Skip to main content
Log in

External tools for collaborative medication scheduling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medication adherence—taking medication as prescribed—is critical for successful self-care, especially among older adults. Adherence depends on developing and implementing plans for taking medications. Age-related cognitive declines that affect adherence may be mitigated using external tools that support patient-provider collaboration needed to develop these adherence plans. We tested the effectiveness of structured collaborative medication tools to support better medication planning and adherence practices. Evidence for benefits of collaborative tools has been mixed in terms of their usefulness for medication-scheduling tasks, perhaps because the tools have not been explicitly designed to support patient-provider collaboration. A total of 144 community-dwelling older adults participated in pairs and performed the role of a patient or provider in a simulated patient-provider medication-scheduling task. Each pair worked with a structured (MedTable and e-MedTable) or unstructured (Medcard) scheduling tool and completed four problems (2 simple and 2 complex). Performance was measured using the following: problem-solving (medication schedule) accuracy, problem-solving time, solution (schedule) optimality, tool usability, collaborative effectiveness, and subjective workload involved in creating the medication schedules. Participants using structured tools produced more accurate and optimal schedules. They also rated subjective workload as lower and thought that the structured tools were easier to use, reduced subjective workload associated with creating the schedules. There was also suggestive evidence that participants using the structured tools rated more highly the quality of their collaboration. Structured medication-scheduling tools have the potential to improve medication adherence among older adults because they support collaborative planning and reduce the cognitive load involved in creating these adherence plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apsden P, Wolcott JA, Bootman JL, Croenwett LR (2007) Preventing medication errors. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke J (1996) SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usabiliy scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, McClelland IL, Weerdmeester B (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PA, pp 189–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Buerhaus PI, Donelan K, Ulrich BT, Norman L, Dittus R (2006) State of the registered nurse workfore in the United States. Nurs Econ 24(1):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levine J, Teasley SD (eds) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. APA, Washington, pp 127–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Convertino G, Mentis HM, Rosson MB, Carroll JM, Slavkovic A, Ganoe CH (2008) Articulating common ground in cooperative work: content and process. Paper presented at the CHI ‘08, In: proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, USA

  • Cordasco KM, Asch SM, Bell DS, Guterman JJ, Gross-Schulman S, Ramer L et al (2009) A low-literacy medication education tool for safety-net hospital patients. Am J Prev Med 37(6 Suppl. 1):S209–S216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Ydewalle G, Luwel K, Brunfaut E (1999) The importance of on-going concurrent activities as a function of age in time- and event-based prospective memory. Eur J Cogn Psychol 11:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak C, Doak L, Root J (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein GO, McDaniel MA (1990) Normal Aging and Prospective Memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16(4):717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH (1976) Manual for the kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart SG, Stavenland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 139–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cogn Sci 19(3):265–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G, Wickens T (2007) Design and analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Ross KG, Moon BM, Klein DE, Hoffman RR, Hollnagel E (2003) Macrocognition. IEEE Intell Syst 18(3):81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripalani S, Robertson R, Love-Ghaffari MH, Henderson LE, Praska J, Strawder A et al (2007) Development of an illustrated medication schedule as a low-literacy patient education tool. Patient Educ Couns 66(3):368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin JH, Simon HA (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn Sci 11(1):65–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machtinger EL, Wang F, Chen LL, Rodriguez M, Wu S, Schillinger D (2007) A visual medication schedule to improve anticoagulation control: a randomized, controlled trial. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 33(10):625–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead S, Lamson N, Rogers WA (2002) Human factors guidelines for web site usability: health-oriented websites for older adults. In: Morrell RW (ed) Older adults, health information, and the world wide web. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell AA, Kaufman DW, Rosenberg L (2007) Patterns of medication use in the United States, 2006: a report from the Slone survey

  • Morrow DG, Raquel L, Schriver A, Redenbo S, Rozovski D, Weiss G (2008) External support for collaborative problem solving in a simulated provider/patient medication. Sched Task 14(3):288–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterberg L, Blaschke T (2005) Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 353(5):487–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasche-Orlow MK, Schillinger D, Greene SM, Wagner EH (2006) How health care systems can begin to address the challenge of limited literacy. J Gen Intern Med 21(8):884–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park DC (2000) The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In: Park DC, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Park DC, Jones TR (1997) Medication adherence and aging. In: Fisk AD, Rogers WA (eds) Handbook of human factors and the older adult. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 257–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Park DC, Morrell RW, Frieske D, Kincaid D (1992) Medication adherence behaviors in older adults: effects of external cognitive supports. Psychol Aging 7(2):252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan EB, Meredith SD, MacLean MJ, Orange JB (1995) Changing the way we talk with elders: promoting health using the communication enhancement model. Int J Aging Hum Dev 41(2):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse TA (1991) Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychol Sci 2(3):179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ (2006) Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Informat Assoc 13:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarn DM, Heritage J, Paterniti DA, Hays RD, Kravitz RL, Wenger NS (2006) Physician communication when prescribing new medications. Arch Intern Med 166(17):1855–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waicekauskas K, Kannampallil TG, Kopren K, Tan P-H, Fu W-T, Morrow DG (2010) Collaborative tools in a simulated patient-provider medication scheduling task. Paper presented at the proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society

  • Wolf MS, Curtis LM, Waite K, Bailey SC, Hedlund LM, Davis T et al (2011) Helping patients simplify and safely use complex prescription regimens. Arch Intern Med 171(4):300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Norman DA (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cogn Sci A Multidiscip J 18(1):87–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support from the UIUC Research Board and the National Institute of Nursing Research (R01 NR011300-01A1). We also thank Laura D’Andrea and Shreyans Ranka for their help in running the experiments. This study is part of the Kevin Waicekauskas’s Masters thesis completed at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Partial results were presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (Waicekauskas et al. 2010). This study was conducted when the first author was a visiting researcher at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas G. Kannampallil.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 95 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kannampallil, T.G., Waicekauskas, K., Morrow, D.G. et al. External tools for collaborative medication scheduling. Cogn Tech Work 15, 121–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0190-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0190-7

Keywords

Navigation