Skip to main content
Log in

Expert Identity construct in analysing prerequisites for expertise development: a case study of nuclear power plant operators’ on-the-job training

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses how shifting the focus of research to the emotional side of human actions and cognition could create new perspectives on the problem of how to support the human operator in the control of rare disturbances. A new construct, Expert Identity, is described. A qualitative study of the specific problems with changing the operator generation at a nuclear power plant is presented. The results indicate that the current identity of the trainees is more or less still one of the trainees. The conceived demands of operator work and the perceived learning opportunities are characterised by a dichotomy: disturbances or other exceptional situations emerge as different from daily work. The key challenge and motive for the trainees in the development of expertise is to achieve not only an adequate degree of competence but also to construct confidence in being able to cope with potential disturbance situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Polanyi (1958, 1983) uses the term “tacit knowledge” to refer to the formation of patterns or cues that signify the features of the environment that are relevant for the action. Because these cues are not within the focal attention during action, but rather in a subsidiary position, the resulting knowledge is tacit, implicit but yet operative. This is due to the comprehension of the meaning of the cues in the context of the whole. According to the presented construct, emotions can be a part of this “tacit knowledge”.

References

  • Alasuutari P (1994) Laadullinen tutkimus (Qualitative research), 2nd edn. Vastapaino, Jyväskylä

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky A (1988) Unravelling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky A (1993a) The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 36(6):725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky A (1993b) Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility. Soc Sci Med 37(8):969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall LG, Taylor SE (1997) A stitch in time: self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychol Bull 121(3):417–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakken BT, Gilljam M (2003) Dynamic intuition in military command and control: why it is important, and how it should be developed. Cogn Technol Work 5(3):197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowsher JE, Keep D (1995) Toward an understanding of three control constructs: personal control, self-efficacy, and hardiness. Issues Ment Health Nurs 16(1):33–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brecke FH (1982) Instructional design for aircrew judgement training. Aviat Space Environ Med 53(10):951–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Briner B (1999a) The neglect and importance of emotion at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 8(3):323–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briner B (1999b) Introduction. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 8(3):321–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briner B (2004) Themed book reviews: Emotions and organizations: a decade of development. Hum Relat 57(10):1333–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Bell HH (1997) Training decision makers for complex environments: implications of naturalistic decision making perspective. In: Zsambok CE, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1998/2000a) Preface. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1998/2000b) Introduction. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1998/2000c) Individual and team decision making under stress: theoretical underpinnings. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Pruitt JS (1996) Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision-making research. Hum Factors 38(2):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M, Freeman JT, Wolf S (1996) Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: recognizing, critiquing and correcting. Hum Factors 38(2):206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driskell JE, Johnston JH (1998/2000) Stress exposure training. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 191–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell JE, Johnson JH, Salas E (2001) Does stress training generalize to novel settings? Hum Factors 43(1):99–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel BT (1985) Stress is a noun! No, a verb! No, an adjective. In: Teoksessa Field TM, McCabe PM, Schneiderman N (eds) Stress and coping. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA (2005) Superior decision making as an integral quality of expert performance: insights into the mediating mechanisms and their acquisition through deliberate practice. In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 135–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard AWK (1993) Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress. Ergonomics 36(9):991–1005

    Article  PubMed  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard AWK (2001) Stress, workload, and fatigue as three biobehavioural states: a general overview. In: Hancock PA, Desmond PA (eds) Stress, workload and fatigue. Human factors in transportation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 623–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthereau V (2003) Work practice, safety and heedfulness. Studies of organizational reliability in hospitals and nuclear power plants. Unitryck, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthereau V (2004) Emergent structures in drug dispensing to inpatients: implications for patient safety. Cogn Technol Work 6(4):223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman D (1998) Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR, Oldhamn GR (1980) Work redesign. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M (1990) Reading ethnographic research: a critical guide. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa N, Yoshimura S (1999) Human-machine cooperation for emotion support: Study by using a simulation model. Le Travail Humain. Special issue: Human-machine cooperation 62(3):247–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Foushee HC (1993) Why resource management? In: Wiener EL, Kanki GB, Helmreich RL (eds) Cockpit resource management. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 3–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Merritt AC (1996) Cultural issues in crew resource management training. (Paper presented at the ICAO global human factors seminar, Auckland, New Zealand, April 1996

  • Hoc J-M (1993) Some dimensions of a cognitive typology of process control situations. Ergonomics 36(11):1445–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoc J-M, Amalberti R (1999) Analyse des activités cognitives en situation dynamique: D’un cadre théorique à une méthode (Cognitive activity analysis in dynamic situations: From a theoretical framework to a method). Le Travail Humain 62(2):97–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoc J-M, Amalberti R (2005) Modeling naturalistic decision-making cognitive activities in dynamic situations: the role of coding scheme. In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey GR (1997) Compensatory control in regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framefork. Biol Psychol 21;45(1–3):73–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Cacciabue PC, Hoc J-M (1995) Work with technology: some fundamental issues. In: Hollnagel E, Cacciabue PC, Hoc J-M (eds) Expertise and technology. Cognition & human-computer cooperation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Hukki K, Norros L (1993) Diagnostic judgement in the control of disturbance situations in nuclear power plant operation. Ergonomics 36(11):1317–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hukki K, Norros L (1998) Subject-centered and systemic conceptualization as a tool of simulator training. Le Travail Humain 61(4):313–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackobsson Kecklund L (1998) Studies of safety and critical work situations in nucler power plants: a human perspective. Stockholm University, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RS (1995) Pilot judgement and crew resource management. Avebury Aviation, Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA (1993) A recognition-primed decision (RDP) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) (1993) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemola U-M, Norros L (1997) Analysis of the clinical behaviour of anaesthetists: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practice. Med Educ 31(6):449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klemola U-M, Norros L (2001) Practice-based criteria for assessment the anaesthetists’ habits of action. Outline for a reflexive turn in practice. Med Educ 35:455–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kontogiannis T (1996) Stress and operator decision making in coping with emergencies. Int J Hum Comput Stud 45(1):75–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontogiannis T (1999) Training effective human performance in the management of stressful emergencies. Cogn Technol Work 1(1):7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KTM (2000) Toimenpiteitä ydinenergia-alan tietämyksen säilyttämiseksi. (Actions for maintaining nuclear power domain specific knowledge) Työryhmäraportti. Kauppa- ja teollisuusministeriön työryhmä- ja toimikuntaraportteja 10/2000. Edita, Helsinki

  • Laird JD, Apostoleris NH (1996) Emotional self-control and self-perception: feelings are the solution, not the problem. In: Harré R, Parrot WG (eds) The emotions. Social, cultural and biological dimensions. SAGE, London, pp 285–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J (1991) Situated learning in communities of practice. In: Resnick L, Levine J, Teasley S (eds) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 63–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R, Cohen M (2005) Warrants for prescription: analytically and empirically based approaches to improving decision making. Hum Factors 47(1):102–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R, Strauss O (1997) Coping with uncertainty: a naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organ Behav Hum decis Process 69(2):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan J, Pavlou O, Omodei MM (2005) Cognitive control processes discriminate between better versus poorer performance by fire ground commanders. In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Monat A, Lazarus RS (1985) Introduction. In: Monat A, Lazarus RS (eds) Stress and coping, an anthology. Columbia Unversity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) (2005a) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (2005b) Introduction: from the first to the fifth volume of naturalistic decision-making research. In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew ME (2001) The future of human performance and stress research: a new challenge. In: Hancock PA, Desmond PA (eds) Stress, workload and fatigue. Human factors in transportation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L (2004) Acting under uncertainty. The core-task analysis in ecological study of work. VTT Publications 546, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Hukki K (1995) Contextual analysis of the operators’ on-line interpretations of process dynamics. Presented at Proceedings of 5th European conference on cognitive science approaches to process control, Espoo, pp 182–95

  • Norros L, Klemola U-M (1999) Methodological considerations in analysing anaesthetists’ habits of action in clinical situations. Ergonomics 42(11):1521–1530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Klemola U-M (2005) Naturalistic analysis of anaesthetists’ clinical practice. In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 395–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Leppänen A (2000) Inhimilliset tekijät dynaamisten tilanteiden hallinnassa. (Human factors in control of dynamic situations). Työ ja ihminen 14(2):125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (1999a) Contextual analysis of the nuclear power plant operators’ utilization of a disturbance management system. Presented at 7th European conference on cognitive science approaches to process control, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, pp 87–92

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (1999b) Development of an approach to analysis of air traffic controllers’ working practices. Presented at Human error, safety and system development, Liege, Belgium

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (2002) The concept of the core task and the analysis of working practices. In: Boreham N, Samurcay R, Fischer M (eds) Work process knowledge. Routledge, London, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (2005) Performance-based usability evaluation of a safety information and alarm system. Int J Hum Comput Stud 63(3):328–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen M (2000) Working practice and safety culture in nuclear power plant operations. In: Vanttola T, Puska E-K, Marttila A (eds) FINNUS. The Finnish research programme on nuclear power plant safety. Interium Report 1999–August 2000. VTT Research Notes 2057, VTT, Espoo

  • Nuutinen M (2003) The change of personnel generation as a challenge of safety critical work: Operator trainee as an apprentice or an inquiring learner?. Työ ja ihminen 17(2):173–189 (In Finnish, English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen M (2005) Contextual assessment of working practices in changing work. Int J Ind Ergon (in press)

  • Nuutinen M, Norros L (2001) Co-operation on bridge in piloting situations. Analysis of 13 accidents on Finnish Fairways. In: Onken R (ed) The cognitive work process: Automation and interaction. Proceedings of the 8th conference on cognitive science approaches to process control. European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics, Munich, pp 3–14

  • Nuutinen M, Reiman T, Oedewald P (2003) Osaamisen hallinta ydinvoimalaitoksessa operaattoreiden sukupolvenvaihdostilanteessa (Management of operators’ competence and change of generation at NPP),VTT Publications No. 496. Espoo: VTT Tuotteet ja tuotanto

  • Oatley K (1992) Best laid schemes: the psychology of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley K (1996) Emotions: communications to the self and the others. In: Parrot WG, Harre R (eds) The emotions. Social, cultural and biological dimensions. SAGE publications, London

  • OECD (2000) Nuclear energy agency. Nuclear education and training: Cause for concern?

  • OECD (2001) Nuclear energy agency. Assuring future nuclear safety competencies. Specific actions

  • Oedewald P, Reiman T (2003) Core task modelling in cultural assessment. A case study in nuclear power plant maintenance. Cogn Technol Work 5(4):283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu J, Connolly T (1993) The reinvention of decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norrwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson C, Stunkard AJ (1992) Cognates of personal control: locus of control, self-efficacy, and explanatory style. Appl Prev Psychol 1(2):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1983) The tacit dimension. Peter Smith, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell R (2003) User customisation of medical devices: the reality and the possibilities. Cogn Technol Work 5(3):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman T, Norros L (2002) Regulatory culture: Balancing the different demands of regulatory practice in the nuclear industry. In: Kirwan B, Hale AR, Hopkins A (eds) Changing regulation—controlling risks in society. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman T, Oedewald P (2004) Measuring maintenance culture and maintenance core task with CULTURE-questionnaire—a case study in the power industry. Saf Sci 42(9):859–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogalski J (1999) Decision making and management of dynamic risk. Cogn Technol Work 1(4):247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogalski J, Plat M, Antolin-Glenn P (2002) Training for collective competence in rare and unpredictable situations. In: Borehamn N, Samurcay R, Fischer M (eds) Work process knowledge. Routledge, London, pp 134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA (1995) Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In: Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L (eds) Rethinking methods in psychology. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith W, Dowell J, Ortega-Lafuente A (1999) Designing paper disasters: An authoring environment for developing training exercises in integrated emergency management. Cogn Technol Work 1(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockes AF, Kemper K, Kite K (1997) Aeronautical decision making, cue recognition, and expertise under time pressure. In: Zambok C, Klein GA (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Theureau J (2000) Nuclear reactor control room simulators: human factors research and development. Cogn Technol Work 2(2):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1993) The vulnerable system: an analysis of the Tenerife air disaster. In: Roberts KH (ed) New challenges to understanding organisations. Macmillan, New York, pp 173–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • YVL 1.6 (1995) Nuclear operator power plant licensing. Radiation and nuclear safety authority of Finland, YVL guide. 9 October 1995

  • Zambok C, Klein GA (eds) (1997) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (1988) In the age of the smart machine. The future of work and power. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the Ministry of Trade and Industry and VTT. I would also like to thank my colleagues Teemu Reiman, Pia Oedewald and Kristiina Hukki, who participated in the conduction of the study. Special thanks to the employees of Teollisuuden Voima Oy who took part in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maaria Nuutinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuutinen, M. Expert Identity construct in analysing prerequisites for expertise development: a case study of nuclear power plant operators’ on-the-job training. Cogn Tech Work 7, 288–305 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0013-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0013-9

Keywords

Navigation