Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Lake Baikal’s most important tributary is the Selenga River, which contributes about 50 to 60% of its surface water influx (Chalov et al. 2015; Opp 1994; Törnqvist et al. 2015). Moreover, the Selenga’s 447.060-km2 watershed covers 82% of the Lake Baikal Basin (Nadmitov et al. 2014) (Fig. 1), which means that any environmental changes along the Selenga and its tributaries may ultimately impact Lake Baikal. However, north of the Buryatian capital Ulan Ude, the Selenga River branches into the largest freshwater inland delta in the world (Logachev 2003). The associated wetland constitutes a unique ecosystem (Гармаев and Христофоров 2010) and acts as the final geobiochemical barrier before the Selenga discharges into Lake Baikal (Chalov et al. 2016). Therefore, it has a great impact on pollution delivery to Lake Baikal, storing up to 60–70% of the sediment load of the Selenga River (Chalov et al. 2017).
The protection of Lake Baikal and the planning of water management measures in the Selenga river basin require a good understanding of current trends regarding hydrology, water quality, aquatic and riparian zone ecology of the Selenga and its key tributaries (Karthe et al. 2016), and geo- and biochemical processes governing the ecological functioning of the Selenga delta (Khazheeva et al. 2004). The following anthropogenic impacts constitute threats to the ecology of the Selenga from its tributaries down to its delta:
Various mining activities are found in the Selenga river basin, including the exploitation of coal, gold, copper, molybdenum and wolfram (Sandmann 2012; Timofeev et al. 2015). As a consequence, elevated levels of heavy metals and other mining-related pollutants (cyanides, phosphorus) have been detected in the water and sediments of the Selenga and its tributaries, as well as floodplain soils and groundwater (Battogtokh et al. 2014; Brumbaugh et al. 2013; Chalov et al. 2015; Inam et al. 2011; McIntyre et al. 2016; Nadmitov et al. 2014; Pavlov et al. 2008; Pfeiffer et al. 2015; Stubblefield et al. 2005; Thorslund et al. 2012). Even though contaminant transport towards the Selenga delta does take place (Chalov et al. 2015; Khazheeva et al. 2004; Karthe et al. 2014), it should be noted that contaminations currently have the largest effects in local hot spots (Hofmann et al. 2010; Inam et al. 2011; Pfeiffer et al. 2015). Currently, there are different views regarding their impact on Lake Baikal itself (Chebykin et al. 2010; Pavlov et al. 2008). However, bioaccumulation and toxicological effects observed in aquatic biota ranging from insects to fish provide indication that water quality deterioration in the Selenga river system does have an ecological impact (Avlyush 2011; Kaus et al. 2016; Komov et al. 2014).
Urban wastewater inputs are another major stressor for the Selenga and its tributaries. A large part of the Selenga river basin’s population is concentrated in four cities. The three largest cities of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar, Erdenet and Darkhan) as well as Ulan Ude, the capital of the Republic of Buryatia in Russia, are located on the Tuul, Orkhon, Kharaa and Selenga rivers, respectively. These urban areas have multiple impacts on the region’s water resources. Firstly, per capita water consumption in urban areas is considerably higher than in peri-urban or rural regions (Scharaw and Westerhoff 2011; Sigel et al. 2012). Secondly, poor wastewater treatment infrastructures lead to nutrient inputs (Hofmann et al. 2010, 2011; Karthe et al. 2016) and microbiological contamination of rivers (Sorokovikova et al. 2013). Thirdly, urban areas in the Selenga river basin are characterized by a concentration of pollutants originating from the combustion of fuels and various industries (Dalai and Ishiga 2013; Kasimov et al. 2011; Opp 2007; Pfeiffer et al. 2015; Sorokina et al. 2013; Kasimov et al. 2016), some of which enter the water cycle directly or via atmospheric deposition.
Land use change, which is currently more pronounced in the Mongolian than the Russian part of the Selenga river basin, is driven chiefly by mining and the expansion of agriculture (Mun et al. 2008; Priess et al. 2011). The conversion of forests and natural grasslands into pastures and fields has implications for both hydrology (Minderlein and Menzel 2015) and water quality, chiefly by stimulating erosion processes (Priess et al. 2011; Theuring et al. 2013, 2015).
Present and expected hydrological changes in the Selenga river basin are caused by three processes: land use changes (Karthe et al. 2015; Minderlein and Menzel 2015), the impacts of global climate change on precipitation and evaporation (Hampton et al. 2008; Magnuson et al. 2000; Malsy et al. 2016; Törnqvist et al. 2015) and permafrost (Moore et al. 2009; Törnqvist et al. 2015), and increasing water withdrawals. The latter are related to the expansion of agriculture and rising irrigation needs in the context of global warming (Malsy et al. 2016; Priess et al. 2011) and in the future, potentially due to water diversions into mining areas in the South Gobi (Sorokovikova et al. 2013).
About this Special Issue
This Special Issue aims at providing insights into recent research activities into environmental change in the Selenga-Baikal Basin. The results of the various international research programs such as the Russian Geographical Society project “Expedition Selenga-Baikal”, UNDP-GEF project “Integrated Natural Resource Management in the Baikal Basin Transboundary Ecosystem”, and the German BMBF-funded projects “Integrated Water Resources Management: Model Region Mongolia” and “Modelling of Water Quantity and Quality in the Selenga-Baikal Region: Current Potentials and Future Necessities” contributed to it.
Thematically, the manuscripts consider hydrological changes and their drivers, pollutant and sediment input, transport and deposition and their role for the aquatic ecosystem of the Selenga, its tributaries and its delta. The spatial focus of the manuscripts ranges from basinwide studies (Malsy et al. 2016; Frolova et al. 2017) to specific subregions such as the Selenga’s headwaters (Kopp et al. 2016; Kaus et al. 2016; Thorslund et al. 2012) or its delta (Chalov et al. 2016) (Table 1). These studies provide an important contribution for a better understanding of spatial and temporal processes regarding hydrology, sediment and pollutant fluxes and aquatic ecology in the Selenga River—Lake Baikal Basin, adding novel insights into this unique ecosystem as compared to previous reports in literature (Table 1).
Various temporal scales have been considered, ranging from the identification of long-term changes in the past based on hydrological and meteorological datasets (since the 1930s) (Frolova et al. 2017) or in the future based on scenarios and bias-corrected climate input (Malsy et al. 2016). Using hydrological and meteorological station data (since the 1930s), remote sensing and statistical analyses, Frolova et al. (2017) estimated long-term changes in annual average flow, annual maximum hourly flows and annual minimum 30-day flows. Compared to the historical period 1934–1975, the most recent period 2002–2014 showed a significant flow reduction of 30%, in comparison with a moderate average reduction of 12% for the longer period 1976–2014. Malsy et al. (2016) focused on the question whether climate change or socioeconomic change in the Selenga river basin is the more important driver of water quality changes in the region. The authors conclude that population growth/urbanization and increasing industrial activities (particularly mining) have the strongest impact on the water quality parameters considered in this study (biological oxygen demand, total dissolved solids, instream coliforms). The observed and predicted water quality deterioration is at least partly reinforced by climate change.
The role of environmental changes for the local to regional scale hydrology were investigated by Kopp et al. (2016) who assessed the impacts of wildfires on infiltration and runoff-forming processes in a Mongolian headwater area of the Selenga river system. The authors found that the impacts on forest fires on organic soil layers reduce its water retention capacity, leading to increased stormflow but decreased baseflow and thus negative effects on water availability further downstream during dry periods. The opposite end of the river system is the focus of an integrated study of the Selenga River delta, which assessed metal accumulation in bottom sediments and plants, heavy metal budgets and water and sediment partitioning (Chalov et al. 2016) with a focus on long-term and seasonal variations. In order to explain recent changes in the delta and its barrier functions, the authors addressed spatiotemporal changes in water flow, morphology and transport of sediments both in the upstream Selenga River system and the delta itself.
Snapshot field measurements of heavy metals in water and sediments (Thorslund et al. 2012) and fish communities (Kaus et al. 2016) were conducted to assess river system change related to mining developments in Kharaa and Tuul river in the upper to central Selenga river basin. Based on an equilibrium geochemical model, Thorslund et al. (2012) revealed that several metals (Al, Cd, Fe, Mn, Pb and V) are exported from mining sites to the downstream river system, as shown by net increasing mass flows. The study also focused on the importance of predicting potential future changes in the bioavailable dissolved fractions under changing ambient conditions from a health risk perspective. Kaus et al. (2016) examined the spatial pattern of heavy metal contamination in fish in the meso-scale Kharaa river basin, which is located in the central part of the Selenga-Baikal basin. The authors reported heavy metal and arsenic accumulation in five fish species sampled, particularly in the middle and lower reaches of the river. They found about a tenth of the river fish to contain mercury at levels above recommended thresholds for human consumption.
The reported regional environmental change in the Selenga River—Lake Baikal Basin is one important basis for water resources management planning with the aim of achieving a sustainable use of water resources by reducing pollution of the aquatic ecosystem for the Selenga. While the research results contained in this thematic issue imply significant advances on the current state of knowledge, Table 1 also reveals needs for future research by identifying combinations of thematic issues, spatial and temporal scales that have not yet been analysed in the area. In particular, a better understanding of pollution impacts on the aquatic ecosystem of the Selenga and its delta based on future pollution scenarios is crucial in order to identify potential tipping points of this system which could lead to much greater contaminant fluxes into Lake Baikal.
References
Avlyush S (2011) Effects of surface gold mining on macroinvertebrate communities. A case study in river systems in the North-East of Mongolia. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken
Battogtokh B, Lee JM, Woo N (2014) Contamination of water and soil by the Erdenet copper-molybdenum mine in Mongolia. Environ Earth Sci 71:3363–3374. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2727-y
Brumbaugh WG, Tillitt DE, May TW, Javzan CH, Komov VT (2013) Environmental survey in the Tuul and Orkhon river basins of northcentral Mongolia, 2010: metals and other elements in streambed sediment and floodplain soil. EnvironMonit Assess 185:8991–9008. doi:10.1007/s10661-013-3229-9
Chalov SR, Jarsjö J, Kasimov N, Romanchenko A, Pietron J, Thorslund J, Belozerova E (2015) Spatio-temporal variation of sediment transport in the Selenga river basin, Mongolia and Russia. Environ Earth Sci 73(2):663–680. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3106-z
Chalov S, Thorslund J, Kasimov NS, Nittrouer J, Iliyecheva E, Pietron J, Shinkareva G, Lychagin M, Aybullatov D, Kositky A, Tarasov M, Akhtman Y, Garmaev E, Karthe D, Jarsjö J (2016) The Selenga River delta: a geochemical barrier protecting Lake Baikal waters. Reg Environ Chang. doi:10.1007/s10113-016-0996-1
Chalov SR, Bazilova VO, Tarasov MK (2017) Modelling suspended sediment distribution in the Selenga River Delta using LandSat data. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences 375:19–22. doi:10.5194/piahs-375-19-2017
Chebykin EP, Goldberg EL, Kulikova NS (2010) Elemental composition of suspended particles from the surface waters of Lake Baikal in the zone affected by the Selenga River. Russian Geol Geophys 51:1126–1132. doi:10.1016/j.rgg.2010.09.004
Dalai B, Ishiga H (2013) Geochemical evaluation of present-day Tuul River sediments, Ulaanbaatar basin, Mongolia. Environ Monit Assess 185:2869–2881. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2757-z
Frolova NL, Belyakova PA, Grigor'ev VY, Sazonov AA, Zotov LV, Jarsjö J (2017) River runoff fluctuations in the Selenga River basin. Reg Environ Chang. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1199-0
Гармаев ЕЖ, Христофоров АВ (2010) Водные ресурсы рек бассейна озера Байкал: основы их использования и охраны. Академическое издательство “ГЕО”, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Hampton SE, Izmest’eva LR, Moore MV, Katz SL, Dennis B, Silow EA (2008) Sixty years of environmental change in the world’s largest freshwater lake—Lake Baikal, Siberia. Glob Change Biol 14:1947–1958. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01616.x
Hofmann J, Hürdler J, Ibisch R, Schaeffer M, Borchardt D (2011) Analysis of recent nutrient emission pathways, resulting surface water quality and ecological impacts under extreme continental climate: the Kharaa river basin (Mongolia). Int Rev Hydrobiol 96(5):484–519. doi:10.1002/iroh.201111294
Hofmann J, Venohr M, Behrendt H, Opitz D (2010) Integrated water resources management in central Asia: nutrient and heavy metal emissions and their relevance for the Kharaa river basin, Mongolia. Water Sci Technol 62:353–363. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.262
Inam E, Khantotong S, Kim KW, Tumendemberel B, Erdenetsetseg S, Puntsag T (2011) Geochemical distribution of trace element concentrations in the vicinity of Boroo gold mine, Selenge Province, Mongolia. Environ Geochem Health 33:57–69. doi:10.1007/s10653-010-9347-1
Karthe D, Heldt S, Houdret A, Borchardt D (2015) IWRM in a country under rapid transition: lessons learnt from the Kharaa river basin, Mongolia. Environmental Earth Sciences 73(2):681–695. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3435-y
Karthe D, Heldt S, Rost G, Londong J, Ilian J, Heppeler J, Khurelbaatar G, Sullivan C, van Afferden M, Stäudel J, Scharaw B, Westerhoff T, Dietze S, Sigel K, Hofmann J, Watson V, Borchardt D (2016) Modular concept for municipal waste water management in the Kharaa river basin, Mongolia. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) (2016): integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 649–681
Karthe D, Kasimov NS, Chalov SR, Shinkareva GL, Malsy M, Menzel L, Theuring P, Hartwig M, Schweitzer C, Hofmann J, Priess J, Lychagin M (2014) Integrating multi-scale data for the assessment of water availability and quality in the Kharaa-Orkhon-Selenga river system. Geography, environment, sustainability 3(7):65–86
Kasimov NS, Kosheleva NE, Sorokina OI, Bazha SN, Gunin PD, Enkh-Amgalan S (2011) Ecological-geochemical state of soils in Ulaanbaatar (Mongolia). Eurasian Soil Sci 44(7):709–721. doi:10.1134/S106422931107009X
Kasimov NS, Kosheleva NE, Gunin PD, Korlyakov I, Sorokina O, Timofeev I (2016) State of the environment of urban and mining areas in the Selenga transboundary river basin (Mongolia Russia). Environmental Earth Sciences 75(1283):1–20. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-6088-1
Kaus A, Schäffer M, Büttner O, Karthe D, Borchardt D (2016) Regional patterns of heavy metal concentrations in water, sediment and five consumed fish species of the Kharaa river basin. Mongolia Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-016-0969-4
Khazheeva ZI, Urbazaeva SD, Bodoev NV, Radnaeva LD, Kalinin YO (2004) Heavy metals in the water and bottom sediments of the Selenga River delta. J Water Res 31(1):64–67. doi:10.1023/B:WARE.0000013574.46546.74
Komov VT, Pronin NM, Mendsaikhan B (2014) Mercury content in muscles of fish of the Selenga River and lakes of its basin (Russia). Inland Water Biol 7:178–184. doi:10.1134/S1995082914020059
Kopp B, Lange J, Menzel L (2016) Effects of wildfire on runoff generating processes in northern Mongolia. Reg Environ Chang. doi:10.1007/s10113-016-0962-y
Logachev NA (2003) History and geodynamics of the baikal rift. Russ Geol Geophys 44(5):391–406
Lychagin M, Chalov SK, N.; Shinkareva, G.; Jarsjö, J. Thorslund, J. (2017) Surface water pathways and fluxes of metals under changing environmental conditions and human interventions in the Selenga River system. Env Earth Sci DOI. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-6304-z
Magnuson JJ, Robertson DM, Benson BJ, Wynne RH, Livingstone DM, Arai T, Assel RA, Barry RG, Card V, Kuusisto E, Granin NG, Prowse TD, Stewart KM, Vuglinski VS (2000) Historical trends in lake and river ice cover in the Northern Hemisphere. Sci 289(5485):1743–1746. doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1743
Malsy M, Flörke M, Borchardt D (2016) What drives the water quality changes in the Selenga basin: climate change or socio-economic development? Reg Environ Chang. doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1005-4
McIntyre N, Bulovic N, Cane I, McKenna P (2016) A multi-disciplinary approach to understanding the impacts of mines on traditional uses of water in northern Mongolia. Sci Tot Environ 557-558:404–414. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.092
Minderlein S, Menzel L (2015) Evapotranspiration and energy balance dynamics of a semi-arid mountainous steppe and shrubland site in northern Mongolia. Environ Earth Sci 73(2):593–609. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3335-1
Moore MV, Hampton SE, Izmest’eva LR, Silow EA, Peshkova EV, Pavlov BK (2009) Climate change and the world’s “sacred sea”—Lake Baikal, Siberia. Bioscience 59(5):405–417. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.5.8
Mun Y, Ko IH, Janchivdorj L, Gomboev B, Kang SI, Lee CH (2008) Integrated water management model on the Selenga river basin—status survey and integration (phase I). Korea Environment Institute, Seoul
Nadmitov B, Hong S, Kang SI, Chu JM, Gomboev B, Janchivdorj L, Lee CH, Khim JS (2014) Large-scale monitoring and assessment of metal contamination in surface water of the Selenga river basin (2007–2009). Environ Sci Pollut R 22(4):2856–2867. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3564-6
Opp C (1994) Naturphänomene und Probleme des Natur- und Umweltschutzes am Baikalsee. Petermanns Geogr Mitt 138(4):219–234
Opp C (2007) Welterbe Baikal: Naturausstattung, Nutzungseingriffe, Schutzstrategien. In: Glaser R, Kremb K (eds) (2007) Asien. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Pavlov DF, Tomilina II, Zakonnov VV, Amgaabazar E (2008) Toxicity assessment of bottom sediments in watercourses in Selenga river basin on the territory of Mongolia. Water Resour 35:92–96. doi:10.1134/S0097807808010119
Pfeiffer M, Batbayar G, Hofmann J, Siegfried K, Karthe D, Hahn-Tomer S (2015) Investigating arsenic (As) occurrence and sources in ground, surface, waste and drinking water in northern Mongolia. Environ Earth Sci 73(2):649–662. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-3029-0
Pietroń J, Chalov S, Chalova A, Alekseenko A, Jarsjö J (2017) Extreme spatial variability in riverine sediment load inputs due to soil loss in surface mining areas of the Lake Baikal basin. Catena 152:82–93. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.008
Priess J, Schweitzer C, Wimmer F, Batkhishig O, Mimler M (2011) The consequences of land-use change and water demands in Central Mongolia. Land Use Pol 28(1):4–10. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.002
Sandmann R (2012) Gier nach Bodenschätzen und Folgen für die Mongolei. Geogr Rundsch 64(12):26–33
Scharaw B, Westerhoff T (2011) A leak detection in drinking water distribution network of Darkhan in framework of the project integrated water resources management in Central Asia, model region Mongolia. In: Gurinovich AD (Ed) (2011) proceedings of the IWA 1st central Asian regional young and senior water professionals conference, Almaty/Kazakhstan, pp. 275–282
Sigel K, Altantuul K, Basandorj D (2012) Household needs and demand for improved water supply and sanitation in peri-urban ger areas: the case of Darkhan, Mongolia. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1561–1566. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1221-7
Sorokina OI, Kosheleva NE, Kasimov NS, Golovanov DL, Bazha SN, Dorzhgotov D, Enkh-Amgalan S (2013) Heavy metals in the air and snow cover of Ulan Bator. Geogr Nat Resour 34(3):291–301. doi:10.1134/S1875372813030153
Sorokovikova LM, Popovskaya GI, Tomberg IV, Sinyukovich VN, Kravchenko OS, Marinaite II, Bashenkhaeva NV, Khodzher TV (2013) The Selenga River water quality on the border with Mongolia at the beginning of the 21st century. Russ Meteorol Hydrol 38(2):126–133. doi:10.3103/S1068373913020106
Stubblefield A, Chandra S, Eagan S, Tuvshinjargal D, Davaadorzh G, Gilroy D, Sampson J, Thorne J, Allen B, Hogan Z (2005) Impacts of gold mining and land use alterations on the water quality of central Mongolian rivers. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:365–373. doi:10.1002/ieam.5630010406
Theuring P, Collins AL, Rode M (2015) Source identification of fine-grained suspended sediment in the Kharaa river basin, northern Mongolia. Sci Total Environ 526:77–87. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03
Theuring P, Rode M, Behrens S, Kirchner G, Jha A (2013) Identification of fluvial sediment sources in a meso-scale catchment, northern Mongolia. Hydrol Process 27(6):845–856. doi:10.1002/hyp.9684
Thorslund J, Jarsjö J, Chalov S, Belozerova E (2012) Gold mining impact on riverine heavy metal transport in a sparsely monitored region: the upper Lake Baikal Basin case. J Environ Monitor 14(10):2780–2792. doi:10.1039/C2EM30643C
Timofeev IV, Kosheleva NE, Kasimov NS, Gunin PD, Enkh-Amgalan S (2015) Geochemical transformation of soil cover in copper-molybdenum mining areas (Erdenet, Mongolia). J Soils Sediments 16(4):1225–1237
Törnqvist R, Jarsjö J, Pietron J, Bring A, Rogberg P, Asokan SM, Destouni G (2015) Evolution of the hydro-climate system in the Lake Baikal basin. J Hydrol 519:1953–1962. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.074
Acknowledgements
This editorial is part of the work conducted within Russian Scientific Foundation (project 14-27-00083). The authors also acknowledge funding for meetings and communication by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF-IB) project “WQQ Baikal - Modelling of Water Quantity and Quality in the Selenga-Baikal-Angara Region: Current Potentials and Future Necessities”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kasimov, N., Karthe, D. & Chalov, S. Environmental change in the Selenga River—Lake Baikal Basin. Reg Environ Change 17, 1945–1949 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1201-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1201-x