Abstract
In this paper, we compare and contrast a Bayesian spatially varying coefficient process (SVCP) model with a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model for the estimation of the potentially spatially varying regression effects of alcohol outlets and illegal drug activity on violent crime in Houston, Texas. In addition, we focus on the inherent coefficient shrinkage properties of the Bayesian SVCP model as a way to address increased coefficient variance that follows from collinearity in GWR models. We outline the advantages of the Bayesian model in terms of reducing inflated coefficient variance, enhanced model flexibility, and more formal measuring of model uncertainty for prediction. We find spatially varying effects for alcohol outlets and drug violations, but the amount of variation depends on the type of model used. For the Bayesian model, this variation is controllable through the amount of prior influence placed on the variance of the coefficients. For example, the spatial pattern of coefficients is similar for the GWR and Bayesian models when a relatively large prior variance is used in the Bayesian model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2004) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Belsley DA (1991) Conditioning diagnostics: collinearity and weak data in regression. Wiley, New York
Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Nodes, paths and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. J Environ Psychol 13:3–28. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80212-9
Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1999) A theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Stud Crime Crime Prev 8:7–26
Brunsdon C, Aitkin M, Fotheringham S, Charlton M (1999) A comparison of random coefficient modelling and geographically weighted regression for spatially non-stationary regression problems. Geogr Environ Model 3:47–62
Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, West Sussex
Gelfand AE, Kim H, Sirmans CF, Banerjee S (2003) Spatial modeling with spatially varying coefficient processes. J Am Stat Assoc 98:387–396. doi:10.1198/016214503000170
Goldstein M (1976) Bayesian analysis of regression problems. Biometrika 63(1):51–58. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.1.51
Gorman D, Speer PW, Gruenewald PJ, Labouvie EW (2001) Spatial dynamics of alcohol availability, neighborhood structure and violent crime. J Stud Alcohol 62:628–636
Griffith D (2008) Spatial filtering-based contributions to a critique of geographically weighted regression (GWR). Environ Plant A (in press)
Group 1 Software (2003) Centrus Desktop, Version 4.01.01. Boulder, CO
Gruenewald PJ, Freisthler B, Remer L, LaScala EA, Treno A (2006) Ecological models of alcohol outlets and violent assaults: crime potentials and geospatial analysis. Addiction 101:666–677. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01405.x
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer, New York
Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for non-orthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55–67. doi:10.2307/1267351
Lindley DV, Smith AFM (1972) Bayes estimates for the linear model. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B Methodol 34(1):1–41
Lipton R, Gruenewald PJ (2002) The spatial dynamics of violence and alcohol outlets. J Stud Alcohol 63:187–195
Nelson AL, Bromley RDF, Thomas CJ (2001) Identifying micro and temporal patterns of violent crime and disorder in the British city center. Appl Geogr 21:249–274. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00008-X
Roncek DW, Maier PA (1991) Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots”. Criminology 29:725–753. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01086.x
Sampson RJ, Lauritsen JL (1994) Violent victimization and offending: individual-, situational- and community-level risk factors. In: Reiss AJ Jr, Roth J (eds) Understanding and preventing violence: social influences, volume 3. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–114
Scribner RA, MacKinnon DP, Dwyer JH (1995) The risk of assaultive violence and alcohol availability in Los Angeles County. Am J Public Health 85:335–340
Waller L, Zhu L, Gotway C, Gorman D, Gruenewald P (2007) Quantifying geographic variations in associations between alcohol distribution and violence: A comparison of geographically weighted regression and spatially varying coefficient models. Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 21(5):573–588. doi:10.1007/s00477-007-0139-9
Wheeler D (2007) Diagnostic tools and a remedial method for collinearity in geographically weighted regression. Environ Plant A 39(10):2464–2481. doi:10.1068/a38325
Wheeler D, Calder C (2007) An assessment of coefficient accuracy in linear regression models with spatially varying coefficients. J Geogr Syst 9:145–166. doi:10.1007/s10109-006-0040-y
Wheeler D, Tiefelsdorf M (2005) Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. J Geogr Syst 7:161–187. doi:10.1007/s10109-005-0155-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wheeler, D.C., Waller, L.A. Comparing spatially varying coefficient models: a case study examining violent crime rates and their relationships to alcohol outlets and illegal drug arrests. J Geogr Syst 11, 1–22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-008-0073-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-008-0073-5