Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Objectives for management of socio-ecological systems in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide range of goals and objectives have to be taken into account in natural resources management. Defining these objectives in operational terms, including dimensions such as sustainability, productivity, and equity, is by no means easy, especially if they must capture the diversity of community and stakeholder values. This is especially true in the coastal zone where land activities affect regional marine ecosystems. In this study, the aim was firstly to identify and hierarchically organise the goals and objectives for coastal systems, as defined by local stakeholders. Two case study areas are used within the Great Barrier Reef region being Mackay and Bowen–Burdekin. Secondly, the aim was to identify similarities between the case study results and thus develop a generic set of goals to be used as a starting point in other coastal communities. Results show that overarching high-level goals have nested sub-goals that contain a set of more detailed regional objectives. The similarities in high-level environmental, governance, and socio-economic goals suggest that regionally specific objectives can be developed based on a generic set of goals. The prominence of governance objectives reflects local stakeholder perceptions that current coastal zone management is not achieving the outcomes they feel important and that there is a need for increased community engagement and co-management. More importantly, it raises the question of how to make issues relevant for the local community and entice participation in the local management of public resources to achieve sustainable environmental, social, and economic management outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The development of the hierarchical format is necessary if the aim is to later prioritise and weight these objectives (Pascoe et al. 2013) Prioritised objectives generated using the hierarchical objectives tree can be used by local management groups and authorities to better target their management actions.

  2. Note that the numbering and ordering of the objectives in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 does not in any way reflect their relative importance.

References

  • Archer B (1996) Sustainable tourism: an economist’s viewpoint. In: Briguglio L, Archer B, Jafari J, Wall G (eds) Sustainable tourism in Islands and small states: issues and policies. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012) Census Quickstats 2011

  • Bennett J, Lawrence P, Johnstone R et al (2005) Adaptive management and its role in managing Great Barrier Reef water quality. Mar Pollut Bull 51:70–75. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.10.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergold J, Thomas S (2012) Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum Qual Social Res 13(1): 30. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201304

  • Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt G (2011) Towards the integration of system modeling with scenario planning to support strategy: the case of the UK energy industry. J Oper Res Soc 62:830–839. doi:10.1057/jors.2010.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles AT (1989) Bio-socio-economic fishery models: labour dynamics and multi-objective management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1313–1322. doi:10.1139/f89-169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner J, Marnane MJ, Mcclanahan TR, et al. (2006) Periodic closures as adaptive coral reef management in the Indo-Pacific. Ecol Soc 11(1): 31. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art31/

  • Cinner J, Fuentes M, Randriamahazo H (2009) Exploring social resilience in Madagascar’s marine protected areas. Ecol Soc 14(1): 41. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art41/

  • Coates KD, Burton PJ (1997) A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives. For Ecol Manag 99:337–354. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00113-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane K (2002) A fishery manager’s guidebook. Management measures and their application, FAO, vol 424. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy MJ, Peterson JT (2013) Decision making in natural resource management: a structured, adaptive approach. Wiley, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dale A, Vella K, Pressey RL et al (2013) A method for risk analysis across governance systems: a Great Barrier Reef case study. Environ Res Lett 8:1–14. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J, Van Putten I, Leith P et al (2013) A working indicator framework to operationalize resilience concepts in Australian marine sectors dealing with climate change. Ecol Soc 18(1–20):4. doi:10.5751/ES-05607-180304

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus AP (1988) Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review March–April, 70–74. http://www.sims.monash.edu.au/subjects/ims5042/stuff/readings/de%20geus.pdf

  • Department of Environment and Resource Management (2011) Queensland Regional Natural Resource Management Framework. https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/land/natural-resource/pdf/qld-regional-nrm-framework.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  • Dichmont CM, Pascoe S, Jebreen E et al (2013) Choosing a fishery’s governance structure using data poor methods. Mar Policy 37:123–131. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dichmont CM, Dutra LXC, van Putten I, Deng RA, Owens R, Jebreen E, Thompson C, Pascual R, Warne MJ, Quinn R, Thébaud O, Bennett J, Read M, Wachenfeld D, Davies J, Garland A, Dunning M, Waycott M, Collier C, Dambacher J, Playford J, Harm R, Gribble N, Pitcher R (2014) Design and implementation of management strategy evaluation for the Great Barrier Reef inshore (MSEGBR). Report to the National Environmental Research Program. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns. http://www.nerptropical.edu.au/sites/default/files/NERP-TE-PROJECT-9.2-FINAL-REPORT-COMPLETE-PART-A.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  • Dutra LXC, Ellis N, Perez P et al (2014) Drivers influencing adaptive management: a retrospective evaluation of water quality decisions in South East Queensland (Australia). Ambio 43:1069–1081. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0537-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutra LXC, Bustamante RH, Sporne I, van Putten I, Dichmont CM, Ligtermoet E, Sheaves M, Deng RA (2015) Organizational drivers that strengthen adaptive capacity in the coastal zone of Australia. Ocean Coast Manag 109:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidelman P, Evans L, Fabinyi M, Foale S, Cinner J, Rosen F (2012) Governing large-scale marine commons: contextual challenges in the Coral Triangle. Mar Policy 36:42–53. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstanding about case-study research. Qual Inq 12:219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2012) Local Marine Advisory Committee: terms of reference. Townsville, Australia. http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/17459/LMAC-Terms-of-Reference-April-2012-V1.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  • Hilborn R (2007a) Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Mar Policy 31:153–158. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2006.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R (2007b) Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Mar Policy 31:153–158. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2006.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S, Stoeckl N, Straton A et al (2008) The changing value of Australian tropical rivers. Geogr Res 46:275–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008.00523.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S (1989) Fisheries co-management: delegating government responsibility to fishermen’s organizations. Mar Policy 13:137–154. doi:10.1016/0308-597X(89)90004-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limpus CJ (2007) A biological review of Australian marine turtle species Flatback turtle, Natator depressus (Garman), Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig D (2001) The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4:758–764. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0044-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynam T, Drewry J, Higham W et al (2010) Adaptive modelling for adaptive water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Environ Model Softw 25:1291–1301. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardle S, Pascoe S, Boncoeur J et al (2002) Objectives of fisheries management: case studies from the UK, France, Spain and Denmark. Mar Policy 26(6):415–428. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCay BJ, Svein J (1996) From the bottom up: participatory issues in fisheries management. Soc Nat Res 9(3):237–250. doi:10.1080/08941929609380969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management (2004) A guide to preparing effective resource management plans forests, lands and marine branch, forests, lands and marine branch. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/slrp/policies-guides/writing_resource_objectives.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  • Olson SB (2003) Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Oceans Coast Manag 46:347–361. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe S, Dichmont CM, Brooks K et al (2013) Management objectives of Queensland fisheries: putting the horse before the cart. Mar Policy 37:115–122. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A, Walker M, Maher M et al (2010) New regionalism and planning for water quality improvement in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Geogr Res 48:297–313. doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00634.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton E (ed) (1989) Cooperative management of local fisheries. New directions for improved management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112:99–127. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00424-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs A, Roder C (2002) Seagrass and marine resources of the Newry region and sand bay dugong Protection areas, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries, Research publication No. 72, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries

  • Sainsbury KJ, Punt AE, Smith ADM (2000) Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES J Mar Sci 57(3):731–741. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A (2005) Guidelines for evaluating the financial, ecological and social aspects of urban stormwater management measures to improve waterway health. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom RM (2000) Adpative managment of coastal ecosystem restoration projects. Ecol Eng 15:365–372. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00086-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (2007) Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems? Ambio 36(4):304–307. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[304:IAMHTS]2.0.CO;2

  • Walters CJ, Hilborn R (1978) Ecological optimization and adaptive management. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:157–188. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096747

  • Ward E, Schriefer AE (1997) Dynamic scenarios: systems thinking meets scenario planning. In: Fahey L, Randall RM (eds) Learning from the future: competitive foresight scenarios. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattage P, Mardle S, Pascoe S (2005) Evaluation of the importance of fisheries management objectives using choice-experiments. Ecol Econ 55(1):85–95. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West D (2005) Vickers’ concept of ‘relationship-maintenance’ as an alternative to ‘goal-seeking’ models of organisation: a difference in the notion of control. Syst Pract Action Res 18:261–274. doi:10.1007/s0000.-005-4814-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1984) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandstra, H. (1994) A case for setting common objectives for natural resource management. IN Goldsworthy P, Penning de Vries FWT (Ed.) Opportunities, use, and transfer of systems research methods in agriculture to developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • Zandstra H (1994b) A case for setting common objectives for natural resource management. In: Goldsworthy P, de Vries PFWT (eds) Opportunities, use, and transfer of systems research methods in agriculture to developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Elizabeth Van Putten.

Additional information

Editor: Jamie Pittock.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Putten, I.E., Dichmont, C.M., Dutra, L.X.C. et al. Objectives for management of socio-ecological systems in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Reg Environ Change 16, 1417–1431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0867-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0867-1

Keywords

Navigation