Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Statistical distribution of building lot frontage: application for Tokyo downtown districts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frontage of a building lot is the determinant factor of the residential environment. The statistical distribution of building lot frontages shows how the perimeters of urban blocks are shared by building lots for a given density of buildings and roads. For practitioners in urban planning, this is indispensable to identify potential districts which comprise a high percentage of building lots with narrow frontage after subdivision and to reconsider the appropriate criteria for the density of buildings and roads as residential environment indices. In the literature, however, the statistical distribution of building lot frontages and the density of buildings and roads has not been fully researched. In this paper, based on the empirical study in the downtown districts of Tokyo, it is found that (1) a log-normal distribution fits the observed distribution of building lot frontages better than a gamma distribution, which is the model of the size distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells on closed curves; (2) the statistical distribution of building lot frontages statistically follows a log-normal distribution, whose parameters are the gross building density, road density, average road width, the coefficient of variation of building lot frontage, and the ratio of the number of building lot frontages to the number of buildings; and (3) the values of the coefficient of variation of building lot frontages, and that of the ratio of the number of building lot frontages to that of buildings are approximately equal to 0.60 and 1.19, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Asami Y (1995a) On the evaluation of residential lots: with a focus on their shape. Environ Plan B Plan Des 22:149–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asami Y (1995b) Evaluation of the shape of residential lots in land-readjustment projects. Reg Sci Urban Econ 25(4):483–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asami Y, Maniruzzaman KM (1996) A statistical test of the critical shape hypothesis for residential lots. Environ Plan B Plan Des 23:575–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asami Y, Niwa Y (2008) Evaluation of the shape of residential lots in land-readjustment projects. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38(5):424–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berghauser Pont M, Haupt P (2009) Space, density and urban form. Doctoral dissertation, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

  • Cho H, Bowman KP, North GR (2004) A comparison of gamma and lognormal distributions for characterising satellite rain rates from the tropical rainfall measuring mission. J Appl Meteorol 43:1586–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks GE (2010) The Amoroso Distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.3274

  • Ferenc JS, Néda Z (2007) On the size distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells. Phys A 385:518–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fialkowski M, Bitner A (2008) Universal rules for fragmentation of land by humans. Landsc Ecol 23:1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B (2011) Statistical distribution. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Asami Y (2005) Estimating the boundary lines of land lots with a multiobjective optimization approach. Environ Plan B Plan Des 32:581–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Asami Y (2007) Influence of lot size and shape on redevelopment projects. Land Use Policy 24:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey C, Aultman-Hall L, Troy A, Hurley SE (2017) Streetscape skeleton measurement and classification. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci 44(4):668–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiang T (1966) Random fragmentation in two and three dimensions. Z für Astrophys 64:433–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropf K (1996) Urban tissue and the character of towns. Urban Des Int 1(3):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Kurtz SK (1993) Properties of a two-dimensional Poisson-Voronoi tessellation: a Monte-Carlo study. Mater Charact 31:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu D, Manglick A (2005) Discriminating between the log-normal and gamma distribution. J Appl Stat Sci 14:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Legras S, Cavailhès J (2016) Environmental performance of the urban form. Reg Sci Urban Econ 59:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 51(5):341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu NS (2000) Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of voronoi diagrams. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira V (2016) Urban morphology: an introduction to the study of the physical form of cities. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osaragi T (2014) Stochastic models describing subdivision of building lots. Procedia Environ Sci 22:352–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shayesteh H, Steadman P (2015) Coevolution of urban form and built form: a new typomorphological model for Tehran. Environ Plan B Plan Des 42(6):1124–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suen W, Tang B (2002) Optimal site area for high-density housing development. Habitat Int 26:539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokyo Metropolitan Government (2013) Your community’s earthquake risk. http://www.toshiseibi.metro.tokyo.jp/bosai/chousa_6/download/kikendo.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2017

  • Usui H, Asami Y (2010) Comparison of accuracy of methods of judging adjacency of buildings to roads. Theory Appl GIS 18(2):161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui H, Asami Y (2011) Setback distance and density of buildings and roads. J City Plan Inst Jpn 46(3):829–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui H, Asami Y (2013) Estimation of mean lot depth and its accuracy. J City Plan Inst Jpn 48(3):357–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui H, Asami Y (2014) Distribution function of lot frontage and building density –Application of distribution of length of Poisson Voronoi cells on closed curves. J City Plan Inst Jpn 49(3):579–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui H, Asami Y (2018) Size distribution of urban blocks in the Tokyo Metropolitan Region: estimation by urban block density and road width on the basis of normative plane tessellation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 32(1):120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz MF, Fortes MA (1988) Grain size distribution: the lognormal and the gamma distribution functions. Scr Metall 22(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vialard A, Carpenter A (2012) Building density of parcels and block-faces from a syntactical, morphological and planning perspective. In: Proceedings of the 10th international space syntax symposium, p 100

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Professor Yasushi Asami and three anonymous referees for their extremely valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP17K12978 and JP16H01830.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Usui.

Appendix

Appendix

A log-normal distribution can be derived as a limiting form of the generalised gamma distribution as given by Eq. (1). In Eq. (1), by substituting the following equations into b and c, respectively,

$$ b = \mu_{x} (k\sigma_{x} )^{{\frac{2}{k}}} ,\quad c = \frac{1}{{(k\sigma_{x} )^{2} }}, $$
(17)

we obtain the following equation:

$$ f(x) = \frac{1}{x} \cdot \frac{1}{{\Gamma \left\{ {\frac{1}{{(k\sigma_{x} )^{2} }}} \right\}}} \cdot \frac{k}{{\mu_{x} (k\sigma_{x} )^{{\frac{2}{k}}} }}\left\{ {\frac{1}{{\mu_{x} (k\sigma_{x} )^{{\frac{2}{k}}} }}} \right\}^{{\frac{1}{{k\sigma_{x}^{2} }} - 1}} \exp \left[ {\frac{1}{{k\sigma_{x}^{2} }}\ln x - \frac{1}{{k^{2} \sigma_{x}^{2} }}e^{{k\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)}} } \right]. $$
(18)

By considering the Taylor expansion of exp[kln(x/μx)] in terms of k,

$$ e^{{k\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)}} = 1 + k\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right) + \frac{1}{2}\left\{ {k\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)} \right\}^{2} + \sum\limits_{j \ge 3}^{\infty } {\frac{1}{j!}} \left\{ {k\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)} \right\}^{j} . $$
(19)

Equation (18) is rearranged as follows:

$$ f(x) = \frac{1}{x} \cdot \frac{1}{{\Gamma \left\{ {\frac{1}{{(k\sigma_{x} )^{2} }}} \right\}}}\left\{ {\frac{1}{{(k\sigma_{x} )^{{\frac{2}{k}}} }}} \right\}^{{\frac{1}{{k\sigma_{x}^{2} }}}} \exp \left[ {\ln k - \frac{1}{{(k\sigma_{x} )^{2} }} - \frac{1}{{2\sigma_{x}^{2} }}\left\{ {\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)} \right\}^{2} + \sum\limits_{j \ge 3}^{\infty } {\frac{{k^{j - 2} }}{{j!\sigma_{x}^{2} }}} \left\{ {\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)} \right\}^{j} } \right]. $$
(20)

When k tends to zero, by applying the Stirling’s formula for the gamma function, we can derive a log-normal distribution:

$$ f(x) = \frac{1}{{x\sqrt {2\pi \sigma_{x}^{2} } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{{2\sigma_{x}^{2} }}\left\{ {\ln \left( {\frac{x}{{\mu_{x} }}} \right)} \right\}^{2} }} . $$
(21)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usui, H. Statistical distribution of building lot frontage: application for Tokyo downtown districts. J Geogr Syst 20, 295–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-018-0268-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-018-0268-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation