Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Refining the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems Framework for comparative analysis of coastal system adaptation to global change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are numerous frameworks for studying the governance of shared resources that have been discussed extensively in the literature. Although these frameworks have been applied to multiple case studies, these applications are often idiosyncratic, subject to the interpretation of the researcher, and raise concerns regarding the operational use of frameworks for case-study comparisons. As a result, insights from these studies have not lived up to the aspirations of the frameworks to generate generalizable knowledge. Here, based on several case studies and our experience using various frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems, we undertake the task of providing a mechanism to systematically qualify interactions among ecological, social, institutional, and built infrastructure systems that impact the governance of shared resources. Specifically, we generate a series of archetypal social-ecological systems and extract from them a verb list to represent key interactions in the Robustness of Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework. We then extend and refine the list based on three case studies of coastal social-ecological systems. We categorize these verbs and use them to demonstrate governance patterns across the case studies. We find that governance entities predominantly seek control over paths of change directed at lower governance levels rather than acting at their own level. Governance entities shed responsibility to lower governance levels without providing necessary resources. Finally, we find high potential for the cancelation of efforts due to lack of coordination among governance entities. The set of system archetypes and associated verb list is a first step in laying the foundation for a general typology of and a standardized protocol for representing the dynamics of CIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are several derivatives and extensions of the IAD and SES: Ghorbani et al. (2013) extend the IAD to the “Modeling Agent systems based on the Institutional Analysis” (MAIA) framework for agent-based simulation of SES. Hinkel et al. (2014) attempt to enhance the SES framework through formalization using very low-level language. The framework is well suited for formal analysis but difficult to operationalize for more empirical scholars. Schlüter et al. (2014) link variables with processes and processes to outcomes using tools from the scientific computing and modeling community to add the dynamics that the SES lacks. However, the utility of this approach is limited to scholars familiar with scientific computing language conventions. We consider these and other extensions as complementary to the Robustness Framework, but typically more specific to particular research communities.

  2. This and more than 80 examples of example 2 archetypes collected by Ostrom and collaborators are cataloged in the Library on Governance in Social-Ecological systems (seslibrary.asu.edu). E.g., see https://seslibrary.asu.edu/node/569 for the forestry case just described.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work conducted during the MAGIC project (Multi-scale Adaptations to Global changes In Coastlines: ANR-13-JCLI-0005 and U.S. National Science Foundation ICER-1342933) under the Belmont Forum and G8 International Opportunities Fund (IOF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Anderies.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderies, J.M., Barreteau, O. & Brady, U. Refining the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems Framework for comparative analysis of coastal system adaptation to global change. Reg Environ Change 19, 1891–1908 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01529-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01529-0

Keywords

Navigation