Skip to main content
Log in

Rail passenger perceptions of risk and safety and priorities for improvement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recommendation 60 of the Ladbroke Grove rail inquiry stated that “comprehensive market research in regard to safety related measures should be carried out in order to take account of the views of informed passengers” (Cullen 2001, p. 235). In response, the Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited (RSSB) commissioned a survey of railway passengers nationwide, to investigate passenger perceptions of risk and safety at stations, on platforms and on trains, and to research passenger preferences for implementing safety interventions. Following qualitative interviews conducted with rail travellers, two separate questionnaires were designed and piloted. Each survey was administered face-to-face at 15 hub railway stations nationwide, according to a quota sample, and respondents were asked to return completed questionnaires by post. The overall response rate was approximately one-third. The results of the safety and risk survey provide a valuable indicator of passenger perceptions of risk, especially when compared to quantitative assessments of actual risk. The findings suggest that the relationship between perceived and actual risk is not particularly strong. The data from the passenger preferences questionnaire were analysed using conjoint techniques, and the results provide information on passenger preferences and priorities for improvement. The results are likely to be of value to the railway industry in allowing passenger preferences to be taken into account when implementing safety interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abley J (2000) Stated preference techniques and consumer decision making: new challenges to old assumptions. Cranfield School of Management Working Paper 2/00, Cranfield University, Cranfield

  • Bray J (2001) Destination passenger: towards a door-to-door railway. Transport 2000 Trust, Platform

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickley S, Seaton A (2002) Research into escape from railway carriages. Interfleet Technology Report for Railway Safety, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, The Rt Hon Lord (2001) The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry Part I. HSE Books. HMSO, London

  • de Blaeij AT, van Vuuren DJ (2003) Risk perception of traffic participants. Accid Anal Prev 35:167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DETR (1998) Secure stations scheme — guidelines for operators. HMSO, London

  • Dunbar IH (2002) Train evacuation risk model: stay or go? Risk Solutions Report for Railway Safety

  • Fennell PJ, Muir HC (1992) Passenger attitudes towards airline safety information and comprehension of safety briefings and cards. CAA Paper 92015, Civil Aviation Authority, London

  • Gamble W (2002a) Final summary report: research into emergency hammers. Interfleet Technology Report for Railway Safety, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble W (2002b) Full report: research into emergency door release. Interfleet Technology Report for Railway Safety, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guppy A (1984) Perceived and real likelihood of the detection of drinking and driving. PhD thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield

  • Hair JE, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs G (2002) Snapwands: final report. Interfleet Technology Ltd commissioned by Railway Safety, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koushki PA, Al-Saleh OI, Al-Lumaia M (2003) On management’s awareness of transit passenger needs. Transport Policy 10:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson A (2002) Annual Safety Performance Report 2001/2. Railway Safety, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Railway Safety (2001) Profile of safety risk on railtrack controlled infrastructure: risk profile bulletin, issue 2, July 2001. Railway Safety, London

  • Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LJ (2001) Is it better to be safe and sorry? Hum Factors Aerospace Saf 1(1):99–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson A, Gutmann J (1998) Public transport: the role of mystery shopping in investment decisions. J Market Res Soc 40(4):285–293

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Rail Safety and Standards Board in conducting this research. The comments provided by two anonymous reviewers are also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren J. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, L.J., Rhind, D.J. & Robinson, K.J. Rail passenger perceptions of risk and safety and priorities for improvement. Cogn Tech Work 8, 67–75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0021-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0021-9

Keywords

Navigation