Skip to main content
Log in

Water supply and water allocation strategy in the arid US West: evidence from the Eastern Snake River Plain Aquifer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the effects of water supply variations on micro-level agricultural irrigation under institutional water constraints and projects the irrigation percentage and farm income under future climate scenarios. We use a highly detailed data sample of irrigation status, water rights, water supply, and agricultural land use from Idaho’s Eastern Snake River Plain Aquifer area. Results indicate that a 1-unit increase in irrigation percentage leads to ~US$12 ha−1 increase in crop revenue. Compared to crop revenue, micro-level irrigation percentage is more prone to changes under long-term water stress. The modest changes in climate, water supply, and crop prices can lead to the change in irrigation percentage by −86 to 53 units and correspondingly in average crop revenue by −52 to 48 % in Idaho’s most productive region. Seasonal water supply variations only have limited impact on the productivity of the irrigated agricultural sector as a whole. We postulate that average irrigation percentage and farm income will, in effect, increase under Idaho’s institutional water governance in the long run, when junior farmers stop irrigated agriculture practices due to persistent water shortage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams RM (1989) Global climate change and agriculture: an economic perspective. Am J Agr Econ 71(5) Proceedings Issue: 1272–1279

  • Adams RM, Rosenzweig C, Peart RM, Ritchie JT, McCarl BA, Glyer JD, Curry RB, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Allen LH Jr (1990) Global climate change and US agriculture. Nature 345(6272):219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams RM, Fleming RA, Chang C-C, McCarl BA, Rosenzweig C (1995) A reassessment of the economic effects of global climate change on U.S. Agriculture. Clim Chang 30(2):147–167

  • Adams RM, McCarl BA, Segerson K, Rosenzweig C, Bryant KJ, Dixon BL, Corner R, Evenson RE, Ojima D (1999) Economic effects of climate change on US agriculture. In: Mendelsohn R, Neumann JE (eds) The impact of climate change on the united states economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 18–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bales RC, Molotch NP, Painter TH, Dettinger MD, Rice R, Dozier J (2006) Mountain hydrology of the Eastern United States. Water Resour Res 42:W08432. doi:10.1029/2005WR004387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crop Res 112(2–3):119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras RL, Cordova JR (1981) Intraseasonal water allocation in deficit irrigation. Water Resour Res 17(4):866–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretsen SN, Hill PJ (2009) Water markets as a tragedy of the anticommons. WM Mary Environ Law Policy Rev 33(3):723–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DP, Kipfmueller KF (2012) Pacific climate forcing of multidecadal springtime minimum temperature variability in the Western United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(2):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burness HS, Quirk JP (1979) Appropriative water rights and the efficient allocation of resources. Am Econ Rev 69(1):25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Burness HS, Quirk JP (1980) Water law, water transfers, and economic efficiency: the Colorado River. J Law Econ 23(1):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, McKinney DC, Lasdon LS (2003a) Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management. J Water Res PL-ASCE 129(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Rosegrant MW, Ringler C (2003b) Physical and economic efficiency of water use in the river basin: implications for efficient water management. Water Resour Res 39(1):1013. doi:10.1029/2001WR000748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayan S, Kammerdiener A, Dettinger MD, Caprio JM, Peterson DH (2001) Changes in the onset of spring in the Western United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82(3):399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobourn K, Xu W, Lowe SE, Mooney S (2013) The effect of climate, weather, and water rights on land-allocation decisions in irrigated agriculture. Boise State University, Economics Department Working Paper

  • Dittmer K (2013) Changing streamflow on Columbia basin tribal lands—climate change and salmon. Clim Chang 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0745-0

  • Dudley N, Howell D, Musgreave W (1971) Optimal interseasonal irrigation water allocation. Water Resour Res 74:770–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling W, Aggarwal P, Batima P, Brander K, Erda L, Howden M, Kirilenko A, Morton J, Soussana J-F, Schmidhuber S, Tubiello F (2007) Food, fibre and forest products. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–313

  • Elsner MM, Cuo L, Voisin N, Deems J, Hamlet AF, Vano JA, Mickelson KEB, Lee SY, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State. Clim Chang 102(1–2):225–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English MJ (1990) Deficit irrigation I: analytical framework. J. Irrig Drain Eng 116(3):399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English MJ, Nuss GS (1982) Designing for deficit irrigation. J Irrig Drain Div-ASCE 108(2):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleskens L, Nainggolan D, Termansen M, Hubacek K, Reed MS (2013) Regional consequences of the way land users respond to future water availability in Murcia, Spain. Reg Environ Change 13(3):615–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French RJ, Schultz JE (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust J Agr Res 35(6):765–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D (2009) Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric Water Manage 96(9):1275–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2010) Econometric analysis, 7th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjigeorgalis E (2009) A place for water markets: performance and challenges. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 31(1):50–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou VA (1993) Simulation estimation methods for limited dependent variable models. In: Maddala GS, Rao CR, Vinod HD (eds) Econometrics, vol 11 of handbook of statistics. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 519–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellín-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375(3): 627–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Horbulyk TM (2010) Market-based policy instruments, irrigation water demand, and crop diversification in the Bow River Basin of Southern Alberta. Can J Agr Econ 58(2):191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homayounfar M, Lai SH, Zomorodian M, Sepaskhah AR, Ganji A (2014) Optimal crop water allocation in case of drought occurrence, imposing deficit irrigation with proportional cutback constraint. Water Resour Manag 28(10):3207–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA (2001) Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron J 93(2):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins WA (1968) The Idaho law of water rights. Idaho Law Rev 5(1):1–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins WA (1977) Water rights laws in the nineteen Western States, vol III. Natural Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

  • Idaho Department of Water Resources, 2006 Irrigated Land Classification for the Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer, http://www.idwr.idaho.gov/News/WaterCalls/Surface%20Coalition%20Call/background/irrigated-nonirrigated%20by%20county/2006%20irrigated-nonirrigated%20classification%20report.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2014

  • Idaho Department of Water Resources, Hydro Online, http://www.idwr.idaho.gov/hydro.online/gwl/default.html. Accessed 9 Dec 2013

  • Idaho Department of Water Resources, Land Cover and Vegetation, Eastern Snake River Plain Irrigated Land, http://www.idwr.idaho.gov/GeographicInfo/gisdata/land_cover.htm. Accessed 8 July 2014

  • Idaho Department of Water Resources, Major River and Lake Layers, http://www.idwr.idaho.gov/GeographicInfo/gisdata/hydrography.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2011

  • Idaho Department of Water Resources, Water Rights Layers, http://www.idwr.idaho.gov/GeographicInfo/gisdata/water_rights.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2011

  • Iglesias A, Mougou R, Moneo M, Quiroga S (2011) Towards adaptation of agriculture to climate change in the Mediterranean. Reg Environ Change 11(1):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Luce CH, Abatzoglou JT, Holden ZA (2013) The missing mountain water: slower westerlies decrease orographic enhancement in the Pacific Northwest USA. Science 342(6164):1360–1364. doi:10.1126/science.1242335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in economics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus WD, Shaw D (1994) The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis. Am Econ Rev 84(4):753–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Mote PW (2003) Trends in snow water equivalent in the Pacific Northwest and their climatic causes. Geophys Res Lett 30(12):1601. doi:10.1029/2003GL017258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mote PW (2006) Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in Western North America. J Clim 19(23):6209–6220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mote PW, Salathé E (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest. Clim Chang 102(1–2):29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14(1): 53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson GT, Gray ST, Woodhouse CA, Betancourt JL, Fagre DB, Littell JS, Watson E, Luckman BH, Graumlich LJ (2011) The unusual nature of recent snowpack declines in the North American Cordillera. Science 333(6040):332–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JR, Xie L, Challinor AJ, Cochrane K, Howden SM, Iqbal MM, Lobell DB, Travasso MI (2014) Food security and food production systems. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 485–533

  • PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University, Minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation in April (from 1971 to 2000), http://prism.oregonstate.edu, created on multiple dates

  • Qiu Z, Prato T (2012) Economic feasibility of adapting crop enterprises to future climate change: a case study of flexible scheduling and irrigation for representative farms in Flathead Valley, Montana. USA. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 17(3):223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regonda SK, Rajagopalan B, Clark M, Pitlick J (2005) Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the Western United States. J Clim 18:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidsma P, Ewert F, Lansink AO, Leemans R (2009) Vulnerability and adaptation of European farmers: a multi-level analysis of yield and income responses to climate variability. Reg Environ Change 9(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidsma P, Ewert F, Lansink AO, Leemans R (2010) Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: the importance of farm level responses. Eur J Agron 32(1):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw EF (1958) Scientific appraisal. Natl Tax J 11(4):314–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Díaz JA, Weatherhead EK, Knox JW, Camacho E (2007) Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements in the Guadalquivir river basin in Spain. Reg Environ Change 7(3):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW (1990) Production and income effects of rotational irrigation and rehabilitation of irrigated systems in the Philippines. In: Sampath RK, Young RA (eds) Social, economic, and institutional issues in third world irrigation management. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 411–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Binswanger HP (1994) Markets in tradable water rights: potential for efficiency gains in developing country water resource allocation. World Dev 22(11):1613–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Svendsen M (1993) Asian food production in the 1990 s: irrigation investment and management policy. Food Policy 18(2):13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Ringler C, McKinney DC, Cai X, Keller A, Donoso G (2000) Integrated economic-hydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: the Maipo River basin. Agr Econ 24(1):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Parry ML (1994) Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367(6459):133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(37):15594–15598

  • Schlenker W, Hanemann WM, Fisher AC (2005) Will U.S. Agriculture really benefit from global warming? Accounting for irrigation in the hedonic approach. Am Econ Rev 95(1):395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker W, Hanemann WM, Fisher AC (2006) The impact of global warming on U.S. Agriculture: An econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions. Rev Econ Stat 88(1):113–125

  • Schlenker W, Hanemann WM, Fisher Fisher AC (2007) Water availability, degree days, and the potential impact of climate change on irrigated agriculture in California. Clim Chang 81(1):19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(50):19703–19708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2005) Changes towards earlier streamflow timing across Western North America. J Clim 18(8):1136–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson BH Jr (1993) Institutional perspectives on water policy and markets. Calif Law Rev 81(3):671–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello FN, Donatelli M, Rosenzweig C, Stockle CO (2000) Effects of climate change and elevated CO2 on cropping systems: model predictions at two Italian locations. Eur J Agron 13(2):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agricultural, Natural Resources Conservation Services, Historic Monthly Adjusted Streamflow (from 1971 to 2000), http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/data/historic.html#mresv. Accessed 1 Aug 2012

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Services, 2012 Idaho Agricultural Statistics, http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Idaho/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/Annual%20Statistical%20Bulletin%202012.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2014

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Services, Cropland Data Layer (CDL) for 2008–2010, http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 1 August 2012

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services, water supply outlook reports (from 1992 to 2011), http://www.id.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/watersupply/. Accessed 1 Aug 2012

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Services, Quick Stats of Crops and Vegetables Price Received and Yield for 2003–2007, http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed 10 May 2014

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services, U.S. General Soil Map (STATSGO2), http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 1 Aug 2012

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Urbanized Areas, http://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2010/UA/2010/. Accessed 9 Dec 2013

  • U.S. Geological Survey, Water Use Data for Idaho (2005) http://waterdata.usgs.gov/id/nwis/water_use/. Accessed 9 July 2014

  • Wichelns D (2002) An economic perspective on the potential gains from improvements in irrigation water management. Agric Water Manage 52(3):233–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willaume M, Rollin A, Casagrande M (2014) Farmers in southwestern France think that their arable cropping systems are already adapted to face climate change. Reg Environ Change 14(1):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Lowe SE (2011) Value-oriented crop choices under natural and institutional risks of water shortage in irrigated land. Economics Department Working Paper, Boise State University, Boise, ID

  • Xu W, Lowe SE, Adams RM (2014a) Climate change, water rights and water supplies: the case of irrigated agriculture in Idaho. Water Resour Res 50(12):9675–9695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Lowe SE, Zhang S (2014b) An analysis of irrigated agricultural outcomes under the prior appropriation doctrine: hypotheses and applications. Appl Econ 46(22):2639–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Li received financial support for this study from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS).  The authors wish to thank Dr.’s Wolfgang Cramer, Erika Coppola, and anonymous reviewers of this Journal for their constructive comments and suggestions.  The authors own great thanks to Dr.’s Richard M. Adams and Scott E. Lowe: Dr. Adams contributed substantially to the initial drafting of this article and deserves authorship on this article.  Dr. Lowe received a grant from the NSF Idaho EPSCoR Program and by the National Science Foundation [Grant No. EPS-0814387] and worked with Xu to lay the foundation of a series of research including this one.  Thanks are also due to Remington Buyer, Michael Ciscell, Ron Abramovich, David Hoekema, Sue Ellis, Jeff Anderson, Dr. Richard G. Allen, Peter Cooper, Shelley Keen, Dr. Don W. Morishita, Dr. Howard Neibling, Tony Olenichak, and other staff from Boise State University, the Idaho Department of Water Resources, the USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Snow Survey, the University of Idaho, and Idaho National Laboratory (INL).  Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the individuals or agencies list above.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenchao Xu.

Additional information

Editor: Erika Coppola.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1264 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, W., Li, M. Water supply and water allocation strategy in the arid US West: evidence from the Eastern Snake River Plain Aquifer. Reg Environ Change 16, 893–906 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0806-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0806-1

Keywords

Navigation