Kulmala (2018) proposed that a minimum of 30 stations be built in Africa, comprising at least one in each key ecosystem and suggested that the best sites should be identified in collaboration with local organisations and scientists. Yet, a detailed assessment on available data and the requirements for establishing an environmental RI in Africa remains missing. In 2016, an EU-funded project entitled Supporting EU-African Cooperation on Research Infrastructures for Food Security and Greenhouse Gas Observations (SEACRIFOG) took up the challenge of designing such a system for the African continent and the results of this project are presented here.
Ecosystems of high importance to the global climate system, such as the Amazon basin or eastern-boundary ocean upwelling systems off North- and South America are much better monitored and understood than comparable areas in Africa (Chavez and Messié 2009; Davidson et al. 2012). Africa has unique natural attributes that are globally important in relation to the dynamics of the Earth system such as (1) wildfire emissions from the savannas of Africa constitute a large fraction of the global total (Lehsten et al. 2009; Archibald 2016), (2) dust emissions from the Sahara desert affect not only distant locations in Europe and the Americas (Knippertz and Knippertz 2017; Kok et al. 2018) but also fuel primary production in the Eastern Tropical North Atlantic through release of limiting macro and micro nutrients (Baker et al. 2013), (3) methane (CH4) emissions from large wetlands on the Nile were previously not reported (Lunt et al. 2019), (4) nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from the Congo basin have for the first time been evidenced by measurements and satellite observations (Borges et al. 2015; Upstill-Goddard et al. 2017), (5) previously unknown hotspots of N2O emissions related to agricultural practices were revealed (Butterbach-Bahl et al. 2020), and (6) emission hotspots of methane and nitrous oxide in the Canary Current (Kock et al. 2008; Wittke et al. 2010) and Benguela Current upwelling systems were identified (Arévalo-Martínez et al. 2019; Morgan et al. 2019). Thus, there is substantial evidence for the growing importance of Africa in the global GHG budget. Yet, the infrastructure that allows accurate spatial attribution of GHG emissions as well as tracking changes in GHG exchange over time remains lacking.
The guiding principle of the SEACRIFOG project is the cost-effectiveness and knowledge benefits of taking an Africa-wide integrated approach, rather than 55 individual national approaches. All African countries have reporting obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which will become more onerous over time and will require more empirical data. Simultaneously, observing the climate forcing from an integrated continental scale observational network would clearly benefit all countries and strengthen their common position within the UNFCCC. In addition to national governments, international organisations such as the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO (IOC-UNESCO) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), international and regional development banks, and private foundations all have an interest in supporting the emergence of such an RI in Africa. Accurate climate-related observations are an essential contributor to the evidence-based guidance of green development pathways which will be required as the population of Africa increases in a climatically uncertain future (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2013; Niang et al. 2015).
The design approach taken by the SEACRIFOG consortium
The SEACRIFOG consortium investigated: (1) the availability of ongoing and historical observations relevant to quantifying the African GHG budget (López-Ballesteros et al. 2018; Beck et al. 2019); (2) feasible designs and associated costs for an integrated environmental research infrastructure, primarily targeted at GHG emission quantification, that meets the requirements of the African continent and the globe (as determined by the UNFCCC reporting requirements and the global ‘essential variable lists’ respectively); (3) investment in human capacity by training future researchers in environmental observations and building a network of researchers to drive an African RI and use its data scientifically, jointly with partners from across the globe; and (4) the establishment of a stakeholder dialogue platform to create awareness and ownership of RIs at national and continental levels. Emphasis was given to building from what already exists, and to the involvement of African institutions. A systems-based approach was adopted to ensure that the most important climate forcing’s are covered in a rigorous and balanced way with a maximum level of standardisation, while permitting the system to expand and adapt in the future. The measurements are based on internationally agreed ‘essential variables’ (Beck et al. 2019), with a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches to allow the system to commence immediately and then progressively reduce uncertainties over time, and built-in redundancy to provide robustness.
Current state of environmental observations in Africa
Compared to other continents, and in particular Europe, North America and Australia, existing environmental observations in and around Africa remain limited and piecemeal (López-Ballesteros et al. 2018). Nevertheless, the African continent is far from being an observational terra incognita. An inventory of in situFootnote 1 observational locations associated with 25 research networks and initiatives revealed multiple locations of observations on and around the continentFootnote 2 as of 2018 (Fig. 1). This includes both operational and inactive sites, with the current operational status of most sites (84%) being unknown. An analysis of the observational coverage of the major natural and anthropogenic biomes (López-Ballesteros et al. 2018) showed that areas that are significant to the global climate system, such as the tropical rainforest in equatorial Africa are only sparsely covered. Station density increases with the degree of human disturbance, which results in few observations in less disturbed ecosystems. An integrated continental climate forcing observation system would build on the existing infrastructure while establishing new sites to systematically close coverage gaps. In general, the marine coastal and open-ocean ecosystem can be considered as highly undersampled compared to terrestrial ecosystems caused by their remoteness and the tremendous effort (infrastructure investments, manpower, shipping time requirements, costs) to operate and maintain offshore sites. At the same time, marine ecosystems are of high socio-economic importance for many African countries as coastal activities such as fisheries, tourism and commerce assure livelihood for large parts of the population. Therefore, a future climate forcing observing network across Africa needs to include both terrestrial and marine observational capacities.
The target variables for a continental observation system were derived through a combination of two approaches. In a top-down analysis, those variables which are required to quantify or estimate the major components of Africa-wide climate forcing were identified, based on the needs of Earth system research. Simultaneously, in a bottom-up approach, a list of relevant environmental variables was compiled by combining existing globally defined variable sets such as the essential climate, ocean and biodiversity variables, along with Africa-specific environmental and ancillary variables. The variables were prioritized based on a survey among 40 participants from the African and European environmental research community. The integration of findings from both approaches resulted in a set of 58 environmental variables (Fig. 2). The systematic and sufficient observations of these variables will increase the accuracy of African climate forcing estimates to global standards. The maximum acceptable uncertainties, and the observational requirements in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, were further defined for each variable (Beck et al. 2019).
As highlighted by Franz et al. (2018) and Smith et al. (2019), methodological protocols are the backbone of a harmonised RI. They allow for the comparison of observations and data products acquired from different sites, by different systems, in various countries and at different times. Protocols allow their integration with satellite products, and transparency and reproducibility over the whole measuring/monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) process. Therefore, López-Ballesteros et al. (2020) identified 140 protocols developed by international research communities (e.g. ICOS, WMO, ICP Forests, FixO3) that are potentially applicable to the measurement of the essential variables identified. Based on the collated protocols and the feasibility assessment, a harmonised approach is proposed to enhance observational capacity in Africa, with the differentiation of at least two types of sites. ‘Basic’ sites collect environmental measurements using relatively cheap and simple methods, improving the spatial coverage in the main biomes, anthromes and land use types. Advanced ‘key sites’ which would collect a larger set of variables, measured at high temporal resolution, usually with sophisticated instruments requiring specialised training, allow for a better understanding of driving processes in representative systems across the continent. Overall, these results aim at supporting existing observations and the implementation of new observations in under-studied regions (to cover the whole African continent including its coastal zone) by following minimum international interoperability principles. Additionally, all these methodological materials must support the capacity development programs envisaged to develop the human resources required for the long-term success of newly implemented environmental observations.
The necessity for an e-infrastructure
Based on the inventory assessment of available data, measurements and capacity, the necessity for an appropriate e-infrastructure became obvious. In order to generate synergies with existing activities, an e-infrastructure that has been built by the South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON) was taken as a starting point and linked to the SEACRIFOG Collaborative Inventory ToolFootnote 3 that can be used to visualise information on essential variables, data products, observation infrastructures and measurement protocols in Africa (Beck et al. 2019). The structure is open for advancements and adjustments in the future. Therefore, the ‘blueprint’ e-infrastructure should only be seen as a brokering registry for all available data products related to environmental monitoring in Africa and can be extended to serve, for example the needs of a future African Research Infrastructures that encompass and go beyond measuring carbon and GHG emissions.
A roadmap describing the status and anticipated technical readiness level which allows to move from a simple to a more advanced solution was developed. The e-infrastructure was designed to serve the African RI, including both operational data handling of the measurement infrastructure and services provided for scientific data evaluation and modelling. The costs of such an endeavour are small compared to investments and operational costs of measurement stations with an e-infrastructure that is thoroughly designed and implemented playing an essential role in the operation of the measurement infrastructure.
In parallel to mapping of needs for a continental observational research infrastructure, the SEACRIFOG project engaged key stakeholder groups to identify capacity development needs in the context of developing, maintaining and operating suchlike. It concluded that in addition to technical and financial investments (outlined in subsequent sections), a functional RI requires the development of both human and technical capacities, in terms of skilled scientific and technical personnel as well as state-of-the-art data centres, calibration laboratories, and efficient local instrument support. The scarcity of capacity across most parts of Africa constitutes the major obstacle towards the establishment and operation of a continentally owned and coordinated RI (Atickem et al. 2019) and related research. For each highly specialised scientific and technical subdiscipline identified, it is currently hard to find the necessary human resources in Africa, and hard to retain them in the financially uncompetitive field of environmental observations (OECD 2009). Moreover, there are currently no continental policies and supporting agreements in place to guide African states in developing a joint continental observational strategy and to regulate data exchange, data hosting and tax-free movement of equipment. Thus, any research infrastructure that is likely going to be established in Africa calls for long-term capacity development programs which are coordinated across the continent. Such programs have to include capacity development at scientific level (e.g. research institutions, universities), technical level (e.g. research institutions, specialised SMEs, national authorities) and administrative level (local and national authorities). One example for a multilateral capacity development program is the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL) which has established 12 graduate schools with the aim to train the next generation of scientists and potential decision-makers (www.wascal.org). Several other examples exist, even though those programmes are commonly not linked. In addition to financial and technology transfers, such capacity development programmes constitute an opportunity for industrialized regions to support locally driven capacity development in direct accordance with Article 11 of the Paris Agreement. As a co-benefit, the economic development of the continent will be favoured.
Regional to local-scale example
While it has become apparent that any additional observational platform will assist in further reducing the uncertainty in the climate forcing of and around the African continent, it needs to be stated that some information may be more important than other. For instance, monitoring the coastal zone with its local fisheries is vital with regards to human health, nutrition and economy. Furthermore, accurate estimates of the environmental footprint of agricultural and particularly livestock systems is key to better constrain emissions and to develop climate-smart agricultural mitigation and adaptation strategies (Clute 1982; Abdulai and Hazell 1996; Thornton and Herrero 2010; Bryan et al. 2013). An example of what can be achieved with focused and continuous in situ observations has been shown by the Mazingira Centre—a state-of-the-art environmental research centre—hosted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) in Nairobi, Kenya. The Centre established the first Tier 2 GHG emissions assessment of a variety of land use types including smallholder farmlands, croplands, savannas, conservation areas as well as forests (Pelster et al. 2017; Wanyama et al. 2018; Wachiye et al. 2019); dominant livestock systems (Ndung’u et al. 2019); and their individual system components (Pelster et al. 2016; Goopy et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2018, 2020). This specific work (i) has led first of all to better scientific understanding of the environmental footprints of agroecosystems in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), accounting for the sometimes unique settings of African livestock systems, (ii) supporting governments in East Africa to fulfil their NDC requirements and accurate GHG emissions reporting to UNFCCC while (iii) identifying and testing potential GHG mitigation measures in parallel (Herrero et al. 2016; Ali et al. 2019; Onyango et al. 2019; Goopy et al. 2020). The centre has further investigated the existing uncertainties, knowns and unknowns in nutrient budgets from key ecosystems and landscapes, such as semi-arid drylands and savannah ecosystems (Carbonell et al. 2021), and was thus able to identify hotspots of nitrous oxide emissions from cattle enclosures which are of continental and global importance (Butterbach-Bahl et al. 2020). Other recent work has also revealed how severe undernutrition in cattle increases their enteric methane production (Goopy et al. 2020). In the next steps, and given the necessity of intensifying agricultural production of major staple crops such as maize, a projection of nitrous oxide emissions when closing maize yield gaps by 2050 was performed based on available publications that measured both crop yields and GHG emissions (Leitner et al. 2020). With such focused approaches of bringing a wide variety of expertise and observations together, the actual services for stakeholders ranging from line ministry staff, academia as well as farmers become a reality.
Which observations should be made where, and what are the costs?
An Africa GHG observation system, as proposed, can inform climate change mitigation, adaptation and economic development decisions. Africa, whose agriculture and food security is vulnerable to global warming, changing precipitation patterns—including droughts and floods—and climate-linked effects such as the locust invasion in East Africa in 2020 (Kimathi et al. 2020), need data, human and institutional capacity development and systemic governance for mitigation and adaptation (Dobardzic et al. 2019). The benefits for society of a comprehensive environmental observation system spanning the African continent would outweigh the investments of building and maintaining it.
Unintended redundancy that does not serve interoperability or robustness and could lead to economies of scale (Table 1) should be avoided. Thus, the SEACRIFOG consortium ran optimization algorithms coupled to top-down inversion techniques to identify the best locations for new observations, such that they reduced the uncertainty in the GHG budget of Africa by the greatest amount (Fig. 3, Nickless et al. 2020). In order to minimise the costs, various technologies that meet the required standards were considered for each of the essential variables (López-Ballesteros et al. 2018, 2020; Beck et al. 2019).
The network design for in situ atmospheric monitoring sites in Africa is an example of how to plan an effective observational network at minimum cost. The study considered many potential locations in Africa and identified in an inverse modelling approach those that reduced uncertainty of African GHG budgets most. The design approach placed stations into the network sequentially, so that the solution provided a ranking of stations to be considered for establishment or refurbishment based on the percentage uncertainty reduction in the total African GHG budget that could be achieved (Fig. 3). The analysis considered each of the three major GHGs separately and provided a solution which optimised across all three gases. The largest amount of uncertainty in the total African GHG budget was due to biogenic GHG emissions, and therefore sites were located near the regions of greatest biogenic activity (Nickless et al. 2020), predominantly tropical rainforest, subtropical and tropical dry forest and grass savanna biomes. The regions/countries which were most frequently included in the network design under various configurations included Angola, the Congo basin and Botswana. For the implementation of the network, the cost of the site versus its ranking in the network solution should be considered. The resulting network would be able to achieve an uncertainty reduction in the total African GHG budget for CO2 of up to 55%, and lower levels for CH4 and N2O. This emphasizes the need for an integrated network to reach higher levels of uncertainty reduction. It would include atmospheric measurements sites, such as proposed in the network design study by Nickless et al. (2020), as well as satellite observations, and ecosystem measurements of GHG fluxes which can improve models predicting biogenic GHG fluxes in African ecosystems. Furthermore, it is important to note that some of the tropical African stations that were used in the study are already active. It would therefore probably cost less to upgrade them than it would cost to build a new site in a hard-to-reach location with no prior observational experience.
Stakeholder involvement and aspects of implementation
Designing GHG observations under a changing climate in Africa, while addressing the double challenge of climate change adaptation and mitigation, is a huge effort that implies the integration of different disciplines and the support of a strong policy mandate with substantial investments. The final question is how to achieve these investments in an African GHG observation system and to ensure the desired impact. It is clear that the implementation needs a strong and sustainable institutional framework that includes national governments and scientific institutions taking ownership of the observational system, its e-infrastructure and the related research and beyond those multi-national institutions including the African Union and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
Stakeholder involvement which has become a common practice in interdisciplinary research projects (Mielke et al. 2017; Ginige et al. 2018) has been applied in SEACRIFOG to ensure that local African knowledge is mainstreamed into the project design (López-Ballesteros et al. 2018). A wide range of actors belonging to different sectors have been consulted to ensure that the design and the strategic plan for implementation of the observational network meet the users’ needs. Within SEACRIFOG, the stakeholders’ engagement was obtained through the organisation of three workshops, each in a different African region (Eastern, Western and Southern Africa) and through the establishment of the SEACRIFOG Dialogue Platform.
A GHG observation system, as well as the derived information, proved to be important for a range of African stakeholders, including farmers, fishermen, environmental managers, research institutions, governmental and non-governmental organisations, regional bodies and UN agencies. Monitoring GHG budgets allows key stakeholders to address climate change mitigation and adaptation measures through informed environmental planning and management. From the stakeholder analysis, the current knowledge on these topics is largely hindered by limited data/metadata availability, accessibility, usability, interoperability, resolution, format and quality. The solution for Africa is unlikely to simply be a system transposed from developed country approaches for RIs. These are not directly applicable to the African context for reasons such as (1) high costs for implementation and maintenance, (2) scarcity of qualified personnel and specialised companies, (3) problems with unreliable energy supply, (4) accessibility and protection of field sites and (5) challenging climatic conditions (López-Ballesteros et al. 2018). Technological and infrastructural gaps can be filled through international cooperation coupled with a suitable strategy for promoting public and private investments, including for example the Green Climate Fund (GCF), World Bank (WB) and African Union (AU) (Afful-Koomson 2015).
Similarly, methodological guidance and an increasing exploitation of research results can be achieved through a collaborative and interactive network among the relevant parties, promoting best practices and capacity development. Besides research and technology, a comprehensive approach must consider not only scientific and ecological issues but also socio-economic dynamics (e.g. land tenure, urbanization, job opportunities, markets, prices, investments). Any planning strategy for an environmental RI with distributed field sites needs to build on what already exists and rely on an optimal network design process based on objective scientific analyses (Sulkava et al. 2011; Lucas et al. 2015; Ziehn et al. 2016). Strengthening cooperation between Africa and Europe on the topics of GHG observations, land use change and food security needs to consider these aspects as part of the same common interest in achieving global objectives and moving from being part of the climate change problem to be a proactive part of the solution.
It is recommended that neo-institutional economic and political frameworks (e.g. Ostrom’s institutional analysis framework as used by Nigussie et al. (2018)) be applied for the diagnosis and analysis of impact. The related theory of change proposes monitoring of research activities through impact pathways. Such strong research component may result in a 550 M€ investment over 30 years which has to be justified by a commensurate return on investment with regards to accuracy, standardisation, reliability of data transmission and archiving, adequate coverage and precision of the observational elements as well as high societal impact of the knowledge produced by the researchers.
The SEACRIFOG consortium has developed a blueprint for an African environmental research infrastructure that could provide the foundation for establishing standardised environmental observations across the continent. This is a necessary step towards achieving national, regional and global objectives with respect to development within the constraints of a worldwide climate crisis. The blueprint is feasible and would represent a substantial advance over the current situation.
Although building on existing infrastructure, considerable investment is needed to lift the existing observations to the desired coverage and enable African scientists to generate the knowledge their societies need to mitigate and adapt to climate change. Pathways towards intended goals need to be reflected on in long-term perspectives for meeting sustainable development goals. Strategies for knowledge management and dialogue between actors at sub-national, national, regional, continental and international level should be inclusively instituted during implementation as the RI works towards societal relevance.
i.e. not taking into account air- and space-based observations.
Between − 26 and 64° longitude and 28 and − 40° latitude.
Abdulai A, Hazell PBR (1996) The role of agriculture in sustainable economic development in Africa. J Sustain Agric 7:101–119. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v07n02_10
Afful-Koomson T (2015) The Green Climate Fund in Africa: what should be different? Climate Dev 7:367–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2014.951015
Ali AIM, Wassie SE, Korir D, Merbold L, Goopy JP et al (2019) Supplementing tropical cattle for improved nutrient utilization and reduced enteric methane emissions. Animals 9:210. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050210
Archibald S (2016) Managing the human component of fire regimes: lessons from Africa. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150346. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0346
Arévalo-Martínez DL, Steinhoff T, Brandt P, Koertzinger A, Lamont T et al (2019) N2O emissions from the northern Benguela upwelling system. Geophys Res Lett 46:3317–3326. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081648
Atickem A, Stenseth NC, Fashing PJ, Nguyen N, Chapman CA et al (2019) Build science in Africa. Nature 570:297–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01885-1
Baker AR, Adams C, Bell TG, Jickells TD, Ganzeveld L (2013) Estimation of atmospheric nutrient inputs to the Atlantic Ocean from 50°N to 50°S based on large-scale field sampling: Iron and other dust-associated elements. Global Biogeochem Cycles 27:755–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20062
Ballantyne AP, Andres R, Houghton R, Stocker BD, Wanninkhof R et al (2015) Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty. Biogeosciences 12:2565–2584. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2565-2015
Beck J, López-Ballesteros A, Hugo W, Scholes RJ, Saunders M et al (2019) Development of a climate forcing observation system for Africa: data-related considerations. Data Sci J 18:42. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-042
Borges AV, Darchambeau F, Teodoru CR, Marwick TR, Tamooh F et al (2015) Globally significant greenhouse-gas emissions from African inland waters. Nat Geosci 8:637–642. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2486
Bryan E, Ringler C, Okoba B, Koo J, Herrero M et al (2013) Can agriculture support climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas mitigation and rural livelihoods? insights from Kenya. Clim Change 118:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0640-0
Butterbach-Bahl K, Gettel G, Kiese R, Fuchs K, Werner C et al (2020) Livestock enclosures in drylands of Sub-Saharan Africa are overlooked hotspots of N2O emissions. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18359-y
Carbonell V, Merbold L, Díaz-Pinés E, Dowling TPD, Butterbach-Bahl K et al (2021) Nitrogen cycling in pastoral livestock systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: knowns and unknowns. Ecol Appl:1–17.https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2368
Chabbi A, Loescher HW (2017) Terrestrial ecosystem research infrastructures. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Infrastructures 2–26.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315368252
Chavez FP, Messié M (2009) A comparison of eastern boundary upwelling ecosystems. Prog Oceanogr 83:80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.032
Clute RE (1982) The role of agriculture in African development. Afr Stud Rev 25:1–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/524398
Davidson EA, de Araújo AC, Artaxo P, Balch JK, Brown IF et al (2012) The Amazon basin in transition. Nature 481:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10717
Dobardzic S, Dengel CG, Gomes AM, Hansen J, Bernardi M et al (2019) 2019 State of climate services: agriculture and food security. Geneva
FAO (2017) The future of food and agriculture: trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Franz D, Acosta M, Altimir N, Arriga N, Arrouays D et al (2018) Towards long-term standardised carbon and greenhouse gas observations for monitoring Europe’s terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Int Agrophys 32:439–455. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0039
Ginige K, Amaratunga D, Haigh R (2018) Mapping stakeholders associated with societal challenges: a methodological framework. Procedia Engineering 212:1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.154
Goopy JP, Onyango AA, Dickhoefer U, Butterbach-Bahl K (2018) A new approach for improving emission factors for enteric methane emissions of cattle in smallholder systems of East Africa – results for Nyando, Western Kenya. Agric Syst 161:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.12.004
Goopy JP, Goopy JP, Korir D, Pelster D, Ali AIM et al (2020) Severe below-maintenance feed intake increases methane yield from enteric fermentation in cattle. Br J Nutr 123:1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519003350
Herrero M, Henderson B, Havlík P, Thornton PK, Conant RT et al (2016) Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat Clim Chang 6:452–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2925
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) The IPCC’s fifth assessment report: what’s in it for Africa? Executive summary. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 33
Janardanan R, Maksyutov S, Tsuruta A, Wang F, Tiwari YK et al (2020) Country-scale analysis of methane emissions with a high-resolution inverse model using GOSAT and surface observations. Remote Sensing 12:375. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030375
Kimathi E, Tonnang HEZ, Subramanian S, Cressmann C, Abdel-Rahman EL et al (2020) Prediction of breeding regions for the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria in East Africa. Sci Rep 10:11937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68895-2
Knippertz P, Knippertz P (2017) Mineral dust generation across northern Africa and its impacts. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science
Kock A, Gebhardt S, Bange HW (2008) Methane emissions from the upwelling area off Mauritania (NW Africa). Biogeosciences 5:1119–1125. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1119-2008
Kok JF, Ward DS, Mahowald NM, Evan AT (2018) Global and regional importance of the direct dust-climate feedback. Nat Commun 9.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02620-y
Kulmala M (2018) Build a global Earth observatory. Nature 553:21–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-017-08967-y
Lehsten V, Tansey K, Balzter H, Thonicke K, Spessa A et al (2009) Estimating carbon emissions from African wildfires. Biogeosciences 6:349–360. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-349-2009
Leitner S, Pelster DE, Werner C, Merbold L, Baggs EM et al (2020) Closing maize yield gaps in sub-Saharan Africa will boost soil N2O emissions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 47:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.018
Liousse C, Assamoi E, Criqui P, Granier C, Rosset R et al (2014) Explosive growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030. Environmental Research Letters 9.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003
Longhurst A, Sathyendranath S, Platt T, Caverhill C (1995) An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J Plankton Res 17:1245–1271. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/17.6.1245
López-Ballesteros A, Beck J, Bombelli A, Grieco E, Lorencova EK et al (2018) Towards a feasible and representative pan-African research infrastructure network for GHG observations. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad66c
López-Ballesteros A, Beck J, Helmschrot J, Saunders M (2020) Harmonised observations of climate forcing across Africa: an assessment of existing approaches and their applicability. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab82ce
Lucas DD, Yver Kwok C, Cameron-Smith P, Graven H, Bergmann D et al (2015) Designing optimal greenhouse gas observing networks that consider performance and cost. Geosci Instrum Methods Data Syst 4:121–137. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-121-2015
Lunt MF, Palmer PI, Feng L, Taylor CM, Boesch H et al (2019) An increase in methane emissions from tropical Africa between 2010 and 2016 inferred from satellite data. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 14721–14740. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-477
Mbow C (2014) Biogeoscience: Africa’s greenhouse-gas budget is in the red. Nature 508:192–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/508192a
Mielke J, Vermaßen H, Ellenbeck S (2017) Ideals, practices, and future prospects of stakeholder involvement in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E10648–E10657. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706085114
Morgan EJ, Lavric JV, Arévalo-Martinez DL, Bange HW, Steinhoff T et al (2019) Air–sea fluxes of greenhouse gases and oxygen in the northern Benguela Current region during upwelling events. Biogeosciences 16:4065–4084. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4065-2019
Ndung’U PW, Bebe BO, Ondiek JO, Butterbach-Bahl K, Merbold L et al (2019) Improved region-specific emission factors for enteric methane emissions from cattle in smallholder mixed crop: livestock systems of Nandi County, Kenya. Anim Prod Sci 59:1136–1146. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17809
Niang I, Ruppel OC, Abdrabo MA, Essel A, Lennard C et al (2015) Africa. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Part B: Regional aspects: Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1199–1266. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415386.002
Nickless A, Scholes RJ, Vermeulen A, Beck J, Lopez-Ballesteros A et al (2020) Greenhouse gas observation network design for Africa. Tellus 72:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1824486
Nickless A, Ziehn T, Rayner PJ, Scholes RJ, Engelbrecht F (2015) Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case. Atmos Chem Phys 15:2051–2069. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2051-2015
Nigussie Z, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Cochrane L et al (2018) Applying Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework to soil and water conservation activities in north-western Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 71:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.039
OECD (2009) Assessing environmental management capacity : towards a common reference framework. Environment. https://doi.org/10.1787/224131752784
Onyango AA, Dickhoefer U, Rufino MC, Butterbach-Bahl K, Goopy JP (2019) Temporal and spatial variability in the nutritive value of pasture vegetation and supplement feedstuffs for domestic ruminants in Western Kenya. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 32:637–647. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0114
Pelster D, Rufino M, Rosenstock T, Mango J, Saiz G et al (2017) Smallholder farms in eastern African tropical highlands have low soil greenhouse gas fluxes. Biogeosciences 14:187–202. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-187-2017
Pelster DE, Gisore B, Goopy J, Korir D, Koske JK et al (2016) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from cattle excreta on an East African grassland. J Environ Qual 45:1531–1539. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.02.0050
Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C et al (2018) Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69:789–815. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256
Roemmich D, Alford MH, Claustre H, Johnson KS, King B et al (2019) On the future of Argo: a global, full-depth, multi-disciplinary array. Front Mar Sci 6:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00439
Smith P, Soussana J, Angers D, Schipper L, Chenu C et al (2019) How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realise the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal. Global Chang Biol gcb.14815. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14815
Steinhoff T, Gkritzalis T, Lauvset SK, Jones S, Schuster U et al (2019) Constraining the oceanic uptake and fluxes of greenhouse gases by building an ocean network of certified stations: the ocean component of the integrated carbon observation system, ICOS-oceans. Front Mar Sci 6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00544
Sulkava M, Luyssaert S, Zaehle S, Papale D (2011) Assessing and improving the representativeness of monitoring networks: the European flux tower network example. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 116:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001562
Thornton PK, Herrero M (2010) Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19667–19672. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912890107
Upstill-Goddard RC, Salter ME, Mann PJ, Barnes J, Poulson J et al (2017) The riverine source of CH4 and N2O from the Republic of Congo, western Congo Basin. Biogeosciences 14:2267–2281. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2267-2017
Valentini R, Arneth A, Bombelli A, Castaldi S, Cazzolla Gatti R et al (2014) A full greenhouse gases budget of africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities. Biogeosciences 11.https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-381-2014
Wachiye S, Merbold L, Vesala T, Rinne J, Raesaenen M et al (2019) Soil greenhouse gas emissions under different land-use types in savanna ecosystems of Kenya. Biogeosciences 17:2149–2167. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-407
Wanyama I, Rufino MC, Pelster DE, Wanyama G, Atzberger C et al (2018) Land use, land use history, and soil type affect soil greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural landscapes of the East African highlands. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 123:976–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003856
Wittke F, Kock A, Bange HW (2010) Nitrous oxide emissions from the upwelling area off Mauritania (NW Africa). Geophys Res Lett 37:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042442
Zhu Y, Merbold L, Pelster DE, Dias-Pines E, Wanyama GN et al (2018) Effect of Dung Quantity and Quality on Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From Tropical Pastures in Kenya. Global Biogeochem Cycles 32:1589–1604. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005949
Zhu Y, Merbold L, Leitner S, Xia L, Pelster DE et al (2020) Influence of soil properties on N2O and CO2 emissions from excreta deposited on tropical pastures in Kenya. Soil Biol Biochem 140.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107636
Ziehn T, Law RM, Rayner PJ, Roff G (2016) Designing optimal greenhouse gas monitoring networks for Australia. Geosci Instrum Methods Data Syst 5:1–15. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-1-2016
Acknowledgement is also given to the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for contributing to this research by supporting SASSCAL. Alecia Nickless acknowledges the support received from Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Methane Observations and Yearly Assessments programme (MOYA, NE/N016548/1). Manuel Acosta acknowledges the support received for by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the CzeCOS program (grant number LM2018123). Ana Lopez-Ballesteros was additionally supported by a Juan de la Cierva-Formación postdoctoral contract from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (FJC2018-563 038192-I) and through the BC3 María de Maeztu excellence accreditation (MDM-2017-0714). We thank Veronika Jorch for critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
We would like to dedicate this article to Robert (Bob) Scholes, who inspired many of us to think beyond our common fields of expertise and with this pushed us to develop a better “systems ecology” thinking. Besides being a brilliant scientist, Bob always stressed the importance of being as inclusive as possible, if it was during summer schools or while writing this manuscript by stressing the necessity of African ownership in any potential future environmental research infrastructure. We will bear this in mind in all the upcoming exciting projects.
Open access funding provided by Agroscope. This work was funded by the European Commission through the project ‘Supporting EU-African Cooperation on Research Infrastructures for Food Security and Greenhouse Gas Observations’ (SEACRIFOG; project ID 730995). Lutz Merbold and Sonja Leitner acknowledge the support received for CGIAR Fund Council, Australia (ACIAR), Irish Aid, the European Union, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Switzerland, UK, USAID and Thailand and the support provided by the Programme for Climate-Smart Livestock (PCSL) implemented by GIZ and commissioned by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Germany. Björn Fiedler and Arne Körtzinger acknowledge support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of WASCAL (grant no. 01LG1805A).
Communicated by Wolfgang Cramer
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Robert J. Scholes is deceased.
About this article
Cite this article
Merbold, L., Scholes, R.J., Acosta, M. et al. Opportunities for an African greenhouse gas observation system. Reg Environ Change 21, 104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01823-w
- Carbon dioxide
- Nitrous oxide
- Environmental research infrastructure