Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
Article
Google Scholar
Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A (2013) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Chang 23:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
Article
Google Scholar
André K, Baird J, Swartling ÅG, Vulturius G, Plummer R (2017) Analysis of Swedish forest owners’ information and knowledge-sharing networks for decision-making: insights for climate change communication and adaptation. Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0844-1
Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Blanco V, Holzhauer S, Brown C, Lagergren F, Vulturius G, Lindeskog M, Rounsevell MDA (2017) The effect of forest owner decision-making, climatic change and societal demands on land-use change and ecosystem service provision in Sweden. Ecosyst Serv 23:174–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.003
Article
Google Scholar
Blennow K (2012) Adaptation of forest management to climate change among private individual forest owners in Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 24:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.005
Article
Google Scholar
Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M (2012) Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS One 7:e50182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050182
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2007) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40:72–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298800
Article
Google Scholar
Brooks N, Neil Adger W, Mick Kelly P (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 15:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006
Article
Google Scholar
Brügger A, Dessai S, Devine-Wright P, Morton TA, Pidgeon NF (2015) Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nat Clim Chang 5:1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2760
Article
Google Scholar
Fazey I, Fazey JA, Fischer J, Sherren K, Warren J, Noss RF, Dovers SR (2007) Adaptive capacity and learning to learn as leverage for social–ecological resilience. Front Ecol Environ 5:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[375:ACALTL]2.0.CO;2
Article
Google Scholar
Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, et al (2014) Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 899–943
Forest Europe, UNECE and FAO (2011) State of Europe’s forests 2011. Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Forest Europe, Oslo. http://www.foresteurope.org/documentos/State_of_Europes_Forests_2011_Report_Revised_November_2011.pdf
Frank E, Eakin H, López-Carr D (2011) Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Glob Environ Chang 21:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.001
Article
Google Scholar
Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75:301–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3
Article
Google Scholar
Goodwin J, Dahlstrom MF (2014) Communication strategies for earning trust in climate change debates: earning trust in climate change debates. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.262
Article
Google Scholar
Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
Article
Google Scholar
Jönsson AM, Bärring L (2011) Future climate impact on spruce bark beetle life cycle in relation to uncertainties in regional climate model data ensembles. Tellus A 63:158–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00479.x
Article
Google Scholar
Jönsson AM, Lagergren F, Smith B (2013) Forest management facing climate change – an ecosystem model analysis of adaptation strategies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9487-6
Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14:147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
Article
Google Scholar
Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547
Article
Google Scholar
Keskitalo ECH, Dannevig H, Hovelsrud GK, West JJ, Swartling ÅG (2011a) Adaptive capacity determinants in developed states: examples from the Nordic countries and Russia. Reg Environ Chang 11:579–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0182-9
Article
Google Scholar
Keskitalo ECH, Klenk N, Bullock R, Smith AL, Bazely DR (2011b) Preparing for and responding to disturbance: examples from the forest sector in Sweden and Canada. Forests 2:505–524. https://doi.org/10.3390/f2020505
Article
Google Scholar
Kreibich H, Seifert I, Thieken AH, Lindquist E, Wagner K, Merz B (2011) Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany. Reg Environ Chang 11:59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0119-3
Article
Google Scholar
Kuruppu N, Liverman D (2011) Mental preparation for climate adaptation: the role of cognition and culture in enhancing adaptive capacity of water management in Kiribati. Glob Environ Chang 21:657–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.002
Article
Google Scholar
Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA (2015) Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat Clim Chang 5:1014–1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2728
Article
Google Scholar
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Chang 77:45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
Article
Google Scholar
Lidskog R, Sjödin D (2014) Why do forest owners fail to heed warnings? Conflicting risk evaluations made by the Swedish forest agency and forest owners. Scand J For Res 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.910268
Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Chang 17:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
Article
Google Scholar
Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 29:633–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x
Article
Google Scholar
Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30:106–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x
Article
Google Scholar
Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11
Article
Google Scholar
Moser SC (2014) Communicating adaptation to climate change: the art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home: communicating adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:337–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.276
Article
Google Scholar
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22026–22031. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007887107
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Narayan D (ed) (2005) Measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives. The World Bank, Washington D.C
Google Scholar
Nikulin G, Kjellström E, Hansson U, Strandberg G, Ullerstig A (2011) Evaluation and future projections of temperature, precipitation and wind extremes over Europe in an ensemble of regional climate simulations. Tellus A 63:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00466.x
Article
Google Scholar
O’Brien KL (2009) Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values. Governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 164–180
Chapter
Google Scholar
O’Brien KL, Wolf J (2010) A values-based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.30
Patt A, Schroter D (2008) Perceptions of climate risk in Mozambique: implications for the success of adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 18:458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.002
Article
Google Scholar
Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Chang 15:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001
Article
Google Scholar
Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Chang 1:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1080
Article
Google Scholar
R Core Team (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Google Scholar
Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Petty JCR (ed) Social psychophysiology: a sourcebook. Guilford, New York, pp 153–176
Google Scholar
Sjöberg L (2006) Will the real meaning of affect please stand up? J Risk Res 9:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870500446068
Article
Google Scholar
Skogsindustrierna [The Swedish Forest Industries] (2014) Facts and Figures 2013
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2007) The affect heuristic. Eur J Oper Res 177:1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
Article
Google Scholar
SMHI (2014) Risker, konsekvenser och sårbarhet för samhället av förändrat klimat-en kunskapsöversikt. SMHI Klimatologi Nr 10. SMHI, Norrköping
Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
Article
Google Scholar
Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
Article
Google Scholar
Stoknes PE (2014) Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox.”. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007
Article
Google Scholar
Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability (2007) Sweden facing climate change—threats and opportunities. Stockholm
Swedish Forest Agency [Skogsstyrelsen] (2014) Statistical yearbook of forestry [Skogsstatistisk årsbok] 2014. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping
Google Scholar
Tam J, McDaniels TL (2013) Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation. Environ Sci Pol 27:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.004
Article
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum MB, Hepler J, Zimmerman RS, Saul L, Jacobs S, Wilson K, Albarracin D (2015) Appealing to fear: a meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychol Bull 141:1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
Article
Google Scholar
Tinch R, Jäger J, Omann I, Harrison PA, Wesely J, Dunford R (2015) Applying a capitals framework to measuring coping and adaptive capacity in integrated assessment models. Clim Chang 128:323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1299-5
Article
Google Scholar
van der Linden S (2015) The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. J Environ Psychol 41:112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012
Article
Google Scholar
Vulturius G, Swartling ÅG (2015) Overcoming social barriers to learning and engagement with climate change adaptation: experiences with Swedish forestry stakeholders. Scand J For Res 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.1002218
Whitmarsh L (2008) Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res 11:351–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235
Article
Google Scholar
Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, Lorenzoni I (2013) Public engagement with climate change: what do we know and where do we go from here? Int J Media Cult Polit 9:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.9.1.7_1
Article
Google Scholar
Wolf J, Moser SC (2011) Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in-depth studies across the world: Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2:547–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.120
Wolf J, Allice I, Bell T (2013) Values, climate change, and implications for adaptation: evidence from two communities in Labrador, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 23:548–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.007
Article
Google Scholar
Zimmerman BJ (2000) Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
CAS
Article
Google Scholar