Skip to main content
Log in

Rectilinear minimax hub location problems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The minimax hub location problem sites a facility to minimize the maximum weighted interaction cost between pairs of fixed nodes. In this paper, distances are represented by a rectilinear norm and may be suited to factory layout or street network problems. The problem is already well known (in 2-D) as the round trip location problem and is extended to 3-D in this paper. One rationale for the solution method is based on an extension of the geometric arguments used to solve the minimax single facility location problem. Suppose a budget is provided for interactions, and that each interaction must be accomplished for no more than this cost. The algorithm uses a bi-section search for the feasible budget until it finds the expenditure needed to provide for these flows. The extension in the present paper is that the nodes are permitted to be on different layers (levels). This 3-D version of the problem appears to be a new variant of the hub model. The models and solution techniques developed in the paper are illustrated using a small 55 node problem. Because of a relatively efficient implementation of the bi-section search, the algorithm in 2-D and 3-D is also applied successfully to a 550 node problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thanks to John McSweeney for this translation.

References

  • Barrodale I, Roberts FDK (1980) Algorithm 552. Solution of the constrained l 1 linear approximation problem. ACM Trans Math Softw 6(2):231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley P (2007) Climbing through complexity ceilings. In: Burke A, Tierney T (eds) Network practices: new strategies in architecture and design. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman O, Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO (2007) The transfer point location problem. Eur J Oper Res 179(3):978–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady SD, Rosenthal RE (1980) Interactive computer graphical solutions of constrained minimax location problems. AIIE Trans 12(3):241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan AW, Hearn DW (1977) A rectilinear round-trip location problem. Transp Sci 11:107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1982) Fast algorithms for the round trip location problem. IIE Trans 14:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO (1980) Single facility lp distance minimax location. SIAM J Algebraic Discrete Methods 1:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga J, Hearn DW (1972) Geometrical solutions for some minimax location problems. Transp Sci 6:379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL (1967) Some aspects of a minimax location problem. Oper Res 15:1163–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL (1972) A geometrical solution procedure for a rectilinear distance minimax problem. IIE Trans 4:328–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, McGinnis LF, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  • Hansen P, Peeters D, Richard D, Thisse J-F (1985) The minisum and minimax location problems revisited. Oper Res 33(6):1251–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly ME (1986) The location of interacting hub facilities. Transp Sci 20(2):92–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly ME, Miller HJ (1991) Solution strategies for the single facility minimax hub location problem. Pap Reg Sci 70(4):367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Späth H (1978) Explizite Lösung des dreidimensionales mini-max Standort-Problems in der City-Block Distanz. Z Oper Res 22:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain R (1971) A decomposition algorithm for a class of facility location problems. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School Cornell University

  • Tamir A, Halman N (2005) One-way and round-trip center location problems. Discrete Optim 2:168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A preliminary version of the paper was presented to the Spatial Analysis workshop at Ohio State in May 2007 and also at ISOLDE XI Santa Barbara, June 2008. The author is grateful for comments at ISOLDE XI from Arie Tamir. Hyun Kim provided assistance with the diagrams. I am very grateful to John McSweeney for a translation of the Späth article from German. The referees provided useful guidance that helped improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. O’Kelly.

Appendix: finite linear program

Appendix: finite linear program

The entire problem can also be solved in one pass by means of the following LP

$$ {\text{MIN}}\,{\text{G}},\quad {\text{s.t.}}\;W_{ij} \left[ {\left| {x_{i} - X} \right| + \left| {y_{i} - Y} \right| + \left| {z_{i} - Z} \right| + \left| {x_{j} - X} \right| + \left| {y_{j} - Y} \right| + \left| {z_{j} - Z} \right|} \right] \le G $$

by choosing \( \left[ {X,Y,Z,G} \right] \)

converting the absolute values into (26) linear inequalities

$$ \pm (x_{i} - X) \pm (y_{i} - Y) \pm (z_{i} - Z) \pm (x_{j} - X) \pm (y_{j} - Y) \pm (z_{j} - Z) \le G/W_{ij} $$

Define a k, b k, c k, d k, e k, f k as a series of ±1 indicators varying systematically over all 64 combinations, and using the k superscript as a notation to indicate one particular combination, we see that

$$ a^{k} (x_{i} - X) + b^{k} (y_{i} - Y) + c^{k} (z_{i} - Z) + d^{k} (x_{j} - X) + {\text{e}}^{k} (y_{j} - Y) + f^{k} (z_{j} - Z) \le G/W_{ij}\quad {\text{ for}}\;k = 1,\; \ldots ,\;64 $$

and collecting all the coefficients of X,Y,Z, and G on the left hand side and the constants to the right hand side, after carefully reversing signs and inequality we get

$$ (a^{k} + d^{k} )X + (b^{k} + e^{k} )Y + (c^{k} + f^{k} )Z + (1/Wij)G \ge (a^{k} x_{i} + b^{k} y_{i} + c^{k} z_{i} + d^{k} x_{j} + {\text{e}}^{k} y_{j} + f^{k} z_{j} )\quad {\text{ for}}\,{\text{all}}\;i,j,k $$

which, with the objective, is a simple linear program in four variables. This problem is however likely to grow quite large in that these constraints exist for all the interacting pairs. While it was initially helpful to use this method to generate exact solutions, ultimately the paper uses a bi-section search, roughly comparable to that which was also used for the 2-D case. As shown in the main text, the intersection decision problem is solved using an imbedded LP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Kelly, M.E. Rectilinear minimax hub location problems. J Geogr Syst 11, 227–241 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-009-0091-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-009-0091-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation